| 研究生: |
陳俊鴻 Chen, Chun-Hung |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
新北市國民小學校長正向領導、教師復原力與學校創新經營效能關係之研究 A Study on the Relationships among Principals' Positive Leadership, Teacher Resilience, and School Innovative Management Effectiveness in New Taipei City Elementary Schools |
| 指導教授: | 秦夢群 |
| 口試委員: |
張明文
陳建志 賴文堅 濮世緯 |
| 學位類別: |
博士
Doctor |
| 系所名稱: |
教育學院 - 教育學系 Department of Education |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 270 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 校長正向領導 、教師復原力 、學校創新經營效能 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | principals' positive leadership, teacher resilience, school innovative management effectiveness |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:138 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討新北市國民小學校長正向領導、教師復原力與學校創新經營效能之現況、差異情形、相關程度、結構關係及中介效果,並分析教師復原力在校長正向領導與學校創新經營效能之間所扮演的角色。
本研究採問卷調查法,以新北市國民小學教師為研究對象,有效樣本共438份,並以描述性統計、獨立樣本 t 檢定、單因子變異數分析、事後比較、Pearson 積差相關分析、結構方程模式與中介效果檢定進行資料分析。本研究主要發現如下:
一、 教師知覺校長正向領導為高程度,以「正向溝通」之表現最高,「正向關係」之表現最低。
二、 教師復原力為高程度,以「開放我-接納與彈性」之表現最高,「未來我-目標與願景」之表現最低。
三、 學校創新經營效能為高程度,以「學生活動創新效能」之表現最高,「行政管理創新效能」之表現最低。
四、 不同背景變項之教師在校長正向領導、教師復原力與學校創新經營效能上呈現部分顯著差異。
五、 校長正向領導、教師復原力與學校創新經營效能三者之間具有顯著正相關。
六、 結構方程模式結果顯示,校長正向領導對教師復原力具有顯著正向路徑效果。
七、 結構方程模式結果顯示,校長正向領導與教師復原力對學校創新經營效能均具有顯著正向路徑效果。
八、 教師復原力在校長正向領導與學校創新經營效能之間具有部分中介效果。
依據研究結果,本研究建議教育行政主管機關、學校與校長應重視正向領導實踐、教師心理支持與學校創新經營制度之整合,透過正向溝通、專業合作與支持性組織文化,增進教師復原力,進而提升學校創新經營效能。
This study investigated the current status, differences, correlations, structural relationships, and mediating effects among principals’ positive leadership, teacher resilience, and school innovative management effectiveness in elementary schools in New Taipei City. It also examined the role of teacher resilience in the relationship between principals’ positive leadership and school innovative management effectiveness.
A questionnaire survey was adopted, with elementary school teachers in New Taipei City as the research participants. A total of 438 valid responses were collected. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance, post hoc comparisons, Pearson product-moment correlation analysis, structural equation modeling, and mediation effect testing. The main findings were as follows:
1. Teachers’ perceptions of principals’ positive leadership were at a high level. Among its dimensions, “positive communication” showed the highest performance, whereas “positive relationships” showed the lowest.
2. Teacher resilience was at a high level. Among its dimensions, “Open Self—Acceptance and Flexibility” showed the highest performance, whereas “Future Self—Goals and Vision” showed the lowest.
3. School innovative management effectiveness was at a high level. Among its dimensions, “student activity innovation effectiveness” showed the highest performance, whereas “administrative management innovation effectiveness” showed the lowest.
4. Teachers with different background variables showed partially significant differences in principals’ positive leadership, teacher resilience, and school innovative management effectiveness.
5. Principals’ positive leadership, teacher resilience, and school innovative management effectiveness were significantly and positively correlated with one another.
6. The structural equation modeling results showed that principals’ positive leadership had a significant positive path effect on teacher resilience.
7. The structural equation modeling results showed that both principals’ positive leadership and teacher resilience had significant positive path effects on school innovative management effectiveness.
8. Teacher resilience had a partial mediating effect between principals’ positive leadership and school innovative management effectiveness.
Based on the findings, this study suggests that educational administrative authorities, schools, and principals should emphasize the integration of positive leadership practices, psychological support for teachers, and institutional mechanisms for school innovative management. Through positive communication, professional collaboration, and a supportive organizational culture, schools can enhance teacher resilience and further improve school innovative management effectiveness.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題 13
第三節 名詞釋義 15
第四節 研究方法 20
第五節 研究範圍與限制 21
第二章 文獻探討 23
第一節 校長正向領導之意涵 23
第二節 教師復原力之意涵 44
第三節 學校創新經營效能之意涵 65
第四節 校長正向領導、教師復原力與學校創新經營效能之相關研究 86
第三章 研究設計與實施 107
第一節 研究架構 107
第二節 研究對象 113
第三節 研究工具 120
第四節 實施程序 140
第五節 資料處理與分析 142
第六節 研究倫理 146
第四章 研究結果與分析 148
第一節 國民小學校長正向領導、教師復原力與學校創新經營效能之現況分析 148
第二節 不同背景變項教師在校長正向領導、教師復原力與學校創新經營效能之差異分析 164
第三節 國民小學校長正向領導、教師復原力與學校創新經營效能之相關分析 204
第四節 國民小學校長正向領導、教師復原力與學校創新經營效能之結構方程模式分析 211
第五章 結論與建議 220
第一節 研究主要發現 220
第二節 研究結論 224
第三節 建議 230
參考文獻 244
附錄 264
附錄一 校長正向領導量表授權同意書 264
附錄二 教師復原力量表授權同意書 265
附錄三 學校創新經營效能量表授權同意書 266
附錄四 校長正向領導、教師復原力與學校創新經營效能量表 267
壹、中文部分
王文賢(2023)。新北市國民小學學務處與輔導室兼任行政職務教師復原力之研究[碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5um435
王世璋(2006)。國小校長轉型領導、學校組織學習與學校組織創新關係之研究[博士論文,國立政治大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/338bsv
王幸芙(2020)。雲林縣國民小學教師復原力與幸福感關係之研究[碩士論文,國立嘉義大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/my3q9f
王淑女(2011)。國中教師自我復原力、教師效能感與幸福感關係之研究[碩士論文,國立彰化師範大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/jnb78v
王淑蓉(2009)。臺北縣市國小教師生活壓力、復原力與身心健康之相關研究[碩士論文,臺北市立教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/uet527
仲秀蓮(2011)。臺灣地區國民小學校長正向領導、學校文化對學校創新經營效能影響之研究[博士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dcmcmd
朱森楠(2001)。一位國中中輟復學生的復原力及相關因素之探討研究。新竹縣教育研究集刊,1,171–202。https://catalog.digitalarchives.tw/item/00/61/ae/14.html
何高志(2017)。國民中學校長課程領導、組織學習與學校創新經營效能關係之研究[博士論文,國立清華大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/tybjw7
何湘菱(2014)。嘉南地區國中教師幽默感、自我復原力與教學效能之相關研究[碩士論文,國立臺南大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/77g88x
何筱晴(2019)。新北市國小教師復原力與教學效能關係之研究[碩士論文,臺北市立大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/92pr36
吳明隆、張毓仁(2011)。SPSS(PASW)與統計應用分析Ⅱ。五南。
吳勁甫(2015)。國小校長正向領導對學校效能影響之研究:教師心理資本的多層次中介效果。教育與心理研究,38(3),1–36。https://doi.org/10.3966/102498852015093803001
吳勁甫(2018)。校長正向領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之後設分析。教育科學期刊,17(2),1–31。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/16808444-201812-201902270009-201902270009-1-31
吳春助(2009)。國民小學校長知識領導、科技領導與創新經營關係之研究[博士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5n8g4a
吳清山(2004)。學校創新經營理念與策略。教師天地,128,30–44。https://catalog.digitalarchives.tw/item/00/4a/e5/12.html
吳清山(2013)。正向領導。教育研究月刊,230,136–137。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602013060230010
呂紹弘(2020)。國民中學校長分布式領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效能關係之研究[博士論文,國立政治大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c9rpzm
李怡樺(2018)。臺北市國民小學校長空間領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效能關係之研究[博士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4e9k3b
李俊毅(2018)。公立高中職校長正向領導、教師學術樂觀與教師專業發展相關之研究[博士論文,國立政治大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/z58528
李若瑜(2017)。新北市國小教師復原力與工作倦怠關係之研究[碩士論文,國立政治大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/vtb83x
李瑞娥(2004)。國民學校終身學習文化、組織學習、組織創新與學校效能關係之研究:學習型學校模型之建構[博士論文,國立高雄師範大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/jbty43
周婉玲(2011)。臺北市國民中學校長變革領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經營效能關係之研究[碩士論文,國立政治大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3j39dp
林琬晴(2024)。臺南市國民小學教師知覺校長正向領導與教師復原力關係之研究—以希望感為中介變項[碩士論文,國立臺南大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/q253jr
林新發(2010a)。正向領導的意涵與實施策略。國民教育,50(3),1–5。https://ericdata.com/tw/detail.aspx?no=186816
林新發(2010b)。校長正向領導的策略與技巧。國民教育,50(6),1–7。https://ericdata.com/tw/detail.aspx?no=186861
林新發、王秀玲、黃秋鑾、仲秀蓮、顏如芳、鄧珮秀、林佳芬(2012)。國民小學校長知識領導、學習社群對學校創新經營效能影響之研究:以臺灣北部地區四縣市為例。教育行政研究,2(1),69–103。https://doi.org/10.3966/222350002012060201003
胡瓊之(2017)。桃園市國民中學校長科技領導、教師專業學習社群與學校創新經營關係之研究[碩士論文,國立政治大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8e6wb7
秦夢群(2013)。教育領導理論與應用(2版)。五南。
秦夢群、莊清寶(2018)。學校特色發展與創新。五南。
常欣怡、宋麗玉(2007)。青少年復原力概念與相關研究之探究。東吳社會工作學報,17,171–192。https://tpl.ncl.edu.tw/NclService/JournalContentDetail?SysId=A08023989
張本文(2011)。校長服務領導、組織文化與創新經營效能關係之研究。學校行政,74,1–23。https://ericdata.com/tw/detail.aspx?no=68225
張志瑋(2025)。國民小學多元文化族群學生學習困境脈絡下教師韌性與幸福感之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,18(1),1–34。https://doi.org/10.53106/207136492025041801001
張攸萍(2016)。高中職以下教師復原力之後設分析[碩士論文,國立政治大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8d4jr7
張明文(2025)。AI導入教育數位轉型的地方實踐:新北市AI教育局行政與教學之政策規劃。臺灣教育評論月刊,14(8),174–199。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/P20130114001-N202508050014-00026
張明文、陳國生、陳建志(2025)。AI時代下教育政策的循證決策與治理:以「新北AI教育局」為例。教育研究月刊,380,4–19。https://doi.org/10.53106/168063602025120380001
張奕華、吳權威(2017)。智慧教育之教師專業發展:理念與案例。高等教育。
張奕華、胡瓊之(2019)。校長科技領導對學校創新經營之影響:教師專業學習社群的中介效果分析。教育行政與評鑑學刊,26,49–78。https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142223
張茵倩(2014)。國民小學校長策略領導、行銷策略與學校創新經營效能關係之研究[博士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/j8h743
張新基(2008)。國民小學創新經營、組織文化與組織效能關係之研究[博士論文,國立屏東教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/74dwsc
教育部(2024,2月5日)。學校訂定教師輔導與管教學生辦法注意事項。教育部主管法規共用系統。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL002147
教育部(2026,1月12日)。高級中等以下學校教師解聘不續聘停聘或資遣辦法。教育部主管法規共用系統。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001995
教育部統計處(2026)。114學年國民小學校別資料[資料集]。政府資料開放平臺。https://data.gov.tw/dataset/6240
梁寶苓(2011)。臺中市國小兼任行政職務教師工作壓力與復原力之關係研究[碩士論文,國立臺中教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/hev2f2
許峻偉(2022)。臺北市國民中學校長真誠領導、教師心理賦權與學校創新經營效能關係之研究[碩士論文,國立政治大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4kw3y6
許嘉祐(2019)。臺北市國民中學校長正向領導與教師復原力關係之研究[碩士論文,臺北市立大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/n9cw52
許燦祥(2011)。臺中市國民小學教師復原力與教學效能相關之研究[碩士論文,國立臺中教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/rjw34b
郭朝慶(2018)。新北市國民小學校長知識領導、易經謙卦與學校創新經營效能關係之研究[博士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/g9hun9
陳尹雯(2016)。臺北市國民小學兼任行政職務教師復原力之研究—以教務處為例[碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d4euay
陳金定(2006)。復原性適應:復原性適應與各類相關因子之動力關係(一)。輔導季刊,42(3),1–11。https://doi.org/10.29742/GQ.200609.0001
陳建銘(2009)。國民小學校長策略領導、組織學習與學校創新經營效能關係之研究[博士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7sh634
陳詠禎(2016)。校長正向領導對學校教育品質的啟示。教育行政論壇,8(1),115–132。https://tpl.ncl.edu.tw/NclService/JournalContentDetail?SysId=A16036729
彭添星(2010)。國民中學校長知識領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經營效能關係之研究[博士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c6fmn2
曾文志(2005)。復原力的構念與研究之分析。國立臺中護理專科學校學報,4,45–68。https://catalog.digitalarchives.tw/item/00/4d/0d/24.html
曾文志(2006)。復原力保護因子效果概化之統合分析。諮商輔導學報,14,1–35。https://doi.org/10.6308/JCG.14.01
曾若玫(2017)。國民小學校長正向領導、教師學術樂觀與學校效能關係之研究[博士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8d2ssk
曾煥鵬、林志成(2011)。治理觀點對學校創新經營的啟示。學校行政,76,147–166。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.201111.0147
曾璧光(2015)。技術型高中校長正向領導內涵建構之研究[博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/575mmm
湯志民(2006)。政大附中創新經營的理念與策略。教育研究月刊,145,59–72。https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=16244
黃巧吟(2023)。國民小學校長微觀政治策略、教導型領導行為與學校創新經營效能之研究[博士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/u59wav
黃玉貞(2012)。國民小學分布式領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經營效能關係之研究[碩士論文,國立政治大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/z4rkaz
黃宏傑(2009)。臺北縣國民小學創新經營與學校行政效能之研究[碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6u37pa
黃建翔(2014)。國民小學校長知識領導、資料導向決定與學校創新經營效能關係之研究[博士論文,臺北市立大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/w8fb9g
黃建翔、吳清山(2012)。臺灣近十年學校創新經營研究之分析與展望:以期刊與學位論文為主。教育研究與發展期刊,8(3),1–29。https://doi.org/10.6925/SCJ.201209_8(3).0001
黃建翔、吳清山(2018)。國小校長知識領導影響學校創新經營效能之關係:以資料導向決定為中介變項。教育學報,46(1),1–21。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/Index/P20181015001-201806-201810150019-201810150019-1-21
黃秋鑾(2009)。臺灣地區國民中學校長知識領導、學習社群與學校創新經營效能關係之研究[博士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3d2373
黃瓊香(2007)。桃園縣國民小學校長知識領導與學校創新經營效能關係之研究[碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/n786mz
黃懿嬌(2007)。臺北縣國民小學校長轉型領導行為與學校創新經營關係之研究[碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/h43685
董保城(2026,7月1日)。校園監督應回歸教育專業。《聯合報》。
廖婉婷(2017)。桃園市國民小學兼任行政教師人格特質、復原力與幸福感之研究[碩士論文,銘傳大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ksv8zw
劉祥熹、陳玉娟、鄭筱慧(2016)。學校創新經營對家長選校意願影響之研究:以服務品質與學校形象為中介變項。教育科學研究期刊,61(4),59–88。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(4).03
蔡政道(2010)。國民小學校長科技領導、組織文化與學校創新經營效能關係之研究[博士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2mqnsj
蔡琇韶(2017)。國民小學校長正向領導、教師正向心理資本、教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究[博士論文,國立高雄師範大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/hu8xad
蔡進雄(2008)。教學領導與課程領導關係與整合之探析。教育研究月刊,167,93–103。https://ericdata.com/tw/detail.aspx?no=47934
蔡進雄(2018)。愈挫愈勇:國民中小學校長韌性之探究。教育科學期刊,17(1),85–111。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=16808444-201806-201808300008-201808300008-85-111
鄭文淵(2014)。國民中學校長空間領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效能關係之研究[博士論文,國立政治大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3e94ph
蕭宏宇(2015)。國民小學校長正向領導、學校公共關係與學校創新經營效能關係之研究[博士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dxe8ta
蕭佳純、郭怡慧(2014)。國民中學教師工作壓力與職業倦怠關聯之研究:教師復原力與學校支持之調節效果。中正教育研究,13(1),121–164。https://doi.org/10.3966/168395522014061301004
賴文堅(2026)。證據本位的教師專業發展策略-數位工具與大數據的應用。臺灣教育,759,40–46。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18166482-N202606170005-00005
賴協志、吳清山(2017)。高級中等學校校長正向領導模式建構之研究。市北教育學刊,57,33–60。https://rh.naer.edu.tw/advSearch/019db85f-49d4-7e9a-b138-bf5e11ecd06b
戴芳台(2014)。捲土重來:教師復原力之個案探究。教師專業研究期刊,7,1–26。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/22250042-201406-201410280019-201410280019-1-26
濮世緯(2003)。國小校長轉型領導、學校文化取向與學校創新經營關係之研究[博士論文,國立政治大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/f8bv62
謝傳崇(2007)。以平衡計分卡理念建構國民中小學創新經營效能指標之研究[博士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/36rz32
謝傳崇(2011)。校長正向領導:理念、研究與實踐。高等教育。
謝傳崇、呂浚瑀、曾文鑑(2012)。國民小學校長正向領導、團隊情感氛圍與組織創新能力關係之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊,14,29–58。https://tpl.ncl.edu.tw/NclService/JournalContentDetail?SysId=A13028938
謝傳崇、劉佳賢(2011)。國民中小學智慧資本與學校創新經營效能關係之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊,11,63–88。https://tpl.ncl.edu.tw/NclService/JournalContentDetail?SysId=A11030090
鍾享龍(2017)。國民小學校長正向領導、教師正向心理資本、組織學習與學校競爭優勢關係之研究[博士論文,國立高雄師範大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/w2n42x
鍾雲英(2016)。高中校長正向領導指標建構與實徵分析[博士論文,國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2wjcjk
簡佩真(2022)。桃園市國民小學校長正向領導與教師復原力關係之研究[碩士論文,銘傳大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/bqwd84
蘇奕娟、林新發(2020)。國民小學校長正向領導、教師專業素養與學生學習成效關係之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊,28,31–68。https://tpl.ncl.edu.tw/NclService/JournalContentDetail?SysId=A2021078345
貳、外文部分
Abou-Zeid, E.-S., & Cheng, Q. (2004). The effectiveness of innovation: A knowledge management approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919604001052
Adams, B. G., Meyers, M. C., & Sekaja, L. (2020). Positive leadership: Relationships with employee inclusion, discrimination, and well-being. Applied Psychology, 69(4), 1145–1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12230
Ainsworth, S., & Oldfield, J. (2019). Quantifying teacher resilience: Context matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.012
Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., Smith, R. M., & Palmer, N. F. (2010). Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016998
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Manual and sampler set (3rd ed.). Mind Garden.
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
Bagdžiūnienė, D., Kazlauskienė, A., Nasvytienė, D., & Sakadolskis, E. (2022). Linking supportive school leadership and teacher resilience: The mediating role of job resources. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 999086. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.999086
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274
Beltman, S. (2015). Teacher professional resilience: Thriving not just surviving. In N. L. Weatherby-Fell (Ed.), Learning to teach in the secondary school (pp. 20–38). Cambridge University Press.
Beltman, S., Mansfield, C., & Price, A. (2011). Thriving not just surviving: A review of research on teacher resilience. Educational Research Review, 6(3), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.09.001
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.
Cameron, K. S. (2008). Positive leadership: Strategies for extraordinary performance. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Cameron, K. S. (2013). Practicing positive leadership: Tools and techniques that create extraordinary results. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (Eds.). (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. Berrett-Koehler.
Cann, R. F., Riedel-Prabhakar, R., & Powell, D. (2021). A model of positive school leadership to improve teacher wellbeing. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 6(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-020-00045-5
Chang, C.-P., Chuang, H.-W., & Bennington, L. (2011). Organizational climate for innovation and creative teaching in urban and rural schools. Quality & Quantity, 45(4), 935–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9405-x
Chen, J., & Lee, J. C.-K. (2022). Teacher resilience matters: A buffering and boosting effect between job demands, job resources, and well-being and job performance. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 28(7), 890–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2022.2116574
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2020). CASEL's SEL framework: What are the core competence areas and where are they promoted? https://casel.org/CASEL-sel-framework-11-2020/
Daniilidou, A., & Platsidou, M. (2018). Teachers' resilience scale: An integrated instrument for assessing protective factors of teachers' resilience. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 15, 15–39. https://pseve.gr/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Volume15_Issue1_Daniilidou.pdf
Daniilidou, A., Platsidou, M., & Gonida, E. (2020). Primary school teachers' resilience: Association with teacher self-efficacy, burnout and stress. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 18(52), 549–582. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v18i52.3487
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Dinkmeyer, D., & Losoncy, L. (1996). The skills of encouragement: Bringing out the best in yourself and others. St. Lucie Press.
Drew, S. V., & Sosnowski, C. (2019). Emerging theory of teacher resilience: A situational analysis. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 18(4), 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-12-2018-0118
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Elias, M. J., Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Frey, K. S., Greenberg, M. T., Haynes, N. M., Kessler, R., Schwab-Stone, M. E., & Shriver, T. P. (1997). Promoting social and emotional learning: Guidelines for educators. ASCD.
Epstein, J. L. (2011). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (2nd ed.). Westview Press.
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827
Granziera, H., Collie, R., & Martin, A. (2021). Understanding teacher wellbeing through job demands-resources theory. In C. F. Mansfield (Ed.), Cultivating teacher resilience: International approaches, applications and impact (pp. 229–244). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5963-1_14
Gu, Q. (2014). The role of relational resilience in teachers' career-long commitment and effectiveness. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 20(5), 502–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.937961
Gu, Q. (2018). (Re)conceptualising teacher resilience: A social-ecological approach to understanding teachers' professional worlds. In M. Wosnitza, F. Peixoto, S. Beltman, & C. F. Mansfield (Eds.), Resilience in education: Concepts, contexts and connections (pp. 13–33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76690-4_2
Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2007). Teachers resilience: A necessary condition for effectiveness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(8), 1302–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.006
Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2013). Challenges to teacher resilience: Conditions count. British Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.623152
Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., & Harms, P. D. (2008). Leadership efficacy: Review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(6), 669–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.09.007
Hannah, S. T., Woolfolk, R. L., & Lord, R. G. (2009). Leader self-structure: A framework for positive leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.586
Harris, A., & Spillane, J. (2008). Distributed leadership through the looking glass. Management in Education, 22(1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020607085623
Hascher, T., Beltman, S., & Mansfield, C. (2021). Teacher wellbeing and resilience: Towards an integrative model. Educational Research, 63(4), 416–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2021.1980416
Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
Johnson, B., Down, B., Le Cornu, R., Peters, J., Sullivan, A., Pearce, J., & Hunter, J. (2014). Promoting early career teacher resilience: A framework for understanding and acting. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 20(5), 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.937957
Kelloway, E. K., Weigand, H., McKee, M. C., & Das, H. (2013). Positive leadership and employee well-being. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051812465892
Klassen, R. M., Wilson, E., Siu, A. F. Y., Hannok, W., Wong, M. W., Wongsri, N., Sonthisap, P., Pibulchol, C., Buranachaitavee, Y., & Jansem, A. (2013). Preservice teachers' work stress, self-efficacy, and occupational commitment in four countries. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(4), 1289–1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0166-x
Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59–67.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
Li, S. (2023). The effect of teacher self-efficacy, teacher resilience, and emotion regulation on teacher burnout: A mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1185079. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185079
Lu, J., Chen, J., Li, Z., & Li, X. (2024). A systematic review of teacher resilience: A perspective of the job demands and resources model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 151, Article 104742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104742
Lu, S.-H., & Chen, C.-C. (2025). Principals' distributed leadership and the effectiveness of school innovation management: The mediating role of school organisational culture. Journal of Educational Administration, 63(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-04-2024-0109
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187526.001.0001
Mansfield, C. F., Beltman, S., & Price, A. (2014). I'm coming back again! The resilience process of early career teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 20(5), 547–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.937958
Mansfield, C. F., Beltman, S., Broadley, T., & Weatherby-Fell, N. (2016a). BRiTE: Building Resilience in Teacher Education: Final report (Project ID13–2924). Office for Learning and Teaching, Department of Education and Training, Australia. https://ltr.edu.au/resources/ID13_2924_Mansfield_report_2016%20.pdf
Mansfield, C. F., Beltman, S., Price, A., & McConney, A. (2012). Don't sweat the small stuff: Understanding teacher resilience at the chalkface. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.11.001
Mansfield, C. F., Beltman, S., Price, A., & McConney, A. (2016b). Building resilience in teacher education: An evidenced informed framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.016
Masten, A. S. (2007). Resilience in developing systems: Progress and promise as the fourth wave rises. Development and Psychopathology, 19(3), 921–930. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579407000442
Masten, A. S., & Garmezy, N. (1985). Risk, vulnerability, and protective factors in developmental psychopathology. In B. B. Lahey & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 1–52). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9820-2_1
Morgan, M. (2011). Resilience and recurring adverse events: Testing an assets-based model of beginning teachers' experiences. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 32(3–4), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.2011.613189
Mullen, C. A., Shields, L. B., & Tienken, C. H. (2021). Developing teacher resilience and resilient school cultures. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 18(1), 8–24. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1295967
Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., Goldring, E., & Porter, A. C. (2006). Learning-centered leadership: A conceptual foundation. The Wallace Foundation. https://doi.org/10.59656/EL-SB0903.002
Noddings, N. (2005). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
Peixoto, F., Silva, J. C., Pipa, J., Wosnitza, M., & Mansfield, C. (2020). The Multidimensional Teachers’ Resilience Scale: Validation for Portuguese teachers. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 38(3), 402–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282919836853
Resick, C. J., Hanges, P. J., Dickson, M. W., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2006). A cross-cultural examination of the endorsement of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(4), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3242-1
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Free Press.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/Currency.
Sitthisomjin, J., Somprach, K., & Phuseeorn, S. (2020). The effects of innovation management on school performance of secondary schools in Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.02.007
Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 25(1), 35–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1948.9917362
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 24(1–2), 23–50. https://doi.org/10.1300/J019v24n01_03
Tait, M. (2008). Resilience as a contributor to novice teacher success, commitment, and retention. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(4), 57–75. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ838701
Taylor, J. L. (2013). The power of resilience: A theoretical model to empower, encourage and retain teachers. The Qualitative Report, 18(35), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1474
Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. Yale University Press.
Ungar, M. (2004). A constructionist discourse on resilience: Multiple contexts, multiple realities among at-risk children and youth. Youth & Society, 35(3), 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X03257030
Ungar, M. (2013). Resilience, trauma, context, and culture. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838013487805
Ungar, M. (Ed.). (2012). The social ecology of resilience: A handbook of theory and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0586-3
Wang, Y. (2021). Building teachers' resilience: Practical applications for teacher education of China. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 738606. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738606
Werner, E. E. (1993). Risk, resilience, and recovery: Perspectives from the Kauai longitudinal study. Development and Psychopathology, 5(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457940000612X
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1982). Vulnerable, but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. McGraw-Hill.
Zhang, S., & Luo, Y. (2023). Review on the conceptual framework of teacher resilience. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1179984. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1179984
全文公開日期 2031/07/13