跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 丁家麒
Ting, Chia-Chi
論文名稱: 具潛在因素之二元變數資料遺失值插補方法之研究
A Study on Missing Data Imputation Methods for Binary Variables with Underlying Latent Factors
指導教授: 張育瑋
Chang, Yu-Wei
口試委員: 魏裕中
Wei, Yu-Chung
簡立欣
Chien, Li-Hsin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 統計學系
Department of Statistics
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 64
中文關鍵詞: 二元變數分類與迴歸樹試題反應理論模型插補遺失值
外文關鍵詞: binary variable, Classification And Regression Tree, Item Response Theory model, missing data imputation
相關次數: 點閱:34下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 二元變數是一種常見的資料型態,而試題反應理論 (Item Response Theory) 模型是一種常見用來描述可觀測的二元變數之潛在相關的模型,常用來分析測驗中受試者的答題狀況的數據或是問卷調查的數據。這類數據也會出現遺失值的現象,其常見的遺失值插補(imputation) 方法有 IN 法、PM 法、IM 法、TW 法、RF 法及 EM 法共 6 種方法。本研究進一步在Chen (2022) 以分類與迴歸樹 (Classification And Regression Tree; CART) 插補遺失值的研究基礎上,應用其中 5 種分類與迴歸樹插補遺失值的方法至試題反應理論模型下的二元變數遺失值之插補,並且控制不同的模型、不同的遺失機制 (Rubin, 1976) 等設定,以模擬研究比較上述 11 種方法的插補效果。最後將這些方法應用在性自我概念問卷 (Multidimensional Sexual Self-Concept Questionnaire; MSSCQ) 與立方體比較測試 (Cube Comparsion Test; CCT)兩筆實際資料,展現各種插補方法的差異。


    Binary variable is a common data type. In the current study, we consider the type of correlation, underlying observed binary variables, that could be generated by latent factors in Item Response Theory (IRT) models, which are commonly used for data from tests or for data from questionnaires. Missing data are also issues for this type of data. In the literature, there are six popular imputation methods for binary variables with missing data: Treat missing responses as incorrect, Person Mean Imputation, Item Mean Imputation, Two-Way Imputation, Response Function Imputation, Expectation-Maximum Imputation. In the current study, we further apply the imputation methods in Chen (2022), imputation based on Classification And Regression Trees (CART) methods, to missing data imputation for binary data. We conduct simulation studies to compare the aforementioned imputation methods for missing binary data under missing mechanisms in (Rubin, 1976) and different data. Finally, these methods are applied to real data from the Multidimensional Sexual Self-Concept Questionnaire (MSSCQ) and Cube Comparsion Test (CCT) to illustrate the differences in imputation methods for binary missing data

    第一章 緒論 1
    第二章 背景知識 3
    2.1 遺失機制的介紹 3
    2.2 模型介紹 4
    第三章填補遺失值的方法 6
    3.1 IN法 6
    3.2 PM法 6
    3.3 IM法 7
    3.4 TW法 7
    3.5 RF法 7
    3.6 EM法 9
    3.7 使用分類與迴歸樹進行插補 10
    第四章 模擬研究 18
    4.1 模擬設定 18
    4.2 MNAR 25
    4.3 MAR 36
    第五章實證分析 46
    5.1 性自我概念問卷之資料分析 46
    5.2 立方體比較測驗之資料分析 58
    第六章結論與建議 61
    參考文獻 63

    Ache, M. (2020). Kaggle Database.Multidimensional Sexual Self-Concept Questionnaire.https : / / www . kaggle . com / datasets / mathurinache / multidimensional - sexual - selfconcept-questionnaire
    Beaulac, C., & Rosenthal, J. S. (2020). Best: A decision tree algorithm that handles missing values.Computational Statistics, 35, 1001–1026.
    Bernaards, C. A., & Sijtsma, K. (2000). Influence of imputation and em methods on factor analysis when item nonresponse in questionnaire data is nonignorable. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 321–364.
    Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C. (1984). Classification and regression trees. monterey, ca: Wadsworth & brooks.
    Chen, J.-Y. (2022). Missing Data Imputation with Classification and Regression Trees: A Simulation Study. (Unpublished master dissertation). National Cheng-Chi University, Taiwan, R.O.C.
    Dai, S., Wang, X., & Svetina, D. (2017). Testdataimputation: Missing item responses imputation for test and assessment data (r package version 2.3).
    Dempster, A. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 39, 1–38.
    Finch, H. (2008). Estimation of item response theory parameters in the presence of missing data. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45, 225–245.
    Gareth, J., Daniela, W., Trevor, H., & Robert, T. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning: With applications in r. Spinger.
    Honaker, J., & King, G. (2010). What to do about missing values in time-series crosssection data. American journal of political science, 54, 561–581.
    Huisman, M. (2000). Imputation of missing item responses: Some simple techniques. Quality and Quantity, 34, 331–351.
    Janssen, A. B., & Geiser, C. (2010). On the relationship between solution strategies in two mental rotation tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 473–478.
    Kim, H., & Loh, W.-Y. (2001). Classification trees with unbiased multiway splits. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 589–604.
    Loh, W.-Y., & Shih, Y.-S. (1997). Split selection methods for classification trees. Statistica sinica, 815–840.
    Mislevy, R. J., & Wu, P.-K. (1996). Missing responses and irt ability estimation: Omits, choice, time limits, and adaptive testing. ETS Research Report Series, 1996, i–36.
    Quinlan, J. R. (1993). C4. 5: Programming for machine learning. Morgan Kauffmann, 38, 49.
    Rahman, M. G., & Islam, M. Z. (2013). Missing value imputation using decision trees and decision forests by splitting and merging records: Two novel techniques.KnowledgeBased Systems, 53, 51–65.
    Rasch, G. (1961). On general laws and the meaning of measurement. Psychology, Proceedings of the Fourth Berkley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability; University of California Press: Oakland, CA, USA, 5, 321–333.
    Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581–592.
    Sijtsma, K., & van der Ark, L. A. (2003). Investigation and treatment of missing item
    scores in test and questionnaire data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 505– 528.
    Tibshirani, R. J., & Efron, B. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2028/07/08
    QR CODE
    :::