| 研究生: |
蔡承佑 Tsai, Cheng-Yu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
臺灣上市公司ESG績效及獲利能力影響因素之探討-聯立迴歸分析 A Study on the Influencing Factors of ESG Performance and Profitability of Taiwanese Listed Companies: Simultaneous Regression Analysis |
| 指導教授: |
王國樑
Wang, Kuo-Liang 余威廷 Yu, Wei-Ting |
| 口試委員: |
張美玲
Chang, Mei-Ling 陳鎮洲 Chen, Chen-Chou |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
社會科學學院 - 經濟學系 Department of Economics |
| 論文出版年: | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度: | 113 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 32 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | ESG績效 、獲利能力 、產業特性 、3SLS |
| 外文關鍵詞: | ESG performance, Profitability, Industry characteristics, 3SLS |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:51 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
参考ESG與獲利能力影響因素的既有文獻,本文首先建立包含ESG與獲利能力兩條方程式的聯立模型,依據2023年臺灣上市公司資料,透過3SLS分析影響ESG表現與公司獲利率之主要因素,並進一步探討兩者之間的交互關係。實證結果顯示,專利數量、董事會規模、董事會出席率與營業成本等變數對 ESG 分數具有正向影響,而董事長兼任總經理則呈負向影響,服務業ESG表現顯著優於非服務業。在獲利能力方面,權益法長期投資與大股東持股比例則為正向影響,而研發費用率與營業週轉天數對獲利率呈負向關係。ESG 與獲利率之間存在顯著雙向正向關係,形成良性循環。
Based on existing literature on the factors influencing ESG performance and profitability, this study first establishes a simultaneous regression model incorporating ESG and profitability. Using data from listed companies in Taiwan in 2023, this study employs a 3SLS approach to analyze the key determinants of ESG performance and corporate profitability and further explore their interaction. The empirical results indicate that variables such as patent count, board size, board meeting attendance, and operating costs positively affect ESG scores, whereas CEO duality has a negative impact. Additionally, ESG performance in the service industry is significantly superior to that in non-service industries. Regarding profitability, long-term equity investment and the shareholding ratio of major shareholders have a positive effect, while R&D expenditure ratio and operating cycle days negatively impact profitability. There is a significant bidirectional positive relationship between ESG and profitability, creating a virtuous cycle.
第壹章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與範圍 3
第三節 研究架構與流程 3
第貳章 文獻回顧
第一節 產業別與ESG表現 4
第二節 財務績效指標對獲利率表現 5
第三節 公司創新能力對ESG及獲利率影響 6
第四節 公司治理對ESG及獲利率影響 7
第五節 ESG分數與公司獲利率相互影響 8
第參章 研究方法
第一節 資料樣本 9
第二節 研究模型 9
第三節 變數定義 10
第肆章 實證結果
第一節 敘述統計分析 15
第二節 相關係數分析 19
第三節 共線性診斷 21
第四節 迴歸結果分析 23
第伍章 結論與建議 27
參考文獻 29
中文文獻
李淑華、簡雪芳、蔡彥卿(2014)。權益法長投之投資淨收益:盈餘持續性與股市反應。管理與系統, 21(3),483-516。
李淑華、蔡彥卿(2011)。合併財務報表規範、盈餘組成份子持續性及股市理性定價之研究。證券市場發展季刊,23(3),153-198。
英文文獻
Alkurdi, A., Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. A. (2024). The mediating role of carbon emissions in the relationship between board attributes and ESG performance: European evidence. EuroMed Journal of Business, 19(4), 1016-1041.
Alshehhi, A., Nobanee, H., & Khare, N. (2018). The impact of sustainability practices on corporate financial performance: Literature trends and future research potential. Sustainability, 10(2), 494.
Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa İstanbul Review, 22(S2), S119-S127.
Batchimeg, B. (2017). Financial performance determinants of organizations: The case of Mongolian companies. Journal of Competitiveness, 9(3), 22-33.
Boussaada, R., & Hakimi, A. (2021). How multiple large shareholders affect bank profitability under the dispersion and the coalition hypotheses? An insight from the MENA region. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 17(1), 1-24.
Chang, C.-C. (2018). Cash conversion cycle and corporate performance: Global evidence. International Review of Economics and Finance, 56, 568-581.
Deari, F., & Palomba, G. (2024). Does the cash conversion cycle affect firm profitability? Some empirical evidence from listed firms in North Macedonia. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, 27(1), 63-77.
Díaz, V., Ibrushi, D., & Zhao, J. (2021). Reconsidering systematic factors during the Covid-19 pandemic – The rising importance of ESG. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101870.
Dicuonzo, G., Donofrio, F., Ranaldo, S., & Dell'Atti, V. (2022). The effect of innovation on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(4), 1191-1209.
Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.
Fadillah, R. R., Taufik, T., & Muthia, F. (2024). Corporate social responsibility and firm value: The moderating effect of profitability. Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 9(1), 38-46.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
Giannopoulos, G., Fagernes, R. V. K., Elmarzouky, M., & Hossain, K. A. B. M. A. (2022). The ESG disclosure and the financial performance of Norwegian listed firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(6), 237.
Guo, X., Guo, K., & Kong, L. (2023). Industrial agglomeration and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from manufacturing and producer services. Sustainability, 15(16), 12445.
Gurol, B., & Lagasio, V. (2022). Women board members' impact on ESG disclosure with environment and social dimensions: Evidence from the European banking sector. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(1), 211-228.
Halid, S., Mahmud, R., Suffian, M. T. M., & Rahman, R. A. (2022). Does firm's board affect ESG? Malaysian evidence. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 12(1), 131-143.
Husted, B. W., & Sousa-Filho, J. M. (2019). Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research, 102, 220-227.
Jaworski, J., & Czerwonka, L. (2024). Profitability and working capital management: A meta-study in macroeconomic and institutional conditions. Decision, 51(1), 123-145.
Kieschnick, R., LaPlante, M., & Moussawi, R. (2011). Working capital management and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 98(3), 563-588.
Leogrande, A., Leogrande, D., & Costantiello, A. (2023). The impact of patent applications in the context of the ESG model at world level. HAL Open Science.
Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2022). Board diversity and ESG performance: Evidence from the Italian banking sector. Sustainability, 14(20), 13447.
Pham, C.-V., Liu, S.-F., & Chen, S.-H. (2024). Corporate ESG performance and intellectual capital: International evidence. Asia Pacific Management Review, 29(3), 306-346.
Rađenović, T., Krstić, B., Janjić, I., & Jovanović Vujatović, M. (2023). The effects of R&D performance on the profitability of highly innovative companies. Strategic Management, 28(3), 34-45.
Romano, M., Cirillo, A., Favino, C., & Netti, A. (2020). ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) performance and board gender diversity: The moderating role of CEO duality. Sustainability, 12(21), 9298.
Su, J., & Ji, X. (2013). Power balance of equity and corporate performance. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 1019-1024). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R. (2017). Transparency among S&P 500 companies: An analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Management Decision, 55(8), 1660-1680.
Treepongkaruna, S., Kyaw, K., & Jiraporn, P. (2024). ESG controversies and corporate governance: Evidence from board size. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4218-4232.
Tung, L. T., & Binh, Q. M. Q. (2022). The impact of R&D expenditure on firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from the Vietnamese listed companies. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 30(2), 447-465.
Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2), 169-185.
全文公開日期 2030/06/23