簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示
| 研究生： |
李垂泰 Eric Lee |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱： |
企業破壞式創新程度與績效:台灣資訊電子業之實證研究 Innovation disruptiveness and firm performance:A Study of Taiwan information technology industry |
| 指導教授： |
黃 國 峯
Huang, Kuo Feng |
| 學位類別： |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱： |
商學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration |
| 論文出版年： | 2008 |
| 畢業學年度： | 96 |
| 語文別： | 英文 |
| 論文頁數： | 74 |
| 中文關鍵詞： | 破壞式創新 、創新策略 、企業破壞式創新程度 |
| 外文關鍵詞： | disruptive innovation, innovation strategy, company's disruptiveness |
| 相關次數： | 點閱：258 下載：168 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘要
本研究之目的在透過實政研究方法回答兩個關於破壞式創新研究問題，首先，產業延續性創新速度與企業破壞式創新程度之關係為何？其次企業的破壞式創新程度對其績效影響為何？本研究透過文獻探討，設計問卷並以台灣資訊電子產業公開發行之企業進行問卷調查蒐集初級資料。經由統計分析，本研究得出兩重大發現，首先，產業延續性創新速度與企業破壞式創新程度為負相關，而企業對新產品開發專案之決策資訊充足要求程度會弱化此關係。其次，企業規模與財務績效有正相關，而企業破壞式創新程度會強化此關係。
The aim of this research is to answer two research questions about disruptive innovation with empirical methodology. First, what is the relation between industrial sustaining innovation rate and a company's disruptiveness. Second, does a company’s disruptiveness impact firm financial performance? By collecting primary data, this research developed the questionnaire based on literature review and collected data from the publicly-listed companies in the Taiwan IT industry. With statistic analysis, this research has two significant findings. First, industrial sustaining innovation rate has a negative impact on an incumbent company’s disruptiveness and the accuracy of company investment decision on NPD project will weaken this relation. Second, firm size has a positive impact on firm financial performance and a company's disruptiveness will strengthen this relationship.
Content 1
Figure 3
Table 4
Chapter 1 Introduction 5
1.1 Background 5
1.2 Research Purpose 5
1.3 Research Process 6
1.4 Thesis Structure 9
Chapter 2 Literature Review 11
2.1 Types of Innovation 11
2.2 Factors of Company’s Disruptiveness 19
2.3 Firm Size, Company’s Disruptiveness and Performance 31
2.4 Research Structure 37
Chapter 3：Research Methodology 39
3.1 Sample Firm Selection 39
3.2 Data Collection 40
3.3 Working Definition and Research Variable Measurement 40
3.4 Analysis Techniques 45
3.5 Questionnaire Survey 47
Chapter 4 Results and Analysis 50
4.1 Descriptive Statistics and Analysis of Correlation 50
4.2 Regression Analysis 55
4.3 Discussion 59
Chapter 5 Conclusion and Suggestion 63
5.1 Contributions 63
5.2 Implications 64
5.3 Research limitation 66
Reference 68
Figure
Figure 1. 1 Research Process 8
Figure 2.1 Low-end Disruptive Innovation Model 21
Figure 2.2 The Third Dimension of Disruptive Innovation Model 22
Figure 2.3 Industrial sustaining innovation rate and company sustaining innovation rate 27
Figure 2.4 The accuracy of company investment decision on NPD project 30
Figure 2.5 Research Structure 38
Figure 3.1 Questionnaire Design Process 48
Figure 4.1 The moderating effect of the accuracy of company investment decision on NPD project on the relationship between industrial sustaining innovation rate and company's disruptiveness. 57
Figure 4.2 The moderating effect of company's disruptiveness on the relationship between firm size and major product revenue. 58
Table
Table 2.1 The spectrum of product innovation 15
Table 2.2 Definitions of Innovation Typology 18
Table 2.3 Measurement Instruments of Innovation Performance 34
Table 4.1 Background of Respondents 1 (Variables: DRT, ISIR, IDA) 51
Table 4.2 Background of Respondents 2 (Variables: DRT, FS, Performance) 52
Table 4.3 Factor Analysis 53
Table 4.4 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations 1 (variables ISIR, DRT, IDA) 54
Table 4.5 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations 2(variables DRT, FS, Performance) 55
Table 4.6 Regression Results 1 (Beta Coefficients) 56
Table 4.7 Regression Results 2 (Beta Coefficients) 58
Table 4.8 Hypotheses and Statistic Analyses Results 59
Abernathy, W.J., Clark. K.B., (1985). Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14, 3–22.
Adner, R., (2002). When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Management Journal, 23,8, 667–688.
Alexander, S.S., (1949). The effecs of size of manufacturing corporation on the distribution of rate of return. Review of Economics, Nov., 229-235.
Amato, L., and Wilder, R.P. (1985). The effects of firm size on profit rates in U.S. manufacturing. South. Econ. J., 52(J), 181-190.
Assink, M., (2006), Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: a conceptual model. European Journal of Innovation, Vol.9, Iss. 2, 215-234.
Baumol, W., (1967). Business behavior value and growth, New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Betz, F. (1991). Next-Generation Technology and Research Consortia. International Journal of Technology Management, special issue, 298-310.
Betz, F. (2003). Managing Technological Innovation. Wiley, 2003.
Charitou, C.D., and Markides, C.C. (2003). Responses to Disruptive Strategic Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(2), 55-63.
Christensen, C.M., (1992). Exploring the limits of the technology S-Curve. Part I：Component Technologies. Production and Operations Management, Vol. 1, No. 4, Fall 1992, 334-357.
Christensen, C.M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma. When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA..
Christensen, C.M., and Bower, J.L., (1996). Customer Power, Strategic Investment, and the Failure of Leading Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197-218.
Christensen, C.M.,. Raynor, M.E. (2003). The innovators’solution. Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA..
Coe, J.T. (1986). Measuring the success of R&D Innovations. National Productivity Review, Summer 1982, 330-335.
Cooper, D.R., and Schindler, P.S., (2003). Business research methods 8th , McGrawHill.
Danneels, E., (2004). Disruptive technology reconsidered: a critique and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 21, 246-258
Denning, S., (2005). Why the best and brightest approaches don’t solve the innovation dilemma. Strategy&Leadership, Vol. 33, Iss. 1, 4-12.
Garcia, R., and Calantone, R. (2001). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology：a literature review. The Journal of Produt Innovation Management, Vol. 19, 110-132.
Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commiment. Havard Business School.
Gilbert, C. (2003). The disruption opportunity. Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 27-32.
Govindarajan, V., and Kopalle, PK. (2006). Disruptiveness of innovations：Measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity. Strategy Management Journal, Vol. 27, 189-199.
Griffin, A. (1997). PDMA research on new product development practices: updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 14, No. 6, 429-59.
Hall, M., and Weiss, L. (1967). Firm size and profitability. Review of Economics and Statistics, 319-331.
Heany, D.F. (1983). The degrees of product innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, Spr. 83, Vol. 3, Iss. 4, 3-14.
Jeffrey, P., and Gerald, R.S. (1978). The external control of organizations. Harper&Row, New York.
Joseph, F.H., William, C.B., Barry, J.B., Rolph, E.A., and Ronald, L.T. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall.
Kim, L. (1986). Invasion of a stable business by radical innovation. P.R. Kleindorfer, ed. The Management of Productivity and Technology in Manufacturing. Plenum Press, New York.
Lin, R. (2006). Multivariate Analysis─SPSS Operation and Application. Best-Wise Press.
Linder, J.C. (2006). Does innovation drive profitable growth？New metrics for a complete picture. The Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 27, Iss. 5, 38.
Marquis, D.G. (1960). The Anatomy of Successful Innovations. Innovation, November. Reprinted in Readings in the Management of Innovation, Tushman M.L., Morres, W.L., and Pitman, E.D. Marshfield, MA, 1982.
Miller, D. (1990). The Icarus Paradox. New York Harper Business.
Montoya-Weiss, M.M., and Calantone, R.J. (1994). Determinants of new product performance：a review and meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 11, 397-417.
Rafael, L., Ricardo, C., and Joaquin, A. (2006). A measurement scale for product innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation, Vol. 9, Iss. 4, 333-346.
Sahal, D. (1981). Patterns of Technological Innovation. Addison-Wesley, London.
Salavou, H. (2002). Profitability in market-oriented SMEs：does product innovation matter. European Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 164-171.
Shapiro, A.R. (2006). Measuring Innovation：Beyond revenue from new products. Research Technology Management, Vol. 49, Iss. 6, 42-51.
Souder, W., and Sherman, J. (1994). Managing New Technology Development. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Starbuck, W.H. (1988). Why organizations run into crises…and sometimes survive them. K. Laudon, J. Turner, eds. Information Technology and Management Strategy. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 11-33.
Steindl, J. (1945). Small and Big Business:Economic Problems of the Size of Firms. Oxford University Press, London.
Stekler, H.O. (1964). The variability of profitability with size of firms. Journal of the American Statistical Association. Dec., 1183-93.
Tidd, J., Bessant, J., and Pavitt, k. (2003). Managing Innovation. Wiley.
Thor, C.G., (1991). Performance measurement in a research organization. National Productivity Review.
Wen, Z., and Bullard, S.H. (2008). Firm size and competitive advantage in the U.S. upholstered, wood household furniture industry. Forest Products Journal, Vol. 58, No. 1/2, 91-96.
Wheelwright, S.C., and Clark, K.N., (1992). Revolutionizing product development─Quantum leas in speed, efficiency, and quality. The Free Press, New York.
Wheelwright, S.C., and Clark, K.N. (1992). Organizing and leading heavyweight development teams. California Management Review, Spr. 34, Iss. 3, 9-28.
Zahra, S.A., and Das, S.R. (1993). Innovation strategy and financial performance in manufacturing companies：an empirical study. Product and Operations Management, Vol. 2, No. 1, 90-101.