| 研究生: |
翁品雅 Kunkawee Wongpiya |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
家庭主義與去家庭化之間:臺灣長期照護體系的轉型及其性別化結果 Between Familialism and Defamilialization: The Transformation of Taiwan's Long-Term Care System and Its Gendered Outcomes |
| 指導教授: |
杜福童
Reidhead, Jacob |
| 口試委員: |
王品
Wang, Pin 蔡咏諭 Tsai, Yung-Yu |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
社會科學學院 - 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS) International Master's Program in Asia-Pacific Studies(IMAS) |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 99 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 長期照顧 、家庭主義 、去家庭化 、台灣 、東亞福利制度 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Long-term care, Familialism, Defamilialization, Taiwan, East Asian welfare regimes |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:12 下載:1 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
台灣將於2025年進入超老齡化社會,其長期照顧體系也不斷發展。本研究旨在對台灣的長期照顧系統進行比較歷史分析,涵蓋從長期照顧1.0正式建立之前到長期照顧2.0擴展的時期。過去學者已探討了長期照顧政策中的家庭化和非家庭化概念。具體而言,Leitner(2003)提出了一個性別敏感的家庭化理論概念。 Saraceno(2016)在此概念的基礎上,進一步發展了照顧制度類型學,根據家庭化和非家庭化的程度和具體模式對照護政策進行分類。隨後,Verbakel等人(2023)將這些理論概念轉化為宏觀層面的指標,為比較福利研究做出了貢獻。因此,本研究將萊特納的框架與薩拉切諾的類型學結合,綜合建構了一個二維概念矩陣,用於分析台灣長期照顧體系在特定類型的家庭化和非家庭化之間隨時間推移而發生的動態變化。為了對此二維概念矩陣進行實證分析和操作化,本研究採用了維巴克爾的宏觀指標,並根據台灣長期照顧體系的實際情況進行了調整。研究發現,儘管長期照顧體系1.0和2.0在某種程度上實現了非家庭化,但它們仍然持續地再現了照顧工作的性別分工。
Taiwan entered a super-aged society in 2025, with its ongoing development of the long-term care system. This study aims to conduct a comparative historical analysis of Taiwan’s long-Term care system, covering the period from before the formal establishment of LTC 1.0 to its expansion into LTC 2.0. Previous scholars have explored the concept of familialism and defamilializaition in long-term care policies. Specifically, Leitner (2003) introduced a gender-sensitive theoretical concept of familialism. Saraceno (2016) later built on the concept and further developed the care regime typologies, classifying care policies in relation to the degree and specific patterns of familialism and defamilialization. Subsequently, Verbakel et al. (2023) translated these theoretical concepts into macro-level indicators, contributing to comparative welfare studies. Thus, this study intersects Leitner’s framework with Saraceno’s typologies, synthesizing into a two-dimensional conceptual matrix that can be applied to analyze the dynamics of Taiwan’s long-term care system shifting within and between specific types of familialism and defamilialization over time. To empirically analyze and operationalize the two-dimensional conceptual matrix, this study adopts Verbakel’s macro-indicators and adjusts for Taiwan’s long-term care system context. Accordingly, this study finds that both LTC 1.0 and LTC 2.0, despite partially achieving a degree of defamilialization, consistently reproduce the gendered division of care work.
Chapter 1 Introduction 7
1.1 Background: Taiwan’s Care Deficit and The Marketization of Care 7
1.2 Problem Statement: A Normative Feminist Critique of LTC 2.0 8
1.3 Research Questions 10
1.4 Research Design 11
1.5 Research Purpose and Contribution 11
1.6 Thesis Structure 12
Chapter 2 Literature Review 13
2.1 Theoretical Frameworks 13
2.1.1 Feminist Political Economy (FPE) 13
2.1.2 Care Regimes Typologies: Familialism and Defamilialization Continuum 16
2.1.3 Reprivatization of Social Reproduction and the Commodification of Care 18
2.1.4 Gendered Division of Care Work 20
2.1.5 The Welfare State Paradox and Global Care Chains 23
2.2 Policy Context and Structural Foundations of Taiwan's Elderly Care Economy 26
2.2.1 Taiwan's Population Aging and Care Regime 26
2.2.2 The Evolution of Public Provision: The Transition from LTC 1.0 to LTC 2.0 27
Chapter 3 Research Method 32
3.1 Research Scope 33
3.1.1 Time Period 33
3.1.2 Geographic Scope 33
3.1.3 Levels of Analysis 33
3.1.4 Units of Analysis 34
3.2 Conceptual Framework: Typological Analysis of Taiwan’s LTC Policies 34
3.3 Operationalization 36
Chapter 4 The Historical Evolution of Taiwan’s Long-Term Care System: Policy Design Mechanisms 43
4.1 Familialism by Default and the Birth of the Migrant Care Market (1980 - 2006) 43
4.2 Taiwan’s Care Regime during LTC 1.0 (2007 - 2016) 46
4.3 Taiwan’s Care Regime during LTC 2.0 (2017 - 2026) 48
Chapter 5 Comparing Structural Outcomes: The Shifting Boundaries of Familialism and Defamilialization 54
5.1 Evidence of Gendered Supported Familialism 55
5.1.1 Family Caregiver Support Services: Service Utilization and Coverage 57
5.1.2 Caregiver Allowances: Cash or Care? 62
5.2 Assessing Supported Defamilialization Through the Market 64
5.2.1 The Marketization of Public Care 65
5.2.2 The Transnational Care Market 69
5.3 Examining the Limits of Defamilialization Through Public Provision 74
5.3.1 The Structural Limits of Public Care Capacity: Institutional Care 75
5.3.2 The Gendered Reality of Public LTC Workforce 77
Chapter 6 Discussion 80
6.1 Summary of Findings 80
6.2 Implications & Policy Recommendations 83
6.3 Limitations 85
6.4 Future Research 85
References 87
Addati, L., Cattaneo, U., Esquivel, V., & Valarino, I. (2018). Care work and care jobs for the
future of decent work. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_633135/lang--en/index.htm
Asian Development Bank. (2020). Lessons from Thailand’s national community-based
long-term care program for older persons (Publication No. 651546). https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/651546/thailand-long-term-care-older-persons.pdf
Ayres, L., Knafl, K., Fisher, L., & Ransom, D. (2008). Typological analysis. In L. M. Given
(Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vol. 2). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n472
Bakker, I., & Gill, S. (2019). Rethinking power, production, and social reproduction:
Toward variegated social reproduction. Capital & Class, 43(4), 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816819848503
Banerjee, S. (2024). Gender and sexuality. In S. S. Jodhka & B. Rehbein (Eds.), Global
handbook of inequality (pp. 346–359). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32152-8
Bhattacharya, T. (Ed.). (2017). Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Class, Recentering
Oppression. Pluto Press.
Brooks, K., Finley, C., Toscano, E., & Willis, D. (Eds.). (2022). Women and migration:
Responses in art and history. Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0296
Cantillon, S., Mackett, O., & Stevano, S. (2023). Feminist Political Economy: A Global
Perspective. Agenda Publishing.
Chaudhuri, M. (2024). Feminism on equality and inequality. In S. S. Jodhka & B. Rehbein
(Eds.), Global handbook of inequality (pp. 190–208). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32152-8
Chang, Y.-H., Hsu, C.-H., Tseng, Y.-C., Yang, W.-C., & Chiou, H.-Y. (2025). Information
sources as determinants of use of formal long-term care: A cross-sectional study in
Taiwan. BMC Health Services Research, 25, 910. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12814-6
Chen, C.-F. (2016). Insiders and outsiders: Policy and care workers in Taiwan’s long-term
care system. Ageing and Society, 36(10), 2090–2116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15001245
Chen, C. F., & Fu, T. H. (2020). Policies and Transformation of Long-Term Care System in
Taiwan. Annals of geriatric medicine and research, 24(3), 187–194.
https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.20.0038
Chen, M.-C. (2009, September). Development and reflections on home care service policy
in Taiwan (我國居家服務政策發展與省思). Community Development Journal, 127, 287–303.
Cho, M. S., & Kwon, M. Y. (2023). Factors associated with aging in place among
community-dwelling older adults in Korea: Findings from a national survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032740
Chou, Y.-C., Jolanki, O., & Chen, B.-W. (2026). Aging in place or relocating? Older adults’
housing decisions in Taiwan and Finland. The Gerontologist, 66(1), gnaf257. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf257
Chou, Y.-C., Kröger, T., & Pu, C.-Y. (2015). Models of long-term care use among older
people with disabilities in Taiwan: Institutional care, community care, live-in migrant
care and family care. European Journal of Ageing, 12, 95–104.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-014-0322-z
Ciccia, R., & Sainsbury, D. (2018). Gendering welfare state analysis: Tensions between care
and paid work. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(1–2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510818X15272520831102
Colombo, F., & Muir, T. (2015). Developing a skilled long-term care workforce. In C. Gori,
J.-L. Fernández, & R. Wittenberg (Eds.), Long-term care reforms in OECD countries: Successes and failures (pp. 197–218). Bristol University Press.
Corlet Walker, C., Druckman, A., & Jackson, T. (2022). A critique of the marketisation of
long-term residential and nursing home care. The Lancet Healthy Longevity, 3(4), e298–e306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00040-X
Dalla Costa, M. (2019). Women and the subversion of the community: A Mariarosa Dalla
Costa reader. PM Press.
Department of Household Registration, Ministry of the Interior. (n.d.). Table 11. Crude birth
rate, and general fertility, age-specific fertility and total fertility rates per thousand childbearing age women for counties and cities. National Statistics, Republic of China (Taiwan). https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/en/3910
Directorate-General of Personnel Administration, Executive Yuan. (2018, June 20).
Issuance of special care allowance for low-income and middle-low-income elderly persons (發放中低收入老人特別照顧津貼). https://www.dgpa.gov.tw/eserver/information?uid=454&pid=9472
Dissens – Institut für Bildung und Forschung e. V. (n.d.). Neue Wege für Jungs I.
https://www.dissens.de/projekte/abgeschlossene-projekte/geschlechterreflektierte-paedagogik/neue-wege-fuer-jungs-i
European Commission. (2018). Informal care in Europe: Exploring formalisation,
availability and quality (ISBN 978-92-79-86583-1; Catalogue
No. KE-04-18-543-EN-N). Publications Office of the European Union.
https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2767/78836
Fagertun, A., Vike, H., & Haukelien, H. (Eds.). (2024). The Political Economy of Care:
Welfare state capitalism, universalism, and social reproduction. Scandinavian University Press. https://doi.org/10.18261/9788215057880-24
Fernández, J.-L., & Nadash, P. (2015). The long-term care financing problem. In C. Gori,
J.-L. Fernández, & R. Wittenberg (Eds.), Long-term care reforms in OECD countries: Successes and failures (pp. 25–44). Bristol University Press.
Folbre, N. (1986). Hearts and spades: Paradigms of household economics. World
Development, 14(2), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(86)90056-2
Folbre, N. (2006). Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy. Journal
of Human Development, 7(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880600768512
Foreign National Labor Rights Portal. (2022, August 10). Increasing the salaries for
migrant caregivers and the allowances of monthly salaries for employers in employing
foreign family caregivers: Q&A. https://fw.wda.gov.tw/wda-employer/home/download-file/2c95efb382b45ee80182b56cc38c0259.pdf
Fraser, N. (2017). Crisis of care? On the Social-Reproductive Contradictions of
Contemporary Capitalism. In T. Bhattacharya (Ed.), Social reproduction theory:
Remapping class, recentering oppression (pp. 21–36). Pluto Press.
Fraser, N., & Jaeggi, R. (2018). Capitalism: A conversation in critical theory (B. Milstein,
Ed.). Polity Press.
Fraser, N. (2022). Cannibal Capitalism: How our system is devouring democracy, care, and
the planet – and what we can do about it. Verso Books.
Fu, R., Iizuka, T., & Noguchi, H. (2023). Long-term care in Japan (NBER Working Paper
No. w31829). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4624232
Fu, T.-H. (2019). Resource allocation and service development in the early stage of
Long-Term Care 2.0 (長期照顧2.0初期的資源佈建與服務發展). Public Governance Quarterly, 7(3), 60–71. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20150327001-201909-201909170008-201909170008-60-71
FWA News. (2026, January 6). Taiwan raises salary thresholds for foreign skilled workers
across the board. https://fwnews.com.tw/taiwan-raises-salary-thresholds-for-foreign-skilled-workers-across-the-board/
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1996). The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It): A Feminist Critique
of Political Economy (NED-New edition). University of Minnesota Press.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.cttts7zc
Gori, C., Fernández, J.-L., & Wittenberg, R. (2015). Conclusion: Looking ahead in
long-term care policies. In C. Gori, J.-L. Fernández, & R. Wittenberg (Eds.), Long-term care reforms in OECD countries: Successes and failures (pp. 293–306). Bristol University Press.
Huang, L.-K., & Yang, P.-S. (2021). Reviewing the History of Taiwan's Long Term Care
Policy and Analyzing its Future Challenges - Based On Long-term Care Plan 2.0 (以長照2.0為基礎回顧臺灣長照政策發展與評析未來挑戰). Journal of Gerontechnology and Service Management, 9(2), 212–236. https://doi.org/10.6283/JOCSG.202106_9(2).212
Huang, R.-Y., & Chen, Y.-H. (2018). Implementation and prospects of Taiwan’s long-term
care policy: An analysis from the perspective of public-private collaborative governance (臺灣長期照顧政策之執行與展望:以公私協力治理觀點分析). Journal of Civil Service, 10(2), 53–83. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20210507001-201804-202105170011-202105170011-53-83
Hsu, H.-C., & Chen, C.-F. (2019). LTC 2.0: The 2017 reform of home- and
community-based long-term care in Taiwan. Health Policy, 123(10), 912–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.08.004
Hung, J.-Y. (2026). Assessment of home- and community-based long-term care centers in
Taiwan. Social Sciences, 15(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15020125
Jodhka, S. S., & Rehbein, B. (Eds.). (2024). Global Handbook of Inequality. Springer
Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32152-8
Johnson, C. J., & Dietrich, D. (2021). The McDonaldization of long-term care. In M. K.
Shankardass (Ed.), Dementia care (Chapter 4). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3864-0_4
Kasai, T. (2020). Preparing for population ageing in the Western Pacific. The Lancet
Regional Health – Western Pacific, 1, 100069.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100069
Kramer, N. (2024). At the heart of neoliberalism: The privatisation of long-term care for
older people and the everyday history of economic policy ideas in the Federal
Republic of Germany and Great Britain. European Journal for Nursing History and
Ethics, 6(2024): Nursing and Economics, 45–64.
https://doi.org/10.25974/enhe2024-4en
Kwak, Y. K., & Wang, M. S. (2022). Exclusion or Inclusion: National Differential
Regulations of Migrant Workers’ Employment, Social Protection, and Migrations
Policies on Im/Mobilities in East Asia-Examples of South Korea and Taiwan.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 16270.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316270
Lai, S., & Chen, C.-l. (2026, June 14). Groups urge protections for migrant caregivers
through agency hiring. Focus Taiwan. https://focustaiwan.tw/society/202606140007
Lan, P.-C. (2001). Among women: Migrant domestics and their Taiwanese employers across
generations (Berkeley Center for Working Families Working Paper No. 30). Center for Working Families, University of California, Berkeley. https://ur.bc.edu/islandora/among-women?absolute=1&language=en
Lan, P.-C. (2022). Contested skills and constrained mobilities: Migrant carework skill
regimes in Taiwan and Japan. Comparative Migration Studies, 10(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-022-00311-2
Legislative Yuan. (2014, July 1). Discussion on Taiwan’s social welfare migrant labor
recruitment and management system—1. Major policy developments in the recruitment of social welfare migrant workers in Taiwan (我國社福外勞引進及管理制度之探討—一、我國引進社福外勞重大政策沿革). https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=9761&pid=135591
Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative
perspective. European Societies, 5(4), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000127642
Liang, L. F. (2018). Creating a gendered-racialized care labor market: Migrant labor policy
and the transformation of care work in Taiwan. In R. Ogawa, R. Chan, A. Oishi, & L.
R. Wang (Eds.), Gender, care and migration in East Asia (pp. 139–156). Palgrave
Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7025-9_7
Liang, L.-F. (2023). Managing work and care: Does employing a live-in migrant care
worker fill the gap? The example of Taiwan. Social Policy and Society, 22(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000233
Liu, D. S., Li, M., & DeMarsh, J. (1996). The 1992 Employment Service Act and the influx
of foreign workers in Taiwan and translation of the 1994 implementary provisions. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, 5(3), 599–637. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj/vol5/iss3/6
Liu, L. F. (2009). Characteristics of the home service utilization for older adults in Taiwan.
台灣老年醫學暨老年學雜誌, 4(3), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.29461/TGG.200908.0005
Liu, Y.-C., & Chen, C.-F. (2025). A historical overview of policy perspectives towards
informal care in Taiwan (1996–2023). Health Policy, 152, 105239.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105239
Liu, Y.-C. (2024). Considerations of Taiwanese working carers on choosing long-term care
services for relatives with disabilities. Practice, 36(4), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2024.2362976
Liu, Y.-S., Wang, P., & Lin, L.-H. (2015). Integrated community-based care: Childcare,
long-term care, and women’s employment policy (社區大家庭的整體照顧——托育、長照、女性就業三合一政策). In Y.-S. Liu (Ed.), Nordic experiences in Taiwan’s transformation: Universal care and democratic deliberation (北歐經驗台灣轉化:普及照顧與民主審議) (pp. 395–454). Feminist Press.
Long-Term Care Services Act [長期照顧服務法]. (2021). Retrieved from
https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=L0070040
Marczak, J., & Wistow, G. (2015). Commissioning long-term care services. In C. Gori, J.-L.
Fernández, & R. Wittenberg (Eds.), Long-term care reforms in OECD countries: Successes and failures (pp. 117–142). Bristol University Press.
Mercille, J. (2024). European long-term care marketisation: A political economy
framework. Social Policy & Administration, 58(7), 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.13013
Ministry of Finance, R.O.C. (2026, February 24). Analysis of tax revenue collection in 2025.
https://service.mof.gov.tw/public/Data/statistic/bulletin/115/Analysis_of_Tax_Revenue_Collection_in_2025.pdf
Ministry of Labor. (n.d.). Labor statistics database query system. https://statdb.mol.gov.tw/statiscla/webMain.aspx?sys=100&kind=10&type=1&funid=wqrymenu2&cparm1=wq64
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2022a, June 9). Applying for long-term care services (申
長照服務). https://1966.gov.tw/LTC/cp-6533-70777-207.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2025a). Long-term care ten-year plan 2.0: Demographic
characteristics of long-term care service users (05-(五)長期照顧十年計畫2.0-長照服務使用者人口學特性). https://1966.gov.tw/LTC/lp-6485-207-1-20.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2025b). Long-term care service institution service volume
(07-(七)長照服務機構服務量). https://1966.gov.tw/LTC/lp-6485-207-1-20.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2016a, December). Long-term care ten-year plan 2.0
(2017–2026) (長期照顧十年計畫2.0(106–115年)〔核定本〕). Ministry of Health and Welfare. https://1966.gov.tw/LTC/cp-6572-69919-207.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2025c). Long-term care ten-year plan 2.0: Respite services
(12-(十二)長期照顧十年計畫2.0-喘息服務). https://1966.gov.tw/LTC/lp-6485-207-1-20.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2026a). Overview of caregivers receiving special care
allowances for low-income and middle-low-income elderly persons (中低收入老人特別照顧津貼照顧者概況). Department of Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare. https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/cp-5223-62358-113.html#_4.%E9%95%B7%E6%9C%9F%E7%85%A7%E9%A1%A7
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2026b). Personnel in elderly long-term care and senior
care institutions (老人長期照顧、安養機構工作人員). Department of Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare. https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/cp-5223-62358-113.html#_4.%E9%95%B7%E6%9C%9F%E7%85%A7%E9%A1%A7
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2021a, July 14). Survey report on main family caregivers
(106年調查報告-主要家庭照顧者). https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/lp-5095-113-xCat-y106.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2007). 2007 Taiwan health and welfare report.
https://www.mohw.gov.tw/lp-137-2.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2010). 2010 Taiwan health and welfare report.
https://www.mohw.gov.tw/lp-137-2.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2013). 2013 Taiwan health and welfare report.
https://www.mohw.gov.tw/lp-137-2.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2014). 2014 Taiwan health and welfare report.
https://www.mohw.gov.tw/lp-137-2.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2015). 2015 Taiwan health and welfare report.
https://www.mohw.gov.tw/lp-137-2.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2016b). 2016 Taiwan health and welfare report.
https://www.mohw.gov.tw/lp-137-2.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2017). 2017 Taiwan health and welfare report.
https://www.mohw.gov.tw/lp-137-2.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2018). 2018 Taiwan health and welfare report.
https://www.mohw.gov.tw/lp-137-2.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2019). 2019 Taiwan health and welfare report.
https://www.mohw.gov.tw/lp-137-2.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2020). 2020 Taiwan health and welfare report.
https://www.mohw.gov.tw/lp-137-2.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2023). 2023 Taiwan health and welfare report.
https://www.mohw.gov.tw/lp-137-2.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2024). 2024 Taiwan health and welfare report.
https://www.mohw.gov.tw/lp-137-2.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2025d). 2025 Taiwan health and welfare report.
https://www.mohw.gov.tw/lp-137-2.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare (Taiwan), Department of Long-Term Care. (2018,
November 1). Department of Long-Term Care. https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-3779-44499-2.html
National Center for Geriatrics and Welfare Research. (2022, June 23). Analysis of fees for
residential long-term care facilities (住宿式長照機構收費調查分析). https://ageing.nhri.edu.tw/%E4%BD%8F%E5%AE%BF%E5%BC%8F%E9%95%B7%E7%85%A7%E6%A9%9F%E6%A7%8B%E6%94%B6%E8%B2%BB%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90/
National Development Council. (2024, October 17). Population projections for the R.O.C.
(Taiwan) – Slide downloads. https://pop-proj.ndc.gov.tw/main_en/News.aspx?n=139&sms=10334
National Health Research Institutes & Jubo Health. (2025). 長期照顧服務機構資源整合
台 [Long-term care service institution resource integration platform]. https://ltc.jubo-care.com/
Ogawa, R., Oishi, A. S., Chan, R. K. H., & Wang, L. R. (2018). Introduction: Situating
gender, care, and migration in East Asia. In R. Ogawa, R. K. H. Chan, A. S. Oishi, & L. R. Wang (Eds.), Gender, care and migration in East Asia (pp. 1–16). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7025-9_1
Orloff, A. S. (2009). Gendering the comparative analysis of welfare states: An unfinished
agenda. Sociological Theory, 27(3), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01350.x
Pasini, G., Knapp, D., Angrisani, M., & Stearns, S. C. (2025). Evaluating LTC policies
around the world: A virtual special issue promoted by the Gateway to Global Aging
Data Project. Health Economics, 34, 1965-1970. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70023
Porobic Isakovic, N. (2018). A User Guide to Feminist Political Economy (2nd ed.).
Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom.
Porobić Isaković, N. (2025). A WILPF Guide to Feminist Political Economy (3rd ed.).
Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom.
Rexhaj, S., Nguyen, A., Favrod, J., Coloni‑Terrapon, C., Buisson, L., Drainville, A. L., &
Martinez, D. (2023). Women involvement in the informal caregiving field: A
perspective review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1113587. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1113587
Rodgers, Y. V. D. M. (2023). Time poverty: Conceptualization, gender differences, and
policy solutions. Social Philosophy and Policy, 40(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052523000389
Roit, B., Le Bihan, B., & Österle, A. (2015). Cash-for-care benefits. In C. Gori, J.-L.
Fernández, & R. Wittenberg (Eds.), Long-term care reforms in OECD countries: Successes and failures (pp. 143–166). Bristol University Press.
ROSE, S. O. (1993). Gender and Labor History: The nineteenth-century legacy.
International Review of Social History, 38, 145–162. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44735371
Saraceno, C. (2016). Varieties of familialism: Comparing four southern European and East
Asian welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(4), 314–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928716657275
Sears, A. (2017). Body politics: The social reproduction of sexualities. In T. Bhattacharya
(Ed.), Social reproduction theory: Remapping class, recentering oppression (pp. 171–191). Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1vz494j.13
Tainan City Government. (2022, August 10). Increasing the salaries for migrant caregivers
and the allowances of monthly salaries for the employers in employing foreign family caregivers: Q&A. https://w3fs.tainan.gov.tw/Download.ashx?n=6Kq%2F6auY5a625LqL56e75bel5pyI6Jaq5Y%2BK6ZuH5Li76IGY5YOx5aSW57GN5a625bqt55yL6K235bel6Jaq6LOH6KOc5ZWP562U6ZuGX%2BiLseaWhy5wZGY%3D&u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvMjAvcmVsZmlsZS8yNDI2Ny83OTE0OTQ0L2JmOTcyNGQ5LWZhMGUtNDBkZi1iYzg3LTQzZDViYTRjYmU5OC5wZGY%3D
Tax Foundation. (2026). Regressive tax.
https://taxfoundation.org/taxedu/glossary/regressive-tax/
Tien, H.-M., & Shiau, C.-J. (1992). Taiwan’s democratization: A summary. World Affairs,
155(2), 58–61. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20672340
Tsai, S.-P. (2025, April 6). “It’s a community thing!”: Decolonizing struggles of Taiwan’s
Indigenous elderly care. Social Work Policy & Society, 7(1). https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/SWPS/article/view/18023
UN Women & United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2024,
September). Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: The gender snapshot 2024. https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2024/09/progress-on-the-sustainable-development-goals-the-gender-snapshot-2024
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, & Perry, J. (2022). Caregiving
in an ageing world. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://doi.org/10.18356/27081990-143
Verbakel, E., Glaser, K., Amzour, Y., Brandt, M., & van Groenou, M. B. (2023). Indicators
of familialism and defamilialization in long-term care: A theoretical overview and introduction of macro-level indicators. Journal of European Social Policy, 33(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287221117095
Wang, M. S., & Chan, T.-C. (2017). The intersections of the care regime and the migrant
care worker policy: The example of Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 27(3–4), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2017.1406822
World Health Organization. (2025, February 21). Ageing: Global population.
https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/population-ageing
Wu, S.-C., & Lin, H.-S. (1999). A national profile of family caregivers of the disabled
elderly people in Taiwan. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 18(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.6288/CJPH1999-18-01-06
Yang, C. C., Hsueh, J. Y., & Wei, C. Y. (2020). Current Status of Long-term Care in Taiwan:
Transition of Long-term Care Plan From 1.0 to 2.0. International journal of health policy and management, 9(8), 363–364. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2019.115
Yeates, N. (2005, September). Global care chains: A critical introduction (Global Migration
Perspectives No. 44). Global Commission on International Migration.
https://www.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl2616/files/2018-07/gmp44.pdf
Yeh, M.-J. (2020). Long-term care system in Taiwan: The 2017 major reform and its
challenges. Ageing and Society, 40(6), 1334–1351. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18001745
Yen, C.-M. (2025). Understanding family caregivers’ experiences with live-in migrant care
workers in dementia care: Challenges and perspectives from a qualitative study in Taiwan. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 62, Article 00469580251355826. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251355826