| 研究生: |
陳奕寰 Chen, Yi-Huan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
台灣室內設計產業利害關係人之互動價值共創機制 The Mechanism of Interactional Value Co-Creation among Stakeholders in Taiwan's Interior Design Industry |
| 指導教授: |
張瑜倩
Chang, Yu-Chien |
| 口試委員: |
吳豐祥
Wu, Feng-Shang 游銘仁 Yu, Ming-Jen |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 科技管理與智慧財產研究所 Graduate Institute of Technology, Innovation and Intellectual Property Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 115 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 107 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 室內設計 、利害關係人 、服務主導邏輯 、價值共創 、互動創造框架 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Interior Design, Stakeholder, Service-Dominant Logic, Value Co-Creation, Co-Creation Framework |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:15 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
室內設計產業正經歷深刻的典範轉移,逐漸從傳統「設計師主導」轉向多方協作的生態系統模式。在學術上,這呼應了從商品主導邏輯轉向服務主導邏輯的趨勢。然而,現有價值共創實證研究多聚焦於企業與顧客的雙邊關係,鮮少探討涉及多元利害關係人網絡的互動機制。為填補此理論缺口,本研究以室內設計產業進行研究,因其呈現典型的多層次利害關係人網絡,且專案具備高度客製化、動態協商與設計施工整合之特性,為探討服務生態系統中的資源整合與價值共創提供了豐富的實證基礎。
本研究採單一個案研究法,選定經營近20年的「美合室內設計」,透過非參與式觀察與深度訪談,並以 Ramaswamy and Ozcan (2018) 的互動創造框架為分析工具,剖析台灣室內設計公司與多元利害關係人的互動價值共創機制。
研究發現,個案公司透過組織建構建立穩定的制度框架,層層遞進的信任鏈機制將個體私有情感轉化為集體協作動能,此兩大機制的動態交織,於不同情境下,促進與約束行動者的互動,進而促成價值的湧現。更重要的是,本研究揭示了此價值湧現過程的雙向循環機制:制度框架規範並促進了互動環境中的共創行動,而行動者的實踐體驗最終反向成為公司的組織慣例與品牌聲譽,實現從「專案成功」到「品牌永續」的價值閉環。
在理論貢獻方面,本研究將服務主導邏輯擴展至複雜的多層次利害關係人網絡,具體化了互動創造框架在高度客製化產業中的運作路徑,並提出「信任鏈」模型,豐富了價值共創的微觀視角。在實務貢獻方面,本研究建議業界推動設計與工程的雙軌分工以建立組織共創能力,善用數位工具將溝通物質化,並透過結構化協調建立信任鏈,打造具備韌性且永續發展的品牌。
The interior design industry is shifting from a "designer-led" model to a collaborative ecosystem, echoing the academic transition toward service-dominant logic (SDL). However, literature rarely explores co-creation within complex multi-stakeholder networks. To bridge this gap, this study examines the Taiwanese interior design sector, which features high customization and design-construction integration. Employing a single-case study on " Merry Hope Design Co." through observation and interviews, this research utilizes Ramaswamy and Ozcan’s (2018) Co-creation Framework (CCF) to analyze multi-stakeholder interactive mechanisms.
The findings reveal that the company catalyzes the emergence of value through the interplay of organization building and a trust-chain mechanism. Specifically, the firm establishes a stable institutional framework, while translating individual sentiments into collective momentum via a four-stage progressive trust chain. Across various contexts, these mechanisms simultaneously enable and constrain interactions, thereby fostering the emergence of co-created value. Crucially, a bidirectional feedback loop is uncovered: the institutional framework shapes co-creative actions in interactive environments, while actors' lived experiences feed back into organizational routines and brand reputation, securing the path from "project success" to "brand sustainability."
Theoretically, this study extends SDL to multi-level networks, contextualizes the CCF in customized industries, and proposes a trust-chain model. Practically, it advises the industry to adopt a design-engineering dual-track division of labor, leverage digital tools to reduce information asymmetry, and establish structured trust chains to build a resilient, sustainable brand.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 5
第三節 研究問題與目的 8
第二章 文獻回顧 9
第一節 室內設計產業 9
第二節 利害關係人理論 15
第三節 價值共創的互動創造觀點 20
第四節 小結與研究架構 33
第三章 研究方法 37
第一節 研究流程 37
第二節 研究個案 39
第三節 研究方法 43
第四節 訪綱設計 47
第四章 研究發現 50
第一節 U社區室內裝修專案的利害關係人及其互動機制 50
第二節 能動參與:價值共創驅動機制 63
第三節 組織建構:價值共創的協調模式 78
第五章 結論與建議 86
第一節 研究結論 86
第二節 研究貢獻 92
第三節 研究限制及未來建議 95
參考文獻 97
附件一 訪綱 106
一、 中文文獻
內政部(2023)。中華民國111年內政性別統計分析專輯。2025年9月15日,取自https://www.moi.gov.tw/cl.aspx?n=18937。
內政部營建署(2023)。檢送本署112年6月19日召開增訂「室內設計科技師」意見交流會議紀錄1份(營署建管字第1121157681號)。2025年9月15日,取自https://www.idroc.org.tw/upload/20230814111548.pdf。
文化內容策進院(2025)。2023台灣文創產業發展年報。2025年9月15日,取自https://taicca.tw/intelligence/industry_research/detail/65。
行政院主計總處(2021)。行業統計分類(第11次修正)。2025年9月15日,取自 https://www.stat.gov.tw。
住展雜誌/住展房屋網(2025)。預售屋三年狂賣5.4兆 交屋潮恐引爆3.78兆房貸需求。經濟日報。2025年9月26日,取自
https://money.udn.com/money/story/5621/8633977。
李家儂、謝翊楷(2021)。新冠肺炎對房地產業的影響。在政大商學院信義不動產研究發展中心(主編),2021台灣地區房地產年鑑(頁582-607)。臺北市:行義文化出版有限公司。
林明鏘、郭斯傑(2018)。工程與法律十講(三版)。臺北市:五南。
胡偉良(2025)。台灣當前房地產的高房價根源及解決策略。聯合新聞網經濟日報。2025年9月25日,取自
https://money.udn.com/money/story/5621/8782205。
曾國維(2012)。住宅室內裝修產業之競爭力分析。設計研究學報,第5期,頁119-134。https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29701/JDR.201207.0010。
黃瑞琴(2021)。質性教育研究方法。臺北市:心理出版社。
楊達凱、蔣詩嶔、黃恆獎(2024)。通路系統中價值共創機制之探討:從顧客參與到行動者參與。臺大管理論叢,34卷2期,頁45-90。
https://doi.org/10.6226/NTUMR.202408_34(2).0002。
萬文隆(2004)。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育,37卷4期,頁17-23。https://doi.org/10.6232/LTE.2004.37(4).4。
劉佩真(2025)。劉佩真觀點:2024年房市為前高後低態勢、2025年將進入調整階段。遠雄房地產。2025年9月26日,取自 https://www.farglory-realty.com.tw/life-proposal/expert_peizhen_2024review_20250107/。
潘淑滿(2022)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北市:心理出版社。
蔡怡純(2022)。2021年總體經濟與房地產關聯分析。在政大商學院信義不動產研究發展中心(主編),2022台灣地區房地產年鑑(頁1-22)。臺北市:行義文化出版有限公司。
蔡曜如(2003)。我國房地產市場之發展、影響暨政府因應對策。中央銀行季刊,25卷4期,31-63。
鄭至甫、康瓈云(2022)。創生不息:新創企業與創業生態系統之互動。組織與管理,15卷2期,頁55-112。https://doi.org/10.53106/199687602022081502002。
蕭瑞麟(2017)。不用數字的研究:質性研究的思辯脈絡(三版)。臺北市:五南。
戴嬡坪、江筱娟、許婉娪、楊淳如、蕭淑娟(2007)。室內設計公司經營管理個案之研究。經營管理論叢,2007特刊,頁287-297。
https://doi.org/10.6872/OMR.200712/SP.0015。
鍾明宏(2017)。成熟市場之創新經營模式分析-以室內裝修產業為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。台北市:國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)。
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/106413。
鍾淑郡(2019)。室內設計專案流程改善之研究〔未出版碩士論文〕。高雄市:國立高雄大學創意設計與建築學系碩士班。
https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dv52z8。
顏志晃、凌網科技股份有限公司(2021)。設計思考(初版)。臺北市:元華文創。
二、 英文文獻
Akaka, M., Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. (2013). The Complexity of Context: A Service Ecosystems Approach for International Marketing. Journal of International Marketing, 21(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.13.0032
Alexander, C. (1977). A pattern language : towns, buildings, construction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Alfakhri, D. H. (2016). Exploring the impact of hotel interior design through service dominant logic (SDL) and consumer culture theory (CCT) lenses [Doctoral dissertation, University of Hull].
https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4218314
Bal, A. S., Käpylä, J., Li, H., & Helander, N. (2023). Collaborative value co-creation from a stakeholder perspective: A literature review. Journal of Creating Value, 9(2), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/23949643231151831
Benn, S., Abratt, R., & O'Leary, B. (2016). Defining and identifying stakeholders : views from management and stakeholders. South African Journal of Business Management, 47(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC190102
Brosch, T., & Sander, D. (2015). Handbook of Value: Perspectives from Economics, Neuroscience, Philosophy, Psychology and Sociology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716600.001.0001
Chernev, A. (2019). Strategic marketing management: theory and practice. San Diego, CA: Cerebellum Press.
Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994
Coleman, C., & Sosnowchik, K. (2006). Interior design trends and implications. Grand Rapids, MI: Council for Interior Design Accreditation.
Council for Interior Design Qualification. (2019). Definition of Interior Design. Council for Interior Design Qualification,. Retrieved September 15, 2025, from https://www.cidq.org/about-cidq.
Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense (M. Lester & C. Stivale, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1969)
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1968)
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1980)
Echeverri, P., & Skålén, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593111408181
Edvardsson, B., Ng, G., Min Choo, Z., & Firth, R. (2013). Why is service‐dominant logic based service system better? International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 5(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqss-07-2012-0007
Eggert, A., Ulaga, W., Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2018). Conceptualizing and communicating value in business markets: From value in exchange to value in use. Industrial Marketing Management, 69, 80–90.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.01.018
Eldh, A. C., Rycroft-Malone, J., van der Zijpp, T., McMullan, C., & Hawkes, C. (2020). Using Nonparticipant Observation as a Method to Understand Implementation Context in Evidence-Based Practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 17(3), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12449
Fares, J. (2024). A multi-level typology for stakeholder influence: A systematic literature review using the structural approach. European Management Journal, 42(4), 462–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2023.08.004
Fischer, G. (2002). Beyond "Couch Potatoes": From Consumers to Designers and Active Contributors. First Monday, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i12.1010
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1984).
Galvagno, M., & Dalli, D. (2014). Theory of value co-creation: A systematic literature review. Managing Service Quality, 24(6), 643–683.
https://doi.org/10.1108/MSQ-09-2013-0187
Gouillart, F. J. (2014). The race to implement co-creation of value with stakeholders: five approaches to competitive advantage. Strategy & Leadership, 42(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1108/SL-09-2013-0071
Grönroos, C. (2000). Service Management and Marketing: A Customer Relationship Management Approach (2nd ed.). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Grönroos, C. (2012). Conceptualising value co-creation: A journey to the 1970s and back to the future. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(13-14), 1520–1534. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.737357
Grönroos, C. (2015). Service Management and Marketing: A Customer Relationship Management Approach (4th ed.). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & De Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction, 31(3), 498–501.
Hartwig, K., von Saldern, L., & Jacob, F. (2021). The journey from goods-dominant logic to service-dominant logic: A case study with a global technology manufacturer. Industrial Marketing Management, 95, 85–98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.04.006
Heinich, N. (2020). A Pragmatic Redefinition of Value(s): Toward a General Model of Valuation. Theory, Culture & Society, 37(5), 75–94.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420915993
Hillebrand, B., Driessen, P. H., & Koll, O. (2015). Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(4), 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0424-y
Huber, A. (2018a). Exploring interior designers’ research utilization strategies and information–seeking behaviors. Journal of Interior Design, 43(2), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12131
Huber, A. M. (2021). Exploring Informed–Design Services during the Project–Defining Phases in Commercial Interior Design. Journal of Interior Design, 46(2), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12191
Konchar, M., & Sanvido, V. (1998). Comparison of U.S. project delivery systems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(6), 435–444.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:6(435)
Kotler, P. (1994). Reconceptualizing marketing: An interview with Philip Kotler. European Management Journal, 12(4), 353–361.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(94)90021-3
Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2019). Marketing 3.0: From products to customers to the human spirit. In K. Kompella (Ed.), Marketing wisdom (pp. 139-156). Singapore: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7724-1_10
Kuo, C.-G., & Wu, C.-H. (2024). The Detection and Calculation of Design-Weighting on Indoor Environmental Elements—Illustrated by Real Interior Design Projects. Applied Sciences, 14(16), 7137. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14167137
Loureiro, S. M. C., Romero, J., & Bilro, R. G. (2020). Stakeholder engagement in co-creation processes for innovation: A systematic literature review and case study. Journal of Business Research, 119, 388–409.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.038
Lusch, R., & Vargo, S. (2006). Service-Dominant Logic: Reactions, Reflections and Refinements. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 281–288.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593106066781
Mainardes, E. W., Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2011). Stakeholder theory: issues to resolve. Management Decision, 49(2), 226–252.
https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111109133
Marshall, A. (2013). Principles of economics. London, UK: Springer. (Original work published 1890)
Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
McVea, J., & Freeman, R. (2005). A Names-and-Faces Approach to Stakeholder Management: How Focusing on Stakeholders as Individuals Can Bring Ethics and Entrepreneurial Strategy Together. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492604270799
Mingione, M., & Leoni, L. (2020). Blurring B2C and B2B boundaries: corporate brand value co-creation in B2B2C markets. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(1-2), 72–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1694566
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
Molenaar, K., Songer, A., & Barash, M. (1999). Public-Sector Design∕Build Evolution and Performance. Journal of Management in Engineering, 15(2), 54–62.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1999)15:2(54)
Mustak, M., Jaakkola, E., & Halinen, A. (2013). Customer participation and value creation: a systematic review and research implications. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 23(4), 341–359.
Mustapha, A. A., Mohamad, M. F., & Noorhani, N. M. A. (2021). A framework of an interior design work delivery process. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 12(3), 322–332.
https://doi.org/10.56028/aetr.10.1.52.2024
Nazari, M., & Mehrjoo, E. (2022). Value Co-Creation Model in Interior Design Industry. Journal of Business Management, 14(1), 4–36.
https://doi.org/10.22059/jibm.2020.301531.3827
Ni, B., Mustapha, A. A., & Noorhani, N. M. A. (2024). Interior design scope of work for interior design project delivery in China. Advances in Engineering Technology Research, 10(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.56028/aetr.10.1.52.2024
Normann, R., & Ramírez, R. (1993). From value chain to value constellation: designing interactive strategy. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 65–77.
Pera, R., Occhiocupo, N., & Clarke, J. (2016). Motives and resources for value co-creation in a multi-stakeholder ecosystem: A managerial perspective. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4033–4041.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.047
Pirgmaier, E. (2021). The value of value theory for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 179, 106790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106790
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004a). Co‐creating unique value with customers. Strategy & Leadership, 32(3), 4–9.
https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570410699249
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004b). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14.
https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015
Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018). What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of Business Research, 84, 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.027
Reypens, C., Lievens, A., & Blazevic, V. (2016). Leveraging value in multi-stakeholder innovation networks: A process framework for value co-creation and capture. Industrial Marketing Management, 56, 40–50.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.03.005
Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107
Rowley, T. J. (2017). The Power of and in Stakeholder Networks. In Stakeholder Management (Vol. 1). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1108/s2514-175920170000005
Sanders, E. B. (2006). Design research in 2006. Design Research Quarterly, 1(1), 1–8.
Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
Smith, A. (1937). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York, NY: Modern Library. (Original work published 1776)
Tantalo, C., & Priem, R. L. (2016). Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 314–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2337
Vargo, S. L., Akaka, M. A., & Vaughan, C. M. (2017). Conceptualizing Value: A Service-ecosystem View. Journal of Creating Value, 3(2), 117–124.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2394964317732861
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008a). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008b). From goods to service(s): Divergences and convergences of logics. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(3), 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.07.004
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2015). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.