工業4.0目前僅注重在生產管理層面等原因型資訊之即時取得，但僅透過原因型資訊，往往不足以構成良好之決策。原因型資訊僅是因果關係中之因，例如：品質、時間、產能等。而良好之決策應該建構於完整之資訊，也就是同時獲得原因型與結果型之資訊，便能以較為全面之觀點評估，進而做出有效之決策。此所稱之結果型資訊為原因型資訊之成本。
　　因此，本研究以管理議題作為工業4.0與作業價值管理結合之方式，並擬定各管理議題之資訊，使工業4.0下之公司能夠即時獲得原因型與結果型之整合性資訊，以利其即時作出良好之管理決策。

　　Industry 4.0 only puts emphasis on acquiring real-time cause information, which is the cause of the causality, e.g., quality, time, and capacity. However, the cause information is not sufficient for the managers to make good decisions. By obtaining complete information, i.e., cause and effect information, the decision-makers would have a comprehensive perspective to evaluate the situation and then make effective decisions. Therefore, this study adopts management issues to integrate Industry 4.0 and AVM, and defines information for a variety of management issues for the Industry 4.0 companies to access the complete information to make a better management decision immediately.

中文部分
韋康博，2015，工業4.0：從製造業到「智」造業，下一波產業革命如何顛覆全世界？台北市：商周出版。
汪建南與馬雲龍，2016，工業4.0的國際發展趨勢與台灣因應之道，中央銀行國際金融參考資料，第69輯：133-155。
吳安妮，2007，作業基礎成本制之發展與整合，會計研究月刊，第263期：60-74。
吳安妮，2015，管理會計技術商品化：以ABC為核心之作業價值管理系統(AVMS)為例，會計研究月刊，第359期：20-24。
經濟部工業局，2014，智慧型自動化產業推動計畫。
行政院全球資訊網，2016，智慧機械產業推動方案規劃，網址：http://www.ey.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=4E506D8D07B5A38D&s=D98F7BAFB503B307，搜尋日期：2017年5月3日。
賴宛靖，2017，智慧機械帶領臺灣產業邁向工業4.0，工業技術與資訊月刊，第305期：28-31。
經濟部，2017，智慧機械產業推動方案Roadmap。
黃仲宏，2016，從2016 Automatica 洞悉機器人產業發展動向，智慧自動化產業期刊，第18期：30-37。

英文部分
Albert, M. 2015. Seven things to know about the internet of things and industry 4.0. Modern Machine Shop Magazine 88 (4): 74-81.
Stojkić, Ž., I. Veža, and I. Bošnjak. 2016. A Concept of Information System Implementation (CRM and ERP) within Industry 4.0. In 26th DAAAM International Symposium pp. 0912-0919. Vienna, Austria: DAAAM International.
Karnouskos, S., A. W. Colombo, and T. Bangemann. 2014. Trends and challenges for cloud-based industrial cyber-physical systems. In Industrial Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical Systems pp. 231-240. Springer International Publishing.
Schmidt, R., M. Möhring, R. C. Härting, C. Reichstein, P. Neumaier, and P. Jozinović. 2015. Industry 4.0-potentials for creating smart products: empirical research results. In International Conference on Business Information Systems pp. 16-27. Springer International Publishing.
Turney, P. B. 2005. Common cents: How to succeed with activity-based costing and activity-based management. McGraw-Hill.
Swenson, D. 1995. The benefits of activity-based cost management to the manufacturing industry. Journal of Management Accounting Research 7: 167.
Gunasekaran, A., and M. Sarhadi. 1998. Implementation of activity-based costing in manufacturing. International journal of production economics 56: 231-242.
Kaplan, R. S., and R. Cooper. 1998. Cost & effect: using integrated cost systems to drive profitability and performance. Harvard Business Press.
Kaplan, R. S. 1989. “Kanthal (A).” Harvard Business School Case 190-002. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Marn, M. V., and R. L. Rosiello. 1992. Managing price, gaining profit. Harvard Business Review 70 (5): 84-94.
Ittner, C. D. 1999. Activity-based costing concepts for quality improvement. European Management Journal 17 (5): 492-500.
Atkinson, H., J. Hamburg, and C. Ittner. 1994. Linking Quality to Profits: Quality-Based Cost Management. ASQC Press, Milwaukee, WI.
Smock, D. 1982. How to stem the tide of shoddy materials. Purchasing 92 (9): 51-57.
Technical Assistance Research Programs (TARP). 1979. Consumer Complaint Handling in America: Final Report. US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.
Gupta, M., and K. Galloway. 2003. Activity-based costing / management and its implications for operations management. Technovation 23(2): 131-138.
Schoreder, R. 2000. Operations Management: Decision Making in the Operations Function. McGraw–Hill, New York.
Schneider, A. J. 1992. TQM and the financial function. Journal of Business Strategy 13 (5): 23-24.
Rupp, A. W. 1995. ABC: A pilot approach. Management Accounting 76: 50-55.
Yin, R. K. 1994. Case study research: design and methods. Thousands Oaks. International Educational and Professional Publisher.
Kagermann, H., J. Helbig, A. Hellinger, and W. Wahlster. 2013. Recommendations for Implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: securing the future of German manufacturing industry; final report of the Industrie 4.0 working group. Forschungsunion.
Armitage, H., and G. Russell. 1993. Activity-based management information: TQM's missing link. CMA Magazine 67 (2): 7.