| 研究生: |
楊敦雅 |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
仿冒查緝與政治獻金 |
| 指導教授: | 王智賢 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
社會科學學院 - 財政學系 Department of Public Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2008 |
| 畢業學年度: | 96 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 29 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 智慧財產權 、政治獻金 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:69 下載:49 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在「商標」與「知識」等無形資產逐漸成為經濟社會中重要生產要素的今日,保障其所有權是維持市場秩序的重要方式之一,為此我國公平交易法第二十條與智慧財產相關法律均有相關規範。本文由政治獻金遊說的角度出發,探討當此類無形資產掌握在外國廠商手中時,本國民選政府如何制定最適的仿冒查緝率。本文研究發現,在沒有利益團體遊說的情況下,本國政府的最適查緝率為零;然若外國正版商的參與政治獻金遊說,即使本國政府對全國福利的重視程度相對於政治獻金兩倍以上,外國正版商的遊說仍可能大幅改變本國政府的選擇,使查緝率大幅提升至仿冒能夠在市場生存的查緝上限;若外國正版商與本國消費者均付出政治獻金遊說,則雙方將會落入類似囚犯的困境中。
第一章 前言………………………………………………………….1
第二章 基本模型…………………………………………………….5
第一節 外國正版商與本國仿冒商的市場競爭……………….6
第二節 禁止政治獻金遊說下,本國政府的最適查緝率…….9
第三章 允許政治獻金遊說,本國政府的最適查緝率…………….11
第一節 允許本國消費者參與遊說…………………………....14
第二節 允許外國正版商參與遊說…………………………....15
第三節 允許外國正版商與本國消費者參與遊說…………....19
第四章 結論………………………………………………………….23
附錄一 ……………………………………………………………...…24
附錄二 ……………………………………………………………...…24
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………...……26
參考文獻
王智賢與蔡坤良 (2005),〈政治獻金限額與關稅遊說〉,《經濟研究》,41(2): 207-247。
王智賢與翁永和 (2006),〈最適自製率與政治獻金〉,《人文與社會科學集刊》,18(2): 269-291。
吳芝文與周建富 (2004),〈智慧財產權與經濟效率〉,《經濟論文》,32(2): 335-361。
吳依芳與王智賢 (2005),〈勞資遊說賽局與關稅保護模型〉,《經社法制論叢》,36: 199-241。
林奇蓉 (2004),〈政治遊說與策略性貿易政策〉,《經濟論文叢刊》,32(3): 347-367。
蔡明芳與邱俊榮 (2006),〈仿冒與政府政策〉,未發表論文。
Adit, T. S. (1997), “Cooperative Lobbying and Endogenous Trade Policy,” Public Choice, 93, 3-4, 455-475.
Banerjee, D. S. (2003), “Software Piracy: A Strategic Analysis and Policy Instruments, ”International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 97-127.
Bernheim, B. D. and M. D. Whinston (1986), “Menu Auction, Resource Allocation, and Economic Influence,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 1-31.
Bertrand, K. (1998), “Hologram Fight Profit Drain of Counterfeit, Diverted Brands,” Brand Packaging, Oct/Nov, 7-22.
Besen, S. M. and S. N, Kirby (1989), “Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties,” Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 255-280.
Conner, K. and R. P. Rumelt (1991), “Software Piracy : An Analysis of Protection Strategies,” Management Science, 37, 125-139.
Dixit, A., G. M. Grossman and E. Helpman (1997), “Common Agency and Coordination: General Theory and Application to Government Policy Making,” Journal of Political Economy, 105, 752-769.
Freedman, D. H. (1999), “Fakers Paradise,” Forbes, 5, Special Supplement, 48-55.
Gallini, N. (1992), “Patent Policy and Costly Imitation,” Rand Journal Economics, 23, 52-63.
Gawande, K., P. Krishna, and M. J. Robbins, “ Foreign Lobbies and US Trade Policy” NBER working paper: 10205.
Glass, A. J. and K. Saggi. (2002), “Intellectual Property Right and Foreign Direct Investment,” Journal of International Economics, 56, 387-410.
Grossman, G. M. and E. Helpman, (1994), “Protection for Sale,” American Economic Review, 84, 833-850.
Helpman, E. (1993), “Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Right,” Econometrica, 61, 1247-1280.
Higgins, R. S. and P. H. Rubin (1986), “Counterfeit Goods,” Journal of Law and Economics, 29, 211-230.
Johnson, W. R. (1985), “The Economics of Copying,” Journal of Political Economy, 93, 158-174.
Konishi, H., K. Saggi, and S. Weber (1999), “Endogenous Trade Policy under Foreign Direct Investment,” Journal of International Economics, 49, 289-308.
Krugman, P. R. (1979), “A model of Tnnovation Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income,” Journal of Political Economy, 87, 253-266.
Ludema, R. D. (2001), ”Market Collusion and the Politics of Protection,” European Journal of Political Economy, 17, 4, 817-833.
Magee, C. (2002), “Endogenous Trade Policy and Lobbying Formation: An Application to the Free-rider Problem,” Journal of International Economics, 57, 2,499-457.
Maggi, G. and A. Rodriguez-Clare (1998), “The Value of Trade Agreements in the Presence of Political Pressures,” Journal of Political Economy, 106, 3, 574-601.
Mitra, D. (2002), “Endogenous Political Organization and the Value of Trade Agreements,” Journal of International Economics, 57, 473-485.
Nascimento, F. and W. R. Vanhonacker (1988), “Optimal Strategic Pricing of Reproducible Consumer Products” Management Science, 34, 921-935.
Novos, I. E and M. Waldman (1984), “The Effects of Increased Copyright Protection: An Analytic Approach,” Journal of Political Economy, 92, 236-246.
Panagariya, A. and R. Duttagupta (2002), “Politics of Free Trade Area: Tarffs versus Quotas,” Journal of International Economics, 58, 413-427.
Rama, M. and G. Tabellinni (1998), “Lobbying by Capital and Labor over Trade and Labor Market Policies,” European Economic Review, 42, 1295-1316.
Shy, O. and J. F. Thisse (1999), “A Strategic Approach to Software Protection,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 8, 163-190.
Takalo, T. and V. Kanniainen (2000), ”Do Patent Slow Down Techonological Progress? Real Options in Research, Patenting, and Market Introduction,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 1105-1127.
Takeyama, L. N. (1994), “The Welfare Implications of Unauthorized Reproduction of Intellectual Property in the Presence of Demand Network Externalities,” Journal of Industrial Economics,” 42, 155-166.
Wang, J.-S., H.-W. Koo and T.-J. Chen (2006), “Resource Rivalry and Endogenous Lobby,” Japan and the World Economy, 18:4, 488-511.
Yang, G. and K. E. Maskus (2001), “Intellectual Property Right, Licensing and Innovation in an Endogenous Product-Cycle Model,” Journal of International Economics, 53, 169-187.