跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 馬佐迪
Mallol Sala, Jordi
論文名稱: 西班牙台灣的宗教與合法性
Religion and Legitimacy in Spanish Formosa
指導教授: 藍適齊
Lan, Shi-Chi
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學學院 - 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
International Master's Program in Asia-Pacific Studies(IMAS)
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 117
中文關鍵詞: 合法性宗教殖民主義殖民化帝國主義西班牙帝國西班牙福爾沙十六世紀十七世紀
外文關鍵詞: Legitimacy, Religion, Colonialism, Colonization, Imperialism, Spanish Empire, Spanish Formosa, Sixteenth Century, Seventeenth Century
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202100923
相關次數: 點閱:79下載:26
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本論文旨在探討西班牙帝國於十六、十七世紀間,宗教在征服合法化中的作用,並透過台灣殖民化為案例研究。現代國家的出現、對理解世界和宗教的改變,及人類在現代時期中所扮演的角色,都影響了人們對道德與合法性觀念上的理解。此分析基於對教會與國家關係之間的理解、宗教在權力結構中的核心作用、利用宗教皈依來改造本土空間以及西班牙傳教士以“邊境機構”的服務作為邊境開放系統的基礎概念下進行。首先,本論文認為,宗教是帝國的首要核心元素,儘管在台灣的殖民時期短暫,但仍然體現西班牙帝國主義在每個佔領階段的功能。其次,宗教辯護在
    國家結構中的成功率很高,而在本土社會中則較為有限。第三,儘管殖民者大多數的行為都符合道義,但有些事件可能都意味著殖民過程中存在的利益衝突。


    This thesis explores the role of religion in legitimizing conquest during the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries Spanish Empire through the colonization of Taiwan as a case study. The emergence of the modern states, the changes in
    understanding the world, religion, and the role of men experienced during the Modern Era affected how the ideas of morality and legitimacy were understood. The analysis is made through the understanding of the Church and State relations, the central role of religion in the power structures, the use of religious conversion to transform the native spaces, and the concept of ‘frontier institution,’ in which the Spanish missions served as a fundamental piece in the frontier opening system. This thesis defends that, first, religion was a central element of the Empire and that, although the shortness of the Formosan colony, the main features of Spanish imperialism were present in each stage of the conquest. Second, the success of the religious justifications was high among the state structures and more limited among the native societies. And third, even though most of the colonizer's actions responded to the moral justifications, some events might suggest conflicting interests in the colonization process.

    1. Introduction 1
    1.1. Research proposal 2
    1.1.1. Research motivation 3
    1.1.2. Research method 4
    1.1.3. Thesis structure 5
    1.2. Clarification on the use of terms 6
    1.3. Spanish Formosa 8
    1.4. Theoretical Framework 11
    1.4.1. The concepts of colony and empire 11
    1.4.2. Legitimacy 14
    1.4.3. Legitimacy and colonialism 17
    1.4.4. Religion and legitimacy 19
    1.4.5. Analyzing legitimacy 21
    1.4.6. Conclusion 22
    2. The Spanish Empire 24
    2.1. The international environment 24
    2.1.1. Colonial empires 27
    2.2. The configuration of the Empire 30
    2.2.1. A paternalistic structure 33
    2.3. Religion in the Spanish colonial system 36
    2.3.1. The missions as ‘frontier institutions’39
    2.4. The morality and legality of the conquest 43
    2.4.1. Francisco de Vitoria 47
    3. Religion and legitimacy in Spanish Formosa: the political level 51
    3.1. The power structure 51
    3.2. Reasons and justifications of the conquest 55
    3.2.1. The reasons for the conquest 55
    3.2.2. The Justification 62
    3.2.3. The idea of the ‘other’ 67
    3.3. Rituals and ceremonies 75
    4. Religion and Legitimacy in Spanish Formosa: the societal level 80
    4.1. The Indigenous views on the Spanish 80
    4.2. Frontier institutions 87
    4.2.1. Conversion 88
    4.2.2. Economic and political functions of the missions 91
    4.2.3. Civilization, hospitals, and schools 94
    4.3. Time and place differences 98
    4.4. Comparison with the Dutch colony 99
    5. Conclusion 101
    5.1. The state level 101
    5.2. The societal level 104
    5.3. Controversies between justifications and facts 106
    5.4. Final discussion and comments 108
    6. References 111

    Abernethy, David B. 2000. The Dynamics of Global Dominance: European Overseas Empires, 1415– 1980. Yale University Press. Pp 44-64.

    Alvares, Claudia. 2008. “New World Slavery: Redefining the Human.” Annali d’Italianistica, 2008, Vol. 26, Humanisms, Posthumanisms, & Neohumanisms. Arizona State University. Pp. 131-153.

    Álvarez, José María. 1930. Formosa geográfica e históricamente considerada. Barcelona, Luis Gili.

    Andrade, Tonio. 2008. How Taiwan Became Chinese: Dutch, Spanish, and Han Colonization in the Seventeenth Century. New York: Columbia University Press. Avialable at:
    http://www.gutenberg-e.org/andrade/andrade09.html Accessed: November 25 2020

    Arora, Satish K. 1970. “On Acquisition of Political Legitimacy.” Economic and Political Weekly. Jan., 1970, Vol. 5, No. 3/5. Economic and Political Weekly.

    Bannon, John Francis. 1979. “The Mission as a Frontier Institution: Sixty Years of Interest and Research.” Western Historical Quarterly, Jul., 1979, Vol. 10, No. 3. Oxford University Press. Pp. 303-322.

    Barnadas, Josep M. 1894. “The Catholic Church in Colonial Spanish America.” in Bethell, Leslie (ed.). The Cambridge History of Latin America, Volume 1. Cambridge University Press.

    Blanco, D. John. 2009. Frontier Institutions: Christianity and Colonial Empire in the Nineteenth-Century Philippines. University of California Press.

    Benton, Lauren. 2002. Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400-1900. Cambridge University Press.

    Berg, Carol. 1993. “Missionaries and Cultures.” U.S. Catholic Historian, Spring, 1993, Vol. 11, No.2, Evangelization and Culture, pp 29-36

    Beyers, Jaco. 2015. “Religion as a Political Instrument: The Case of Japan and South Africa.” Journal for the Study of Religion, Vol. 28. No. 1. Association for the Study of Religion in Southern Africa (ASRSA). Pp. 142-164.

    Bolton, Herbert E. 1917. “The Mission as Frontier Institution in the Spanish-American Colonies.” The American History Review. Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Historical Association. Vol. 23, No. 1 (Oct., 1917), pp. 42-61

    Borao Mateo, José Eugenio. 1992. “La llegada de Españoles a Isla Hermosa en el contexto del mito orientalista.” Encuentros en Catay, No 6, Fu-jen University, 1992, pp. 183-205. (Expanded version of a paper presented in the “3rd International Meeting on the Novo- Hispanic Presence in the Pacific Islands”, Taxco-Acapulco (Mexico), April 6-10, 1992).

    Borao Mateo, José Eugenio. 1992. “The Spanish Presence in Taiwan (1626-1642).” Bulletin of the Department of History of NTU 台大历史学报, No. 17, NTU, December 1992, pp. 315-330. (Expanded version of a paper presented in the “12th International Conference of IAHA”, Hong Kong, June 24-28, 1991).

    Borao Mateo, José Eugenio. 1993. “The aborigines of Northern Taiwan according to the 17th Spanish Sources.” In: Newsletter of Taiwan History Field Research, No 27, Academia
    Sinica, June 1993. (Expanded version of a paper presented in the “III Congreso Internacional de la Asociación Asiática de Hispanistas (AAH)”, Japan, 8-10 January 1993).

    Borao Mateo, José Eugenio. 1998. “The Catholic Dominican Missionaries in Taiwan, 1626-1642.” Proceedings of the International Symposium Christianity in Taiwan: Review of Historical Materials [臺灣基督教:史料與研究回顧國際學術研討會], Taipei: Chinese University and Cosmic Light, pp. 33-76.

    Borao Mateo, José Eugenio. 2000. “The Catholic Dominican Missionaries in Taiwan (1624- 1642).” Leuven Chinese Studies. Special Issue on Missionary Approaches and Linguistic in Mainland China and Taiwan. No. X, pp. 101-132.

    Borao Mateo, José Eugenio. 2001. Spaniards in Taiwan: Documents. Taipei SMC Publishing Incorporated.

    Borao Mateo, José Eugenio. 2004. “The ‘Justification’ of the Spanish Intrusion in Taiwan.”《文史哲學報》Humanitas Taiwanica (TA&HCI), No. 60, NTU, Taipei. Pp. 338-372.

    Borao Mateo, José Eugenio. 2005. “Some notes about the Misericordia of Isla Hermosa.” Review of Culture (Instituto Cultural do Governo da R.A.E. da Macau), No. 14, pp. 101-111.

    Borao Mateo, José Eugenio. 2009. “An overview of the Spaniards in Taiwan (1626-1642).” Proceedings of the International Conference on China and Spain during the Ming and Ching Dinasties《 明清時期的中國與西班牙國際學術研討會》(conference held on 30 Oct.-2 Nov. 2007), Centre of Sino-Western Cultural Studies, Istituto Politecnico de Macao. Pp.
    306 -328.

    Borao Mateo, José Eugenio. 2009. The Spanish Experience in Taiwan: 1626-1642: The Baroque Ending of a Renaissance Endeavor. SMC Publishing Inc. Taipei.

    Borao Mateo, José Eugenio. 2017. “The Formosa Catholic mission, 1626-1895.” In: Francis K.H. So; Beatrice K.F. Leung & Ellen Mary Mylod, Catholic Church in Taiwan: Birth, Growth and Development. Palgrave Macmillan Press. Pp. 15-38.

    Boucher, David. 2016. “Invoking a World of Ideas: Theory and Interpretation in the Justification of Colonialism.” Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, June 2016, Vol. 63, No. 147, Special Issue: ‘Empire and Economics’. Pp. 6-24

    Brennan, Edward J. 1958. “The Ideology of Imperialism: The Spanish Debates Regarding the Conquest of America, 1511-51.” Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, Spring, 1958, Vol. 47, No. 185. Messenger Publications. Pp. 66-82

    Chatterjee, Deen (ed.). 2011. Encyclopedia of Global Justice. Springer.

    Chiu, Hsin-hui. 2008. The Colonial ‘Civilizing Process’ in Dutch Formosa, 1624-1641. Brill Academy Pub. Leiden, Boston.

    Cooper, J. P. (ed.). 1971. The New Cambridge Modern History: Volume 4. The Decline of Spain and The Thirty Years War 1609-48/59. Cambridge University Press.

    Dussel, Enrique. 1995. The Invention of the Americas: Eclipse of “the Other” and the Myth of Modernity. The Continuum Publishing Company, New York.

    Dussel, Enrique. 2005. “Origen de la filosofía moderna: Las Casas, Vitoria y Suárez (1514-1617).” Caribbean Studies, Jul. – Dec., 2005, Vol. 33, No. 2. New Caribbean Philosophy. Institute of Caribbean Studies, UPR, Rio Piedras Campus. Pp. 35-80.

    Dwyer, Philip; Nettelbeck, Amanda. 2018. Violence, Colonialism and Empire in the Modern World. Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Edmonds, Ennis B; Gonzalez, Michelle. 2010. “Early Colonial Catholicism.” In Caribbean Religious History: An Introduction. NYU Press.

    Elliott, J. H. 1984. “Spain and America in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries” in Bethell, L. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Latin America, vol. 1, Cambridge
    University Press.

    Elliott, J. H. 1984. “The Spanish Conquest and Settlement of America” in Bethell, L. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Latin America, vol. 1, Cambridge University Press.

    Fannon, Franz. 1963. The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press.

    Fetzer, Joel S.; Soper, Christopher. 2014. “Church and State in Spanish Formosa.” Review of Religion and Chinese Society. Pepperdine University.

    Fraser, John. 1974. “Validating a Measure of National Political Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science, Feb., 1974, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Feb., 1974), pp. 117-134.

    Fujitani, James. 2019. “The Jesuit Hospital in the Religious Context of Sixteenth-Century Japan.” Japanese Journal of Regional Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1 (2019), pp. 79-102

    Galtung, Johan. 1969. “Violence, Peace, and Peace Research.” Journal of Peace Research. Aug., 1990, Vol. 27, No. 3. Sage Publicagions. Pp. 167-191.

    Galtung, Johan. 1990. “Cultural Violence.” Journal of Peace Research. Aug., 1969, Vol. 6, No.
    3. Sage Publicagions. Pp. 291-305.

    García Pérez, Rafael. 2015. “Revisiting the America’s Colonial Status Under the Spanish Monarchy” in New Horizons in Spanish Colonial Law. Contributions to Early Modern Legal History. Max Planck Institute for European Legal History.

    Goldberg, Mark Alan. 2016. “Conquering Sickness: Race, Health, and Colonization in the Texas Borderlands.” Borderlands and Transcultural Studies. University of Nebraska Press.

    Koskenniemi, Martti. 2011. “Empire and International Law: The Real Spanish Contribution.” The University of Toronto Law Journal, Winter 2011, Vol. 6, No. 1. University of Toronto Press. Pp. 1-36.

    Levene, Ricadro. 1951. Las Indias no eran colonial. Colección Austral, Espasa-Calpe, S.A.v.

    Lynch, John. 1981. Spain Under the Habsburgs. Vol. 2: Spain and America 1598-1700. New York: New York University Press.

    Lynch, John. 1991. Spain 1516-1598: From Nation State to
    World Empire. Oxford, U.K. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Maoz, Zeev; Henderson, Errol A. 2020. Scriptures, Shrines, Scapegoats, and World Politics: Religious Sources of Conflict and Cooperation in the Modern Era. University of Michigan Press.

    Mathes, Michael. 1990. “A Quarter Century of Trans-Pacific Diplomacy: New Spain and Japan, 1592-1617.” Journal of Asian History, Vol. 24, No. 1 (1990), pp 1-29

    Mathur, A. 1991. “Machiavellian Theory of the State.” The Indian Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 418-423.

    Meyer, Lukas H. 2009. Legitimacy, Justice, and Public International Law. Cambridge University Press.

    Moreno, Frank Jay. 1967. “The Spanish Colonial System: A Functional Approach.” The Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 20, No.2, Part 1. University of Utah on Behalf of the Western Political Association.

    Moyser, George. 1991. Politics and Religion in the Modern World. Routledge, London and New York.

    O’Neil, Patrick H. 2010. Essentials of comparative politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Osterhammel, Jürgen; Jansen, Jan C. 2012. Colonialismo: Historia, formas, efectos. Siglo XXI. Serie Historia.

    Peter, Fabienne. 2017. “Political Legitimacy.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/legitimacy>. Visited March 12 2021

    Price, Richard N. 2018. “The Psychology of Colonial Violence” in Dwyer, Philip; Nettelbeck, Amanda. Violence, Colonialism and Empire in the Modern World. Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Saavedra, Yvette J. 2018. “The Spanish Colonial Project.” Pasadena Before the Roses: Race, Identity, and Land Use in Southern California, 1771–1890. University of Arizona Press.

    Schwaller, John Frederick. 2011. “The History of the Catholic Church in Latin America: From Conquest to Revolution and Beyond.” NYU Press.

    Sheikh, Mona Kanwal. 2012. “How does religion matter? Pathways to religion in International Relations.” Review of International Studies, April 2012, Vol. 38, No. 2. Cambridge University Press, April 2012, Pp. 365- 392.

    Thomas, Christopher A. 2014. “The Uses and Abuses of Legitimacy in International Law.”Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Winter 2014, Vol. 34, No. 4 (Winter 2014), Oxford University Press. Pp. 729-758.

    Thornhill, Chris. 2011. “Political Legitimacy: A Theoretical Approach Between Facts and Norms.” Constellations Vol. 18, No. 2. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Oxford. Pp. 136-169.

    Young, Louise. 1998. Japan’s Total Empire: Manchuria and the Culture of Wartime Imperialism. Series: Twentieth Century Japan: The Emergence of a World Power. University
    of California Press.

    Valenzuela-Vermehren, Luis. 2013. “Empire, Sovereignty, and Justice in Francisco de Vitoria’s International Thought: A Re-Interpretation of “De Indis” (1532).” Revista Chilena de Derecho, Enero- Abril 2013, Vol. 40, No. 1. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Pp. 261-299.

    Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpreting Sociology. University of California Press, Second Edition. Pp. 31-38.

    Weigand, Florian. 2015. Investigating the role of legitimacy in the political order of conflict-torn
    spaces. Working papers, 04/15 (SiT/WP/04/15). Security in Transition, LSE, London, UK.

    QR CODE
    :::