| 研究生: |
許秋惠 Hsu,Chiu Hui |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
區域技術知識網絡與創新之研究 The study of the typology of regional technology knowledge network and innovation |
| 指導教授: | 邊泰明 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
社會科學學院 - 地政學系 Department of Land Economics |
| 論文出版年: | 2007 |
| 畢業學年度: | 95 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 105 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 技術知識網路 、創新網絡 、社會網絡理論 、網絡中心性 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | technology knowledge networks, UCINET |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:208 下載:335 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
製藥產業是高度依賴研究發展之產業,因此技術知識網絡在製藥產業中相當活躍,製藥產業因技術的突破,又可分為傳統製藥與生技醫藥兩個分支。本研究旨在探討我國製藥產業技術知識網路與創新績效之關係,透過文獻之探討,以社會網絡理論之觀點切入,利用網絡分析工具UCINET計算出廠商網絡中心性,藉由網絡中心性的分析與評估,尋找出台灣地區製藥產業技術知識網絡中的關鍵行動者。並且以網絡中心性來衡量個別廠商網絡關係的強弱及區分網絡的型態,研究區域內與跨區域網絡對廠商創新成效之影響。
研究結果發現,生技醫藥廠商跨區域合作互動情形愈高,對於創新績效愈有顯著性差異;傳統製藥產業則不論是區域內的合作或是跨區域的合作,皆能帶給其創新的能力,另外,不同的合作關係亦會影響其創新績效之表現,區域內的網絡較著重於直接網絡所帶來的系統性知識,而跨區域的網絡則著重於間接網絡中多樣化的知識。
As a knowledge intensive industry, pharmaceutical industry cultivates highly active networks among firms and relative actors. Because of technology revolution, Pharmaceutical is divided into two forms: traditional Pharmaceutical and Pharmaceutical biotechnology. This paper aims to advance our understanding of the technology knowledge and innovation capacity of the pharmaceutical industry in Taiwan. We begin by reviewing literatures regarding network and network position. Using the UCINET, a useful method to describe and measure firms’ centralities in a social network, we find out the key players in Taiwan Pharmaceutical industry and offers an emprical examination by examining the geography of technology knowledge associated with innovation in Taiwan Pharmaceutical industry.
The empirical results indicate that there is a significant relationship between intra-regional knowledge and innovation performance in Pharmaceutical biotechnology industry, and both intra-regional knowledge and regional knowledge determine the innovation performance of the pharmaceutical industry. Furthermore, Results of this study indicate that a firm that occupies a central position in regional network of direct ties is more accessible to useful knowledge; in the other hand, firms can innovate successfully in intra-regional network both directly and indirectly.
第一章 緒論...................................... 1
第一節 研究動機與目的..............................1
第二節 研究範圍與研究方法..........................4
第三節 研究架構與流程............................. 5
第二章 理論與文獻回顧............................. 9
第一節 網絡理論.................................. 9
第二節 網絡中心性................................. 16
第三節 跨區域網絡................................. 21
第三章 製藥產業現況分析.......................... 25
第一節 發展歷程與範圍............................. 25
第二節 發展特性.................................. 28
第三節 發展現況.................................. 35
第四章 研究設計.................................. 43
第一節 研究架構.................................. 43
第二節 研究方法--社會網絡分析法.................... 45
第三節 問卷設計與資料蒐集.......................... 53
第五章 實證分析.................................. 57
第一節 資料處理與樣本數統計........................ 57
第二節 製藥產業網絡結構分析........................ 65
第三節 迴歸分析.................................. 84
第六章 結論與建議................................. 95
第一節 結論...................................... 95
第二節 政策建議.................................. 98
第三節 後續研究建議.............................. 100
參考文獻........................................ 101
附錄一 製藥產業調查問卷………………………………………A-1
附錄二 問卷受訪之生技醫藥廠商………………………………A-2
附錄三 問卷受訪之傳統製藥廠商………………………………A-3
附錄四 相關之研究機構、大專院校及醫院……………………A-4
一、中文部份
1.方世杰、林麗娟、邱志芳,(2003),「參與研發聯盟廠商之知識創造與技術移轉績效—社會資本與經濟性互動之觀點」,『管理評論』,22(3);123-148。
2.李仁芳,(1997),「聚智分金--台灣企業技術網路建構之探討」,論文發表於〈第六屆產業管理研討會〉,東海大學。
3.李仁芳(1998),「產學研合作創新與國家競爭力」,『行政院國科會科學技術資料中心』,1~44。
4.吳心慈,(2000),「台灣生技製藥廠商之技術知識特質與技術網路之研究」,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士學位論文:台北。
5.吳思華,(1998),「知識流通對產業創新的影響」,論文發表於〈產業科技研討會論文集〉,台北,政大:2~42。
6.吳潁飛,(1994),「網絡基本觀念之探討」,『台灣經濟研究月刊』,17(10):19~20。
7.吳毓淳,(2002),「誰在八卦?一個社會網絡分析」,國立政治大學社會研究所碩士論文:台北。
8.徐進鈺、鄭陸霖,(2001),「全球在地化的地理學:跨界組織場域的統理」,『都市與計畫』,28(4):391~411。
9.財團法人生物技術開發中心,(2003),『生物科技產業年鑑』,台北:財團法人生物技術開發中心。
10.財團法人生物技術開發中心,(2005),『台灣生技產業名錄2005』,台北:財團法人生物技術開發中心。
11.財團法人生物技術開發中心,(2005),『醫藥產業年鑑2005』,台北:財團法人生物技術開發中心。
12.財團法人生物技術開發中心,(2006),『醫藥產業年鑑2006』,台北:財團法人生物技術開發中心。
13.黃仁德、姜樹翰,(2001),「我國生物科技產業的展望與區位的選擇」,『經濟情勢既評論』,7(1):90-119。
14.黃昱虹,(2006),「產業知識傳遞與空間外溢之研究—以台灣地區生物科技產業為例」,政治大學地政學系碩士班論文:台北。
15.黃楷茵,(2005),「網絡觀點下的策略群組同型化分析—以台灣集團企業為例」,國防大學碩士班論文:桃園。
16.許書銘,(2002),「產業網絡中心廠商在地化鑲嵌之研究」,東海大學企業管理學系碩士斑論文:台中。
17.張火燦、劉淑寧,(2002),「從社會網路理論探討員工知識分享」,『人力資源管理學報』,2(3):101-113。
18.經濟部技術處,(2004),『生技公司研發技術及產品成功商業化之策略』,台北:經濟部技術處。
19.經濟部工業局,(2003),『生技產業白皮書』,台北:經濟部工業局。
20.經濟部工業局,(2006),『台灣生技產業新興生技公司名錄』,台北:經濟部工業局。
21.蔡佩純,(2004),「區域創新系統下數位遊戲產業網絡之研究」,政治大學地政學系碩士班論文:台北。
22.劉士銘,(2005),「社會網絡、社會資本與知識創新關聯性之探討—網絡中心性與對偶互動觀點」,國防大學研究所碩士論文:桃園。
二、外文部分
1.Adler, P. S. and Kwon Seok-Woo (2002), “Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept”, Academy of Management Review,27: 17-40.
2.Ahuja, G. (2000), “Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: a Longitudinal Study”,Administrative Science Quarterly,45:425-455.
3.Ambrosio, E. M.(1995), “Technological Management and Transfer of Technology” , International Journal Technology Management,10: 687-703.
4.Arora, A. and Gambarella, A.(1994), “Evaluating technological information and utilizing it, Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology” , Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,24:91-114.
5.Badaracco, J. L. (1991), “The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete through Strategic Alliances” Boston: Harved Business School Presss.
6.Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. (2004),”Cluster and Knowledge : local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation” , Progress in Human Geography,28:31-56.
7.Borgatti, S.P. and Everett, M.G.(1999),”Models of core/periphery structures”, Social Networks 21(4):375-395.
8.Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. and Freeman, L. C.(2002), ”Ucinet 6 for Windows” , Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
9.Buchel, B. and Raub, S. (2002),"Building knowledge-creating value networks", European Management Journal, 20(6):587-596.
10.Burt, R. (1992), ”Structural holes: The Social Structure off Competition ”, Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
11.Chiesa, V. and Toletti,G.(2004),”Network of Collaborations for Innovation : The Case of Biotechnology” , Technology Analysis and Strategic Management,16:73-96.
12.Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D.(1990),”Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation “, Administrative Science Quarterly,35:128-152.
13.Ding, H. B. (2003), “innovation and network: the impact of inial conditions on interfirm network formation of entrepreneurial firms”, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Management, Renesselaer Polytechnic Institute, New York.
14.Fontes, M. (2005),”Distant Networking: The Knowledge Acquistion Stragegies of ‘Out-cluster’ Biotechnology Firms”, European Planning Studies,13(6):899-920.
15.Freeman, L. C. (1979),”Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification”,Social Networks, 1:245-239.
16.Gay,B. and Dousset,B.(2005),”Innovation and network structural dynamics : Study of alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry” , Research Policy,34:1457-1475.
17.Gertler,M. S. and Levitte,Y.M.(2005),”Local Nodes in Global Networks : The Geography of Knowledge Flows in Biotechnology Innovation” , Industry and Innovation,12:487-507.
18.Gilsing,V. and Nooteboom,B(2005),” Density And Strength Of Ties In Innovation Networks: An Analysis Of Multimedia And Biotechnology” ,European Management Review,2:179-197
19.Granovetter, M. S.(1973),”The strength of weak ties” , American Journal of Sociology,78:1360-1380.
20.Griliches, Z. (1990),”Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, 27:1661-1707.
21.Hagedoorn, J. and Schakenraad, J.(1990),”Inter-firm partnerships and co-operative in core technologies” , New Explorations in the Economics of Technical Change. Eds. By Freeman,C. and Soete, L. London: Pinter.
22.Hagedoorn,J. and Cloodt,M.(2003),”Measuring innovation performance : is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?” Research Policy,13:671-686.
23.Hansen, M. T. (1999),”The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization aubunits”,Administrative Science Quarterly,44:82-111.
24.Hanneman, R. A. (1998),”Introduction to Social Network.”Available at http://wizard.ucr.edu/~rhannema/networks/nettext.pdf
25.Lewis, J. D. (1990),“Partnerships for Profit—Structuring and Management Strategic Alliance”,New York: The Free Press.
26.Malmberg, P. and Maskell,A. (1999), “Localized learning and infustrial competitiveness”,Cambrige Journal of Economics,23:167-185.
27.Martin, T. Vision and Nauwelaers, C.(2004),”Innovation Networks”, from Forfas, Dublin, on the World Wide Web: http://www.forfas.ie/publications/forfas040624/webopt/forfas040624_innovation_networks_webopt.pdf
28.Niosi, J. (2002),”Alliances are not enough explaining rapid growth in biotechnology firms”, Rearch Policy,32:737-750.
29.Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H.(1995),”The Knowledge-Creating Company” , NewYork:Oxford University Press,Inc.
30.OECD.(1996),”The Knowledge-based economy”, Paris:Author.
31.Oerlemans, L., Meeus, M, and Boekema, F.(2000), “Innovation and proximity: theoretical perspectives”, 17-45 in Industrial networks and proximity, edited by Green, M and McNaughton, R., Hampshire: Ashgate.
32.Owen-Smith, J and Powell, W. W. (2004),”Knowledge networks as channels and conduits:The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community” , Organization science,15:5-21.
33.Polanyi, M.(1967),”The tacit dimension” ,London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
34.Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W. and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996), ”Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology” , Administrative Science Quarterly, 41:116-146.
35.Rank, C., Rank, O. and Wald, A. (2005),” Integrated Vs Core-Periphery Structures In Regional Biotechnology Networks” , Europent Management Journal,24:73-85
36.Salman, N.(2002),”Networks and innovation : a social network analysis of biotechnology collaboration” , MSc.Thesis,John Molson School of Business,Concordia University,Montreal,Canada,70p.
37.Salman, N. and Saives, A.L.(2005),” Indirect Networks : An Intangible Resource For Biotechnology Innovation” , R&D Management,35:203-215.
38.Scott, J. (1991),”Social Network Analysis: A handbook”, London.
39.Schumpeter, J.A. (1942), “Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy”, New York:Harper Press.
40.Soresen, J.B., Stuart, T.E., (2000),”Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly,45(1):81-112.
41.Staber,U.(2001),”The Structure of Networks in Industrial District” , International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25:537-55.
42.Stock, G.N., Greis, N.P., Fischer, W.A., (2002),”Firm size and dynamic technological innovation” , Technovation, 22:537-549.
43.Tsai, W. (2001),”Knowledge Transfer In Interorganizational Networks: Effects Of Network Position And Absorptive Capacity On Business Unit Innovation And Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 44:996-1004
44.Tether, B. S. (2002),”Who co-operates for innovation, and why An empirical analysis”, Reasearch Policy, 31: 947-967.
45.Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994),”Social network analysis: Methods and applications” , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.