一般企業總以銷售量來衡量廣告的效果，但影響銷售量的因素很多，廣告只是其中之一，因此，用這種方式是不合理的，然而究竟廣告的效果要如何衡量才具信度及效度。如果能夠作好廣告效果測試即能夠預知顧客喜愛傾向，以便抓住大眾心理，保證能夠瞄準目標市場，贏得市場勝仗，為本研究之動機。從過去文獻的探討與整理，建立廣告效果測試觀念性架構為基礎，本研究的研究目的有三。其一，以個案公司為例，探究業界對廣告效果測試的方式與本研究之架構作比對；其二，探討廣告之階段性效果是否存在；其三，探討不同的廣告策略下，廣告效果測試所扮演的角色。本研究所採行之研究方法，在研究性質方面採屬質性，在推論方法上採取先建架構之演繹法，在樣本數量屬小量觀察，因此研究重點在於針對個案公司進行深度訪談。

本研究提供了一套完整的架構來探討廣告效果，從創意測試、腳本測試、廣告前測試、廣告後測試、追蹤測試、銷售效果測試都沒有遺漏，簡單的說就是，從廣告的概念一直到廣告播出前及播出之後，每一細節均必須測定效果，因此可以用這個架構來檢試廣告效果之測試過程是否有不足的地方；企業界可以藉著這個架構來測試自己所打出的廣告是否「有效」，另一方面亦提供了策略上的修訂準則，企業界將可以明確瞭解在廣告方面的問題所在。

所選擇的個案分別為「77乳加－接力賽篇」、「新貴派－人狗共鳴篇」、「麗星郵輪」、「富士軟片－酷龍篇」等四支廣告。以觀念性架構中的「消費者特質」以及「產品特質」的差異性為個案選擇構面，在此以「涉入程度」為縱軸，「廣告目標群眾分散程度」為橫軸，由此兩個構面構成四個象限。分別為涉入程度高/廣告目標群眾集中、涉入程度低╱廣告目標群眾集中、涉入程度高╱廣告目標群眾分散、涉入程度低/廣告目標群眾分散等四群。

研究結果發現，目標群眾愈集中，產品涉入程度愈高，所訂定的廣告目標愈明確；目標群眾愈集中，廣告效果測試的指標中，測量「態度」指標的數量愈多。涉入程度愈低的產品，消費者是否購買的決定因素愈傾向於高品牌知名度；低涉入度產品的電視廣告接觸率，較高涉入產品的電視廣告接觸率高。廣告目標群眾如果太分散，會使廣告訴求對象不明確。

It’s usually used to measure advertising effect by increasing sales in business, but it has a lot of factors to influence increasing sales. Advertising is one of them. Therefore, it is not reasonable. However, we should know how to measure advertising effect. If we can measure advertising effect much better, we will understand thinking of consumers and hit the target market. There are three purposes in this research. First, it will research how to measure advertising effect and compare to this framework. Second, it will research advertising stage effect. Final, it will research advertising effect in different advertising strategies. This research uses qualitive analysis and deductive method.

These cases are “77chocolate”, ”upstare pie”, ”beautiful star liner”, ”fuji film”. Using consumer’s characterlistics and product characterlistics to sort out. They are “high involvement/target consumers focus”, ”high involvement/target consumers disperse”, ”low involvement/target consumers focus”, and ”low involvement/target consumers disperse”.

This research provides a complete framework to compare advertising effect. It concludes “creating test”, ”script test”, ”pre-broadcast test”, ”post-broadcast test”, “tracking test”, and “sales test”. It must be tested in every step. Companies can test his advertisement by this framework. On the other hand, it provides a base on making strategies.

　This research finds that target consumers have more high focus and involvement, then making clearer advertising goals. Target consumers more high focus, then having more attitude index. Well-known brands makes consumers to make choice to buy products of low involvement. Products of low involvement have higher TV reaching rate then products of high involvement. Disperse advertising goals will make advertising appeal indeterminately.

中文部分
1.王志剛及謝文雀編譯（1995），消費者行為學，初版，台北：華泰。譯自James F.Engel, Roger D.Blackwell, and Paul W.Miniard(1994)。
2.周文賢（1998），行銷管理－市場分析與策略規劃，初版，台北：智勝。
3.周文賢（2001），多變量統計分析－SAS之應用，初版，台北：智勝。
4.周文賢及高滋芬（1993），市場分析與廣告策略研擬，初版，台北：華泰。
5.林紫玲譯（1989），有效的廣告法，初版，台北：暖流，譯自川勝久等（1988）。
6.邱莉玲（1999），廣告陽謀，初版，台北：時報。
7.洪順慶（2000），行銷管理，初版，台北：新陸。
8.祝鳳岡（1995），「廣告感性訴求策略」，廣告學研究，第5期，1995年1月。
9.祝鳳岡（1996），「廣告理性訴求策略」，廣告學研究，第8期，1996年7月。
10.梁文傑（1992），「訊息正反性、資訊來源可信度與訊息涉入對廣告效果關係之研究」，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
11.郭大仕（1997），「廣告訴求對消費者認知與態度的影響－以大台北學生為例」，國立政治大學企業管理研究究所碩士論文。
12.郭貞譯（1997），廣告目標與效果測定，初版，台北：滾石文化，譯自Solomon Dutka(1961)。
13.陳韶琪及鄭淑芬譯1991），AR廣告效果測定，初版，台北：朝陽堂，譯自日經廣告研究所（1991）。
14.黃志文（1994），市場調查，初版，台北：華泰。
15.黃俊英（1999），行銷學，初版，台北：商周，譯自Charles D.Schewe and Alexander W.Hiam(1998)。
16.楊正華（1989），「廣告影片效果與重覆收視行為相關研究」，國立中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
17.楊忠川譯（1997），廣告何時有效，初版，台北：滾石文化，譯自John Philip Jones(1997)。
18.樊志育（1980），廣告效果研究，初版，台北：三民。
19.樊志育（1999），廣告效果測定技術，台北：三民。
20.簡貞玉譯（1996），消費者行為學，初版，台北：五南，譯自Del I.Hawkins, Roger J.Best, and Kenneth A. Coney(1995)。
21.顏伯勤（1990），廣告學，第3版，台北：三民。
22.羅文坤及鄭英傑（1993），廣告學－策略與創意，初版，台北：華泰。
英文部分
23.Appel,D.W.(1971), “On Advertising Wearout” Journal of Advertising Research Vol.11 No.1, 1971, P.11-13.
24.Atkinson, R. C., and R. M. Shiffrin (1986), “The Control of Short-Term Memory, ” Scientific American, Vol.224, p.82-91.
25.Batra, R. and M. Holbrook(1987), ”Assessing the Role of Emotions as Mediators of Consumer Responses to Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.14, p.404-420.
26.Bogen B.(1997), Some Educational Lmplications of Hemispheric Specialization,.New Youk:Prentice-hall, pp.132.
27.Colley D.(1961) , Defining Advertising Goals for Measured Advertising Results, NY:Prentice Hall.
28.Dennis H.G.(1970)”Media Factor:Areview Article”Journal of Marketing Research Vol.7 ,May 1970.
29.Edward,C.S.(1974)”The Use at Field Experimental Observation in Estimating Advertising”Journal of Advertising Research, Vol 7, May 1974.
30.Engel. B.(1995), Consumer Behavior , NY: Dryden Press.
31.Flynn, L. R., and R. E. Goldsmith (1993), “Application of the Personal Involvement Inventory in Marketing, ”Psychology and Marketing, Vol.10 No.4, p.357-366.
32.Furse,D.H. (1984),”A Typology of Individual Search Strategies Among Purchases of New Automobiles,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.10 No.3, pp.417-431.
33.Gardner R.(1985),”Dpes Attitude Toward the AD ffect Brand Attitude Under a Brand Evaluation set? ”Journal of Marketing Research Vol .22, May 1985, p.192-198.
34.Grass R.C. and Wallace W.H.(1969), “Satiation Effects of TV Commercials” Journal of Advertising Research,P3-9.
35.Haskins J.B.(1970), “Factual Recall as a Measure of Advertising Effectiveness, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.15, p.4-14.
36.Hirschman E. C.(1986). "The Experiential Aspects of Consumption：Consumer Fantasies, Feeling and Fun", Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.9, p.132-140.
37.Hornik, J. (1984).“Subjective versus objective time measures: A note on the perception of time in consumer behavior.” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.11, p.615-618.
38.Howard A.(1977), Consumer Behavior: Application of Theory. NY:McGraw-Hill Book Company.
39.Howard A.J.(1957), Marketing, NY: Richar D Inwin Inc. P. 327.
40.Kotler P.(1995), Marketing Management: Analysis, planning and control, 8th. ,ed. ,Englewood Cliffs ,NJ: Prentice-Hall.
41.Krugman P(1968), “Proceses underlying Exposure to Exposure”, American Psycholoyist. Vol.l No.23 p.245-253.
42.Krugman P.(1972) ”Why Three Exposure May bhe Enough” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.5, Nov.1957.
43.Krugman P.(1973)Exposure or Perception, NY:Association of National Advertisers , Mar. 1973.
44.Lavidge R(1961)” Better Field Study Quality Urged by Researcher, Client-"Recruiting, Control, Pay Must Improve” Marketing News, Vol.12 No.5, p.1-13.
45.Lavidge, R (1961).“A Model for Predictive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness.”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.25 No.4.
46.Lutz, Richard J.(1985), "Changing Brand Attitudes Through Modification of Cognitive Structure", Journal of Consumer Research,Vol.1 No.4, p49-59.
47.Marplan T.A.(1967), “Quest for Boredom”, TV Age , Vol.11 No.18.,1967.
48.Mittal B.(1985), Theory of Involvement inConsumer Behavior Problems and Issues, J. N.: Jai Press, Inv., pp.220-223.
49.Mittal H.S.(1986)”The Relative Role of Brand Beliefs and Attitude Toward the Ad as Mediators of Brand Attitude ”,Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.10, Sep. 1986 ,p.135-146.
50.Ogilvy, D(1979), ” Research on Advertising Techniques That Work And That Caples, J.” Measuring the Effectiveness of Ads by Opinion Tests”, Direct Marketing , Vol.41 No11 p.134-135.
51.Ogilvy, D.(1982), ” Attacks Establishment Advertising Practice”, Marketing Times, v29n4, p.16-20.
52.Petty, R. E., and J. T. Cacioppo(1981), “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement, ” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.102, p.135-146.
53.Politz,A., “Things To Know About Research And Excess Power of Large Groups”, Advertising Age, Vol.45 No.44, p59-60.
54.Ray A.(1973), “Marketing communication and the Hierarchy of effects”, New Model for Mass Communciation Research, Vol.2 2ed., CA: Sage, p.147-176.
55.Vaughn Tay,(1980) "Multimedia: Making It Work", How Advertising Works: A Planning Model Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 20, No.5, 1980, pp. 27-33.
56.Wagner L.C.(1914),”Advertising and Business Cycle”, Journal of Marketing, Vol 8 , Oct 1914, P.124-135.
57.Wagner, L C.(1968), “Advertising and Business Cycle”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.8, No.2, Oct. 1968.
58.Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1986), “ Conceptualizing Involvement,” Journal of Advertising, Vol.15, p.4-14.