| 研究生: |
陳惠邦 |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
自我設限與行為歸因 |
| 指導教授: | 陳皎眉 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
理學院 - 心理學系 Department of Psychology |
| 論文出版年: | 1990 |
| 畢業學年度: | 78 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 75 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:188 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
自我設限( Self - handicap )是指個人在面臨可能威脅自尊的情境時,為了避免失敗損及自尊,而故意造成障礙或陷自己於不利情境的行為。根據研究發現:以往有關自我設限的研究大都集中在影響自我設限發生的相關情境變項或個人變項上,但對於二者之間的統整性研究較為缺乏。其次,自我設限的重要意義在於個人對其行為的解釋,而對於自我設限與行為歸因之關係也仍缺乏實徵研究。
本研究旨在探討自我設限的行為傾向與有無自我設限線索的情境變項對自我設限行為的影響,以及自我設限的行為傾向、情境、回饋變項對事後歸因的影響。研究受試來自台北市成功及景美高中共160人。研究工具包括研究者設計的假智力測驗、修訂完成之自我設限量表以及測量歸因情形之歸因量表等。有關自我設限行為的部分為2 (傾向變項) x 2 (情境變項)獨立設計,其中傾向變項係以自我設限量表事先篩選,情境變項係由實驗者操弄指導語所形成。測量的依變項為受試作練習題的時間。接著在有關歸因情形的研究中,研究者在受試作完測驗之後,再繼續操弄不同的回饋,形成2 (傾向變項) x 2 (情境變項) x 2 (回饋變項)獨立設計。依變項的測量為受試在歸因量表上的分數。
研究結果發現:在「練習會影響成績」(有自我設限線索)情境之下,高傾向的受試最容易以不足的練習時間作為自我設限的策略。在事後也傾向於以練習時間的不足作為主要的歸因因素,尤其是在獲致失敗回饋時為然。這是一種自我保護的歸因現象。可是如果受試獲得成功的回饋,則以「平時的努力」、「真實的智力」作為自我擴充的歸因因素。
當受試獲知練習和成績無關時,受試不會以「練習不夠」作為自我設限的策略。受試並且轉向「情緒或心情」、「難易度」、「運氣」等不可控制的或外在的歸因。另外具有高度自我設限傾向的後試傾向於把行為歸因於不穩定的因素(如情緒、運氣) ;他們在有自我設限線索的情境中獲致失敗回饋時,則會把失敗結果歸因於其自我設限(練習不足)。相對的,低傾向者則傾向於把行為歸因於較穩定而內在的因素。最後,研究結果也顯示有自利偏差的現象,亦即獲得成功回饋者作較多的真實的智力、平時的努力等內在歸因;而獲失敗回饋者則作較多的練習因素、以及難易度、運氣等外在歸因。
本研究結果釐清了自我設限對行為歸因的影響,對於自我設限的兩種動機一一自我保護與自我擴充也提供了實徵上的支持。
第一章 緒論.................... 1
第二章 文獻探討....................5
第一節 自我設限的意義.................... 5
第二節 自我設限的類別....................10
第三節 自我設限與歸因....................14
第四節 理論架構與研究假設....................18
第三章 研究方法.................... 22
第一節 受試.................... 22
第二節 研究工具.................... 23
第三節 實驗過程....................25
第四章 研究結果.................... 30
第一節 實驗操弄檢驗....................30
第二節 自我設限的行為....................31
第三節 傾向、情境、回饋變項對歸因的影響.................... 34
第五章 討論與結論.................... 44
第一節 討論.................... 44
第二節 結論與建議.................... 49
參考文獻....................52
附錄....................58
附錄一自我設限研究文獻之分類....................59
附錄二自我設限問卷(學校生活問卷)....................60
附錄三本研究所使用假「智力測驗」 ....................62
附錄四歸因問卷....................75
朱瑞玲(民77 ) 。中國人的社會互動,論面子的問題。見楊國樞主編:中國人的心理,台北,桂冠圖書公司,頁239-288 。
李明堂(民76 )。歸因的測量。測驗與輔導, 94 期,頁1855 - 1858。
劉佑星(民74 )。國民小學視覺障礙學生自我觀念,成就動機與生活適應之研究。 見中華民國特殊教育學會年刊:展望新世紀的特殊教育。頁571-578 。
韓幼賢(民73 )編譯:變態心理學與現代生活,第三版,台北市中央圖書供應社。
Arkin, R.M., & Baumgardner, A. H. (1985). Self-handicapping,In J. H. Harvey and G. Weary ( Eds),Attribution: Basic issues and applications (pp. 169 - 202). New York: Academy Press.
Baumeister, R. F., & Scher, S. J. (1988). Self – defeating behavior patterns among normal individuals: Reviewand analysis of common self - destructive tendencies.Psychological Bulletin, 104, 3 - 22.
Baumgardner, A. H., Lake, E.A., & Arkin, R. M. ( 1985 ) .Claiming mood as a self - handicap: The influence of spoiled and unspoiled public identities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, II, 349 - 357.
Berglas, S., & Jones, E. E. (1978 ) . Drug choice as a self-handicapping stratege in response to noncontigent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,36, 405 - 417.
Bernstein, V?.,1. M., Stephan,W. G., & Davis, M. H. (1979 ) .Explaining attributions for achievement: A path analytic approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1810-182l.
Bradley, G. W. (19718 ) . Self - serving biases In the attributional process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56 - 7l.
DeGree, C. E., & Snyder, C. R. (1985). Adler’s Psychology of use today: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1512 - 1519.
Frankel, A. & Snyder, M. L. (1978). Poor performance following unsolvable problems: Learned helplessness or egotism. Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 1415 - 1423.
Greenberg, ]. (1983). Difficult goal choice as a self -handicapping strategy. Unpublish manuscript,Ohio Ote University, Columbus, OH.
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Paisley, C. (1985). The effect of extrinsic incentives on the use of test anxiety as an anticipatory attributional defense: Playing it coll when the stakes are high. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,47, 1136-1145.
Handelsman, M. M., Kraiger, K., & King, C. S. (1985). Self -handicapping by task choice: An attribute ambiguity analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, AZ.
Harris, R. N., & Snyder, C. R. (1986). The role of uncertain self - esteem in self - handicapping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 451 - 458.
Higgins, R. L., & Harris, R. N. ( 1988 ). Strategic alcohol use:Drinking to self - handicap. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 191 - 202.
Jones, E. E., & Berglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self - handicapping strategies:The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 200- 206.
Jones, E. E., & Rhodewalt, F. (1982). Self – handicapping Scale. Department of Psychology, Princeton University and University of Utah.
Kelly, H. H. (1971). Attributions in social interaction.Morristown, N J: General Learning Press.
Koditz, T. A., & Arkin, R. M. (1982). An in1pression management interpretation of the self - handicapping strategy.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 492 -502.
Leary, M. R., & Shepperd, J. A. (1986). Behavioral self-handicaps versus self - reported handicaps: A conceptual note. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1265 - 1268.
Mayerson, N. H., & Rhodewalt, F. (1988). The role of self -protective attributions in the experience of pain.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 203 - 218.
Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (1983). Determinants of reductions in intended effort as a strategy for coping with anticipated failure. Journal of Research In Personality, 17, 412 - 422.
Rhodewalt, F. (1988). Self - handicappers: Individual difference in the preference for anticipatory self – protective acts. A chapter to appear in R. L. Higgins and C. R.Snyder (Eds.), Self - handicapping: The Paradox That Isn't. New York: Plenum. (in press)
Rhodewa]t, F., & Davison, J., (1986). Self – handicapping and subsequent performance: Role of outcome valence and attributional certainty. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 307 - 323.
Rhodewalt, F., Saltzman, A. T., & Wittmer, J., (1984). Self -handicapping among competitive athletes: The role of practice in self - esteem protection. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 197 - 209.
Rhodewalt, F., Strube, M. J., Hil1, C. A., & Sansone, C. (1988). Strategic self - attribution and Type A behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 60 - 74.
Sn1ith, T. W., Snyder,C. R., & Handelsman, M. M. (1982). On the self - serving function of an accademic wooden leg:Test anxiety as a self - handicapping strategies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 314 -321.
Smith, T. W., Snyder,C. R., & Perkins, S. C. (1983). The self - serving function of hypochondriacal complaints:Physical symtoms as self - handicapping strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 787 -797.
Snyder, C. R., & Smith, T. Al. (1982). Syn1toms as self-handicapping strategies: The virtues of old wine in a new bottle. In G. Weary and H. L. Mirels (Eds.), Integrations of clinical and social Psychology (pp.l04-127). New York: Oxford University Press.
Snyder, C. R., Sn1ith, T. W., Augelli, R.W., & Ingram, R. E. (1985 ). ON the self - serving function of social anxiety:Shyness as a self - handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 970 - 980.
Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1985). Self – handicapping as a self - presentational response to success and failure: The role of self - esteem. Paper presented at the meeting of the midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago,IL.
Tucker, J. A., Vuchinich, R.E., & Sobel, M. (1981). Alcohol comsumption as a self - handicapping strategy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 220 - 230.
Weidner, G. ( 1980). Self - handicapping following learned helplessness treatment and the Type A coronoryprone behavior pattern. Journal of sychosomatic Research, 24, 319 - 325.
Weiner, B. ( 1979). Theory of motivation for some classroom expenences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3 - 25.
(限達賢圖書館四樓資訊教室A單機使用)