| 研究生: |
陳玠安 Chen, Jie-An |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
房屋稅有效稅率對建物價格之影響—以台北市萬華區為例 The Impact of the Effective House Tax Rate on House Prices: Evidence from Wanhua District, Taipei. |
| 指導教授: |
吳文傑
Wu, Wen-Chieh |
| 口試委員: |
林子欽
韓幸紋 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
社會科學學院 - 財政學系 Department of Public Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2019 |
| 畢業學年度: | 107 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 39 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 房屋稅 、房價 、分量迴歸 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | house tax, house prices, quantile regression |
| DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU201900335 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:333 下載:11 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文旨在探討房屋稅有效稅率對於建物價格(分離土地價格後之房價)的影響。本文研究對象鎖定台北市萬華區總層數為四或五層樓之房屋。與多數國內文獻不同的是,本文利用房屋實價登錄資料以及 2018 年房屋稅稅籍資料,兩份資料進行配對,進而得出包含稅額及房價之樣本共 1043 筆。除了透過OLS迴歸模型觀察房屋稅有效稅率及其他與房屋特性相關之解釋變數對被解釋變數—建物價格之影響外,另也透過分量迴歸(Quantile Regression),檢視各解釋變數對於不同分量之建物價格有何不同的邊際影響。
實證結果發現,房屋稅有效稅率對建物價格有顯著負向影響,即有財產稅資本化之情形發生。由分量迴歸結果可知,房屋稅有效稅率對於0.1、0.25、0.5、0.75、0.9五個價格分量皆有顯著負向影響,然而隨著分量愈高,房屋稅有效稅率對價格的負向影響越小。
The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of the effective tax rate on house prices (prices without land value). The research object is the houses in the Wanhua District of Taipei City with four or five floors. Different from most previous domestic literatures, this paper uses the actual selling price of house registration data and the 2018 house tax information of Taipei City, and the two data are paired. In turn, a total of 1043 samples including tax and house prices were obtained. In addition to observing the effect of effective tax rate and other explanatory variables related to housing characteristics on house prices through the OLS regression model, we examine the marginal effect of each independent variable on house prices under certain quantile through quantile regression.
The empirical results show that the effective tax rate of house tax has a significant negative effect on the house prices, that is, the capitalization of property tax occurs. According to the results of quantile regression, the effective tax rate of housing tax has a significant negative impact on the price quantiles of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 0.9. However, the higher the quantile, the smaller the negative effect of the effective tax rate on house prices.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究方法 3
第三節 研究限制 4
第四節 研究架構 4
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 特徵價格模型 5
第二節 財產稅資本化 6
第三節 Amenity Models 10
第三章 研究設計 12
第一節 資料配對方法 12
第二節 計量模型設定 15
第三節 變數與預期符號 18
第四章 資料來源 21
第一節 資料來源 21
第二節 樣本限制—台北市房屋實價登錄資料 21
第三節 樣本限制—台北市房屋稅籍資料 22
第四節 敘述統計 22
第五章 實證結果 26
第一節 模型檢定 26
第二節 實價登錄資料之迴歸結果 27
第三節 配對後資料之迴歸結果 29
第四節 穩健性測試 33
第六章 結論與建議 35
第一節 結論 35
第二節 建議 36
第七章 參考文獻 37
第一節 英文文獻 37
第二節 中文文獻 39
林秋瑾、楊宗憲、張金鵬(1996),「住宅價格指數之研究-以台北市為例」,住宅學報,第4期,頁1-30。
張金鶚、范垂爐(1993),「房地產真實交易價格之研究」,住宅學報,第1期,頁75-97。
黃佳鈴、張金鶚(2005),「從房地價格分離探討地價指數之建立」,台灣土地研究,8(2),頁73-106。
彭建文、吳森田、吳祥華(2007),「不動產有效稅率對房價影響分析-以台北市大同區與內湖區為例」。臺灣土地研究,第10卷第2期,P49-66
Brasington, D. M. (2001), “Capitalization and Community Size,” Journal of Urban Economics, 50, 385-395.
Church, A. M. (1974), “Capitalization of the Effective Property Tax Rate on Single Family Residences,” National Tax Journal, 27(1), 113-122.
Edel, M. and Sclar, E. (1974), “Taxes, Spending, and Property Values: Supply Adjustment in a Tiebout-Oates Model,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82, No. 5, pp. 941-954.
Goodman, A. C. (1983), “Capitalization of Property Tax Differentials within and among Municipalities,” Land Economics, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 211-219.
Guilfoyle, J (2000), “The Effect of Property Taxes on Home Values,” Journal of Real Estate Literature: 2000, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 109-127.
Hyman, D. and Pasour, E. C. (1973), “Real Property Taxes, Local Public Services and Residential Property Values,” Southern Economic Journal, April, 601-611.
Johnson, M.S. and Lea, M.J. (1982), “Differential Capitalization of Local Public Service Characteristics,” Land Economics, Vol. 58, No. 2 (May, 1982), pp. 189-203.
King, A. T. (1977), “Estimating Property Tax Capitalization: A Critical Comment,” Journal of Political Economy, 85, 425-431.
Meadows, G. R. (1976), “Taxes, Spending, and Property Values: A Comment and Further Results,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 84, No. 4, Part 1, pp. 869-880.
Oates, W. E. (1969), “The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 77(6), pp.957-971.
Palmon, O. and Smith, B. A. (1998a), “A New Approach for Identifying the Parameters of a Tax Capitalization Model,” Journal of Urban Economics, 44, 299-316.
Palmon, O. and Smith, B. A. (1998b), “Confirmations and Contractions: New Evidence on Property Tax Capitalization,” Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 1099-1111.
Reinhard, R. M., “Estimating property tax capitalization: A further comment,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 89, No. 6, pp. 1251-1260.
Richardson, D. H. and Thalheimer, R. (1981), “Measuring the Extent of Property Tax Capitalization for Single Family Residences,” Southern Economic Journal, 47 (3): 674-89.
Pollakowski, H.O. (1973), “The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: A Comment and Further Results,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, No. 4, pp. 994-1003.
Wales, T. J. and Wiens, E. G. (1974), “Capitalization of Residential Property Taxes: An Empirical Study,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 329-333.
Yinger, J. (1988), Property Taxes and House Values: the Theory and Estimation of Intrajurisdictional Property Tax Capitalization.