| 研究生: |
陳威\旭 |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
Studies on the Business and Financial Strategy of Global Companies with Diversified Businesses |
| 指導教授: | 林基煌 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration(EMBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2006 |
| 畢業學年度: | 93 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 奇異 、多角化 、跨國企業 、財務策略 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | GE, Diversification, Globalization, Financial Strategy |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:87 下載:37 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
N/A
In the previous academic studies, there are different views on the pros and cons for diversified firms and focus firms. On the other hand, most of previous works show that going to globalization is quite a definite trend and able to generate values for its shareholders. Both topics are especially critical for contemporary multi-business multinational firms, of which GE is a very typical example.
In this study, we intend to conduct comprehensive analysis of the business and financial strategy that GE uses to grab deeper understanding of how a globally diversified company should leverage its competitive advantages to pursue growth and great performance. We also provide our views on some of the potential issues for firms like GE and recommend some measures to be done to make those companies more financially sound.
From the result of our case study, we primarily conclude that diversification is good if the company can leverage the power of its various businesses and use the resources of one business to support the others in a reasonable manner. It is also crucial that the diversified firm should do its best to maintain its transparency to the outsiders to remove their concerns about information asymmetry. Furthermore, from the case of GE, it is also suggested that globalization should do a company with the scale like GE’s more good than harm. Going globally is actually an inevitable direction for most of the companies in the future.
Chapter 1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………. 4
1.1 Research Motivation………………………………………………………... 4
1.2 Research Objectives………………………………………………………… 5
1.3 Methodology……………………………………………………………….. 6
1.3.1 Review and Analysis on Secondary Sources………………………………. 6
1.3.2 Competitive Forces Analysis………………………………………………. 6
1.3.3 Case Study – Using GE as an Example…………………………………… 6
1.3.4 Comparative Financial Analysis of GE with the Benchmarked Company… 7
1.3.5 Interview with GE’s Senior Executives…………………………………… 7
1.4 Conceptual Structure………………………………………………………. 9
1.5 Limitations………………………………………………………………… 11
Chapter 2 Literature Review…………………………………………………………. 12
2.1 Diversified Companies vs. Focused Companies – Trend in the Industry
and Theories Developed………………………………………………….. 12
2.2 Globalization of Companies and the Trend………………………………. 17
Chapter 3 Case Study………………………………………………………………... 22
3.1 Introduction to GE and Its Businesses……………………………………. 22
3.1.1 Introduction to GE………………………………………………………... 22
3.1.2 Introduction to GE’s Businesses…………………………………………. 27
3.2 Competitive Forces Analysis……………………………………………... 34
3.3 GE’s Business and Financial Strategy……………………………………. 38
3.4 Comparative Financial Analysis………………………………………….. 44
3.4.1 Short-Term Liquidity……………………………………………………... 44
3.4.2 Specialized Cash Flow Ratios……………………………………………. 48
3.4.3 Capital Structure and Solvency…………………………………………... 52
3.4.4 Return on Invested Capital……………………………………………….. 55
3.5 EVA Analysis and Valuation……………………………………………... 60
3.5.1 EVA Analysis……………………………………………………………. 60
3.5.2 Valuation………………………………………………………………… 64
3.6 GE & Diversification……………………………………………………. 69
3.7 GE & Globalization……………………………………………………… 72
Chapter 4 Conclusions and Suggested Further Studies…………………………….. 76
4.1 Conclusion………………………………………………………………. 76
4.2 Suggested Further Studies………………………………………………. 84
Reference …………………………………………………………………………… 86
Berstein L. A., Wild, J. J., 1999. Analysis of financial statements, 5th ed.,
Brady, D., Scherriek, S., Timmons, H., 2002. “How does GE grow?” Business Week April 8.
Bruche, G., 2000. “Corporate strategy, relatedness and diversification.” Unpublished Manuscript, the Business Institute Berlin at the Berlin School of Economics (FHW-Berlin)
Chen, H., Hu, M.Y., Shieh, J.C.P., 1991. “The wealth effect of international joint ventures: the case of U.S. investment in China.” Financial Management 20, 31-41.
Chang, S.C. & Huang, P. C., 2002. “Corporate multinationalism, organizational learning, and market reaction to international joint ventures: evidence from Taiwan.” Global Finance Journal 13, 181-194.
Denis, D.J., Denis, D.K., Sarin, A., 1997b. “Agency problems, equity ownership, and corporate diversification.” Journal of Finance 52, 135-160.
Doukas, J. & Travlos, N.G., 1988. “The effect of corporate multinationalism on shareholders’ wealth.” Journal of Finance 43, 1161-1175.
Gordan, M. J., 1962. “The investment, financing and valuation of the corporation.” Homeward, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
Govindarajan, V., Gupta, A., 2000. “Analysis of the Emerging Global Arena.” European Management Journal 18, No. 3, 274-284.
Gupta, A. & Misra, L., 2000. “The value of experiential learning by organizations: evidence from international joint ventures.” Journal of Financial Research 33, 77-102.
Hadlock, C., Ryngaert, M., Thomas, S., 2001. “Corporate structure and equity offerings: are there benefits to diversification?” Journal of Business 54, 613-635.
Hamel, G., 1991. “Competition for competence and Interpartner learning within international strategic alliances.” Strategic Management Journal 12, 83-103.
International Monetary Fund, 1997, World Economic Outlook
Kogut, B., 1983. “Foreign direct investment as a sequential process.” The Multinational Corporation in the 1980s, 38-56.
Lang, M., Lundholm, R.J., 1996. “Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior.” The Accounting Review 71, 467-492.
Lewellen, W., 1971. “A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger.” Journal of Finance 26, 521-537.
MacDougall, D. C., 2002. “Company update – General Electric – A closer look at GECS and implications for GE, Equity Research.” J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
Markides, C. C., Williamson, P. J., 1996. “Related diversification, core competencies and corporate performance.” Strategic Management Journal 15, 149-165
Martin, J. D., Sayrak, A. 2003. “Corporate diversification and shareholder value: a survey of recent literature.” Journal of Corporate Finance 9, 37-57.
Montegomery, C. A., 1994. “Corporate diversification.” Journal of Economics Perspectives 8 (3), 163-178.
Parshotam, D., 2000. “Relationship of firm size, initial diversification, and internationalization with strategic change.” Journal of Business Research 48, 135-146.
Porter, M. E., 1980. “Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors.” New York: free press
Prahalad, C.K., 1990. “The changing nature of worldwide competition.” Vital Speech of the Day 56, 354-357.
Slater, R., Jack, 1999. Jack Welch and the GE Way (企業強權-傑克.威爾許再造奇異之道 (袁世珮 譯)). 281-294.
Stewart, T. A., 1999a. “See Jack. See Jack run Europe.” Fortune September 27, 124-136
Stewart, T. A. 1999b. “The house that Jack built.” The Economist September 18, 23-26
Stowe, J. D., Robinson, T. R., Pinto, J. E., McLeavey, D. W., 2002. Analysis of equity investments: valuation, 47-50
Thomas, S., 2002. “Firm diversification and asymmetric information: evidence from analysts’ forecasts and earnings announcements.” Journal of Financial Economics 64, 373-396.
Timmons., H., 2002. “Does GE Capital deserve that AAA?” Business Week Apr. 8
Welch, J., Byrne, J. A., 2001. jack: straight from the gut. 2001
吳啟銘, 2001. 企業評價 – 個案實證分析. 67-68