| 研究生: |
姚惠元 Yao, Huei-Yuan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以非樞紐統計量為基礎之格蘭傑因果關係檢定 Granger Causality Test Based on Non-pivotal Statistics |
| 指導教授: |
洪英超
Hung, Ying-Chao |
| 口試委員: |
吳偉標
Wu, Wei-Biao 曾能芳 Tseng, Neng-Fang |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 統計學系 Department of Statistics |
| 論文出版年: | 2022 |
| 畢業學年度: | 110 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 62 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 格蘭傑因果關係 、Modified Wald 檢定 、非樞紐統計量 、向量自迴歸 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Granger causality, Modified Wald test, Nonpivotal statistic, Vector autoregression |
| DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202200767 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:90 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
格蘭傑因果關係是一個透過結合向量自迴歸模型中所有變數的資訊於衡量兩組時間序列間可預測性的經典統計分析工具,傳統分析格蘭傑因果關係的推論方法為 Wald 類型的檢定方法,然而這些檢定方法可能會面臨以下問題: 一、需要挑選微調參數,二、當預估測之共變異數矩陣為奇異矩陣時,用於推論的臨界值會失效。在這篇論文中,我們發展了一個基於非樞紐統計量的格蘭傑因果關係檢定,此方法不僅避免了以上兩個問題,相較於 Wald 類型的檢定,我們的方法有更佳的檢定力,最後我們也通過幾個模擬例子和實際資料分析驗證此方法的有效性。
Granger causality is a classical tool for measuring predictability from one group of time series to another by incorporating information of variables described by a vector autoregressive (VAR) model. Traditional methods for validating Granger causality are based on the Wald type tests, which may encounter a problem with (i) tuning parameter selection or (ii) test-statistic inflation when the true covariance matrix is singular or near-singular. In this study, we propose an alternative procedure for testing Granger causality based on non-pivotal statistics. The proposed hypothesis testing method is valuable in that (i) it does not require any calibration of tuning parameters (thus saving huge computational cost); and (ii) it yields very competitive power values as compared with the Wald type tests. Finally, a number of simulation examples and a real data set are used to illustrate and evaluate the proposed method.
Acknowledgements i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
Contents iv
List of Figures vi
List of Tables vii
1 Introduction 1
2 Background Knowledge 4
2.1 The VAR Model 4
2.2 The Concept of Granger Causality 5
3 Granger Causality Tests 9
3.1 Estimation of VAR Models 9
3.1.1 Least Square Estimate 9
3.1.2 Order Selection 11
3.2 Hypothesis Testing of Granger Causality 11
3.2.1 Granger Causality Test 12
3.2.2 Testing Zero Coefficients 12
3.2.3 The Wald-type Tests 13
3.2.4 Shortcomings of the Wald-Type Tests 17
3.2.5 New Test Based on Non-pivotal Statistics 18
4 Simulation and Numerical Analysis 21
4.1 Conventional Granger Causality Test 21
4.1.1 Simulation Setup 21
4.1.2 Size of the Tests 23
4.1.3 Power of the Tests 25
4.2 Testing Non-linear Restrictions 28
4.2.1 Simulation Setup 28
4.2.2 Size of the Tests 30
4.2.3 Power of the Tests 32
4.3 Real data analysis 37
5 Conclusions 44
6 Appendices 46
6.1 Detail of Equation (3.5) 46
6.2 Proofs in Section 3.2.5 47
6.3 More on the Numerical Results 49
6.3.1 The Power of Conventional Granger Causality Test 49
6.3.2 The Power of Testing Non-linear Restrictions 54
6.3.3 Comparison with LASSO-type Methods 56
References 59
Akaike, H. (1998). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Selected papers of hirotugu akaike, pages 199–213. Springer.
Amblard, P.-O. and Michel, O. J. (2011). On directed information theory and granger causality graphs. Journal of computational neuroscience, 30(1):7–16.
Anderson, T. W. (1963). Asymptotic theory for principal component analysis. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34(1):122–148.
Andrews, D. W. (1987). Asymptotic results for generalized wald tests. Econometric Theory, 3(3):348–358.
Basu, S., Shojaie, A., and Michailidis, G. (2015). Network granger causality with inherent grouping structure. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 16(1):417–453.
Boudjellaba, H., Dufour, J.-M., and Roy, R. (1992). Testing causality between two vectors in multivariate autoregressive moving average models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(420):1082–1090.
Dagenais, M. G. and Dufour, J.-M. (1991). Invariance, nonlinear models, and asymptotic tests. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 1601–1615.
Davis, R. A., Zang, P., and Zheng, T. (2016). Sparse vector autoregressive modeling. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 25(4):1077–1096.
Dufour, J.-M. (2003). Identification, weak instruments, and statistical inference in econometrics. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 36(4):767–808.
Dufour, J.-M., Pelletier, D., and Renault, É. (2006). Short run and long run causality in time series: inference. Journal of Econometrics, 132(2):337–362.
Dufour, J.-M. and Renault, E. (1998). Short run and long run causality in time series: theory. Econometrica, pages 1099–1125.
Dufour, J.-M., Renault, E., and Zinde-Walsh, V. (2013). Wald tests when restrictions are locally singular. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.0569.
Ferguson, T. S. (2017). A course in large sample theory. Routledge.
Fox, J. (2015). Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. Sage Publications.
Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and crossspectral methods. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, pages 424–438.
Hannan, E. J. and Quinn, B. G. (1979). The determination of the order of an autoregression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 41(2):190–195.
Hung, Y.-C., Tseng, N.-F., and Balakrishnan, N. (2014). Trimmed granger causality between two groups of time series. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 8(2):1940–1972.
Lozano, A. C., Abe, N., Liu, Y., and Rosset, S. (2009). Grouped graphical granger modeling for gene expression regulatory networks discovery. Bioinformatics, 25(12):i110–i118.
Lütkepohl, H. (2000). Bootstrapping impulse responses in var analyses. In COMPSTAT, pages 109–119. Springer.
Lütkepohl, H. (2005). New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer Science & Business Media.
Lütkepohl, H. and Burda, M. M. (1997). Modified wald tests under nonregular conditions. Journal of Econometrics, 78(2):315–332.
Quinn, B. G. (1980). Order determination for a multivariate autoregression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 42(2):182–185.
Ratsimalahelo, Z. (2005). Generalised wald type tests of nonlinear restrictions. IFAC
Proceedings Volumes, 38(1):100–105.
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The annals of statistics, pages 461–464.
Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, pages 1–48.
Tank, A., Covert, I., Foti, N., Shojaie, A., and Fox, E. (2018). Neural granger causality. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05842.
Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 58(1):267–288.
Vicente, R., Wibral, M., Lindner, M., and Pipa, G. (2011). Transfer entropy—a modelfree measure of effective connectivity for the neurosciences. Journal of computational neuroscience, 30(1):45–67.
Von Weyl, H. (1909). Über beschränkte quadratische formen, deren differenz vollstetigist. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo (1884-1940), 27(1):373–392.
Xiao, H. and Wu, W. B. (2012). Covariance matrix estimation for stationary time series. The Annals of Statistics, 40(1):466–493.
Yuen, T., Wong, H., and Yiu, K. F. C. (2018). On constrained estimation of graphical time series models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 124:27–52.
全文公開日期 2027/07/05