| 研究生: |
張文魁 |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
股權結構對私募發行公司價值影響之分析 |
| 指導教授: | 屠美亞 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 財務管理學系 Department of Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2006 |
| 畢業學年度: | 94 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 64 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 私募 、事件研究法 、股權集中度 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:99 下載:126 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
自民國91年,國內法令准許私募,私募是指公司的內部人,透過協商,尋求願意投資公司的投資人,把公司的股票,售給少數的投資人,不需經過承銷商,揭露也比較少。
國外的文獻,有些學者實證的結果,私募宣告時有正的異常報酬,但有些學者實證的結果發現有負的異常報酬,本篇主要探討國內宣告私募時,對公司價值的影響,以及國內公司大多屬於家族企業,在這麼高的控制權之下,股權集中度對於私募發行公司的價值又有什麼影響?
實證的結果發現,國內公司宣告私募時有正的異常報酬,除了資訊不對稱會影響公司價值之外,本文還發現,公司在私募時,家族集團的控股如果低於30%時,增加公司持股,可以增加公司的價值,但當家族集團的股權超過30%時,就不明顯了。
此外,當股權集中度在10%~30%時,公司價值的變化與股權集中度成反比,顯示國內股權集中度在10%~30%時,符合利益掠奪假(Entrenchment Hypothesis),增加公司的股權集中度反而會減少公司的價值。
第一章 緒論………………………………P1
第一節 研究動機…………………………P1
第二節 研究目的…………………………P3
第三節 研究流程與論文架構……………P4
第二章 文獻回顧及私募特徵.........P6
第一節 文獻探討…………………………P6
第二節 私募特徵…………………………P12
第三章 研究設計…….………………………P19
第一節 研究說明…………………………P19
第二節 樣本選取及資料來源……………P20
第三節 變數定義…………………………P21
第四節 實證分析方法……………………P25
第四章 實證結果與分析………………………P39
第一節 比較現金增資與私募的敘述統計……P39
第二節 Logit分析……………………………P44
第三節 私募宣告效果…………………………P49
第四節 股權集中度與公司價值變化…………P52
第五節 迴歸分析………………………………P56
第四章 結論與建議..……………………………P60
第一節 研究結論………………………………P60
第二節 研究限制及對後續研究之建議………P61
參考資料..…………………………………………P62
1.Arneson, G. S., 1981, Nonmarketability discounts should
exceed fifty percent, Taxes 59, 25-31.
2.Arneson, G. S., 1981, Minority discounts beyond fifty
percent can be supported, Taxes 59, 97-102.
3.Barclay, Michael J., and Dennis P. Sheehan, 2001, The
block pricing puzzle, working paper, SSRN, FEN Cap-
Structure WPS.
4.Berle, A.A. Jr. and G.C. Means, 1932, The modern
cooperation and private properry, Macmillan, New York.
5.Daniel, Kent, David Hirshleifer, and Avanidhar
Subrahmanyam, 1998, Investor psychology and security
market under- and overreactions, Journal of Finance 53,
1939-1885.
6.Demsetz, H. and K. Lehn, 1985, the structure of corporate
ownership: Causes and consequences, Journal of Political
Economy 93, pp.1155-1177.
7.Demsetz, H., 1983, The structure of ownership and the
theory of the firm, Journal of Law and Economics 26, 375-
390.
8.Fields, L. P., and E. L. Mais, 1991, The valuation
effects of private placements of convertible debt,
Journal of Finance 46, 1925-1932.
9.Jensen, M. and R. Ruback, 1983, The market for corporate
control: The scientific evidence, Journal of Financial
Economics 11, 5-50.
10.Jensen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling, 1976, Theory of the
firm : Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership
structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.
11.Johnson, Richard D, and George A. Racette, 1981,
Discounts on Letter Stock Do Not Appear to Be a Good Base
on Which to Estimate Discounts for Lack of Marketability
on Closely Held Stocks, Taxes 59, 574-81.
12.Kasim L. Alli and Donald J. Thompson II, 1993, The
Wealth Effects of Private Stock Placements under
Regulation D, THE Financial REVIEW 28, 329-350.
13.Leland, H., and Pyle, D. H., 1977, Information
Asymmetric, Financial Structure and Financial
Intermediation, Journal of Finance 32, 371-388.
14.Leland, H., and Pyle, D., 1999, Improved methods for
tests of long-run abnormal stock returns, Journal Finance
32, 371-387.
15.Loughran, Tim, and Jay R. Ritter, 1997, The operating
performance of firms conducting seasoned equity
offerings, Journal of Finance52, 1823-1850.
16.Michael Hertzel, and Michael Lemmon, James S. Linck, and
Lynn Rees, 2002, Long-run Performance following Private
Placements of Equity, The Journal of Finance 6, 2595-2617.
17.Michael Hertzel and Richard L. Smith, 1993, Market
Discounts and Shareholder Gains for Placing Equity
Privately, The Journal of Finance 48, 459-485.
18.Michael L. Lemmon and Karl V. Lins, 2003, Ownership
Structure, Corporate Governance, and Firm Value: Evidence
from the East Asian Financial Crisis, The Journal of
finance 4, 1445-1468.
19.Morck, R.,A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, 1988, Management
ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis,
Journal of Financial Economics 20, 293-315.
20.Myers, S. C., and N. S. Majluf, 1984, Corporate
financing and investment decisions when the firm has
information that investors do not have, Journal of
Financial Economics 13, pp.187-221.
21.Randall Morck, Andrei SHLEIFER and Robert W. VISHNY,
1988, MANAGEMENT OWNERSHIP AND MARKET VALUATION: An
Empirical Analysis, Journal of Financial Economics 20,
293-315.
22.Shleifer, A., and R. Vishiny, 1986, Large shareholders
and corporate control, Journal of Financial Economics 95,
461-488.
23.Sheehan D., Swisher, J., 1998, How sophisticated
investors? Working paper. Smeal College of Business,
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
24.Sheng-Syan Chen, Kim Wai Ho, Cheng-few Lee, and Gillian
H.H. Yeo, 2002, Wealth Effects of Private Equity
Placements: Evidence from Singapore, The Financial Review
37, 165-184.
25.Silber, W. L., 1991, Discounts on restricted stock : The
impact of illiquidity on stock prices, Financial Analysts
Journal 47, 60-64.
26.Srinivsan Krishnamurthy, Paul Spindt, Venkat
Subramaniam, Tracie Woidtke, 2005, Does investor identity
matter in equity issues? Evidence from private
placements, Journal of Financial Intermediation 14, 210-
238.
27.Weston, 1979, The tender takeover, Mergers and
Acquisitions, 74-82.
28.Wruck, 1989, EQUITY OWNERSHIP CONCENTRATION AND FIRM
VALUE Evidence from Private Equity Financings, Journal of
Financial 23, 3-28