跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 朱祥瑋
CHU, HSIANG-WEI
論文名稱: ESG、環境績效與公司風險之探討
A Study of ESG Score, Environment Score, and Firm Risks
指導教授: 陳鴻毅
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 財務管理學系
Department of Finance
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 41
中文關鍵詞: ESG公司風險特有風險下檔風險財務風險環境績效
外文關鍵詞: ESG, Firm risk, Idiosyncratic risk, Downside risk, Financial risk, Environmental performance
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202000535
相關次數: 點閱:1263下載:355
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究探討公司在環境、社會及公司治理(ESG)之表現績效,特別是在環境表現績效上是否影響公司之特有風險及下檔風險。本研究之下檔風險係以股價價格崩跌風險(NSCKEW、DUVOL)與財務限制指數(KZ、WW指數)衡量表示,並且更進一步探討公司之ESG績效排名與公司特有風險及下檔風險之關係。實證結果發現ESG之表現績效與風險存在顯著的負相關。同時也發現只有ESG表現績效排名處於前段之公司才能降低其下檔風險。實證結果顯示,公司建立良好的ESG績效可形成一種社會資本,使公司之特有風險降低,並使公司的融資能力更強。此外,唯有公司之ESG總體績效評分或環境績效評分處於領先排名區間時,公司方能降低其特有風險和財務限制。本研究結果鼓勵公司在ESG表現績效上取得領先之排名,以降低公司之特有風險及下檔風險。然而,ESG的績效雖有助於降低特有風險及財務限制,卻無助於降低公司特定的股票價格崩盤風險。


    In this study, I examine whether the diligent of ESG performance, especially the environment performance, can help a firm to avoid the idiosyncratic risk and downside risks, and reduce its financial constraints. In addition, I investigate the relation between the rank of firm’s ESG performance and firm’s risks. The empirical result shows a significant and negative association between with ESG performance score and risks. I also find that only those firms that have high rank of ESG and Environmental engagement can reduce their downside risk. The basic socially responsible engagement does not help firms decrease their downside risk. The empirical results suggest that the building of great ESG performance can form the social capital which can reduce idiosyncratic risk of a firm and enhance a firm’s financing ability. Moreover, I find that the excellent performance rank of ESG score and E score can decrease idiosyncratic risk and financial constraints, while the basic socially responsible engagement does not help firms to decrease their downside risks. The findings of this study encourage firms to do their best on ESG engagement and decrease their downside risks. However, ESG efforts cannot help decrease firm-specific stock price crash risk.

    List of Tables IV
    1. Introduction 1
    2. Literature Review 4
    2.1 ESG and financial risks 4
    2.2 E Score, E components and risks 6
    2.3 Ranks of ESG, ranks of E score, and risks 7
    3. Empirical Methodology 9
    3.1 Sample 9
    3.2 Variables 9
    3.3 Models 13
    4. Empirical Results 16
    4.1 Descriptive statistics and correlation of major variables 16
    4.2 The effect of ESG performance on idiosyncratic risk 17
    4.3 The effect of ESG performance on stock price crash risk 18
    4.4 The effect of ESG performance on financial constraints 19
    4.5 The effect of Rank of ESG performance on idiosyncratic risk & stock price crash risk and financial constraints 20
    4.6 ESG firms versus non-ESG firms 23
    5. Recommendations for Future Research 24
    6. Conclusion and Discussions 25
    References 27

    Aguilera, R., Rupp, D., Williams, C., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.

    Benlemlih, M., Amama, S., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2018). Environmental and social disclosures and firm risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 613–626.

    Beurden, P., & Gossling, T. (2008). The worth of values—A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 407–424.

    Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1–23.

    Cormier, D., Aerts, W., Ledoux, M. J., & Magnan, M. (2009). Attributes of social and human capital disclosure and information asymmetry between managers and investors. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 26(1), 71–88.

    Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777–798.

    Jo, H., & Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 441–456.

    Jones, T. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.

    Kim, Y., Park, M.S., Wier, B., 2012. Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review, 8 (3), 761–796.

    Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, 1–13.

    Kaplan, S., & Zingales, L. (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 169–215.

    Lamont, O., Polk, C., & Saá-Requejo, J. (2001). Financial constraints and stock returns. The Review of Financial Studies,14(2), 529–554.

    Mackey, A., Mackey, T., & Barney, J. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817–835.

    McElhaney, K. (2007). Strategic CSR. Sustainable Enterprise Quarterly, 4(1), 1–7.

    Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy & society. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

    Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77.

    Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., & Tharyan, R. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. British Accounting Review, 48(1), 102–116.

    Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569–592.

    Sirri, E., & Tufano, P. (1998). Costly search and mutual fund flows. Journal of Finance, 53, 1589–1622.

    Whited, T., & Wu, G. (2006). Financial constraints risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(2), 531–559

    QR CODE
    :::