跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳俞靜
Chen, Yu-Ching
論文名稱: AI推薦系統與網路口碑可信度比較研究 ─以日本線上購物情境為例─
The Impact of AI Recommendations and Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Source Credibility and Purchase Intention: Evidence from Japanese Online Shopping
指導教授: 李世暉
Li, Shih-Hui
口試委員: 劉慶瑞
Liu, Ching-Jui
陳聖智
Chen, Sheng-Chih
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 國際事務學院 - 日本研究學位學程
Program in Japan Studies
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 96
中文關鍵詞: 日本電商平台來源可信度AI推薦系統網路口碑
外文關鍵詞: Japan e-commerce, source credibility, AI recommendation, eWOM
相關次數: 點閱:33下載:14
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著全球電子商務市場快速擴張,線上購物已成為主要的消費模式之一。然而,產品選擇日益多樣、資訊量持續增加,使消費者面臨資訊過載與決策不確定性,亟需可信的資訊來源協助判斷。網路口碑作為同儕經驗分享的重要管道,有助於降低購買風險;近年人工智慧技術的發展使 AI 推薦系統逐漸普及,透過演算法分析大量資料,提供個人化商品建議。兩者在電商環境中並存,但消費者如何評價與信任這兩種資訊來源,以及其對購買決策的影響,仍缺乏系統性比較。基於此,本研究旨在比較 AI 推薦與網路口碑的來源可信度差異,並檢驗可信度對購買意願的影響機制。

    本研究以日本消費者為對象,採實驗設計,將受測者隨機分配至 AI 推薦組或網路口碑組,閱讀相應的產品推薦資訊後,評估其對資訊來源的專業性、可靠性與購買意願。問卷共取得 259 份有效樣本,並採獨立樣本 t 檢定、相關分析與迴歸分析進行假說驗證。

    研究結果呈現三項主要發現。首先,AI推薦在專業性上顯著優於網路口碑, 但在可靠性上兩者相當。可靠性對購買意願的影響力大於專業性,在網路口碑情境中更僅有可靠性具顯著影響。最後,AI推薦的專業性優勢未能完全轉化為購買意願優勢,顯示可靠性不足限制了其購買促進效果。由此,本研究揭示 AI 推薦與網路口碑在可信度構成上的差異,並證實可靠性相較於專業性在購買決策中更具關鍵影響力。實務上,結果強調電商業者須同時提升 AI 的透明性與信任度,並在日本市場採取漸進導入策略以發揮 AI 與網路口碑的互補效益。


    As the global e-commerce market continues to expand, consumers face increasing information overload, raising the need for credible information sources. While eWOM provides peer-based evaluations and AI recommendation systems offer algorithmic, personalized suggestions, consumer evaluation and trust these two information sources and the ways this trust influences purchase intention remains underexplored. This study compares the source credibility of AI recommendations and eWOM and examines its influence on purchase intention.

    A total of 259 valid responses were collected from Japanese consumers. Participants were randomly assigned to either an AI recommendation or an eWOM condition and evaluated the source’s expertise, trustworthiness, and their purchase intention.

    The results indicate that AI recommendations were perceived as more expert but not more trustworthy than eWOM. Trustworthiness exerted a stronger influence on purchase intention than expertise. In the case of eWOM, only trustworthiness showed a significant effect. Although AI recommendations hold an expertise advantage, this advantage did not fully transfer into higher purchase intention due to insufficient credibility. Overall, the findings highlight distinct credibility structures between AI and eWOM and underscore the central role of trustworthiness in purchase decisions. Practically, firms should improve the transparency and trustworthiness of AI systems and adopt a gradual implementation strategy in the Japanese market to leverage the complementary strengths of AI recommendations and eWOM.

    第一章 緒論 1
    第一節 研究背景與動機 1
    第二節 研究問題與目的 4
    第三節 研究方法 6
    第四節 研究流程 8
    第二章 文獻探討 9
    第一節 來源可信度 9
    第二節 網路口碑(eWOM)14
    第三節 AI推薦系統 18
    第四節 購買意願 25
    第五節 日本市場情境分析 26
    第三章 研究方法 35
    第一節 研究架構 35
    第二節 研究假說 36
    第三節 變數定義與衡量 38
    第四節 研究設計 40
    第五節 資料分析方法 44
    第四章 資料分析 47
    第一節 樣本結構分析 47
    第二節 敘述性統計分析 52
    第三節 信效度分析 54
    第四節 假說驗證分析 58
    第五節 小結 64
    第五章 結論與建議 65
    第一節 研究結果與討論 65
    第二節 研究貢獻 67
    第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 69
    參考文獻 73
    一、英文文獻 73
    二、中文文獻 87
    三、日文文獻 88
    附錄一 日文問卷 92

    一、英文文獻
    (一)書籍
    Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). Elsevier.
    Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2021). Marketing 5.0: Technology for humanity. Wiley.
    Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2024). Marketing 6.0: The future is immersive. Wiley.
    (二)期刊/專書論文
    Albon, A., Kraft, P., & Rennhak, C. (2018). Analyzing the credibility of eword-of-mouth using customer reviews on social media. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 37-50.
    Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
    Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261.
    Bansal, H. S., & Voyer, P. A. (2000). Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context. Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 166-177.
    Bannister, B. D. (1986). Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback: Interactive effects on recipient responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 203–210.
    Bharati, P., & Chaudhury, A. (2004). An empirical investigation of decision-making satisfaction in web-based decision support systems. Decision Support Systems, 37(2), 187-197.
    Bohner, G., Ruder, M., & Erb, H. P. (2002). When expertise backfires: Contrast and assimilation effects in persuasion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(4), 495-519.
    Brynjolfsson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2017). What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science, 358(6370), 1530-1534.
    Chakraborty, U., & Bhat, S. (2018). The effects of credible online reviews on brand equity dimensions and its consequence on consumer behavior. Journal of Promotion Management, 24(1), 57-82.
    Cheung, C. M., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461-470.
    Cheung, M. Y., Luo, C., Sia, C. L., & Chen, H. (2009). Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of on-line consumer recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), 9-38.
    Danks, D., & London, A. J. (2017). Algorithmic Bias in Autonomous Systems. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization.
    Dellarocas, C. (2003). The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49(10), 1407-1424.
    Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015). Algorithm aversion: people erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 114.
    Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.
    Doh, S. J., & Hwang, J. S. (2009). How consumers evaluate eWOM (electronic word-of-mouth) messages. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(2), 193-197.
    Dou, X., Walden, J. A., Lee, S., & Lee, J. Y. (2012). Does source matter? Examining source effects in online product reviews. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1555-1563.
    Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (2004). Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 191-198.
    Fogg, B. J. (2003). Prominence-interpretation theory: Explaining how people assess credibility online. In CHI'03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 722-723.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
    Featherman, M. S., Miyazaki, A. D., & Sprott, D. E. (2010). Reducing online privacy risk to facilitate e‐service adoption: the influence of perceived ease of use and corporate credibility. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(3), 219-229.
    Frantz, R. (2003). Herbert Simon. Artificial intelligence as a framework for understanding intuition. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(2), 265-277.
    Friedman, H. H., & Friedman, L. (1979). Endorser effectiveness by product type. Journal of Advertising Research, 19(5), 63-71.
    Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2009). Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Science, 28(4), 721-739.
    Goodman, B., & Flaxman, S. (2017). European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanation”. AI Magazine, 38(3), 50-57.
    Gunawan, D. D., & Huarng, K. H. (2015). Viral effects of social network and media on consumers’ purchase intention. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2237-2241.
    Harrison-Walker, L. J. (2001). The measurement of word-of-mouth communication and an investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential antecedents. Journal of Service Research, 4(1), 60-75.
    Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52.
    Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2000). Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work , 241-250.
    Hildebrand, C., Häubl, G., & Herrmann, A. (2014). Product customization via starting solutions. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(6), 707-725.
    Hoffman, D., and Novak, T. (1997). A new marketing paradigm for electronic commerce. Information Society, 13(1), 43–54.
    Huang, J. H., & Chen, Y. F. (2006). Herding in online product choice. Psychology & Marketing, 23(5), 413-428.
    Khan, A. W., & Mishra, A. (2024). AI credibility and consumer-AI experiences: a conceptual framework. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 34(1), 66-97.
    Kim, J., Merrill Jr, K., Xu, K., & Kelly, S. (2022). Perceived credibility of an AI instructor in online education: The role of social presence and voice features. Computers in Human Behavior, 136, 107383.
    Komiak, S. Y., & Benbasat, I. (2006). The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 941-960.
    Kusumasondjaja, S., Shanka, T., & Marchegiani, C. (2012). Credibility of online reviews and initial trust: The roles of reviewer’s identity and review valence. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 18(3), 185-195.
    Lee, H. H., & Jin Ma, Y. (2012). Consumer perceptions of online consumer product and service reviews: Focusing on information processing confidence and susceptibility to peer influence. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 6(2), 110-132.
    Lee, K. T., & Koo, D. M. (2012). Effects of attribute and valence of e-WOM on message adoption: Moderating roles of subjective knowledge and regulatory focus. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1974-1984.
    Lis, B. (2013). In eWOM We Trust: A Framework of Factors that Determine the eWOM Credibility. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5 (3), 129–140.
    Longoni, C., Bonezzi, A., & Morewedge, C. K. (2019). Resistance to medical artificial intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(4), 629-650.
    Luo, X., Tong, S., Fang, Z., & Qu, Z. (2019). Frontiers: Machines vs. humans: The impact of artificial intelligence chatbot disclosure on customer purchases. Marketing Science, 38(6), 937-947.
    Masciari, E., Umair, A., & Ullah, M. H. (2024). A systematic literature review on ai based recommendation systems and their ethical considerations. IEEE Access.
    Mayzlin, D., Dover, Y., & Chevalier, J. (2014). Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2421-2455.
    McGinnies, E., & Ward, C. D. (1980). Better liked than right: Trustworthiness and expertise as factors in credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6(3), 467-472.
    Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413-439.
    Moran, G., & Muzellec, L. (2017). eWOM credibility on social networking sites: A framework. Journal of Marketing Communications, 23(2), 149-161.
    Nabi, R. L., & Hendriks, A. (2003). The persuasive effect of host and audience reaction shots in television talk shows. Journal of Communication, 53(3), 527-543.
    OECD (2025), The 2025 OECD definition of e-commerce and guidelines for interpretation, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/2254f1de-en.
    Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39-52.
    Park, C., & Lee, T. M. (2009). Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: A moderating role of product type. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 61-67.
    Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades' evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243-281.
    Racherla, P., & Friske, W. (2012). Perceived ‘usefulness’ of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(6), 548-559.
    Rai, A. (2020). Explainable AI: From black box to glass box. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 137-141.
    Ratchford, B., Soysal, G., Zentner, A., & Gauri, D. K. (2022). Online and offline retailing: What we know and directions for future research. Journal of Retailing, 98(1), 152-177.
    Reich, T., Kaju, A., & Maglio, S. J. (2023). How to overcome algorithm aversion: Learning from mistakes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33(2), 285-302.
    Reichelt, J., Sievert, J., & Jacob, F. (2014). How credibility affects eWOM reading: The influences of expertise, trustworthiness, and similarity on utilitarian and social functions. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20(1-2), 65-81.
    Riegner, C. (2007). Word of mouth on the web: The impact of Web 2.0 on consumer purchase decisions. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(4), 436-447.
    Sahoo, P., Singh, A. K., Saha, S., Jain, V., Mondal, S., & Chadha, A. (2024). A systematic survey of prompt engineering in large language models: Techniques and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.07927.
    Samuel, A. L. (1959). Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 3(3), 210-229.
    Schindler, R. M., & Bickart, B. (2005). Published word of mouth: Referable, consumer-generated information on the Internet. Online consumer psychology: Understanding and Influencing Consumer Behavior in the Virtual World, 32(1), 35-61.
    Schmitt, P., Skiera, B., & Van den Bulte, C. (2011). Referral programs and customer value. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 46-59.
    Shan, Y. (2016). How credible are online product reviews? The effects of self-generated and system-generated cues on source credibility evaluation. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 633-641.
    Shin, D., & Park, Y. J. (2019). Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 277-284.
    Shin, D., Zhong, B., & Biocca, F. A. (2020). Beyond user experience: What constitutes algorithmic experiences?. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 102061.
    Shin, D. (2022). How do people judge the credibility of algorithmic sources? Ai & Society, 37(1), 81-96.
    Smith, D., Menon, S., & Sivakumar, K. (2005). Online peer and editorial recommendations, trust, and choice in virtual markets. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(3), 15-37.
    Smith, T., Coyle, J. R., Lightfoot, E., & Scott, A. (2007). Reconsidering models of influence: the relationship between consumer social networks and word-of-mouth effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(4), 387-397.
    Stoltenberg, C. D., & Davis, C. S. (1988). Career and study skills information: Who says what can alter message processing. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6(1), 38-52.
    Susmann, M. W., & Wegener, D. T. (2023). The independent effects of source expertise and trustworthiness on retraction believability: The moderating role of vested interest. Memory & Cognition, 51(4), 845-861.
    Tan, S. M., & Liew, T. W. (2020). Designing embodied virtual agents as product specialists in a multi-product category E-commerce: The roles of source credibility and social presence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(12), 1136-1149.
    Thiebes, S., Lins, S., & Sunyaev, A. (2021). Trustworthy artificial intelligence. Electronic Markets, 31(2), 447-464.
    Thomas, M. J., Wirtz, B. W., & Weyerer, J. C. (2019). Determinants of online review credibility and its impact on consumers’ purchase intention. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 20(1), 1-20.
    Tsao, W. C., Hsieh, M. T., Shih, L. W., & Lin, T. M. (2015). Compliance with eWOM: The influence of hotel reviews on booking intention from the perspective of consumer conformity. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 46, 99-111.
    Vendemia, M. A. (2017). (Re) Viewing reviews: effects of emotionality and valence on credibility perceptions in online consumer reviews. Communication Research Reports, 34(3), 230-238.
    Verma, D., & Dewani, P. P. (2021). eWOM credibility: a comprehensive framework and literature review. Online Information Review, 45(3), 481-500.
    Wang, X., Wei, K. K., & Teo, H. H. (2007). The acceptance of product recommendations from web-based word-of-mouth systems: Effects of information, informant and system characteristics. ICIS 2007 Proceedings, 93.
    Wathen, C. N., & Burkell, J. (2002). Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 134-144.
    Weiss, A. M., Lurie, N. H., & MacInnis, D. J. (2008). Listening to strangers: whose responses are valuable, how valuable are they, and why?. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(4), 425-436.
    Willemsen, L. M., Neijens, P. C., & Bronner, F. (2012). The ironic effect of source identification on the perceived credibility of online product reviewers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(1), 16-31.
    Wilson, E. J., & Sherrell, D. L. (1993). Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(2), 101-112.
    Wu, Y., Ngai, E. W., Wu, P., & Wu, C. (2020). Fake online reviews: Literature review, synthesis, and directions for future research. Decision Support Systems, 132, 113280.
    Xiang, Z., Magnini, V. P., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2015). Information technology and consumer behavior in travel and tourism: Insights from travel planning using the internet. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 22, 244-249.
    Xiao, B., & Benbasat, I. (2007). E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quarterly, 137-209.
    Xu, K. (2019). First encounter with robot Alpha: How individual differences interact with vocal and kinetic cues in users’ social responses. New Media & Society, 21(11-12), 2522-2547.
    Xu, Q. (2014). Should I trust him? The effects of reviewer profile characteristics on eWOM credibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 136-144.
    Yale, L. J., & Gilly, M. C. (1995). Dyadic perceptions in personal source information search. Journal of Business Research, 32(3), 225-237.
    Yang, J., & Mai, E. S. (2010). Experiential goods with network externalities effects: An empirical study of online rating system. Journal of Business Research, 63(9-10), 1050-1057.
    Zhang, K. Z., Zhao, S. J., Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2014). Examining the influence of online reviews on consumers' decision-making: A heuristic–systematic model. Decision support systems, 67, 78-89.
    (三)網際網路資料
    Accenture (2025) Me, my brand and AI: The new world of consumer engagement. Retrieved June 3, 2025, from< https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/consulting/me-my-brand-ai-new-world-consumer-engagement>
    eMarketer. (2025). Worldwide Retail Ecommerce Forecast 2025. Retrieved November 20, 2025, from <https://www.emarketer.com/content/worldwide-retail-ecommerce-forecast-2025>
    Rakuten.Today (2024). Chief AI & Data Officer Ting Cai unveils Rakuten AI strategy at Rakuten Optimism 2024. Retrieved October 8, 2025, from<https://rakuten.today/blog/chief-ai-data-officer-ting-cai-unveils-rakuten-ai-strategy-at-rakuten-optimism-2024.html>
    Statista. (2024). Artificial intelligence and extended reality in e-commerce. Retrieved January 20, 2025, from <https://www.statista.com/topics/11640/artificial-intelligence-and-extended-reality-in-e-commerce/#topicOverview>

    二、中文文獻
    Babbie(2021)。社會科學研究方法(林秀雲譯)。雙葉書廊。
    OpenAI (2025) ,在 ChatGPT 中購物:即時結帳與自主代理商務協定<https://openai.com/zh-Hant/index/buy-it-in-chatgpt/> 。(最後瀏覽日期:2025年10月30日)
    李世暉(2021)。日本科技政策決策思維研究:從經濟至上到以人為本。政治科學論叢,(87),93-122。

    三、日文文獻
    (一)期刊/專書論文
    藤原一肇(2020)「ラグジュアリー・ブランド専門店の店舗属性が消費者の行動意向へ与える影響」『早稲田大学商学研究科紀要』, 91, 39–60。
    西原彰宏(2010)「クチコミ発信者の信憑性を規定する要因としての企業サイト」『関西学院商学研究』62, 69-94
    松下東子、林裕之(2022)「日本の消費者はどう変わったか:生活者1万人アンケートでわかる最新の消費動向」『東洋経済新報社』
    寺田麻佑(2024)「ソーシャル・データサイエンス 特集論文-VI AI活用の推進とデジタル化 日本とEUにおける展開」『一橋ビジネスレビュー』,72(3),78-79.
    及川直彦、鎌田啓輔 (2025) 「生成AIがマーケティング・コミュニケーションにもたらす変化―ブランド企業とプラットフォーマー・消費者の間の力関係はどうなるか―」『マーケティングジャーナル』, 45(4), 312–321.

    (二)網際網路資料
    Amazon(2025)。「Amazonの生成AIを搭載した対話型ショッピングアシスタント Rufus(ルーファス)、日本のすべてのお客様が利用可能に」。檢自:<https://www.aboutamazon.jp/news/retail/amazon-ai-shopping-assistant-rufus>。(最後瀏覽日期:2025年10月7日)
    BCG (2024)。「職場におけるAI活用に関する意識調査2024」。檢自:<https://www.bcg.com/ja-jp/publications/2024/friend-and-foe>。(最後瀏覽日期:2025年11月17日)
    ITmedia (2012) 。「Amazon、『本当に買った人が書いたレビュー』の認証機能を導入」。檢自:<https://www.itmedia.co.jp/news/articles/1203/23/news106.html>。(最後瀏覽日期:2025年10月7日)
    JIPDEC(2024)。「生成AIへの“期待”は“不安”を上回るも、誤情報の拡散や自分への影響に不安感」。檢自:< https://www.jipdec.or.jp/news/pressrelease/20240418.html>。(最後瀏覽日期:2025年11月17日)
    KPMG(2024)。「AIは信頼できるか ~AIへの社会的認識の変化に関するグローバル調査2023」。檢自:< https://kpmg.com/jp/ja/home/insights/2024/01/trust-in-ai.html>。(最後瀏覽日期:2025年11月7日)
    ZOZO Developers blog(2024)。「ビジネス元年の2024年・ZOZOの生成AI活用事例」。檢自:<https://technote.zozo.com/n/ndcb5e401e15b>。(最後瀏覽日期:2025年10月8日)
    内閣府(2016)。「第五期科学技術基本計画」。檢自:<https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/ kihonkeikaku/5honbun.pdf>。(最後瀏覽日期:2025年11月10日)
    松下東子、林裕之(2025)。「⽣活者1万⼈アンケート(10回⽬)にみる ⽇本⼈の価値観・消費⾏動の変化 −コロナ禍を経た⽇本の⽣活者に戻らなかったもの−」,檢自:< https://www.nri.com/jp/knowledge/report/files/000041825.pdf>。(最後瀏覽日期:2025年12月2日)
    消費者庁(2023)。「令和4年度消費者意識基本調査 調査結果の概要」,檢自:< https://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/consumer_research/research_report/survey_002/assets/consumer_research_cms201_230613_15.pdf>。(最後瀏覽日期:2025年11月17日)
    経済產業省(2024)。「令和5年度電子商取引に関する市場調査報告書」。檢自:<https://www.meti.go.jp/press/2024/09/20240925001/20240925001-1.pdf>。(最後瀏覽日期:2025年8月22日)
    経済產業省(2025)。「令和6年度電子商取引に関する市場調査報告書」。檢自:<https://www.meti.go.jp/press/2024/09/20240925001/20240925001-1.pdf>。(最後瀏覽日期:2025年10月22日)
    野村綜合研究所(2024)。「生成AI導入検討における課題と対応」。檢自:<https://www.nri.com/jp/media/column/scs_blog/20241031_1.html>。(最後瀏覽日期:2025年11月7日)
    総務省(2025)。「令和7年版情報通信白書」。檢自:<https://www.soumu.go.jp/johotsusintokei/whitepaper/ja/r07/html/nd112130.html#f00031>。(最後瀏覽日期:2025年11月17日)

    QR CODE
    :::