本文研究分析各國智慧財產權保護的差異對台灣出口前十大高技術密集高科技產品出口值的影響。探討資料由1997-2008年期間的追蹤資料 (panel data)　採用瑞士洛桑國際管理學院 (IMD) 所公布的智慧財產指標，並以適用追蹤資料的計量模型來做探討。並分別針對台灣出口前十大高技術高科技產品，藉此提供一個比較精確角度來觀察新興工業經濟體出口高技術密集高科技產品之情況。實證結果發現大多數國家在智慧財產權的保護加強對於台灣出口前十大高技術密集高科技產品有著正向且顯著的關係，此結果支持市場擴張效果存在於台灣高科技產品的市場上。此外，再經由區分不同國家的仿冒威脅程度之下，發現市場擴張效果的情形仍比較強勢，此結果特性與過去理論預測有不一致的情況。而顯著影響的高科技產品在投入要素密集度呈現大多是屬於中度資本密集，高度勞力密集。

一、中文部分
李昆峰 (2004)，「專利保護與出口貿易－台灣地區出口實證」，國立中央大
學產經所碩士論文。
孫震 (1996)，「台灣科技產業之發展」，1996海峽兩岸暨香港地區經貿研討
會專題報告。
張建一、蔡毓芳 (2004)，「進出口貨品結構別複分類之修訂」，台灣經濟研
究院，財政部九十三年度委託研究計畫。
黃仁德、姜樹翰 (2000)，「高科技產業的發展策略: 高科技中心的發展經
驗」， 經濟情勢暨評論, 6, 41-73。
趙文璋 (2001)，「加入WTO後台灣高科技產業發展趨勢」，台銀季刊，第五
十二卷，第四期，1-17。
楊朝祥 (2005)，「高科技產業與人才創新－台灣模式與經驗」，財團法人國
家政策研究基金會，教文(研) 094-017 號。

二、英文部分

Anderson, J.E. (1979), “A Theoretical Foundation of the
Gravity Equation,” American Economic Review, 69, 106-116.

Bergstrand (1989), “The Generalized Gravity Equation,
Monopolistic Competition, and Factor Proportions Theory
in International Trade,” Review of Economics and
Statistics, 71, 143–53.

Boretsky, M. (1982), “The Threat to U.S. High Technology
Industries: Economic and National Security Implications
Draft,” International Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.

Breusch, T., and Pagan, A., (1980), “The Lagrange
Multiplier test and its applications to model
specification in econometrics,”Review of Economic
Studies, 47, 239-253.

Briggs, K. N. (2008), “The Effect of Intellectual Property
Rights on High Technology Exports to Developing
Countries,” University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Brown, D. (1991), “Tariffs and Capacity Utilization by
Monopolistically Competitive Firms,” Journal of
International Economics, 30, 371-381.

C. H. Yang and Y. J. Huang, (2009), “Do Intellectual
Property Rights Matter to Taiwan’s Exports? A Dynamic
Panel Approach,” Pacific Economic Review, 14, 555-578.

Co, C.Y. (2004), “Do Patent Rights Regimes Matter?”
Review of International Economics, 12, 359-373.

Davis, Lester (1982), “Technology Intensity of U.S. Output
and Trade, Report of the Office of Trade and Investment
Analysis,”U.S. Department of Commerce; Washington, DC.

Deardorff, A. V. (1998), “Determinants of Bilateral Trade:
Does Gravity Work in a NeoclassicalWorld?” in J. A.
Frankel, Ed., The Regionalization of the World Economy,
University of Chicago Press.

Falvey, R., Foster, N., & Greenaway, D. (2009),“Trade,
Imitative Ability and Intellectual Property
Rirhts,”Reserch Paper, Rev World Econ, 145, 373–404.

Ferrantino, M.J. (1993), “The Effect of Intellectual
Property Rights on International Trade and Investment,”
Weltwirtschaftkiches Archiv, 129, 300-331.

Fink, C, and Primo-Braga, C.A. (2005), “How Stronger
Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Affects
International Trade Flows?” In C. Fink & K.E. Markus
(Eds), Intellectual Property and Development: Lessons
frowm recent Economic research. Washington, DC: The World
Bank.

Geert Duysters and John Hagedoorn (2001), “Do Company
Strategies and Structures Converge in Global Markets?
Evidence from the Computer Industry,” Journal of
International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan
Journals, 32, 347-356.

Ginarte, Juan and Walter Park (1997), “Determinants of
Patent Rights: A Cross-National Study,” Research Policy,
26, 283-301.

Griliches, Z. (1990), “Patent Statistics as Economic
Indicators: A Survey,” Journal of Economic Literature,
28, 1661-707.

Griliches, Z. (1998),“R&D and Productivity: The
Econometric Evidence,” University of Chicago Press.

Grupp,H.,Munt,G.andSchmoch,U.(1996),“Knowledge-
Intensiveand Resource-Concerned Growth In Germany,”
Research Evaluation, 6, 96-104.

Hansen, B. E., (1996), “Inference When a Nuisance
Parameter Is Not Identified Under The Null Hypothesis,”
Econometrica, 64, 413-430.

Hansen, B. E. (1999),“Threshold effects in non-dynamic
panels: Estimation, testing and inference.”Journal of
Econometrics, 93, 345–368.

Hansen, B. E. (2000),“Sample splitting and threshold
estimation,”Econometrica, 68, 575–603.

Hausman, J.A. (1978), “Specification Tests in
Econometrics,”Econometrica, 46, 1251–1271.

Hausman, J. A., Hall, B. H. and Griliches, Z.
(1984), “Econometric models for count data and with
application to thepatents-R&D relationship,”
Econometrica, 52, 909–938.

Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E. and H. Kim
(1997), “International Diversification: Effects on
Innovation and Firm performance in Product-Diversified
Firms,”Academy of Management Journal, 40, 767-798.

Henderson, R. and I. Cockburn (1994), “Measuring Core
Competencies: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical
Industry.”UBC Faculty of Commerce.

Helpman, E. and P. R. Kruguman (1985), “Market Structure
and Foreign Trade,” MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Hsiao, C. (1986), “Analysis of Panel Data,” Cambridge
University Press.

Liu, W.H. and Y.C. Lin (2005), “Foreign Patent Rights and
High-tech Exports: Evidence from Taiwan,” Applied
Economics, 37, 1543-1555.

Maskus, K.E. and M. Penubarti (1995), “How Trade-Related
Are Intellectual Property Rights?” Journal of
International Economics, 39, 227-248.

Mundalk, Y. (1978),“On the pooling of time series and
cross-section data,”Econometrica , 46, 69–85.

Primo-Braga, C. A. and A. Yeats, (1992),“The Simple
Arithmetic of existing Multilateral Trading Arrangements
and Implications for a Post-Uruguay Round
World,”International Trade Division, World
Bank,processed.

Rafiquzzaman, M. (2002), “he Impact of Patent Rights on
International Trade: Evidence from Canada,” Canadian
Journal of Economics, 35, 307-330

Schwartz, M. (1991), “Patent Protection through
Discriminatory Exclusion of Imports,” Review of
Industrial Organization, 6, 231-246.

Smith, P. J. (1999), “Are Weak Patent a Barrier to
U.S. Exports?” Journal of International Economics, 48,
151-177.

Smith, P. J. (2001), “How do Foreign Patent Rights Affect
U.S. Exports, Affiliate Sales, and Licenses?” Journal of
International Economics, 55, 411-439.

Stewart, J. Q. (1947),“Suggested principles of social
physics.”Science, 106, 179-180.

Taylor, M. S. (1993), “TRIPS, Trade and Technology
Transfer,” Canada Journal of Economic, 26, 625-637.

Tinbergen, J (1962),“Shaping the World Economy:
suggestions for an internationaleconomic policy,”The
20th century fund, New York.