跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 馮羽欣
論文名稱: 國中學生接受聽力策略訓練後聽力策略發展之研究
An Investigation of Junior High School Students' Listening Strategies Development after Explicit Listening Instruction
指導教授: 葉潔宇
Yeh, Chieh Yue
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 外國語文學院 - 英語教學碩士在職專班
The Master of Arts in English Teaching
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 102
中文關鍵詞: 聽力策略學習過程聽力策略訓練聽力策略國中生
相關次數: 點閱:326下載:76
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討國中學生在接受為期十二周的聽力策略訓練(LSI)之後,其後設認知、認知、社會情感策略的使用和發展以及了解國中學生聽力策略學習的過程。研究對象為36名北部國中七年級學生。其中,後設認知策略和認知策略將在課堂上明確的(explicitly)教導;而社會情感策略則是暗示的(implicitly)教導。從反思日記中所收集的資料以質化和量化的方式分析。量化資料以SPSS 11.5 來做描述統計分析;而質化資料則以逐字稿打出並由研究者和另一名英文老師來做分析與歸類的工作。
    研究結果顯示後設認知策略和社會情感策略的使用減少,而認知策略的使用增加。此外能力高低與策略使用的次數並沒有絕對的對應。另外,學生可以在策略訓練的過程中發展出自己的策略。最後,策略的使用十分的個人化與複雜。根據研究發現,本研究提出三點對於國中英文聽力教學上的建議。第一,聽力策略訓練可以與國中英文課程做結合。第二,教導學生聽力策略的同時,應要求學生寫反思日記。最後,不應強迫學生在聽力策略上的使用方式,因為聽力策略的使用個別性很高。


    This study aimed to investigate students’ listening strategy learning process and their metacognitive, cognitive, and social/affective strategies utilization as well as development after listening strategy instruction(LSI). The subjects were 36 seventh graders in junior high school in northern Taiwan. These students were taught listening strategies for twelve weeks. Metacognitive strategies and cognitive strategies were taught explicitly while social/affective strategies were taught implicitly. The data from reflective journals were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The quantitative data were analyzed by the SPSS version 11.5 for the descriptive statistics, while the qualitative data from reflective journals were transcribed verbatim and categorized into the themes by the researcher and another English teacher.
    The result showed the reported use of metacognitive strategies and social/affective strategies reduced with time, whereas the reported use of cognitive strategies increased. Meanwhile, the students’ proficiency levels did not correspond to the frequency of strategies use. Besides, students developed strategies that had not been emphasized in LSI. Moreover, students changed their roles from passive learning to active thinking and became better able to apply a wide range of strategies after LSI. Last, it was found that strategy use is highly individualized and complex. Based on these findings, some pedagogical implications were suggested. First, LSI can be integrated in EFL classroom in junior high school. Next, it is important to teach students listening strategies as well as ask them to write reflection journal at the same time. Last, it is better not to force students to use some specific strategies at specific time because strategy use is highly individualized.

    Acknowledgements v
    Chinese Abstract I
    English Abstract III
    Chapter One: Introduction 1
    Background and Motivation 1
    Purpose of the Study 3
    Research Questions 3
    Chapter Two: Literature Review 5
    Listening Process 5
    Top-down Processing 5
    Bottom-up Processing 6
    Interactive Processing 7
    Language Learning Strategies and Listening Strategies 8
    Strategy-based Instruction 10
    The Model of Explicit Strategy Instruction 10
    The Effectiveness of Explicit Strategy Instruction 14
    Chapter Three: Methodology 17
    Participants 17
    The Listening Section of GEPT Elementary Level 17
    Teaching Materials 18
    Reflective Journal 19
    Strategy Classification Scheme 20
    Treatment 20
    Listening Strategies List 20
    Procedure 23
    Pilot Study 24
    Main Study 24
    Data Analysis 25
    Chapter Four: Results ...27
    Students’ Strategy Use 27
    Metcognitive Strategies Use in Listening 31
    Metcognitive Strategies Use in Listening—Quantitative Analysis 31
    Sub-strategies of Planning 34
    Sub-strategies of Monitoring 35
    Sub-strategies of Evaluation 37
    Metcognitive Strategies Use in Listening—Qualitative Analysis 40
    Cognitive Strategies Use in Listening 42
    Cognitive Strategies Use in Listening—Quantitative Analysis 42
    Sub-strategies of Top-down Strategies 46
    Sub-strategies of Bottom-up Strategies 49
    Sub-strategies of Cognitive Other Strategies 52
    Cognitive Strategies Use in Listening –Qualitative Analysis 56
    Social and Affective Strategies Use in Listening 59
    Social and Affective Strategies Use in Listening—Quantitative Analysis 59
    Chapter Five: Discussion 65
    Chapter Six : Conclusion 75
    Summary of the Major Findings 75
    Quantitative Findings 75
    Qualitative Findings 77
    Pedagogical Implications 77
    Limitations of the Present Study and Suggestions for Future Research 78
    Reference 79
    Appendix A 87
    Reflective Journal 87
    Appendix B 90
    Listening Strategies Classification Scheme 90
    Appendix C 100
    Listening Strategy List 100

    Abraham, R. G., & Vann, R. J. (1987). Strategies of two language learners: A case study. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (p. 85-102). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Anderson, N. J. (2005). L2 learning strategies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, (pp 757-771). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Arnold, J. (e.d.) (1999). Affect in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Arnold, J. & Brown, H.D. (1999). A map of the terrain. In Arnold, J. (e.d.) Affect in language Learning. (pp1-24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.
    Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. (5th edition). (p118-51). NY: Longman.
    Bubin, J. (2011). A review of second language listening comprehension research. Hermitage Avenue Wheaton, MD 20902
    Buck, G. (1991). The testing of listening comprehension: an introspective study. Language Testing, v8 (1), pp67-91
    Chamot, A. U. (1987). The learning strategies of ESL students. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning. (pp.71-84). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
    Chamot, A. U., and Kupper. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals 22, 1 pp.13-24.
    Chamot, A.U., & El-Dinary, P. B. (1990). Children’s learning strategies in inmmersion classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 83 (2), 319-341
    Chamot, A. U. (2001). The role of learning strategies in second language acquisition. In M.P. Breen (ed.) Leaner Contributions to Language Learning (pp. 25-43)
    Chamot, A. U. (2004). The Cognitive Academic Language Approach (CALLA): An update. In P.A. Richard- Amato & M.A. Snow (Eds.), Academic success for English language learners: Strategies for K-12 mainstream teachers (PP. 87-101). White Plains, NY: Longman
    Chamot, A.U. (2004b). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 1(1), (pp.14-26).
    Chamot, A.U. (2005). The Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach (CALLA): An update. In P.A. Richard-Amato & M.A. Snow. (eds.), Academic success for English language learners: Strategies for K-12 mainstream teachers (pp87-101). White Plains, NY: Longman.
    Chen, Ai-Hua. (2009). Listening strategy instruction: Exploring Taiwanese college students’ strategy development. Asian EFL Journal, 11(2), 54-85
    Chan, C. Y. (2005). A Study of Metacongitive Strategies in EFL Listening Comprehension. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin, Taiwan.
    Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Longdon: Longman.
    Cohen, A. D. (2011). Second language learner strategies. In Hinkel (Ed.) Handbook of research in second language learning and teaching. (pp. 681-98). NY: Routledge.
    Dornyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
    Ellermeyer, D. (1993). Improving listening comprehension through a whole-schema approach. Early child development and care, v93, P.101-110
    Grenfell, M. & Harris, V. (1999). Modern languages and learning strategies: In theory and practice. London: Routledge.
    Gillette, B. (1994). The role of learner goals in second language success in J.P. Lantikf and G. Appel (eds.) Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Learning (pp.195-213). New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    Graham, S. & Harris, K.R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In L. Swanson, K. R. Harris & S. Graham (eds.), Handbook of research on learning disabilities (pp. 323-344). New York: Guildford.
    Long, D. (1990). What you don't know can't help you. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 65-80.
    Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners: listening comprehension problems. System 28, 55-75
    Goh, C. (2002). Teaching listening in the language classroom. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
    Goh, C. (2002b). Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns. System 30, 185-206
    Goh, C. & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60(3), 222-232
    Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: theory, practice and research implications. RELC Journal, 39, 188
    Harris, V. (2003). Adating classroom-based strategy instruction to a distance learning context. TESL-EJ, 7 (2).
    Hildyard, A. & Olson, D. (1982). On the structure and meaning of prose texts. In W. Otto and White (Eds.) Reading expository material. New York, Academic Press.
    Hong- Nam, K. & Leavell, A. G. (2006). Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context. System 34 (2006) 399-415
    Huang, J. (2005). A diary study of difficulties and constraints in EFL learning. System,33(4),609621
    Huang, Y. C. (2008). The effects of explicit teaching of listening strategies on senior high school. Unpublished master thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.
    Hung, Li-Chaou. (2010). An experimental study on the effect of metacognitive strategy based English listening comprehension instruction and strategy using junior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.
    Hurd, S. (2008). Affect and strategy use in independent language learning. In Hurd, S. and Lewis, T. (Eds.), Language learning strategies in independent settings (pp. 218-236). UK: Multilingual Matters.
    Lee, Jin-An Leo. (2007). Exploring metacognitive strategy use in listening comprehension. Unpublushed master thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Kelly, P. (1991). The main obstacle to listening comprehension with advanced foreign language learners. IRAL,29(2).
    Khaldieh, S.A. (2000). Learning strategies and writing processes of proficient VS. less proficient learners of Arabic. Foreign Language Annals, 33(5), 522-533
    Li, Pei-Chi. (2009) Effects of listening Strategy Instruction on Junior high school students’ EFL listening comprehension in Taiwan. Unpublished master thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.
    Little, D. (1996). Strategic competence considerer in relation to strategic control of the language learning process. In H Holec, D. Little and R. Richaterich (eds.) Strategies in Language Learning and Use (Modern Languages): Studies towards a common European Framework of Reference for Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 11-37). Starsbourg: Council of Europe.
    Long, D. (1989). Second language Listening Comprehension: A schema-theoretic perspective. Modern Language Journal, 18,3-19
    Macaro, E. (2001). Learner Strategies in Second and Foreign Language Classrooms. London: Continuum.
    McDonough, S. (1999). Leaner strategies: State-of-the art. Language Teaching 32, 1-18
    Meyer, B. J. F.& Rice, G. E. (1983). Effects of discourse type on recall by young, middle, and old adults with high and average vocabulary scores. RIEMEY 1984.
    Murphy, J. M. (1985). Investigation into the listening strategies of ESL college students. Paper, TESOL, New York, 1985
    Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. New York, N.Y.: MacGraw-Hill/ Contemporary.
    Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House/ Harper Collins.
    Oxford, R.L. & Cohen, A.D. (1992). Language learning strategies: Crucial issues of concept and classification. Applied Language Learning 3 (1), 1-35
    Oxford, R.L. (1993). Research on second language learning strategies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 13, 175-187
    Oxford, R. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. Retrieved June 4th, 2013, from http://hyxy.nankai.edu.cn/jingpinke/buchongyuedu/learning%20strategies%20by%20Oxford.pdf
    O’ Malley, J. & Chamot, A. & Kupper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 10, (pp.18-437)
    O’ Malley, J. & Chamot, A. (1990).Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Rees-Miller, J. (1993). A critical appraisal of learner training: Theoretical bases and teaching implications. TESOL Quarterly 27 (4), 679-689
    Richards, J. C. (2003). Tactics for Listening (2nd edition) Basic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Schrafnagl & Fage (1998). The Good Distance Language Learner. Unpublished study into the background, learning experience and strategies of students in the open University London region studying L120.
    Serri, F., Boroujeni, A, J. & Hesabi, A.(2012). Cognitive, Metacognitive, and social/ affective strategies in listening comprehension and their relationships with individual differences. Theory and practice in language studies, V2(4), 843-849, April 2012
    Tsui, A. B. M., & Fullilove, J. (1998). Bottom-up or top-down processing as a discriminator of L2 listening performance. Applied Linguistic, 19, 432-451.
    Vandergrift, L. (1996). Listening strategies of core French high school students. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 52(2), 200-223.
    Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30(3)
    Vandergrift, L. (1998). Successful and less successful listeners in French: what are the strategy differences? The French Review 71, 370-395
    Vandergrift, L. (2002). It was nice to see that our predictions were right: Developing metacognition in L2 listening comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review 58, 555-575
    Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning 53, 463-496
    Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learn to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linquistics, 25,325.
    Vandergrift, L. (2008). Learning strategies for listening comprehension. In Hurd, S. and Lewis, T. (Eds.), Language learning strategies in independent settings (pp. 84-102). UK: Multilingual Matters.
    Weissenrieder, M. (1987). Understanding spoken Spanish: a course in listening. Foreign Language Annals, v20 n6, p531-36.
    Wei-Lin, Li. (2009). An action research of metacognitive strategy instruction in English listening comprehension. Unpublished thesis. Tamkang University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Wenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linquistics, 19(4), 515537
    Wilson, M. (2003). Discovery listening-improving perceptual processing. ELT Journal, 57(4), 335-343.
    Wharton, G. (2000). Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign language learners in Singapore. Language Learning 50 (2), 203-243
    White, C. (2008). Language learning strategies in independent language learning: an overview. In Hurd, S. and Lewis, T. (Eds.), Language learning strategies in independent settings (pp. 3-22). UK: Multilingual Matters.
    Wolf, Dieter. “Some Assumptions about Second Language Text Comprehension.” Studies in Second Language Acquisitions 9 (1987): 307-26
    Wu, Y. (1998). What do tests of listening comprehension test? A retrospection study of EFL test-takers performing a multiple-choice task. Language Testing, v15 n1, p21-44.
    Yaru, You. (2007). Effects of explicit strategy instruction on EFL listening performance and strategy use. Unpublished master thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.

    QR CODE
    :::