本研究以Meta為核心個案，探討假訊息治理中平臺責任之形成、運作與限制，並比較美國、歐盟與臺灣不同制度環境下的平臺治理模式。隨著大型數位平臺掌握資訊排序、演算法推薦、廣告投放與資料運用等能力，平臺已不再只是被動的資訊中介者，其治理責任亦逐漸成為數位治理的重要議題。
本研究採質性研究取徑，運用文獻分析法、文件分析法、個案研究法及比較法研究法，分析Meta官方政策文件、美歐相關法規與判例、臺灣政策資料及國內外學術文獻。研究發現，平臺責任並非由「中介者免責」線性發展至「全面監管」，而是在不同法律文化、制度設計、政治社會環境、技術條件與商業誘因下形成不同的責任配置。美國以第一修正案、《通訊端正法》第230條及平臺自治為重要基礎；歐盟則以基本權保障、系統性風險治理與程序問責為核心，透過《數位服務法》（DSA）要求大型平臺承擔風險評估、透明度及外部問責等義務。
研究亦發現，Meta由第三方事實查核轉向社群備註（Community Notes），並非單純治理工具的替換，而是平臺、專業查核組織與使用者之間責任的重新配置。
本研究認為，未來平臺責任應由個別內容治理逐步轉向系統責任，要求平臺對其可控制的演算法推薦、廣告系統、治理程序與風險管理承擔相應責任，同時以言論自由與程序正義限制治理權力的擴張。對臺灣而言，未來制度設計應優先強化透明義務、申訴救濟、資料近用及外部監督，逐步建立兼顧言論自由與平臺問責的治理架構。

中文文獻
中央通訊社（2022年9月7日）。〈NCC將數位中介法草案退回工作小組　重新盤點爭議〉。中央社。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202209070201.aspx
中央選舉委員會（2024年1月14日）。〈網傳誣指中選會作票影片〉【新聞稿】。https://2024.cec.gov.tw/article/content/?id=M0026&target=%2Farticle%2FA0211
王牧寰、楊儷綺（2022）。〈從責任到義務─論歐盟「電子商務指令」至「數位服務法」草案的思維轉變〉，王震宇編《數位貿易政策與資訊科技法律》，頁143-186。五南。
王奕雅（2020）。《社群媒體假訊息的管制模式：以美國法為比較基礎》。國立臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
王泰俐（2019）。〈假新聞與民主危機〉。《臺灣民主季刊》，16（3），155–161。
何吉森（2018）。〈假新聞之監理與治理探討〉。《傳播研究與實踐》，8（2），1–41。https://doi.org/10.6123/JCRP.201807_8(2).0001
何吉森（2023）。〈歐盟對假訊息管制影響言論自由之省思〉。《教育暨資訊科技法學評論》，10，67–87。https://doi.org/10.6920/EITLR.202305_(10).0004
余若凡（2025）。〈網路自由的基石：第230條的過去、現在與未來——簡評《網路自由的兩難》一書〉。《資訊社會研究》，48，157–170。
余政倫（2021）。《利用已查核資訊邁向自動化不實訊息偵測》。國立臺灣大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文。
李柏寛（2022）。《如何追求真相：臺灣事實查核運動的發展與實踐》。國立臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202201656
何琇琪（2021）。《新冠肺炎不實訊息的內容特徵與組織查核策略：以臺灣事實查核中心新冠肺炎查核專區為例》。國立政治大學傳播碩士學位學程碩士論文。https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202100918
林芷芸（2019年5月）。〈探討我國政府機關如何處理爭議訊息〉。2019年臺灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會年會發表論文。
林家暘（2022）。〈2022年數位中介服務法草案爭議評析〉。《教育暨資訊科技法學評論》，9，127–143。https://doi.org/10.6920/EITLR.202210_(9).0008
林書立、吳志勇（2021）。〈網路假訊息之刑事不法研究〉。《軍法專刊》，67（6），111–137。
林照真（2020）。〈假新聞類型與媒體聚合：以2018年臺灣選舉為例〉。《新聞學研究》，142，111–153。https://doi.org/10.30386/MCR.202001_(142).0003
林照真（2022）。《假新聞政治：台灣選舉暗角的虛假訊息與資訊操控》。聯經出版。
胡元輝（2018）。〈商營社群媒體的自律與問責：政治經濟學取徑的批判〉。《傳播文化與政治》，8，37–76。
胡元輝（2021）。〈COVID-19疫情下的探戈之舞：事實查核新聞學的臺灣實踐與反思〉。《中華傳播學刊》，39，109–127。https://doi.org/10.3966/172635812021060039004
洪貞玲（2023年6月16–18日）。〈全球因應假訊息政策：三種模式比較〉【論文發表】。「2023年中華傳播學會年會」，臺南市，臺灣。
翁任慧（2022年8月）。〈臺灣「數位中介服務法草案」有無限制人民言論自由之虞？〉。理慈國際科技法律事務所。https://www.leetsai.com/
唐淑美（2024）。〈假新聞規範與言論自由之探討〉。《生物產業科技管理叢刊》，12，1–11。https://doi.org/10.6170/BTMR.202404_12.0001
翁逸泓（2022）。〈社群媒體不實訊息之治理：以個資保護模式為選項〉。《中研院法學期刊》，30，171–226。
郭永賦（2024）。《社群媒體平臺使用者之言論自由保障與司法救濟》。國立東吳大學法律學系碩士論文。
許育典、李霽恆（2022）。〈網路平臺上假訊息的管制問題〉。《中正大學法學集刊》，75，167–227。https://doi.org/10.53106/172876182022040075003
國家通訊傳播委員會（2022年6月29日）。〈「數位中介服務法」草案意見徵詢〉。公共政策網路參與平臺。https://join.gov.tw/policies/detail/43dbdcc4-af21-4fcb-9173-d3b5993ab88d
張陳弘（2022）。〈假訊息管制的言論自由理論思考：美國法的比較觀察〉。《輔仁法學》，63，187–249。
黃自強（2020）。《社群媒體時代下對於「更多言論」之質疑：以假訊息之管制為中心》。國立臺灣大學法律研究所碩士論文。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202004328
黃銘輝（2019）。〈假新聞、社群媒體與網路時代的言論自由〉。《月旦法學雜誌》，292，5–29。
葉乃靜（2020）。〈後真相時代社群媒體上的假新聞分享行為研究〉。《圖書資訊學刊》，46（1），96–112。https://doi.org/10.6245/JLIS.202004_46(1).0004
楊智傑（2021）。〈美國不實言論之言論自由保障〉。《中正大學法學集刊》，71，121–192。
臺灣事實查核中心（2024）。〈2024總統大選不實訊息〉。https://tfc-taiwan.org.tw/2024-presidential-election-misinformation/
臺灣事實查核中心（2025）。〈科技公司以「社群備註」打擊錯誤資訊有效嗎？〉。取自 https://tfc-taiwan.org.tw/
盧建誌（2023）。〈假訊息管制與言論自由的平衡——美國網路中介責任的立法邊界探察與反思〉。《中華傳播學刊》，44，1–41。
譚躍（2025）。〈媒體使用對政治誤信、錯誤訊息和分享意願的影響及其調節因素〉。《傳播與社會學刊》，73，73–114。https://doi.org/10.30180/CS.202507_(73).0004
蘇慧婕（2019）。〈假訊息管制與資訊揭露義務：以選罷法、公投法及其修正草案為中心〉。《月旦法學雜誌》，292，42–59。

英文文獻
Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919).
Allen, J., Arechar, A. A., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Scaling. up fact-checking using the wisdom of crowds. Science Advances, 7(36), eabf4393. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf4393
Allen, J., Arechar, A. A., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2024). Scaling up fact-checking using the wisdom of crowds. Science Advances, 10(18), eadk3451. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk3451
Bakir, V., & McStay, A. (2018). Fake news and the economy of. emotions: Problems, causes, solutions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 154–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645
Balkin, J. M. (2018). Free speech in the algorithmic society: Big data, private governance, and new school speech regulation. UC Davis Law Review, 51(3), 1149–1210.
Balkin, J. M. (2018). Free speech is a triangle. Columbia Law Review, 118(7), 2011–2055.
Balkin, J. M. (2022). The future of free expression in a digital age. Pepperdine Law Review, 49(4), 917–938.
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production. transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.
Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.
Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
Bontcheva, K., Posetti, J., Teyssou, D., Meyer, T., Gregory, S., Hanot, C., & Maynard, D. (2023). Balancing act: Countering digital disinformation while respecting freedom of expression. UNESCO.
Borenstein, N., Warren, G., Elliott, D., & Augenstein, I. (2025). Can. Community Notes replace professional fact-checkers? In Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) (pp. 535–552). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-short.42
Bostoen, F. (2023). Understanding the Digital Markets Act. The Antitrust Bulletin, 68(2), 263–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X231162998
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. N. (2019). The global disinformation order: 2019 global inventory of organised social media manipulation. Oxford Internet Institute.
Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. N. (2021). Industrialized disinformation: 2020 global inventory of organised social media manipulation. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford. https://demtech.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/posts/industrialized-disinformation-2020-global-inventory-of-organized-social-media-manipulation/
Brady, W. J., McLoughlin, K., Doan, T. N., & Crockett, M. J. (2021). How. social learning amplifies moral outrage expression in online social networks. Science Advances, 7(33), eabe5641. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe5641
Brennen, J. S., Simon, F. M., Howard, P. N., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/types-sources-and-claims-covid-19-misinformation
Bridgman, A., Merkley, E., Loewen, P. J., Owen, T., Ruths, D., Teichmann, L., & Zhilin, O. (2020). The causes and consequences of COVID-19 misperceptions: Understanding the role of news and social media. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-028
Bruno, M., Lambiotte, R., & Saracco, F. (2022). Brexit and bots: Characterizing the。behaviour of automated accounts on Twitter during the UK election. EPJ Data Science, 11(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00335-6
Cabral, L., Haucap, J., Parker, G., Petropoulos, G., Valletti, T., & Van. Alstyne, M. (2021). The EU Digital Markets Act: A report from a panel of economic experts. Publications Office of the European Union.
Central Election Commission. (2024). Clarifications regarding election. and vote-counting misinformation. Central Election Commission.
Chesney, R., & Citron, D. K. (2019). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for. privacy, democracy, and national security. California Law Review, 107(6), 1753–1819.
Chuai, Y., Large, H., Moshirnia, A., & Roy, D. (2024). Quantifying. the. impact of Community Notes on information sharing on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(50), e2407190121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2407190121
Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between truth and power: The legal constructions of. informational capitalism. Oxford University Press.
Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. §230 (1996).
Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe Inc., 776 F. Supp. 135 (S.D.N.Y. 1991).
de Gregorio, G. (2023). Digital constitutionalism in Europe: Reframing rights and powers in the algorithmic society. Cambridge University Press.
de Gregorio, G. (2023). The rise of digital constitutionalism in the. European Union. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 21(1), 41–70.
Diakopoulos, N. (2019). Automating the news: How algorithms are. rewriting the media. Harvard University Press.
Dommett, K. (2020). Regulating digital campaigning: The case of. political micro-targeting. Political Quarterly, 91(2), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12821
Douek, E. (2021). Governing online speech: From “posts-as-trumps”. to. proportionality and probability. Columbia Law Review, 121(3), 759–834.
Douek, E. (2021). The rise of content cartels. Knight First Amendment Institute Research Paper.
Douek, E. (2022). Content moderation as systems thinking. Harvard Law. Review, 136(2), 526–616.
Douek, E. (2022). Governing online speech: From “posts-as-trumps” to. proportionality and probability. Columbia Global Freedom of Expression.
Drolsbach, D., Solovev, K., & Pröllochs, N. (2024). The effects of. Community Notes on users’ perception of misinformation and platform trust. Scientific Reports, 14, 26824. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-78227-0
Eady, G., Guess, A. M., Zilinsky, J., & Nyhan, B. (2023). Exposure to. the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior. Nature Communications, 14, 62. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35576-9
Facebook. (2017, September 6). Information operations and Facebook. Facebook Newsroom. https://about.fb.com/news/2017/09/information-operations-and-facebook/
Flew, T., & Martin, F. (2022). Digital platform regulation: Global. perspectives on Internet governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory. development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content. moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
Gonzalez v. Google LLC, 598 U.S. 617 (2023).
Gorodnichenko, Y., Pham, T., & Talavera, O. (2021). Social media, sentiment and public opinions: Evidence from #Brexit and #USElection. European Economic Review, 136, 103772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103772
Gorwa, R. (2019). What is platform governance? Information, Communication & Society, 22(6), 854–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914
Gorwa, R., Binns, R., & Katzenbach, C. (2020). Algorithmic content. moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data & Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945
Gorwa, R., Binns, R., & Katzenbach, C. (2020). Algorithmic content. moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data & Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945
Gorwa, R. (2024). The politics of platform regulation: How governments shape online content moderation. Oxford University Press.
Griffin, R. (2023). From brand safety to suitability: Advertisers in platform governance. Internet Policy Review, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.3.1716
Griffin, R. (2025). The politics of risk in the Digital Services Act: A. stakeholder mapping and research agenda. Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.34669/wi.wjds/5.2.6
Gruzd, A., Soares, F. B., & Mai, P. (2023). Trust and safety on social. media platforms: A critical review. Social Media + Society, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231216944
Hacker, P., Engel, A., & Mauer, M. (2023). Regulating ChatGPT and other large generative AI models. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 1112–1123). Association for Computing Machinery.
Helberger, N., Pierson, J., & Poell, T. (2018). Governing online platforms: From contested to cooperative responsibility. The Information Society, 34(1), 1–14.
Helberger, N. (2023). The political power of platforms: How the Digital. Services Act reframes platform responsibility. Internet Policy Review, 12(4).
Helberger, N., Pierson, J., & Poell, T. (2024). Governing online. platforms: From content moderation to systemic risk regulation. Internet Policy Review, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.14763/2024.3.1805
Husovec, M. (2024). The Digital Services Act and the limits of. disinformation regulation. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 13(2), 63–71.
Husovec, M. (2024). The Digital Services Act’s red line: What the Commission can and cannot do about disinformation. Journal of Media Law, 16(1), 47–56.
International Fact-Checking Network. (2024). Code of principles. Poynter. Institute.
Irish Data Protection Commission. (2023). DPC announces conclusion of. Meta Ireland inquiry into EU-US data transfers. Data Protection Commission.
Isaak, J., & Hanna, M. J. (2018). User data privacy: Facebook, Cambridge. Analytica, and privacy protection. Computer, 51(8), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.3191268
Jhaver, S., Bruckman, A., & Gilbert, E. (2019). Does transparency in moderation really matter? User behavior after content removal explanations on Reddit. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), Article 150. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359252
Jhaver, S., Zhang, A. Q., Chen, Q. Z., Natarajan, N., Wang, R., & Zhang, A. X. (2023). Personalizing content moderation on social media: User perspectives on moderation choices, interface design, and labor. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CSCW2), Article 289. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610080
Keller, D. (2022). Who do you sue? State and platform hybrid power over online speech. Hoover Institution Press.
Keller, D. (2023). Amplification and its discontents: Why regulating. the reach of online speech is hard. Journal of Free Speech Law, 3(2), 227–290.
Klonick, K. (2018). The new governors: The people, rules, and processes. governing online speech. Harvard Law Review, 131(6), 1598–1670.
Kosseff, J. (2019). The twenty-six words that created the Internet. Cornell University Press.
Krauth, K., Wang, Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2022). Breaking feedback loops in recommender systems with causal inference. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.01616
Laux, J., Wachter, S., & Mittelstadt, B. (2021). Taming the few: Platform regulation, independent audits, and the risks of capture created by the DMA and DSA. Computer Law & Security Review, 43, 105613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105613
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
Leiser, M. R. (2023). Reimagining digital governance: The EU’s. Digital Services Act and the fight against disinformation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4427493
Lindquist, J., & Weltevrede, E. (2024). Authenticity governance and the market for social media engagements: The shaping of disinformation at the peripheries of platform ecosystems. Social Media + Society, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231224721
Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Reliance on emotion. promotes belief in fake news. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(47). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3
Meta. (2016). Addressing hoaxes and fake news.
Meta. (2016, December 15). News feed FYI: Addressing hoaxes and fake news. Meta Newsroom. https://about.fb.com/news/2016/12/news-feed-fyi-addressing-hoaxes-and-fake-news/
Meta. (2016, December 15). Working with third-party fact-checkers to. help identify and review fake news. Meta Newsroom.
Meta. (2021). Combating COVID-19 misinformation across our apps.
Meta. (2021). Combating COVID-19 misinformation and harmful content. Meta Newsroom.
Meta. (2024). Community standards. Meta Transparency Center. https://transparency.meta.com/policies/community-standards/
Meta. (2024). Coordinated inauthentic behavior reports. Meta Transparency Center. https://about.fb.com/news/tag/coordinated-inauthentic-behavior/
Meta. (2024). Inauthentic behavior. Meta Transparency Center. https://transparency.meta.com/policies/community-standards/inauthentic-behavior/
Meta. (2024). Labeling AI-generated content on Facebook, Instagram and. Threads. Meta Newsroom.
Meta. (2024a). Our approach to labeling AI-generated content and. manipulated media.
Meta. (2024b). Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior Report.
Meta. (2024c). Transparency Center.
Meta. (2025). More speech and fewer mistakes: Replacing fact-checking with Community Notes in the United States. Meta Newsroom.
Meta. (2025, January 7). More speech and fewer mistakes.
Meta. (2025, January 7). More speech and fewer mistakes: Community. notes and changes to fact-checking. Meta Newsroom. https://about.fb.com/news/2025/01/community-notes-and-third-party-fact-checking/
Meta. (2025, January 7). More speech and fewer mistakes: Updating our approach to content moderation. Meta Newsroom. https://about.fb.com/news/2025/01/updating-our-approach-to-content-moderation/
Meta. (2025, March 13). Testing begins for Community Notes on Facebook, Instagram and Threads.
Mill, J. S. (1859/2003). On liberty. Yale University Press.
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, 603 U.S. ___ (2024).
Murero, M. (2023). Coordinated inauthentic behavior: An innovative. manipulation tactic to amplify and suppress online information. Frontiers in Communication, 8, 1122898. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1122898
Napoli, P. M. (2023). Social media and the public interest: Media. regulation in the disinformation age. Columbia University Press.
NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton, 603 U.S. ___ (2024).
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Eddy, K., & Nielsen, R. K. (2024). Digital news report 2024. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2024
Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425
Renault, T., Restrepo Amariles, D., & Troussel, A. (2024). Community. notes versus fact-checking: Can crowdsourced moderation curb misinformation diffusion? Journal of Online Trust and Safety, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.54501/jots.v3i2.238
Reuters. (2025). Meta ends third-party fact-checking program in the. United States. Reuters.
Reuters. (2025, January 7). Meta scraps U.S. fact-checking program, adopts Community Notes. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com
Rone, J. (2023). Beyond Brexit? Public participation in decision-making. on platform governance and political campaigning after Cambridge Analytica. Media and Communication, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i4.7137
Siems, M. M. (2022). Comparative law (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Skafle, I., Nordahl-Hansen, A., Quintana, D. S., Wynn, R., & Gabarron, E. (2022). Misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines on social media: Rapid review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(8), e37367. https://doi.org/10.2196/37367
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage. Publications.
Starbird, K., Arif, A., & Wilson, T. (2023). Disinformation as. collaborative work: Surfacing the participatory nature of strategic information operations. Social Media + Society, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231186343
Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Services Co., No. 31063/94, 1995 WL. 323710 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. May 24, 1995).
Su, Z., Lee, R., Xiao, Y., Shu, W., & Liu, H. (2022). Lifespan. perspective on vaccine hesitancy and misinformation among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(5), e2772–e2783. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13742
Suzor, N. P. (2019). Lawless: The secret rules that govern our digital lives. Cambridge University Press.
Suzor, N. P. (2023). Digital constitutionalism and the governance of online platforms. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 21(4), 1345–1365.
Tandoc, E. C., Jr., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
Tangcharoensathien, V., Calleja, N., Nguyen, T., Purnat, T., D’Agostino, M., Garcia-Saiso, S., Landry, M., Rashidian, A., Hamilton, C., AbdAllah, A., Ghiga, I., Hill, A., Hougendobler, D., van Andel, J., Nunn, M., Brooks, I., Sacco, P. L., De Domenico, M., Mai, P., & Briand, S. (2020). Framework for managing the COVID-19 infodemic: Methods and results of an online, crowdsourced WHO technical consultation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), e19659. https://doi.org/10.2196/19659
Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104–104, 110 Stat. 56. (1996).
The Economist. (2025). Meta’s move to Community Notes and the future of platform governance.
The Economist. (2025, January 11). Mark Zuckerberg wants Facebook to be more like X. The Economist. https://www.economist.com
Truong, B. T., Wu, S., Flammini, A., Menczer, F., & Stewart, A. J. (2025). Community Notes are vulnerable to rater bias and manipulation. arXiv.
Truong, B. T., Wu, Y., Flammini, A., Menczer, F., & Stewart, L. G. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness of Community Notes in reducing misinformation spread on social media. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(1), 44–56.
U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. (2019). Report on Russian active measures campaigns and interference in the 2016 U.S. election. U.S. Government Publishing Office.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for the governance of digital platforms. UNESCO.
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
van Hoboken, J. (2022). The Digital Services Act package and the. governance of online platforms. Common Market Law Review, 59(6), 1705–1742.
Volokh, E. (2011). The First Amendment and related statutes: Problems, cases and policy arguments (4th ed.). Foundation Press.
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false. news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an. interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe.
World Health Organization. (2020). Managing the COVID-19 infodemic: Promoting healthy behaviours and mitigating the harm from misinformation and disinformation. World Health Organization.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and. methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Zeran v. America Online, Inc., 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997).
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a. human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). An introduction to comparative law. (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.