臺北市是全臺交通最為繁忙的城市之一，推動交通安全教育評鑑行之有年，惟現行缺乏系統性深入的探討，因此，本研究從後設評鑑的角度進行探討，補足現有研究，去評估評鑑本身的品質與成效。為此本研究之目的主要以建構臺北市國民小學交通安全教育評鑑之後設評鑑標準、分析受評人員對各方案評鑑標準重要性認同及表現程度、探討不同背景之受評人員對方案評鑑標準重要性及表現程度差異。
本研究先以文獻進行分析，並參考教育評鑑標準聯合委員會（簡稱JCSEE）所發行之方案評鑑標準，經由專家適切性分析後，建構出56項指標，透過重要性—表現程度之分析（IPA）回應本研究目的，依據研究之結果與分析，結論摘述如下：
一、參考「JCSEE方案評鑑標準」建構臺北市國民小學交通安全教育評鑑之後設評鑑標準56項指標，本方法能全面性的探討評鑑之品質。
二、本研究調查結果中以「可行性」標準類別最為重要，表現程度最佳為「適切性」。
三、受訪人員認為最重要的指標為「訪視應有效率」；另最不重要的指標為「委託單位能委託『非利害關係人』進行外部後設評鑑」。
四、受訪人員認為表現最好的指標為「訪視能確認受訪學校的優點並提供缺點改善建議」；表現最不好的指標為「主管機關能委託非利害關係人進行外部後設評鑑」。
五、IPA分析發現，在行政減量及經費編列落入第四象限（優先改善區），顯示行政作業繁瑣與經費資源不足，是學校端感受最強烈的指標，主管機關需重視並正視此問題。
六、不同背景變項「性別」、「工作職務」、「年齡」與「訪視學年度」在重要性與表現程度上，部分標準類別有顯著差異，表示不同背景的人員有不同的看法。
綜上，透過資料分析與結論，提供主管機關、學校及未來研究之方向提供建議。

Taipei City is one of the cities with the heaviest traffic in Taiwan. While The Traffic Safety Education Evaluation has been implemented for many years, there is currently a lack of systematic and in-depth investigation into its practices. Consequently, this study approaches the issue from the perspective of meta-evaluation to bridge the gap in existing literature and assess the quality and effectiveness of the evaluation itself. To this end, the primary objectives of this study are: to construct meta-evaluation standards for traffic safety education evaluation in Taipei elementary schools; to analyze the evaluatees' perceptions regarding the importance and performance levels of various program evaluation standards; and to explore the differences in these perceptions among evaluatees with different backgrounds.
This study first conducted a literature review and referenced the Program Evaluation Standards published by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation （JCSEE）. Following an expert validity analysis, a questionnaire comprising 56 indicators was constructed. Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) was utilized to address the research objectives. Based on the research results and analysis, the conclusions are summarized as follows:
1.Referencing the "JCSEE Program Evaluation Standards," 56 meta-evaluation indicators were established for traffic safety education evaluation in Taipei elementary schools. This approach allows for a comprehensive assessment of the evaluation's quality.
2.The survey results indicate that the "Feasibility" standard is considered the most important, while the "Propriety" standard exhibits the best performance level.
3.Respondents identified "Visitation should be efficient" as the most important indicator. Conversely, the least important indicator was "The commissioning unit can commission non-stakeholders to conduct external meta-evaluation."
4.The indicator rated as having the best performance was "The visitation can confirm the school's strengths and provide suggestions for improvement." The worst-performing indicator was "The competent authority can commission non-stakeholders to conduct external meta-evaluation."
5.The IPA analysis revealed that "reduction of administrative burden" and "budget allocation" fell into the fourth quadrant （Concentrate Here）. This indicates that cumbersome administrative procedures and insufficient funding are the most critical issues felt by schools. Competent authorities must value and address these problems seriously.
6.Regarding different background variables including "Gender," "Job Position," "Age," and "Visitation Academic Year," significant differences were found in certain standard categories concerning importance and performance levels, indicating that personnel with different backgrounds hold varying perspectives.
In summary, based on the data analysis and conclusions, this study provides recommendations for competent authorities, schools, and future research directions.

壹、中文書目
行政院（2023）。中央道路交通安全會報設置要點。https://www.motc.gov.tw/ch/app/folder/10039
交通部（2023a）。國家道路交通安全綱要計畫（113至116年）（核定本）。https://nges.chc.edu.tw/storage/074604/posts/3384/files/%E3%80%8C%E5%9C%8B%E5%AE%B6%E9%81%93%E8%B7%AF%E4%BA%A4%E9%80%9A%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB%EF%BC%88113-116%E5%B9%B4%EF%BC%89%E3%80%8D%E6%A0%B8%E5%AE%9A%E6%9C%AC.pdf
交通部（2023b）。第14期院頒「道路交通秩序與交通安全改進方案」核定本。https://168.motc.gov.tw/related
交通部（2025）。道路交通事故死亡人數（30日內）—按年齡分。https://stat.motc.gov.tw/mocdb/stmain.jsp?sys=220&ym=10800&ymt=11200&kind=21&type=1&funid=b330708&cycle=4&outmode=0&compmode
交通部路政及道安司（2024）。全國歷年死傷人數事故死傷。https://roadsafety.tw/Dashboard/Custom?type=%E7%B5%B1%E8%A8%88%E5%BF%AB%E8%A6%BD%E5%9C%96%E8%A1%A8#dash_item_1876
交通部路政及道安司（2025）。113年臺北市各鄉鎮市區高齡當事者30日死亡人數。https://roadsafety.tw/Dashboard/Custom?type=30%E6%97%A5%E6%AD%BB%E4%BA%A1%E4%BA%BA%E6%95%B8
交通部道路交通安全督導委員會（2020）。交通安全週介紹。https://168.motc.gov.tw/activity/2020
林志烽（2017）。交通安全教育評鑑項目期望與認知之探討-以臺南市國民小學為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立成功大學交通管理科學系碩士在職專班。
教育部（2019）。108學年度交通安全教育訪視及輔導實施計畫。https://ws.moe.edu.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvNi9yZWxmaWxlLzc4NTYvNjg1MzUvYWRmNzkxMjUtOGRmOS00M2U1LWIxNGMtM2I3YjczMGMwYjYwLnBkZg%3d%3d&n=MS4xMDjlrbjlubTluqbkuqTpgJrlronlhajmlZnogrLoqKroppblj4rovJTlsI7lr6bmlr3oqIjnlasucGRm&icon=..pdf
教育部（2024a）。學校及社會交通安全教育執行作業要點。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000204
教育部（2024b）。學校推動交通安全教育參考指引。https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/6/relfile/7856/92897/95d85862-05da-4b1d-ab5d-81da19885dd6.pdf
郭建和（2017）。我國國民中學交通安全評鑑之後設評鑑研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立清華大學教育行政碩士在職專班。
梁信筌、馮丰儀（2024）。地方教育主管機關協助國民中小學推動交通安全教育之策略。臺灣教育評論月刊，13（10），153-158。
臺北市政府（2024）。臺北市道路交通安全會報設置要點。https://www.laws.taipei.gov.tw/Law/LawSearch/LawArticleContent/FL012533
臺北市政府（2025）。114年臺北市 「道路交通安全執行計畫」。https://www.dot.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=ADCDC8B28F2E79EF&sms=3DECCD54ACA861AD&s=6460CAFE9492A6BC
臺北市政府民政局（2025）。臺北市各行政區最新月份人口數及戶數。https://ca.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=8693DC9620A1AABF&sms=D19E9582624D83CB&s=EE7D5719108F4026
臺北市政府交通局（2025）。臺北市政府交通局112年刊。https://www-ws.gov.taipei/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvMzkwL3JlbGZpbGUvNjE0MzMvOTM0MDQ3Ni9jM2RkYTJjNC0wNzIwLTQ4MjQtYmJmOS1mOTRjYmU3M2Q5ZGMucGRm&n=5Lqk6YCa5bGA5bm05YiK77yaMTEy5bm05bqmLnBkZg%3d%3d&icon=.pdf
臺北市政府教育局（2020）。教育局新聞稿1091110 109年度道路交通安全金安獎，臺北市學校突破紀錄囊括8金、全國之冠。
https://www.doe.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=B3DDF0458F0FFC11&sms=72544237BBE4C5F6&s=8FAC30AC491B2F35
臺北市政府教育局（2022a）。教育局新聞稿1111206-2022金安獎頒獎表揚大會-臺北市交通安全教育囊括金安獎11項大獎，閃耀金安 全國之冠。https://www.doe.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=B3DDF0458F0FFC11&sms=72544237BBE4C5F6&s=A3213CDC8B45AF54
臺北市政府教育局（2022b）。臺北市111學年度公私立高級中等以下學校交通安全教育訪視實施計畫。
https://d8.dcsh.tp.edu.tw/file/download/48748
臺北市政府教育局（2023a）。臺北市112學年度公私立高級中等以下學校交通安全教育訪視實施計畫。https://www.cyhs.tp.edu.tw/uploads/17318885538379pqfByVy.odt
臺北市政府教育局（2023b）。臺北市交通安全教育囊括2023國家交通安全奧斯卡「金安獎」11項大獎。https://www.doe.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=B3DDF0458F0FFC11&sms=72544237BBE4C5F6&s=27D9C5FDBEAFBBE2
臺北市政府教育局（2024a）。臺北市113學年度公私立高級中等以下學校交通安全教育訪視實施計畫。
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fEEipK-Dgf6uwCVlvdsN_xV2QSHkW8B6/view
臺北市政府教育局（2024b）。臺北市落實交通安全教育獲肯定，榮獲2024國家交通安全奧斯卡「金安獎」11項大獎，居全國之冠。https://www.doe.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=B3DDF0458F0FFC11&sms=72544237BBE4C5F6&s=6AC60912682923C1
臺北市政府教育局（2025）。113學年度臺北市高級中等以下學校概況。
https://www-ws.gov.taipei/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvMzQyL3JlbGZpbGUvMzY5NjcvODUyMTMwOS8yNDg1ODBjNS0yMjNmLTRlOTQtOWZjMC03ZmNjODNlMTNjNDEucGRm&n=MTEz5a245bm05bqm6Ie65YyX5biC6auY57Sa5Lit562J5Lul5LiL5a245qCh5qaC5rOB6KGoLnBkZg%3d%3d&icon=..pdf
衛生福利部（2024）。112年死因統計結果。https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-16-79055-1.html

貳、英（外）文書目
Abalo, J., Varela, J., & Manzano, V.（2007）. Importance values for importance-performance analysis: A formula for spreading out values derived from preference rankings. Journal of Business Research, 60（2）, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.009
Akıncı, M., & Köse, E.（2023）. A META-EVALUATION RESEARCH ON MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION COURSE. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 13（2）, 817-829. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.1075308
Alonso, F., Esteban, C., Useche, S., & Colomer, N. （2018）. Effect of Road Safety Education on Road Risky Behaviors of Spanish Children and Adolescents: Findings from a National Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15（12）, 2828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122828
Alexakis, D. E.（2020）. Meta-evaluation of water quality indices. application into groundwater resources. Water, 12（7）, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12071890
Alonso, F., Gonzalez-Marin, A., Esteban, C., & Useche, S. A.（2020）. Behavioral Health at School: Do Three Competences in Road Safety Education Impact the Protective Road Behaviors of Spanish Children? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17（3）, 935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030935
American Evaluation Association.（2018）. Guiding principles for evaluators. https://www.eval.org/About/Guiding-Principles
American Evaluation Association.（2025）. Values of the American Evaluation Association （AEA）. https://www.eval.org/About/About-AEA
Bakhtari Aghdam, F., Sadeghi-Bazargani, H., Azami-Aghdash, S., Esmaeili, A., Panahi, H., Khazaee-Pool, M., & Golestani, M. （2020）. Developing a national road traffic safety education program in Iran. BMC public health, 20（1）, 1064. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09142-1
Cabrera-Arnau, C., Prieto Curiel, R., & Bishop, S. R. （2020）. Uncovering the behaviour of road accidents in urban areas. R. Soc. Open Sci., 7（5）, 191739. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191739
Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. （2021）. 11th Basic Traffic Safety Plan. https://www8.cao.go.jp/koutu/kihon/keikaku11/pdf/kihon_keikaku-g_en.pdf
Carfora, A., Feola, A., Petrella, R., Ambrosio, G., Festinese, S., Fracassi, I., Palermo, P., Zampone, M., & Campobasso, C. P. （2023）. Qualitative/Quantitative Analysis of Alcohol and Licit/Illicit Drugs on Post-Mortem Biological Samples from Road Traffic Deaths. Separations, 10（12）, 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10120589
Chang, W. （2022, December 6）. ‘Taiwan’s ‘living hell’ traffic is a tourism problem, say critics. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/taiwan-traffic-war-tourism-intl-hnk
Chen, Y.-N., Kang, J.-L., & Guo, C.-Y. （2020）. The Construction of Meta-evaluation Indicators of Taiwan's University Program Evaluation: JCSEE Program Evaluation Standards as a Framework. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 6（1）, 10-24. https://dx.doi.org/10.20469/ijhss.6.20002-1
Cho, O.-K., & Choi, K. （2013）. The development of the meta-evaluation criteria for the accreditation evaluation system of engineering education in Korea. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 16（2）, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.8
Chou, C. C., Yoh, K., Inoi, H., Yamaguchi, T., & Doi, K. （2022）. Effectiveness evaluation on cross-sector collaborative education programs for traffic safety toward sustainable motorcycle culture in Vietnam. IATSS Research, 46（2）, 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2022.01.001
Chung, Y. S. （2013）. Traffic Safety Education and Information Campaign Activities in Taiwan. https://www.iatss.or.jp/en/entry_img/FY2014_Report_TW_En.pdf
Cieśla, M. （2021）. Modern Urban Transport Infrastructure Solutions to Improve the Safety of Children as Pedestrians and Cyclists. Infrastructures, 6（7）, 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures6070102
Cooksy, L. J., & Caracelli, V. J. （2009）. Metaevaluation in Practice: Selection and Application of Criteria . Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 6（11）, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v6i11.211
Cox, A. E., & Cicchino, J. B. （2021）. Continued trends in older driver crash involvement rates in the United States: Data through 2017-2018. Journal of safety research, 77, 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.03.013
Deluka-Tibljaš, A., Šurdonja, S., & Ištoka Otković, I. （2021）. Analysis of children’s traffic behaviour at signalized crosswalks as a precondition for safe children routes design: A case study from Croatia. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021, 7936261, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7936261
DiMaggio, C., Frangos, S., & Li, G. （2016）. National Safe Routes to School program and risk of school-age pedestrian and bicyclist injury. Annals of epidemiology, 26（6）, 412–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.04.002
Dykstra, C., Davis, J. J., & Conlon, E. G. （2020）. Tactical and strategic driving behaviour in older drivers: The importance of readiness to change. Accident; analysis and prevention, 141, 105519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105519
Ehsani, J. P., & Kinnear, N. （2021）. Young driver licensing and COVID-19. Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 27（6）, 574–576. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2020-044053
Elliott, L. D., Lieberman, M., Rovniak, L. S., Bose, M., Holmes, L. M., & Bopp, M. （2022）. What are States Doing to Encourage Safe Routes to School Programming in Disadvantaged Communities? Findings From a U.S. Mixed-Methods Survey. Transportation Research Record, 2677（5）, 1151-1163. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221140363
European Commission. （2012）. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/treaty/tfeu_2012/oj
European Commission. （2018）. Europe on the move - Sustainable mobility for Europe: Safe, connected and clean. http://bit.ly/2RtiqZN
Farahnak Benekohal R.（2019）. Infrastructure Related Road Safety Interventions. Journal of Injury and Violence Research, 11（4 Suppl 2）, Paper No. 3. doi: 10.5249/JIVR.V11I2.1283.
Finney, S. J., Stewart, P., Wild, N., Herr, R. K., & Schaefer, K. E.（2024）. A meta-assessment rubric to guide professional development and practice in equitable outcomes assessment. Research & Practice in Assessment, 19（1）, 45–58.
Foss R. D. （2018）. Adolescent Drivers, Experiential Learning, and the Driver Licensing Process: New Findings, Emerging Questions, and Continuing Policy Needs. The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 63（5）, 521–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.08.008
Gayef, A., Ilgaz, G., & Karlıkaya, C.（2024）. The metaevaluation of a faculty of medicine undergraduate medical education program. Authorea. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.170667200.01304581/v1
Gelmez Burakgazi, S., & Karsantık, Y. （2023）. Development of a Meta-Evaluation Rubric and Meta-Evaluation of Initial Teacher Education Programs. Education and Science, 49（217）, 225-248. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2023.11755
Garney, W., Panjwani, S., Curran, L., Enderle, J., King, L., O'Neil, D., & Li, Y. （2023）. Systems-Level Evaluation of Safe Routes to School Policies in El Paso, Texas: A Modeling Study on Health and Economic Outcomes. Family & community health, 46（Suppl 1）, S22–S29. https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000374
Hedler, H., & Ribeiro, N.（2009）. The contribution of metaevaluation to program evaluation: Proposition of a model. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 6（12）, 210–223. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v6i12.206
Hernández, A. E. （2023）. Concluding Thoughts and Reflections on the Special Issue on Program Evaluation Standards. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 19（43）, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v19i43.855
Ibrahim Aliyu Adamu, Bello Umar Jada, Ahmad Sani, & Olamoju Rabiu Olayemi. （2025）. The Role of Mobile Phone Distraction in Road Traffic Accidents. Journal of Systematic, Evaluation and Diversity Engineering, 7（5）.151–162. https://doi.org/10.70382/ajsede.v7i5.010
İpek, D. Ş., Gezer, E., Tuncer, F. K., Baltaci, H., & Ok, A. （2023）. A systematic meta-evaluation of curriculum evaluation research studies conducted between 2004-2022 on K12 school curricula in Türkiye. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 13（2）, 325–356.
https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.2023.014
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. （2025）. Graduated licensing laws. https://www.iihs.org/topics/teenagers/graduated-licensing-laws-table
LaJeunesse, S., Thompson, S., Pullen-Seufert, N., Kolbe, M. B., Heiny, S., Thomas, C., & Johnson, E. R. （2019）. Diverse school community engagement with the North Carolina active routes to school project: a diffusion study. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 16（1）, 118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0889-z
Lavoie, M., Burigusa, G., Maurice, P., Hamel, D., & Turmel, E. （2014）. Active and safe transportation of elementary-school students: comparative analysis of the risks of injury associated with children travelling by car, walking and cycling between home and school. Chronic diseases and injuries in Canada, 34（4）, 195–202. https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.34.4.02
Lee, Y., Lee, M. J., Ahn, J., Ha, C., Kang, Y. J., Jung, C. W., Yoo, D. M., Yu, J., & Lee, S. H. （2024）. Challenges and potential improvements in the Accreditation Standards of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation 2019 （ASK2019） derived through meta-evaluation: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 21, 8. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.8
Leslie, M., Moodley, N., Goldman, I., Jacob, C., Podems, D., Everett, M., & Beney, T.（2015）. Developing evaluation standards and assessing evaluation quality. African Evaluation Journal, 3（1）, 112. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/aej.v3i1.112
Le, H. N., Cuenen, A., Trinh, T. A., Janssens, D., Wets, G., & Brijs, K. （2024）. Investigating the immediate and mid-term effect of a gamified e-learning platform for the enhancement of traffic knowledge and skills among Vietnamese adolescents operating powered two-wheelers. Journal of safety research, 90, 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2024.06.005
Mansukoski, L., Lockyer, B., Creaser, A., Sheringham, J., Sheard, L., Garnett, P., Yang, T., Cookson, R., Albert, A., Islam, S., Shore, R., Khan, A., Twite, S., Dawson, T., Iqbal, H., Skarda, I., Villadsen, A., Asaria, M., West, J., & Bryant, M. （2023）. Meta-evaluation of a whole systems programme, ActEarly: A study protocol. PLoS ONE, 18（6）:e0280696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280696
Meir, A., & Oron-Gilad, T. （2020）. Understanding complex traffic road scenes: The case of child-pedestrians’ hazard perception. Journal of Safety Research, 72, 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.014
Mütze, F., & de Dobbeleer, W. （2019）. The status of traffic safety and mobility education in Europe. https://etsc.eu/wp-content/uploads/ETSC-LEARN-Report-on-the-Status-of-Traffic-Safety-and-Mobility-Education-in-Europe.pdf
Mütze, F., Meinero, M., Carson, J., Jost, G., & ETSC. （2022）. The role of education in reducing deaths among children and youngsters on European roads. https://www.trafficsafetyeducation.eu/wp-content/uploads/LEARN-Key-Principles.pdf
Mütze, F., & de Dobbeleer, W.（2023）. LEARN Flash 3 – Linking education on sustainable mobility with traffic safety. https://www.trafficsafetyeducation.eu/wp-content/uploads/LEARN-Flash-3-Linking-Education-on-Sustainable-Mobility-with-Traffic-Safety.pdf
Nawaz, I., Cuenen, A., Wets, G., Paul, R., Ahmed, T., & Janssens, D. （2024）. Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Online Gamified Traffic Safety Education Platform for Adolescent Motorcyclists in Pakistan. Applied Sciences, 14（19）, 8590. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14198590
Oguchi, T. （2016）. Achieving safe road traffic—The experience in Japan. IATSS Research, 39（2）, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2016.01.003
Onishi, H., Fujiu, M., Morisaki, Y., & Takayama, J. （2022）. Analysis of the Relationship between Age and Violation of Traffic Laws and Ordinances in Traffic Accidents on Children. Sustainability, 14（19）, 12778. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912778
Oxford University Press.（2025）. Oxford Learner's Dictionaries. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/evaluation
Patton, M. Q.（2008）. Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text（4th ed）. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pazzini, M., Cameli, L., Vignali, V., Simone, A., & Lantieri, C. （2024）. Video-Based Analysis of a Smart Lighting Warning System for Pedestrian Safety at Crosswalks. Smart Cities, 7（5）, 2925-2939. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7050114
Sadeghi-Bazargani, H., Somi, M. H., Golestani, M., Amiri, M., Ghaffarifar, S., Aslanabadi, S., et al. （2018）. Developing and preliminary evaluation of a general academic course on traffic health and safety. Research and Development in Medical Education, 7（1）, 21–25. https://doi.org/10.15171/rdme.2018.005
Safe Routes Partnership. （2025a）. History of Safe Routes to School. https://www.saferoutespartnership.org/safe-routes-school/101/history
Safe Routes Partnership. （2025b）. What is Safe Routes to School? https://www.saferoutespartnership.org/safe-routes-school/101
Schwebel D. C. （2017）. Children Crossing Streets: The Cognitive Task of Pedestrians Across Nations. Annals of global health, 83（2）, 328–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2017.04.004
Seberovä, A. （2023）. A Meta-Evaluation of Action Research Final Reports. [Eine Meta-Evaluierung von Abschlussberichten der Aktionsforschung] Zeitschrift Für Evaluation, 22（1）, 76-99. https://doi.org/10.31244/zfe.2023.01.05
Setyowati, D., Shaluhiyah, Z., Widjanarko, B. ., & Setyaningsih, Y. . （2024）. Understanding risk factors in road traffic accidents among young motorcyclists aged 18-24: a scoping review. Journal of Public Health and Development, 23（1）, 311–328. https://doi.org/10.55131/jphd/2025/230123
Smith, R., Olah, D., Hansen, B., & Cumbo, D. （2003）. The effect of questionnaire length on participant response rate: A case study in the U.S. cabinet industry. Forest Products Journal, 53（11）, 33-36. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/effect-questionnaire-length-on-participant/docview/214631810/se-2
Stufflebeam, D. L. （2000）. The methodology of metaevaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan （Eds.）, Evaluation models （Vol. 49, pp. 457–471）. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D. L.（2001）. The metaevaluation imperative. American Journal of Evaluation, 22（2）, 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400102200204
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J.（2007）. Evaluation theory, models, and applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Stufflebeam, D. L.（2011）. Meta-Evaluation. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 7（15）, 99–158. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v7i15.300
Stufflebeam, D. L. （2012）. Program evaluations summary metaevaluation checklist （Based on the program evaluation standards）. https://activistresearchmethods.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/meta_evaluation_checklist.pdf
Trifunović, A., Pešić, D., Čičević, S., & Antić, B. （2017）. The importance of spatial orientation and knowledge of traffic signs for children's traffic safety. Accident; analysis and prevention, 102, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.019
United States Department of Transportation. （2022）. National Roadway Safety Strategy. https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2022-02/USDOT-National-Roadway-Safety-Strategy.pdf
United States Department of Transportation. （2025）. 2025 progress report on the National Roadway Safety Strategy. https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2025-01/2025-NRSS-Progress-Report.pdf
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. （2025）. Data, statistics, and reporting. https://wisqars.cdc.gov/animated-leading-causes/
Van Humbeeck, N., Van Wilderode, M., Kliegl, R., van Wieringen, A., & Krampe, R. T. （2024）. Multitasking across the lifespan in different task contexts. Scientific reports, 14（1）, 11817. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61859-w
van Erpecum, C.-P. L., Bornioli, A., Cleland, C., Jones, S., Davis, A., den Braver, N. R., & Pilkington, P. （2024）. 20mph speed limits and zones for better public health: Meta-narrative evidence synthesis. Journal of Transport & Health, 39, 101917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2024.101917
von Beesten, S., & Bresges, A. （2025）. The effectiveness of teaching methods for preparing teacher education students to teach road safety-related content. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1471022. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1471022
Voulgaris, C. T., Hosseinzade, R., Pande, A., & Alexander, S. E. （2021）. Neighborhood Effects of Safe Routes to School Programs on the Likelihood of Active Travel to School. Transportation Research Record, 2675（8）, 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198121995490 （Original work published 2021）
Volden G. H. （2018）. Public project success as seen in a broad perspective.: Lessons from a meta-evaluation of 20 infrastructure projects in Norway. Evaluation and program planning, 69, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.04.008
World Bank Group. （2025）. Population ages 0-14. https://data.worldbank.org.cn/indicator/SP.POP.0014.TO.ZS
World Health Organization. （2023）. Global status report on road safety 2023. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/teams/social-determinants-of-health/safety-and-mobility/global-status-report-on-road-safety-2023
Yarbrough, D. B., Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Caruthers, F. A. （2010）. The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users （3rd ed.）. Corwin Press.
文部科學省（Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology）。（2023）。文部科学省における交通安全対策について [Regarding traffic safety measures at the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology]。https://www8.cao.go.jp/koutu/taisaku/sougou/pdf/k_231215/s2.pdf
國家警察廳（National Police Agency）。（2023）。平成23年警察白書概要第3章　安全かつ快適な交通の確保 [Overview of 2011 White Paper on Police, Chapter 3: Ensuring Safe and Comfortable Traffic]。https://www.npa.go.jp/hakusyo/h23/honbun/pdf/09sho3.pdf