| 研究生: |
陳琳琦 |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
衡量與分解銀行業生產力與利潤力的變動 Measuring and decomposing banking productivity and profitability change |
| 指導教授: | 李文福 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
社會科學學院 - 經濟學系 Department of Economics |
| 論文出版年: | 2012 |
| 畢業學年度: | 100 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 58 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 利潤力 、台灣銀行業 、Hicks-Moorsteen TFP index |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Profitability, Taiwan Banking, Hicks-Moorsteen TFP index |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:247 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
銀行為資金融通的中介,在經濟體中佔有舉足輕重的地位。過去多使用Malmqusit 總生產力指數來衡量生產力的變化,然而Malmquist 總生產力指數雖易於分解,卻不具相乘完整性(multiplicatively complete),可能產生偏誤的情況,因此本文採用具有相乘完整性之Hicks-Moorsteen 總生產力指數,並根據O’Donnell所提出的分解方式,將生產力變動分解為技術變動、效率變動、規模效率變動與組合變動,同時總生產力指數與交易條件指數的乘積為利潤力指數,有助於了解在交易條件改變時會如何影響廠商的生產決策。
本文研究發現台灣銀行業在追求產出極大、投入極小,以提升經營績效時,卻因交易條件逐年惡化,導致利潤力呈現衰退,因此相對於總生產力,台灣銀行業的交易條件及利潤力還有待改善。生產力指數的各拆解項在2004-2005年交易條件指數大幅成長時呈現衰退,2008-2009年交易條件指數衰退時,產出技術效率指數、產出組合效率指數及殘餘組合效率指數為成長,其中產出組合效率、剩餘產出組合效率的變動與產出、投入數量有關,因此也與交易條件指數關係密切。最後根據統計檢定結果顯示Hicks-Moorsteen總生產力指數及Malmquist 總生產力指數具有顯著的差異性。
謝辭......................................................I
中文摘要 ..................................................II
英文摘要..................................................III
目錄......................................................IV
圖目錄......................................................V
表目錄......................................................V
第一章 緒論.................................................1
1.1 研究背景與動機...........................................1
1.2 研究目的................................................2
1.3 研究架構與流程...........................................4
第二章 台灣銀行業發展與文獻回顧.................................5
2.1 台灣銀行業發展...........................................5
2.2 生產力研究..............................................8
2.3 國內銀行業生產力及效率相關文獻..............................8
2.4 國外銀行業生產力及效率相關文獻.............................11
第三章 理論模型.............................................14
3.1 生產力與利潤力..........................................14
3.2 效率衡量與生產力拆解.....................................17
3.3 HICKS-MOORSTEEN生產力指數及 MALMQUIST生產力指數..........22
3.4 資料包絡分析法簡述......................................25
第四章 實證分析.............................................28
4.1 變數定義及資料來源.......................................28
4.2 實證結果分析............................................34
4.3 HICKS-MOORSTEEN總生產力指數與MALMQUIST總生產力指數........45
4.4 多邊(MULTILATERAL)生產力指數比較.......................47
第五章 結論與建議...........................................50
5.1 結論..................................................50
5.2 建議..................................................51
參考文獻...................................................52
附 錄...................................................55
李文福、王媛慧、洪琬婷(2009), 技術變動、產出組合與台灣銀行業生產力變動, 《經濟論文》, 37:4, 495-524。
李文福、范雅鈞(2010), 台灣銀行業經營績效分析:Luenberger生產力指標法之應用, 《經濟論文叢刊》, 38:4, 593-627。
李文福、翁祥容(2010), 預期放款損失與台灣銀行業生產力分析, 《台灣金融財務季刊》, 11:3, 33-59。
林炳文(2002), 臺灣地區商業銀行合併效率性之分析:資料包絡分析法的應用, 《臺灣管理學刊》, 1:2, 341-355。
傅祖壇(2009), 特刊導讀:兼簡述台灣生產力研究之發展, 《經濟論文叢刊》, 37:4, 347-351。
彭雅惠、吳東姿(2006),台灣金融控股公司所屬銀行之特質及銀行績效探討, 《績效與策略研究》, 3:1,19-32。
黃台心、陳盈秀、陳珮欣(2007),台灣地區本國銀行長期效率的動態分析, 《經濟論文》, 35:1,83-114。
黃台心、張寶光、邱郁芳(2009),應用共同成本函數探討東亞六國銀行業之生產效率,《經濟論文》, 37, 61-100。
楊永列、黃鏡如(2009), 台灣地區本國銀行生產面與成本面:Malmquist生產力指數之估計, 《經濟論文叢刊》, 37:4, 353-378
詹維玲、劉景中(2006), 金融自由化後台灣銀行的效率及生產力, 《經濟論文》, 34:2, 251-300。
劉秀玲、鄭鴻章(2010),金控公司架構與非利息收入業務對台灣銀行經營效益與風險影響, 《台灣金融財務季刊》, 11:3, 1-31。
劉松瑜、謝燧琪、溫玉芳(2006),台灣銀行業在金控與非金控架構下之效率分析, 《台灣金融財務季刊》, 7:3, 127-176。
Ariff, M., and L. Can(2008),”Cost and Profit Efficiency of Chinese Banks: A Non-Parametric Analysis”, China Economic Review, 19, 260–273.
Asmild, M., J.C. Paradi, V. Aggarwall, and C. Schaffnit (2004), “ Combining DEA Window Analysis with the Malmquist Index Approach in a Study of the Canadian Banking Industry”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21, 67-89.
Balk, B.M.(2001), “Scale Efficiency and Productivity Change” ,Journal of Productivity Analysis, 15,159-183.
Banker, R.D., A. Chames and W.W. Cooper (1984), “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Management Science, 30, 1078-1092.
Banker, R.D., H. Chang, and S.Y. Lee(2010), “Differential Impact of Korean Banking System Reforms on Bank Productivity”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 34, 1450–1460.
Berger, A.N., and L.J. Mester(1997), “Inside the Black Box: What explain differences in the efficiencies of Financial Institutions”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 21, 895-947.
Bjurek, H.(1996), “The Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 98, 303-313.
Brissimis, S.N., M.D. Delis, and N.I. Papankiolaou(2008), “Exploring the Nexus between Banking Sector Reform and Performance: Evidence from Newly Acceded EU countries”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 2674–2683.
Caves, D.W., L.R. Christensen, and W.E. Diewert(1982), “The Economic Theory of Index Number and the Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity”, Econometrica, 50, 1393-1414.
Chen, X., M. Skully, and K. Brown(2005), “Banking Efficiency in China: Application of DEA to Pre- and Post-Deregulation Eras: 1993 – 2000”, China Economic Review, 16, 229−245.
Das, A., and S. Ghosh(2006), “Financial Deregulation and Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis of Indian Banks During the Post Reform Period”, Review of Financial Economics, 15, 193–221.
Diewert, W.E. (1992), “Fisher Ideal Output, Input, and Productivity Indexes Revisited”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 211–248.
Drake, L., and M.J.B., Hall(2003), “Efficiency in Japanese Banking: An Emprical Analysis”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 891-917.
Elteo, O., and P. Koves(1964), “On a Problem of Index Number Computation Relating to International Comparison”, Statisztikai Szemle, 42, 507-518.
Färe, R., and D. Primont(1995), Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., and Zhang, Z.(1994), “Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized countries” , American Economic Review, 84, 66-83.
Farrier, G.D., and C.A.K. Lovell(1990), “Measuring Cost Efficiency in Banking- Econometric and Linear Programming Evidence”, Journal of Econometrics, 46, 229-245.
Grifell-Tatjé, E., and C.A.K. Lovell(1994), “A Note on the Malmquist Productivity Index”, Economics Letters, 47, 169-175.
Hicks, J.R.(1961), “Measurement of Capital in Relation to the Measurement of Other Economic Aggregates”, in Lutz, F.A. and Hague, D.C. (Eds.) , The Theory of Capital, Macmillan, London.
Hunter, W.C., and S.G. Timme(1995), “Core Deposits and Physical Capital: a Reexamination of Bank Scale Economies and Efficiency with Quasi-Fixed Input”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27(1), 165-185.
Lozano-Vivas, A., J.T. Pastor, and J.M. Pastor(2002), “An Efficiency Comparison of European Banking Systems Operating under Different Environmental Conditions”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18, 59–77.
Moorsteen, R.H.(1961), “On Measuring Productive Potential and Relative Efficiency”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(3), 151–167.
O’Donnell, C.J.(2010), “Measuring and Decomposing Agricultural Productivity and Profitability Change”, The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 54, 527-560.
Pastor, J. T., A. Lozano, and J. M. Pastor(2002), “An Efficiency Comparison of European Banking Systems Operating under Different Environmental Conditions”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18, 59–78.
Ray, S.C., and A. Das(2010), “Distribution of Cost and Profit Efficiency: Evidence from Indian Banking”, European Journal of Operational Research, 201, 297-307.
Shephard, R.W.(1953), Cost and Production Functions, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Sherman, H.D. and F. Gold(1985), “Bank Branch Operating Efficiency: Evaluation with Data Envelopment Analysis”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 9, 297-315.
Szulc,B.J.(1964), “Indices for Multi-Regional Comparisons ”, Prezeglad Statystyczny(Statistical Review), 3, 239-254.
此全文未授權公開