| 研究生: |
蔡維奇 CAI, WEI-QI |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
不同訊息類型.人格特質對目標接受度與工作表現的影響 |
| 指導教授: | 陳彰儀 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
理學院 - 心理學系 Department of Psychology |
| 論文出版年: | 1992 |
| 畢業學年度: | 80 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 89 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:156 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘要
自我評估理論( self-appraisal theory) 認為A 型性格與B 型性格的認知模式有不同,A 型性格者渴望能正確評估自己的能力, B 型性格者則無此傾向,因此他們在
面對一個較難目標時,也會產生不同的知覺, A 型性格者覺得達成目標能幫助他正確評估自己的能力, B 型性格者則無此反應。本研究之目的是探討不同人格特質的受試(A 型或B 型性格類型) ,是否會因接受不同的訊息類型(能力訊息、策略訊息與重要性訊息) ,而使其目標接受度、工作表現量有所不同?
本研究採用實驗法,研究的樣本是政治大學大學部的學生9 6 名,先根據『中國人A 型量表』將受試區分為A 型或B 型性格組,再隨機分派到三個實驗組(這三組受試得到不同的訊息,分別為能力訊息、策略訊息與重要性訊息)和一個控制組(無任何訊息) ,讓他們進行幾個『動動腦』作業,並在實驗過程中,收集其目標接受度、工作表現及個人目標值的資料。
經統計分析後,得到以下的結果( 1) 重要性訊息組的目標接受度及工作表現均優於無訊息組。( 2) 無論在第一或第二個實驗作業, A 型性格組的工作表現與B 型性格組均無差異。( 3) A 型性格組受試比B 型性格組設定較高的個人目標值。 且前者在第一個實驗作業的工作表表現低於其個人目標值;後者在第一個實驗作業的工作表現高於其個人目標值,但並無顯著差異。最後本研究以自我評估理論對結果做了一些討論。
目錄
第一章 導論....................1
第一節 研究動機與目的....................1
第二節 文獻探討.................... 6
第三節 研究問題與假設....................19
第二章 研究方法.................... 24
第一節 研究對象....................24
第二節 研究工具.....................24
第三節 主試.................... 26
第四節 實驗設計.................... 27
第五節 實驗程序....................31
第六節 統計方法....................36
第三章 研究結果....................37
第一節 實驗操弄的檢驗....................37
第二節 研究假設的驗證.................... 47
第四章 討論與建議....................61
第一節 討論.................... 61
第二節 檢討與建議....................69
參考文獻.................... 74
附錄一 中國人A 型量表.................... 81
附錄二 實驗題本....................82
附錄三 假造報表....................89
參考文獻
汪孝慈(民7 8 )目標設定方式與目標預期差異對認知與工作表現之影響。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
林一真(民7 8 )中國人A型量表編製初步報告。測驗年刊,第3 6 期,頁13-24。
林文蘭(民7 8 )不同訊息的目標設定對內在動機的影響。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
林清山(民72) 教育與心理統計學。東華書局。
洪英正(民7 6 )工作團隊中工作者的A 型性格、領導角色、主管領導型態、與工作壓力、工作滿足與工作投入的關係研究。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
楊明磊(民7 9 )目標難度、目標明確度及回明確度對工作表現的影響。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
蔡志明(民77) 大學生A型行為組型之調查研究。 國立臺灣教育學院輔導研究所碩士論文。
Bandura,A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist,34,92-98.
Burger,J.M. (1985). Desire for control and achievement-related behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,48,1520-1533.
Campion,M.A., & Lord,R.G. (1982). A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,~265-287.
Dembroski,T.M.,Macdougall,J.M.,& Musante,L. (1984).
Desirability of control versus locus of control: Relationship to paralinguistics in the Type A interview. Health Psychology,3,15-26.
Earley,P.C. (1985). Influence of information, choice and task complexity upon goal acceptance, performance, and personal goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(3) ,481-491.
Earley,P.C. (1986). supervisors and shop stewards as sources of contextual information in goal setting: A comparison of the united states with England.
Journal of Applied Psychology,71(1) ,111-117.
Earley,P.C.,& Kanfer,R. (1985) .The influence of component participation and role models on goal acceptance, goal satisfaction and performance.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,36,378-390.
Erez,M & Zidon,I. (1984). Effect of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal difficulty to performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 69-78.
Garland,H. (1982). Goal levels and performance: A compelling replication of some compelling results. Journal of Applied Psychology,67,245-248.
Gastorf,J.W. ,Suls.J & Sanders,G.S. (1980). Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern and social facilitation. Journal of Personality and social psychology,38(5),773-780.
Glass, D. C. (1977). Behavior patterns, stress, and coronary disease. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hannan,R.L. (1975). The effect of participation In goal setting on goal acceptance and performance: A laboratory experiment. Department of Psychology, university of Maryland, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.
Hollenbeck,J.R.,& Klein,H.J. (1987) .Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Problems, perspects, and proposals for future research. Journal of
Applied Psychology,72, 212-220.
Hollenbeck,J.R.,& Williams,C.R. (1987) .Goal importance, self-locus and the goal-setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology,72,204-211.
Jackson,S.E.,& Zedeck,S. (1982) .Explaining performance variability: Contributions of goal setting, task characteristics, and evaluative contexts.
'Journal of Applied Psychology,67, 759-768.
Latham,G.P. & Yukl, G.A. (1975).A review of research on the application of goal setting in organizations. Academy of Management Journal,18, 824-845.
Locke,E.A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,3,157-189.
Locke,E.A. (1982) .Relation of goal performance with a short work period mutiple goal levels. Journal of Applied Psychology,67,512-514.
Locke,E.A. (1984). Job satisfaction. in M.Gruneberg and T.Wall(eds.) ,Social Psychology and Organizational Behavior. Chichester. England: Wiley Ltd.
Locke,E.A, Frederick,E., Lee,C., & Bobko,P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy"goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,69,241-251.
Locke,E.A, & Latham,G.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance.Prentice-Hall,Inc. Locke,E.A,Latham,G.P., & Erez,M. (1988). The determinants of goal commitment. Academy of Management Review,13, 23-39.
Locke,E.A,Saari,M.L,Shaw,K.N. & Latharn,G.P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin,90, 125-152.
Matthews,K.A. (1982). Psychological perspectives on the Type A behavior pattern. Psychological Bulletin,91, 293-323.
Mento,J.A, Steel, P.R. & Karren,J.R. (1987). A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966-1984. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,39, 52-83.
Miller,S.M., Lack,E.R., & Asroff,S. (1985). Preference for control and the coronary-prone behavior pattern: " I'd rather do it myself." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,49, 492-499.
Mossholder,K.W. (1980). Effects of externally mediated goal setting on intrinsic motivation: A laboratory experiment.
Journal of Applied Psychology,65, 202-210.
Motowidlo,S.L., Loehr,V., & Dunnette,M.D. (1978). A laboratory study of the effects of goal specificity on the relationship between probability of success and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63,172-179.
Phillips,J.S,& Freedman,S.M. (1988) .The task-related competency and co.mp-liance aspects of goals : A clarification. organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,41,34-49.
Phillips, J.S, Freedman, S.M, Ivancevich, J.M. & Matteson, M.T. (1990). Type A behavior, self-appraisals, and goal setting: A framework for future research.
Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(1), 59-76.
Shalley,C.E., & Oldham,G.R. (1985). The effects of goal difficulty and expected external evaluation on intrinsic motivation. Academy of Management
Journal,28, 628-640.
Stedry, A.C.& Kay,E. (1966) .The effect of goal difficulty on performance: A field experiment. Behavioral Science,11,459-470.
Strube,M.J,Berry,J.M., & Moergen,S. (1985). Relinquishment of control and the Typr A behavior pattern The role of performance evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,49, 831-842.
Strube,M.J, & Boland,S.M. (1986). Post performance attributions and task persistence among Type A and B indivisuals: A clarification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,50,413-420.
stiube,M.J, & Werner,C. (1985). Relinquishment of control and the Typr A behavior pattern. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholoqy,48, 688-701.
Tubbs,M.E. (1986) .Goal setting: A meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology,21,474-483.
Yukl,G.A., & Latham,G.P. (1978). Interrelationships among employee participation, indivisual differences, goal difficulty, goal acceptance, goal instrumentality, and performance, Personnel Psychology, 31, 305-323.
(限達賢圖書館四樓資訊教室A單機使用)