簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示
| 研究生： |
潘賢恕 Pan, Hsien Shu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱： |
貿易自由化、實質工資與失業率 Trade Lberalization, Real Wage, and Unemployment Rate |
| 指導教授： | 徐則謙 |
| 口試委員: |
徐則謙
林柏生 黃幼宜 |
| 學位類別： |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱： |
商學院 - 國際經營與貿易學系 Department of International Business |
| 論文出版年： | 2017 |
| 畢業學年度： | 105 |
| 語文別： | 中文 |
| 論文頁數： | 37 |
| 中文關鍵詞： | 實質工資 、貿易 、失業 、效率工資 、異質廠商 、獨占性競爭 |
| 外文關鍵詞： | Real Wage, Trade, Unemployment, Efficiency Wage, Firm Heterogeneity, Monopolistic Competition |
| 相關次數： | 點閱：54 下載：35 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本篇論文結合Shapiro and Stiglitz (1984)與Melitz (2003)探討貿易自由化對臺灣實質工資與失業率的影響。本模型可能存在多個均衡，此時均衡之位置取決於生產者對未來經濟景氣預期的好壞。當模型出現多個均衡時，政府會有政策介入的空間。政府除了透過最低工資政策提升全民福祉，也可以透過補貼政策提升生產者對未來景氣的預期，進而提升全民福利。本模型在貿易自由化後皆會出現兩個均衡，當生產者預期未來景氣轉好，均衡越有可能處於高實質工資與低失業率的狀態。
The purpose of the study is to find out the influence of trade liberalization on real wage and unemployment rate in Taiwan. Our paper develops a new model that merges Shapiro and Stiglitz (1984) with Melitz (2003). The result of the study is that there are more than one equilibrium in our model, and that the decision of the equilibrium depends on the suppliers’ expectation of future economy. There will also be more than one equilibrium after the trade liberalization so the influence of trade liberalization on real wage and unemployment rate is not clear. It was found that when the suppliers expect the economy will prosper, the equilibrium is more likely to move toward the status of higher real wage and lower unemployment rate. Government can implement minimum wage and subsidy policy to impact suppliers’ expectation and improve people’s welfare.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 與文獻的關係 1
第三節 研究架構 2
第二章 模型設定 4
第一節 消費者 4
第二節 生產者 4
第三章 貿易自由化前的均衡 5
第一節 效用極大化 5
第二節 利潤極大化 6
第三節 零利潤條件 7
第四節 自由進入市場條件 8
第五節 勞動市場均衡 10
第四章 貿易自由化後的均衡 19
第一節 新零利潤條件 19
第二節 自由進入市場條件 22
第三節 勞動市場均衡 23
第五章 結論與建議 32
參考文獻 33
附 錄 35
Brecher, R. A. (1974). Minimum wage rates and the pure theory of international trade. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88(1), 98-116.
Davidson, C., Martin, L., & Matusz, S. (1999). Trade and search generated unemployment. Journal of International Economics, 48(2), 271-299.
Davis, Donald R., & James Harrigan(2011). Good jobs, bad jobs, and trade liberalization. Journal of international Economics 84(1), 26-36.
Diamond, P. A. (1982). Aggregate demand management in search equilibrium. Journal of political Economy, 90(5), 881-894.
Dutt, P., Mitra, D., & Ranjan, P. (2009). International trade and unemployment: Theory and cross-national evidence. Journal of International Economics, 78(1), 32-44.
Felbermayr, G., Prat, J., & Schmerer, H. J. (2011). Trade and unemployment: What do the data say?. European Economic Review, 55(6), 741-758.
Helpman, E., & Itskhoki, O. (2010). Labour market rigidities, trade and unemployment. The Review of Economic Studies, 77(3), 1100-1137.
Leichenko, R., & Silva, J. (2004). International trade, employment and earnings: Evidence from US rural counties. Regional Studies, 38(4), 355-374.
Matusz, S. J. (1996). International trade, the division of labor, and unemployment. International Economic Review, 37(1), 71-84.
Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra‐industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725.
Reynolds, B. L. (1987). Trade, employment, and inequality in postreform China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 11(3), 479-489.
Şener, F. (2001). Schumpeterian unemployment, trade and wages. Journal of International Economics, 54(1), 119-148.
Shapiro, C., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1984). Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. The American Economic Review, 74(3), 433-444.
反補貼調查簡介（2004）。台北市：經濟部國際貿易局。2017年6月15日。取自http://www.trade.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeID=1370&pid=515933&dl_DateRange=all&txt_SD=&txt_ED=&txt_Keyword=&Pageid=0
