| 研究生: |
蔡曜安 Tsai, Yao-An |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
技術換股權:印台機動車鎖合資企業中少數股權的協商 Technology for Equity: Negotiating Minority Shareholding Equity in an Indo-Taiwanese Automotive Lock Joint Venture |
| 指導教授: |
林月雲
Lin, Yeh-Yun |
| 口試委員: |
張大為
Chang, Ta-Wei 梅國卿 Mei, Kuo-Ching |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 國際經營管理英語碩士學位學程(IMBA) International MBA Program College of Commerce(IMBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 57 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 國際合資 、技術入股 、少數股權 、談判策略 、垂直知識移轉 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | International joint venture (IJV), Technology for equity, Minority shareholding, Negotiation strategy, Vertical knowledge transfer (VKT) |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:18 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究分析了一家台灣技術供應商(A 公司)與一家印度上市公司(B 公司)之間的合資公司(JVC),重點探討在龐大的印度機車電子鎖市場中,以先進的智慧財產權(IP)和技術專有知識(Technical Know-how)交換 20% 少數股權的核心挑戰。
本分析運用「改良型全面詮釋結構模型」(M-TISM)與「5C 談判架構」(行為韌性)來闡述談判過程。「目標不一致」這一立即性的結構挑戰,透過策略性的「妥協」得以解決:A 公司接受將其 20% 的股權出資額涵蓋所有一次性工程費用(NRE)。這種權衡——犧牲短期營收以換取長期股權增長——被視為進入該市場的唯一可行途徑。
雖然行為治理緩解了立即性的結構性失敗風險,但合資公司的長期韌性仍需持續管理潛在威脅。對於少數股權夥伴而言,成功取決於以下雙重焦點:
少數控制權保障:針對關鍵策略變更建立必要的否決權。
降低知識風險:藉由確保合資公司技術職能內部「跨界人員」(Boundary Spanners)具備強大的組織承諾,主動對抗垂直知識轉移(VKT)的機會主義風險。
本個案證實了在管理國際合資企業(IJV)的複雜性,以及確保高成長新興市場中的少數股權保護時,採用靈活的非貨幣估值模型與持續談判的必要性。
This study analyzes the Joint Venture Company (JVC) between Company A, a Taiwanese technology provider, and Company B, a publicly listed company in India, focusing on the core challenge of exchanging advanced Intellectual Property (IP) and technical know-how for a 20% minority equity stake in the high-volume Indian motorcycle e-lock market.
The analysis utilized Modified Total Interpretive Structural Modelling (M-TISM) and the 5 C's Negotiation Framework (behavioral resilience) to elaborate on the negotiation process. The immediate structural challenge of Goal Incongruency was resolved via strategic Compromise: Company A accepted that its 20% equity contribution would cover all Non-Recurring Engineering (NRE) costs. This trade-off—forfeiting immediate revenue for long-term equity growth—was deemed the only viable path to market entry.
While behavioral governance mitigated immediate structural failure, the JVC's long-term resilience requires continuous management of latent threats. Success for the minority partner mandates a dual focus:
1. Minority Control Safeguards: Establishing essential veto rights on key strategic changes.
2. Mitigating Knowledge Risk: Proactively combating Vertical Knowledge Transfer (VKT) opportunism risk by ensuring strong Boundary Spanners' Organizational Commitment within the JVC's technical functions.
This case validates the necessity of flexible, non-monetary valuation models and continuous negotiation for managing International Joint Venture (IJV) complexity and ensuring minority protection in high-growth, emerging markets.
1. Introduction 1
2. Literature Review 3
2.1 Definition and Strategic Benefit of a Strategic Partner 4
2.1.1 Strategic Alliances 5
2.1.2 Channel Partnerships 6
2.1.3 Partner Marketing and Alliance Marketing 6
2.1.4 Co-Innovation Alliances 6
2.1.5 Key Topics in International Joint Venture Literature 7
Legal and Operational Considerations 7
2.2 The Structural Modelling and Difficulties of International Joint Ventures' Performance 8
2.2.1 Identified Inter-Partner Factors 8
2.2.2 The Hierarchical Structure (M-TISM) 9
2.2.4 Difficulties and Issues for International Joint Ventures within India 11
2.3 Integrating Negotiation Strategy: The 5 C's Framework for IJV Resilience 12
2.4 Knowledge Transfer and Relational Governance in IJVs 15
2.4.1 Interpersonal Attachment and Horizontal Knowledge Sharing 15
2.4.2 The Role of Organizational Commitment 16
3. Background 17
3.1 Introduction to Company A 17
3.2 Introduction to Company B 20
3.3 Genesis of the Collaboration: How Company A and Company B Connected 23
3.4 The Evolution to a Joint Venture Proposal 24
3.4.1 Strategic Rationale for the Joint Venture 26
3.5 Company A’s Role and Contributions to the JVC’s Growth 27
Company A's core contributions are defined by three distinct areas: 27
The Author’s Role in Operationalizing the JVC 28
3.6 Current Challenges and Opportunities in the JVC Context 28
3.6.1 Market and Competitive Pressures 28
3.7 JVC Signing and Post-Agreement Client Roadshow (August–October 2025) 29
I. Joint Venture Formation and Negotiation in India (August 12–14, 2025) 29
II. Client Outreach (August 15–23, 2025) 30
3.8 Timeline and Timetable for the key events 33
4. Case analysis 36
4.1 SWOT Analysis for Company A Automotive Lock System (PKE, e-Key, i-Key) in the JVC Context 36
4.1.1 Strengths (applicable to JVC): 36
4.1.2 Weaknesses (JVC-specific concerns): 37
4.1.3 Opportunities (for JVC): 38
4.1.4 Threats (for JVC): 38
4.2 The 5Cs (Communication, Collaboration, Creativity, Compromise, and Consistency) of the Negotiation framework 40
4.2.1 Communication 41
4.2.2 Collaboration 41
4.2.3 Creativity 42
4.2.4 Compromise 43
4.2.5 Consistency 45
5. Analysis, Interpretation, and Conclusion 46
5.1 Framework and Theoretical Interpretation 46
5.2 Mitigation, Experience, and Future Resilience 48
5.2.1 Difficulties Encountered and Overcome: 49
5.2.2 Future Pitfalls and Prevention Strategies: 49
5.3 Conclusion 51
6. References 53
Appendix 57
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem Advantage: How to Successfully Harness the Power of Partners, Platforms, and Paint Points. MIT Press.
Albers, S., Schmaul, T., & Koch, L. (2016). Managing business ecosystems: A systematic literature review. Proceedings of the European Marketing Academy Conference.
Amidi, S., & Fagheh Majidi, A. (2020). Geographic proximity, trade and economic growth: a spatial econometrics approach. Annals of GIS, 26 (1), 49–63.
Anaba, D. C., Kess-Momoh, A. J., & Ayodeji, S. A. (2024). Strategic negotiation and contract management: Best practices for high-stakes projects. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6 (7), 1310–1320. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i7.1268.
Averetek. (n.d.). The State of Channel Marketing 2018. Averetek.
Batra, I., & Dhir, S. (2024). Developing structural modelling of inter-partner factors of international joint ventures performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73 (1), 186–209. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2021-0714.
Baxter, D. (2019). Joint ventures and competitive advantage in the global air cargo industry. Journal of Transport Geography, 74, 145-156.
Calantone, R. J., & Zhao, Y. S. (2001). Joint ventures in China: a comparative study of Japanese, Korean, and U.S. partners. Journal of International Marketing, 9 (1), 1–23.
Choi, C. B., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). Split management control and international joint venture performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (3), 201–215.
Chou, S. C., Lin, J. H., & Huang, J. S. (2014). The effect of strategic alliances on firm performance: The moderating role of environmental hostility. International Journal of Production Economics, 154, 24-31.
Cornett, B. A. (2021). Exploring how small business owners interpret the value of partnerships (Order No. 28963633). Dissertation Manuscript, Northcentral University. (2639733193). Retrieved from https://www.google.com/search?q=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/exploring-how-small-business-owners-interpret/docview/2639733193/se-2.
Demirbag, M., Weir, D. T. H., & Mirza, H. (2003). Trust, inter-partner conflicts, cultural distance, commitment and joint venture performance: an empirical analysis of international joint ventures in Turkey. Journal of Transnational Management Development, 8 (1-2), 111–140.
Eikelenboom, M., & de Jong, G. (2019). The impact of dynamic capabilities on the sustainability performance of SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1360–1370.
Esen, E., & Alpay, G. (2017). Alliance orientation: A scale development and validation. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18 (4), 682-698.
Fagundes, E. A., de Almeida, M. I., & do Valle, C. E. (2014). Co-innovation in product and service development: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 67 (11), 2397-2404.
Fang, E., Palmatier, R., & Steenkamp, J. B. (2016). Marketing alliances and firm value: The role of marketing resource complementarity and alliance structure. Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (3), 329-346.
Fredrich, V., Bouncken, R. B., & Kraus, S. (2019). The race is on: configurations of absorptive capacity, interdependence and slack resources for interorganizational learning in coopetition alliances. Journal of Business Research, 101, 862–868.
Hanssens, D. M., & Pauwels, K. (2016). The link between marketing and finance. Journal of Marketing, 80 (3), 178-192.
Hasan, Z., Dhir, S., & Dhir, S. (2019). Modified total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) of asymmetric motives and its drivers in Indian bilateral CBJV. Benchmarking, 26 (2), 614–637.
Hutzschenreuter, T., Kleindienst, I., & Lange, S. (2014). Added psychic distance stimuli and MNE performance: performance effects of added cultural, governance, geographic, and economic distance in MNEs' international expansion. Journal of International Management, 20 (1), 38–54.
Jiang, F., Liu, L. X., & Li, J. (2023). From horizontal knowledge sharing to vertical knowledge transfer: The role of boundary-spanning commitment in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 54 (2), 182–202. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00507-9.
Khanna, T., Gulati, R., & Nohria, N. (1998). The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (3), 193–210.
Koch, B. J., & Koch, P. L. T. (2018). Joint venture survival in China: the importance of tangible and intangible trust.Journal of Asia Business Studies, 12 (2), 173–192.
Kochhar & Co. (2025). India Legal Guide: Foreign Direct Investment and Joint Ventures. Kochhar & Co.
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys. (2015). Legal & Governance Issues in Indian Joint Ventures. Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys.
Luo, Y. (2001). Antecedents and consequences of personal attachment in cross-cultural cooperative ventures.Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (2), 177–201.
Luo, Y. (2002). Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (10), 903–919.
Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2004). Moving forward with a service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions. Journal of Service Research, 7 (1), 15-28.
Mint. (2017). The inherent challenges of joint ventures in India. Livemint.
Morris, M. H., & Cadogan, J. W. (2001). Product portfolio strategy of joint ventures: An empirical examination.Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (1), 127-147.
Narayan, S. (2012). Measuring the marketing impact on brand equity and firm value: An event study approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (5), 654-668.
O’Donnell, S. (2014). Networked for growth: Small business owners’ use of their social networks to achieve business goals. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 29 (2), 168-176.
Phillips, S. (2025, July 17). What are the 5 Cs of negotiation? A no-fluff guide to smarter deals. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-5-cs-negotiation-no-fluff-guide-smarter-deals-sharon-phillips-acrkc/
Pires, F., Gountas, J., & Pech, R. (2015). Value co-creation and co-destruction in service ecosystems. Journal of Service Research, 18 (1), 92-106.
Tecnova Global. (2024). Report Title on Economic Asymmetry in India. Tecnova Global.
Williamson, D., & De Meyer, A. (2012). Competitive advantages where business organizations co-exist to optimize service to consumers. California Management Review, 54 (3), 5-28.
Zarantonello, L., & Schmitt, B. H. (2013). The experience economy: Past, present, and future. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23 (1), 25-36.
Zhan, W., & Chen, R. R. (2023). Dynamic capability and IJV performance: the effect of exploitation and exploration capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30 (2), 601–632.
此全文未授權公開