| 研究生: |
莊雯珺 Chuang, Wen Chun |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
臺灣各縣市房價對家庭教育支出的影響 The Impact of Housing Prices on Household Education Expenditure in Taiwan's Cities and Counties |
| 指導教授: |
黃智聰
Huang, Jr-Tsung |
| 口試委員: |
潘俊男
Pan, Chun-Nan 林晉勗 Lin, Jin-Xu |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
社會科學學院 - 行政管理碩士學程 Master for Eminent Public Administrators |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 115 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 70 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 家庭教育支出 、房價 、家庭資源配置 、擠壓效應 、空間溢出效應 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Household Education Expenditure, Housing Prices, Family Resource Allocation, Crowding-out Effect, Spatial Spillover Effects |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:14 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
家庭教育支出是提升子女人力資本與促進社會代間流動的核心驅動力,然而在當前不動產金融化的趨勢下,高昂的居住成本已成為制約家庭教育資源配置的關鍵外部財務壓力。 過去關於家庭教育支出的研究,多聚焦於家庭所得、家長教育程度等家戶特徵統計變項,鮮少將外部居住環境之住房負擔納入分架構。
本研究旨在探討臺灣各縣市房價變動如何牽動家庭教育支出的配置決策 ,分析居住成本的攀升是否會對家庭的教育投資產生排擠效應。在研究方法上,本文結合2011年至2024年行政院主計總處家庭收支調查微觀資料,以及內政部動產資訊平臺之房價數據,運用空間自我迴歸模型(SAR)進行實證分析藉此捕捉鄰近縣市間因家庭人力資本投資策略之相互模仿 ,以及跨區域教育軍備競賽所產生的空間相依性與地理溢出效應。
實證結果顯示,房價對家庭教育支出具有顯著的負向影響,證實高昂的居住負擔確實會迫使家庭縮減對子女影子教育的資源投入 ,進而對長期的社會流動構成潛在風險。 本研究結果可作為政府在制定教育公平與住宅政策時之重要依據。在教育政策方面,政府應優化區域教育資源分配,打破明星學區與高房價的強烈連動,並針對高房價、高房貸負擔之家庭,研擬對應的教育資源補貼,以確保家庭教育支出不被住房成本過度排擠;在住宅政策方面,則應透過持有稅制調整抑制房市投機從根本上減輕家庭的居住負擔,使家庭能將資源合理配置於子女的人力資本投資藉此確保家庭子女的教育機會公平,避免居住地房價負擔排擠家庭教育支出的合理配置,進而消除阻礙社會階層向上流動的空間與經濟障礙 。
Family education expenditure is a core driver for enhancing children's human capital and promoting intergenerational social mobility. However, under the current trend of real estate financialization, high housing costs have become a key external financial pressure restricting the allocation of family education resources. Past research on family education expenditure has largely focused on household characteristic statistical variables such as family income and parents' education level, rarely incorporating the housing burden of the external living environment into the analytical framework.
This study aims to explore how changes in housing prices in various counties and cities in Taiwan affect family education expenditure allocation decisions, analyzing whether rising housing costs have a crowding-out effect on family education investment. Methodologically, this paper combines micro-data from the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics' Household Income and Expenditure Survey from 2011 to 2024 with housing price data from the Ministry of the Interior's Real Estate Information Platform, using a spatial autoregressive (SAR) model for empirical analysis. This aims to capture the spatial dependence and geographical spillover effects arising from the mutual imitation of family human capital investment strategies among neighboring counties and cities, and the cross-regional education arms race.
Empirical results show that housing prices have a significant negative impact on family education expenditures, confirming that high housing costs do indeed force families to reduce their resource investment in their children's shadow education, thus posing a potential risk to long-term social mobility. The findings of this study can serve as an important basis for the government to formulate education equity and housing policies. Regarding education policy, the government should optimize the allocation of regional education resources, break the strong link between prestigious school districts and high housing prices, and develop corresponding education resource subsidies for families with high housing prices and high mortgage burdens to ensure that family education expenditures are not excessively squeezed out by housing costs. Regarding housing policy, adjustments to the property ownership tax system should be made to curb housing market speculation, fundamentally reducing the housing burden on families and enabling them to rationally allocate resources to their children's human capital investment. This ensures equal educational opportunities for children, prevents housing price burdens from crowding out the rational allocation of family education expenditures, and ultimately eliminates spatial and economic barriers that hinder upward social mobility.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 5
第三節 研究貢獻 6
第四節 研究架構及流程 7
第二章 文獻回顧 9
第一節 房價變動對家庭教育支出的影響 9
第二節 影響家庭教育支出的相關文獻 13
第三章 現況分析 24
第一節 臺灣各縣市家庭教育支出現況分析 24
第二節 臺灣各縣市房價現況分析 31
第四章 研究方法 42
第一節 空間相關性檢定 42
第二節 空間計量模型設定 43
第三節 實證模型與變數設定 45
第五章 實證結果與分析 51
第一節 檢定結果 51
第二節 實證模型估計之確立及分析結果 54
第六章 結論與建議 62
第一節 結論 62
第二節 政策建議 64
第三節 研究限制 66
參考文獻 67
內政部地政司(2024)。 113年第3季房價負擔能力指標統計報告。 取自:https://pip.moi.gov.tw/Publicize/Info/E1050。
行政院主計總處(2024)。 111年國富統計及110年家庭財富分配統計結果。取自:https://www.stat.gov.tw/。
行政院主計總處(2025)。 國民所得統計及國內經濟情勢展望。 取自:https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/。
宋麗敏與姚仕琪(2021)。 家庭老齡化、代際資源轉移與兒童教育投資 。人口與發展,31(5),151-160。
李家龍(2018)。臺灣家庭教育支出世代分析相關研究 。 臺中市:朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系碩士論文,未出版。
徐紹軒(2022)。 房價變動對家庭教育支出影響之實證研究 。 新竹市:國立清華大學經濟學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
彭祐宜(2024)。 臺灣各縣市教育資源與家庭教育支出決策之探討 。 臺北市:國立臺北大學財政學系碩士論文,未出版。
葉怡君(2022)。區域特徵差異與家庭教育支出彈性的變化:臺灣縣市案例。宜蘭縣:佛光大學應用經濟學系碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版。
蔡孟錦(2017)。家庭所得與家庭結構對教育支出之影響 ─ 臺灣實證分析。
高雄市:國立高雄應用科技大學企業管理系碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版。
駱明慶(2002)。誰是臺大學生?-性別、省籍與城鄉差異。經濟論文叢刊,30(1),113-147。
Acar, E. Ö., B. Günalp, and S. M. Cilasun (2016), “An Empirical Analysis of Household Education Expenditures in Turkey.” International Journal of Educational Development, 51, 23–35.
Acerenza, S. and N. Gandelman (2019), “Household Education Spending in Latin America and The Caribbean: Evidence from Income and Expenditure Surveys.” Education Finance and Policy, 14(1), 61–87.
Baltagi, B. H. (2021), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (6th ed.). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Becker, G. S., and H. G. Lewis (1973), “On The Interaction Between The Quantity and Quality of Children.” Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), S279-S288.
Bray, M. (2013), “Shadow Education: Comparative Perspectives on The Expansion and Implications of Private Supplementary Tutoring.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 77, 412-420.
Campbell, J. Y., and J. F. Cocco (2007), “How Do House Prices Affect Consumption? Evidence from Micro Data.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(3), 591-621.
Demiroglari, S. and Ö.K. Gürler (2020), “Determinants of Household Education Expenditures by Education Level: The Case of Turkey.” International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences, 10(1), 235–258.
Ebaidalla, E. M. (2017), “Determinants of Household Education Expenditure in Sudan.” Economic Research Forum, Working Paper Series, No. 1138, Cairo, Egypt.
Elhorst, J. P. (2014), Spatial Econometrics: From Cross-sectional Data to Spatial Panels. Berlin: Springer.
Fondation Abbé Pierre, and FEANTSA. (2020). Chapter 4: Index of Housing Exclusion in Europe 2020. In Fifth Overview of Housing Exclusion in Europe 2020. Brussels: Fondation Abbé Pierre and FEANTSA.
Gujarati, D. N. and D. C. Porter (2009), Basic Econometrics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Lovenheim, M. F. (2011), “The Effect of Liquid Housing Wealth on College Enrollment.” Journal of Labor Economics, 29(4), 741-771.
Moran, P. A. P. (1950), “Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena.” Biometrika, 37(1/2), 17–23.
Nakagawa, M., A. Oura, and Y. Sugimoto (2022), “Under- and Over-investment in Education: The Role of Locked-in Fertility. ” Journal of Population Economics, 35(3), 755-784.
Newman, S. J. and C. S. Holupka (2015), “Housing Affordability and Child Well-Being.” Housing Policy Debate, 25(1), 116-151.
OECD (2020). Housing and Inclusive Growth. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Preston, S. H. (1984), “Children and The Elderly: Divergent Paths for America's Dependents.” Demography, 21(4), 435–457.
Sun, S. (2019), “Does Housing Wealth Affect Family Investment in Human Capital: Evidence from China.” International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 2(8), 98-113.
Tang, M. and N. E. Coulson (2022), “Housing Wealth, Fertility, and Child Quality.” International Real Estate Review, 25(1), 1–53.
Wei, H., R. Guo, H. Sun, and N. Wang (2021), “Household Leverage and Education Expenditure: The Role of Household Investment.” Finance Research Letters, 38, 101837.
全文公開日期 2031/07/16