為了習得新的知識與技能，閱讀在每個學生的求學階段裡必不缺席。本研究探討文章排版對閱讀的影響，包含讀者的理解、主觀評價、閱讀處理與疲勞感受。排版設計時可調整的變項眾多，本研究使用字間距、行距、文字大小與欄位來進行兩項閱讀實驗，除了以主觀評分分數與理解題回答正確數來衡量參與者的主觀感受與理解成果，更以眼動技術紀錄參與者的閱讀時的眼動型態，以推論排版變化對讀者閱讀處理與疲勞的影響。
統合兩項實驗結果，本研究發現行距尺寸增加能使讀者的閱讀處理效率更好，這可能源自於行距隔離臨近行文字的干擾，降低視覺擁擠效應帶來的損耗。當文字尺寸增加，閱讀時眼跳範圍內的字數隨之逐漸減少，儘管平均一次凝視時間也逐漸下降，但總閱讀時間未受變化，因此無法推定放大文字會對閱讀處理帶來正向影響。在欄位與字間距中，從數據分佈推論三欄位可能因行長較短導致預視效益被浪費，字間距過大時也可能讓視網膜敏銳區域的文字成像數量下降，兩者都可能使閱讀處理效率變差。在主觀感受層面，本研究發現行距與文字尺寸增加時能使讀者的感受變好，但偏大的行距與文字儘管未增加讀者的閱讀困難，卻會使讀者評價下降，且讀者閱讀處理較佳時，對該版型的美觀評價也會隨之提高。在閱讀理解上，本研究未發現排版變化產生有效影響，可能源自於文章內容與作業難度經過控制。最後在疲勞感受，僅在疲勞主觀評分中發現緊密排版使讀者感覺疲勞，但客觀指標可能受參與者努力閱讀或認知負荷等現象影響，無法再次檢測出相應效果。
綜上所述，本研究確認排版變化確實會影響讀者的主觀感受與閱讀處理，其中對閱讀效率的影響可能主要來自於文字辨識等前期歷程，且主觀感受與閱讀處理之間存在一定的正向關係。本研究更藉由每一個變項中皆有多水準的設計，提供了各層面受排版影響時的變化曲線，可供未來排版編排者參考。而排版對理解與疲勞層面的影響、更精確的適宜數值，則需後續研究進一步探討。

Al-Samarraie, H., Sarsam, S. M., & Umar, I. N. (2017). Visual perception of multi-column-layout text: insight from repeated and non-repeated reading. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2016.1196502
Baccino, T., & Pynte, J. (1994). Spatial coding and discourse models during text reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402114
Bailey, R. W. (1989). Human performance engineering: Using human factors/ergonomics to achieve computer system usability. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bernard, M. L., Chaparro, B. S., Mills, M. M., & Halcomb, C. G. (2002). Examining children’s reading performance and preference for different computer-displayed text. Behaviour & Information Technology, 21(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290210146737
Bernard, M. L., Chaparro, B. S., Mills, M. M., & Halcomb, C. G. (2003). Comparing the effects of text size and format on the readibility of computer-displayed Times New Roman and Arial text. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(6), 823–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00121-6
Bernard, M., Liao, C. H., & Mills, M. (2001). The effects of font type and size on the legibility and reading time of online text by older adults. CHI ’01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 175–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634173
Blackmore-Wright, S., Georgeson, M. A., & Anderson, S. J. (2013). Enhanced Text Spacing Improves Reading Performance in Individuals with Macular Disease. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e80325. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080325
Boer, M. van den, & Hakvoort, B. E. (2014). Default spacing is the optimal spacing for word reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(4), 697–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.964272
Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition. Nature, 226(5241), 177–178. https://doi.org/10.1038/226177a0
ButTaiwan. (2020). genryu-font (1.501) [Computer software]. https://github.com/ButTaiwan/genryu-font
Chan, A. H. S., Tsang, S. N. H., & Ng, A. W. Y. (2013). Effects of Line Length, Line Spacing, and Line Number on Proofreading Performance and Scrolling of Chinese Text. Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 56(3), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720813499368
Chen, J.-T., Kuo, Y.-C., Hsu, T.-Y., & Wang, C.-A. (2022). Fatigue and Arousal Modulations Revealed by Saccade and Pupil Dynamics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9234. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159234
Chung, S. T. L. (2002). The effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 43(4), 1270–1276.
Chung, S. T. L. (2004). Reading Speed Benefits from Increased Vertical Word Spacing in Normal Peripheral Vision. Optometry and Vision Science, 81(7), 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200407000-00014
Chung, S. T. L. (2012). Dependence of Reading Speed on Letter Spacing in Central Vision Loss. Optometry and Vision Science, 89(9), 1288–1298. https://doi.org/10.1097/opx.0b013e318264c9dd
Chung, S. T. L., Jarvis, S. H., Woo, S. Y., Hanson, K., & Jose, R. T. (2008). Reading Speed Does Not Benefit from Increased Line Spacing in AMD Patients. Optometry and Vision Science, 85(9), 827–833. https://doi.org/10.1097/opx.0b013e31818527ea
DeBruine, L. M., & Barr, D. J. (2021). Understanding Mixed-Effects Models Through Data Simulation. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920965119. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920965119
Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: a proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004
Diemand-Yauman, C., Oppenheimer, D. M., & Vaughan, E. B. (2011). Fortune favors the (): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition, 118(1), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.012
Dobryakova, E., Genova, H., Schneider, V., Chiaravalloti, N. D., Spirou, A., Wylie, G. R., & DeLuca, J. (2020). Reward presentation reduces on-task fatigue in traumatic brain injury. Cortex, 126, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.01.003
Doerig, A., Bornet, A., Rosenholtz, R., Francis, G., Clarke, A. M., & Herzog, M. H. (2019). Beyond Bouma’s window: How to explain global aspects of crowding? PLoS Computational Biology, 15(5), e1006580. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006580
Duchowski, A. T. (2017). Eye Tracking Methodology, Theory and Practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57883-5
Dyson, M. C. (2004). How physical text layout affects reading from screen. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(6), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290410001715714
Dyson, M. C., & Kipping, G. J. (1997). The legibility of screen formats: Are three columns better than one? Computers & Graphics, 21(6), 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0097-8493(97)00048-4
Eckstein, M. K., Guerra-Carrillo, B., Singley, A. T. M., & Bunge, S. A. (2017). Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development? Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.001
Feely, M., Rubin, G. S., Ekstrom, K., & Perera, S. (2005). Investigation into font characteristics for optimum reading fluency in readers with sight problems. International Congress Series, 1282, 530–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.05.121
Fuchs, J., Heyer, T., Langenhan, D., & Hippius, M. (2008). Influence of Font Sizes on the Readability and Comprehensibility of Package Inserts.pdf. Pharmazeutische Industrie, 70, 584–592.
Gershon, P., Ronen, A., Oron-Gilad, T., & Shinar, D. (2009). The effects of an interactive cognitive task (ICT) in suppressing fatigue symptoms in driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2008.06.004
Goldstein, E. B., & Brockmole, J. (2016). Sensation and perception. Cengage Learning.
Hagtvedt, H. (2011). The Impact of Incomplete Typeface Logos on Perceptions of the Firm. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.86
Hakvoort, B., Boer, M. van den, Leenaars, T., Bos, P., & Tijms, J. (2017). Improvements in reading accuracy as a result of increased interletter spacing are not specific to children with dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 164, 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.07.010
Hendrickson, A. (2005). Macular Degeneration. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26977-0_1
Herzog, M. H., Sayim, B., Chicherov, V., & Manassi, M. (2015). Crowding, grouping, and object recognition: A matter of appearance. Journal of Vision, 15(6), 5. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.6.5
Huang, D.-L., Rau, P.-L. P., & Liu, Y. (2009). Effects of font size, display resolution and task type on reading Chinese fonts from mobile devices. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.09.004
Hughes, L. E., & Wilkins, A. J. (2002). Reading at a distance: Implications for the design of text in children’s big books. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158856
Ingre, M., Åkerstedt, T., Peters, B., Anund, A., & Kecklund, G. (2006). Subjective sleepiness, simulated driving performance and blink duration: examining individual differences. Journal of Sleep Research, 15(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2869.2006.00504.x
Jo, J., Lee, S. J., Park, K. R., Kim, I.-J., & Kim, J. (2014). Detecting driver drowsiness using feature-level fusion and user-specific classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4), 1139–1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.108
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8(4), 441–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3
Kassambara, A. (2021). rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests. R Package Version 0.7.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix
Kemmerer, D. (2015). Reading and Writing: Cognitive Neuroscience of Language. In D. Kemmerer (Ed.), Psychology Press (pp. 215–245).
Kliegl, R., Wei, P., Dambacher, M., Yan, M., & Zhou, X. (2011). Experimental Effects and Individual Differences in Linear Mixed Models: Estimating the Relationship between Spatial, Object, and Attraction Effects in Visual Attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00238
Kruk, R. S., & Muter, P. (1984). Reading of Continuous Text on Video Screens. Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 26(3), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088402600309
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
Lambooij, M., Fortuin, M., Heynderickx, I., & IJsselsteijn, W. (2009). Visual Discomfort and Visual Fatigue of Stereoscopic Displays: A Review. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, 53(3), 030201. https://doi.org/10.2352/j.imagingsci.technol.2009.53.3.030201
Lee, D.-S., Ko, Y.-H., Shen, I.-H., & Chao, C.-Y. (2011). Effect of light source, ambient illumination, character size and interline spacing on visual performance and visual fatigue with electronic paper displays. Displays, 32(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2010.09.001
Ling, J., & Schaik, P. van. (2007). The influence of line spacing and text alignment on visual search of web pages. Displays, 28(2), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2007.04.003
Liu, P., & Li, X. (2014). Inserting spaces before and after words affects word processing differently in Chinese: Evidence from eye movements. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12013
Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M., Patil, I., Waggoner, P., & Makowski, D. (2021). performance: An R Package for Assessment, Comparison and Testing of Statistical Models. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3139. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03139
Ma, G. (2017). Does interword spacing influence lexical processing in Chinese reading? Visual Cognition, 25(7–8), 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2017.1338322
Ma, X., Li, D., Tsai, J.-L., & Hsu, Y.-Y. (2022). An eye-tracking based investigation into reading behavior during Chinese-English sight translation: The effect of word order asymmetry. The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.114201.2022.a04
Manassi, M., Sayim, B., & Herzog, M. H. (2013). When crowding of crowding leads to uncrowding. Journal of Vision, 13(13), 10–10. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.13.10
Martelli, M., Filippo, G. D., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (2009). Crowding, reading, and developmental dyslexia. Journal of Vision, 9(4), 14–14. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.4.14
Masulli, F., Galluccio, M., Gerard, C.-L., Peyre, H., Rovetta, S., & Bucci, M. P. (2018). Effect of different font sizes and of spaces between words on eye movement performance: An eye tracker study in dyslexic and non-dyslexic children. Vision Research, 153, 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2018.09.008
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.88.5.375
McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17(6), 578–586. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03203972
McCormick, E. J., & Sanders, M. S. (1982). Human factors in engineering and design. McGraw-Hill Companies.
Mills, C. B., & Weldon, L. J. (1987). Reading text from computer screens. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 19(4), 329–357. https://doi.org/10.1145/45075.46162
Moll, K., & Jones, M. (2013). Naming Fluency in Dyslexic and Nondyslexic Readers: Differential Effects of Visual Crowding in Foveal, Parafoveal, and Peripheral Vision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(11), 2085–2091. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.840852
Morrison, R. E., & Inhoff, A. W. (1981). Visual factors and eye movements in reading. Visible Language, 15(2), 129–146.
Muter, P., & Maurutto, P. (1991). Reading and skimming from computer screens and books: the paperless office revisited? Behaviour & Information Technology, 10(4), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449299108924288
Nakagawa, S., Johnson, P. C. D., & Schielzeth, H. (2017). The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 14(134), 20170213. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0213
Noguchi, K., Gel, Y. R., Brunner, E., & Konietschke, F. (2012). nparLD: An R Software Package for the Nonparametric Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Factorial Experiments. Journal of Statistical Software, 12(50), 1–23. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v50/i12/
Ostrovsky, A., Ribak, J., Pereg, A., & Gaton, D. (2012). Effects of job-related stress and burnout on asthenopia among high-tech workers. Ergonomics, 55(8), 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.681808
Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
Pelli, D. G., & Tillman, K. A. (2008). The uncrowded window of object recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 11(10), 1129–1135. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2187
Perea, M., Giner, L., Marcet, A., & Gomez, P. (2016). Does Extra Interletter Spacing Help Text Reading in Skilled Adult Readers? The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, E26. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2016.28
Perea, M., Panadero, V., Moret-Tatay, C., & Gómez, P. (2012). The effects of inter-letter spacing in visual-word recognition: Evidence with young normal readers and developmental dyslexics. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.04.001
Perkins, E. S., & Davson, H. (2020, August 7). Human eye. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/human-eye
Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Statistics and Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/b98882
Pollatsek, A., Bolozky, S., Well, A. D., & Rayner, K. (1981). Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain and Language, 14(1), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934x(81)90073-0
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38(8), 1129–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00274-5
Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Jr., C. C. (2019). Psychology of Reading, 2nd Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203155158
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. [R]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver’s Processing Experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
Sanchez, C. A., & Jaeger, A. J. (2015). If it’s hard to read, it changes how long you do it: Reading time as an explanation for perceptual fluency effects on judgment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(1), 206–211. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0658-6
Schneps, M. H., Thomson, J. M., Sonnert, G., Pomplun, M., Chen, C., & Heffner-Wong, A. (2013). Shorter Lines Facilitate Reading in Those Who Struggle. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e71161. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071161
Shu, H., Zhou, W., Yan, M., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Font size modulates saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(2), 482–490. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0029-y
Slattery, T. J., Yates, M., & Angele, B. (2016). Interword and Interletter Spacing Effects During Reading Revisited: Interactions With Word and Font Characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22(4), 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000104
Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2008). If It’s Hard to Read, It’s Hard to Do. Psychological Science, 19(10), 986–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02189.x
SR Research. (2020). EyeLink® Portable Duo User Manual. https://www.sr-research.com/support/attachment.php?aid=1386
Stern, J. A., Boyer, D., & Schroeder, D. (1994). Blink Rate: A Possible Measure of Fatigue. Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 36(2), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089403600209
Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2016). Cognitive Psychology. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Tarasov, D. A., Sergeev, A. P., & Filimonov, V. V. (2015). Legibility of Textbooks: A Literature Review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1300–1308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.751
Tinker, M. A. (1963). Influence of simultaneous variation in size of type, width of line, and leading for newspaper type. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47(6), 380–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043573
Vanderschantz, N. (2008). Reveiwing the understanding of the effects of spacing on children’s eye movements for on screen reading.
Veneri, G., & Rufa, A. (2017). Extrafoveal Vision Maximizes the Likelihood to Grab Information in Visual-sequential Search. In Computer Communication & Collaboration (Vol. 1–5, pp. 21–34). Academic Research Centre of Canada.
Vidyasagar, T. R., & Pammer, K. (2010). Dyslexia: a deficit in visuo-spatial attention, not in phonological processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(2), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.003
Wei, T., & Simko, V. (2021). R package “corrplot”: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix (0.92) [R]. https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot
Wierwille, W. W., Wreggit, S. S., Kirn, C. L., Ellsworth, L. A., & Fairbanks, R. J. (1994). Research on vehicle-based driver status:performance monitoring; development, validation and refinement of algorithms for detection of driver drowsiness.pdf. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/2578
Wilkins, A., Cleave, R., Grayson, N., & Wilson, L. (2009). Typography for children may be inappropriately designed. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(4), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01402.x
Williamson, K., Scolari, M., Jeong, S., Kim, M. S., & Awh, E. (2009). Experience-dependent changes in the topography of visual crowding. Journal of Vision, 9(11), 15–15. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.11.15
Winter, B. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1308.5499
Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2015). Perceptual Span Depends on Font Size During the Reading of Chinese Sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(1), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038097
Yen, N.-S., Tsai, J.-L., Chen, P.-L., Lin, H.-Y., & Chen, A. L. P. (2011). Effects of typographic variables on eye-movement measures in reading Chinese from a screen. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(6), 797–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2010.523900
Yu, L., Zhang, Q., Priest, C., Reichle, E. D., & Sheridan, H. (2016). Character-complexity effects in Chinese reading and visual search: A comparison and theoretical implications. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1272616
Zhang, J.-Y., Zhang, T., Xue, F., Liu, L., & Yu, C. (2009). Legibility of Chinese characters in peripheral vision and the top-down influences on crowding. Vision Research, 49(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.021
Zorzi, M., Barbiero, C., Facoetti, A., Lonciari, I., Carrozzi, M., Montico, M., Bravar, L., George, F., Pech-Georgel, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2012). Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(28), 11455–11459. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205566109

佐藤直樹、ASYL （2014)）。基本の基本:版面設計的基礎思維。麥浩斯。
劉麗穎（2015）。字體大小、字體類型和文本間距對黃斑病變病人閱讀績效的影響。吉林大學。
台灣傳播調查資料庫（2020年1月20日）。你常看新聞嗎？——探討台灣民眾觀看新聞之習慣與問題。 https://crctaiwan.dcat.nycu.edu.tw/ResultsShow_detail.asp?RS_ID=105
吳培聖（2011）。以眼動追蹤法探討電子書文字編排易讀性研究。中國文化大學新聞暨傳播學院資訊傳播學系。
周鈺、王娟、陳憬、李永鋒（2015）。信息載體影響文本閱讀的實證研究。中國遠程教育，21–26。https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2015.10.005
國家圖書館（2020）。108年台灣閱讀風貌及全民閱讀力年度報告。
國民健康署（2021年6月2日）。居家防疫狂用眼 Eye眼動起來。https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-5017-61163-1.html
孫玉婷（2016）。字色與分欄對英文閱讀影響的眼動研究。校園心理，14(5)，344–347。
康珀瑞（2014）平板電腦與紙本閱讀績效之研究——媒體使用及眼動特徵之測量。中國文化大學新聞暨傳播學院資訊傳播學系。
徐立威（2006）。光源、照度、字體大小及行間距對電子紙顯示器的視覺績效與視覺疲勞之影響。國立臺灣科技大學工業管理學系。
李明信（2013）。字體不流暢性於漢字電子書閱讀成效之研究。國立臺灣師範大學圖文傳播學系。
柯慶育（2010）。網頁文字的訊息凸顯方式、字體大小與欄位對學習者閱讀績效及搜尋績效之影響。國立臺北教育大學理學院教育傳播與科技研究所。
程海彧（2015）。字體大小和行距對城市低齡老年人閱讀報紙材料影響的眼動研究。天津師範大學。
葉國棟（2006）。中文字型種類以及字距與行距對國小六年級學童閱讀速度之影響。國立台中教育大學教育測驗統計研究所。
蔡介立（2000）。從眼動控制探討中文閱讀的訊息處理歷程——應用眼動誘發呈現技術之系列研究。國立政治大學心理學系。
蔡介立、顏妙璇、汪勁安（2005）。眼球移動測量及在中文閱讀研究之應用。應用心理研究，28，91–104