權力概念不僅在日常生活中被廣泛使用，更是政治學科的基本概念。然而，對我們如此重要的權力概念卻始終缺乏一個所有人認同的內涵，即便有眾多學者前仆後繼地投入權力研究中，在人言言殊的情況下，我們對於權力概念的理解反而更加模糊。為了解決權力概念的困境，本文在檢視當前對於權力概念的主要論述後，將之大致分成三種權力觀點：權力行使觀、權力能力觀、權力界線觀。本文認為：雖然這三種權力觀點皆無法憑一己之力描繪出完整的權力概念，但他們卻各自指出權力概念的不同部份，因而彼此之間有互補關係。為了完整理解權力概念，本文乃將此三種觀點進一步整合成「三位一體權力整合觀」，並闡明三位一體權力整合觀優於個別權力觀點之處。最後，為了彰顯本文提出的權力整合觀不僅僅是純粹抽象的理論建構，同時也能進行實際的操作，論文最後除了以實際的例子來說明權力整合觀比個別權力觀點還能辨識出完整的權力現象外，也試圖指出權力整合觀更能「有意義地」提出衡量權力大小的指標。

一、中文部份

米爾斯。1994。《權力菁英》，王逸舟譯，台北：桂冠。
呂郁女。2009。〈發揮巧實力 打通活路外交〉，《中國時報》，6月6日，A19版。
林保純。1999。〈金庸小說版本學〉，《金庸小說國際學術研討會論文集》，台北：遠流，頁401-24。
林婉翎。2008。〈柔性領導 更服眾〉，《經濟日報》，9月22日，A14版。
金庸。1996a。《天龍八部(一)》，台北：遠流。
金庸。1996b。《天龍八部(二)》，台北：遠流。
金庸。1996c。《天龍八部(三)》，台北：遠流。
金庸。1996d。《天龍八部(五)》，台北：遠流。
金庸。1996e。《神鵰俠侶》，台北：遠流。
金庸。1996f。《笑傲江湖》，台北：遠流。
金庸。1996g。《碧血劍》，台北：遠流。
朗。1994。《權力：它的形式、基礎和作用》，高湘澤、高全余譯，台北：桂冠。
莊錦農、魏中平。1998。〈解釋與批判：論批判實存論的科學解釋觀〉，《政治科學論叢》，9：121-144。
郭秋永。1995。〈解析「本質上可爭議的概念」：三種權力觀的鼎力對峙〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，7(2)：175-206。
郭秋永。2001。〈權力與因果：方法論上的解析〉，《台灣政治學刊》，5(64-131)。
郭秋永。2003。〈科學哲學中的兩種因果解析〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，4：121-177。
郭秋永。2004。〈對峙的權力觀：行為與結構〉，《政治科學論叢》，20：29-78。
郭秋永。2005。〈批判實存主義與價值中立原則〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，17(3)：565-614。
郭秋永。2006。〈權力概念的解析〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，18(2)：215-267。
陳敦源。2010。〈政務官為何反對考績改革〉，《中國時報》，3月22日，A14版。
楊興安。1998。《金庸小說十談》，台北：遠流。
蕭公權。1982。《中國政治思想史》，台北：聯經。

二、英文部份

Bachrach, Peter and Morton Baratz. 1970. Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Barry, Brain. 1975. “The Obscurity of Power: Review of Lukes’ Power: A Radical View” Government and Opposition 10(2): 250-254.
Benton, Ted. 1981. “Objective Interests and the Sociology of Power” Sociology 15(2): 161-84.
Bhaskar, Roy. 1983. “Realism” in “Dictionary of the History of Science” edited by William F. Bynum, Janet Browne and Roy Porter. London: Macmillan, pp.362-3.
Bhaskar, Roy. 1997. A Realist Theory of Science. London and New York: Verso. First published in 1975 by Leeds Books. This edition first published in 1978 by The Harvest Press.
Connolly, William. 1985. “Taylor, Foucault, and Otherness” Political Theory 13:365-76.
Connolly, William. 1993. The Terms of Political Discourse. U. K.: Blackwell.
Crenson, Matthew. 1971. The Un-Politics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non- Decisionmaking in the Cities. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
Dahl, Robert, 1961. Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University.
Dahl, Robert. 1958. “A Critique of the Ruling Elite Model” American Political Science Review 52:463-9.
Dahl, Robert. 1994. “The Concept of Power” in Power: Critical Concept edited by John Scott. Vol. I: 288-309. New York: Routledge. Reprinted from Behavioral Science 1957, 2:201-215.
Digeser, Peter. 1992. “The Fourth Face of Power.” The Journal of Politics 54(4): 977-1006.
Foucault, Michel. 1980a. “Power and Strategies” in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 edited by Colin Gordon translated by Leo Marshall, John Merpham, and Kate Soper. New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, Michel. 1980b. The History of Sexuality translated by Robert Hurley. New York: Random House.
Gallie, Walter. 1955-6. “Essentially Contested Concepts” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167-198.
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press
Gray, John. 1977. “On the Contestability of Social and Political Concepts” Political Theory 5(3): 331-348.
Gray, John. 1978. “On Liberty, Liberalism and Essential Contestability.” British Journal of Political Science 8: 385-402.
Hayward, Clarissa. 2000. De-facing Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Issac, Jeffrey. 1992. “Beyond the Three Faces of Power: A Realist Critique” in Rethinking Power edited by Thomas Wartenberg Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 32-55. Reprinted from Polity, 1987, 20: 4-31.
Issacs, Harold. 1964. India’s Ex-Untouchables. New York: John Day.
Jouvenel, Bertrand de. 1992. “Authority: The Efficient Imperative” in The Nature of Politics edited by Dennis Hale and Marc Landy. New Brunswick, N.J., pp.84-93. Reprinted from Authority. 1959, edited by Carl J. Friedrich. New York: New York University Press.
Lasswell, Harold and Abraham Kaplan. 1952. Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. London : Routledge.
Lukes, Steven. 1977. “Power and Structure” in Essay in Social Theory edited by Steven Lukes. London: Macmillan, pp. 3-23.
Lukes, Steven. 2005. Power: A Radical View. New York : Palgrave Macmillan.
Macdonald, K. I. 1976. “Is ’Power” Essentially Contested?” British Journal of Political Science 6: 380-382.
Miller, David. 1983. ”Linguistic Philosophy and Political Theory” in The Nature of Political Theory edited by David Miller and Larry Siedentop. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp.35-51.
Morriss, Peter. 2002. Power: A Philosophical Analysis. New York: Manchester University Press.
Parsons, Talcott. 1957. “The Distribution of Power in American Society.” World Politics 10: 123-143.
Polsby, Nelson. 1963. Community Power and Political Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Popper, Karl. 1976. "The Logic of the Social Sciences," in The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology translated by Glyn Adey and David Frisby. London: Heinemann, pp. 87-104.
Russell, Bertrand. 2004. Power. New York: Routledge.
Ryle, Gilbert. 2009. The Concept of Mind. New York: Routledge.
Schattschneider, Elmer. 1975. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in American. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Srinivas, Mysore. 1952. Religion and Society among the Coorgs of South India. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Srinivas, Mysore. 1962. Caste in Modern India and Other Essays. London: Asia Publishing Hourse..
Wartenberg, Thomas. 1992. “Situated Social Power” in Rethinking Power edited by Thomas Waternberg. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 79-101.
Weber, Max. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization translated by A. M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons. Free Press.