| 研究生: |
金沛然 Sittikorn Boonla |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
從地位與價值同質性檢視奈米影響者行銷對購買意圖的影響:以泰國書籍產業為例 Examining the Impact of Nano-Influencer Marketing on Purchase Intentions from the Perspectives of Status and Value Homophily: A Study of Thailand's Book Industry |
| 指導教授: |
林芝璇
Lin, Jhih-Syuan |
| 口試委員: | Naa Amponsah Dodoo |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
傳播學院 - 國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS) International Master's Program in International Communication Studies(IMICS) |
| 論文出版年: | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度: | 113 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 111 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 奈米影響者行銷 、購買意圖 、同質性 、信任感 、真實性 、地位消費 、文化產品 、書籍產業 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | nano-influencer marketing, purchase intentions, homophily, trustworthiness, authenticity, status consumption, cultural products, books industry |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:170 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討地位同質性與價值同質性在奈米影響者推薦書籍時,對消費者購買意圖的影響,並進一步檢視信賴感與真實性感知的中介角色,以及地位消費傾向於此關係中的調節作用。本研究以泰國書籍市場為背景,採用受試者間實驗設計,透過操弄同質性類型(地位同質性與價值同質性)與書籍類型(小說與非小說),驗證奈米影響者行銷之成效。兩種同質性在購買意圖、信賴感與真實性感知上皆無顯著差異。雖然信賴感在購買決策中具有顯著預測力,信賴感與真實性感知皆未中介同質性對購買意圖的影響。此外,地位消費傾向與真實性感知之間呈現邊際顯著的交互作用,但在信賴感上則未達顯著,顯示高地位消費傾向者對真實性感知的反應較為正向,與低地位消費傾向者有所不同。最後,本研究針對奈米影響者行銷於文化產品情境中的理論與實務意涵進行討論,並提出研究限制與未來研究方向。
The current research examines how different types of homophily influence purchase intentions in nano-influencer book recommendations, investigating the mediating roles of trustworthiness and authenticity, and how these relationships are moderated by status consumption. Focusing on Thailand's book market, a between-subjects experimental study manipulating homophily type (status vs. value) and book genre (fiction vs. non-fiction) was conducted. The findings revealed no significant differences between the two types of homophily on purchase intentions, trustworthiness, and authenticity. While trustworthiness emerged as a significant predictor of purchase decisions, neither trustworthiness nor authenticity mediated the relationship between homophily and purchase intentions. Status consumption showed a marginally significant interaction with authenticity, but not with trustworthiness, suggesting that high status consumption consumers respond more positively to authenticity perceptions than low status consumption consumers. Theoretical and practical implications for nano-influencer marketing in cultural product contexts are discussed, along with limitations and future research directions.
INTRODUCTION 1
Research context 4
Research objectives 7
LITERATURE REVIEW 10
Social media influencer 10
Nano-influencer 11
Homophily 14
The effect of homophily on purchase intention 19
the effect of homophily on trustworthiness 21
the effect of homophily on authenticity 23
the mediating roles of trustworthiness and authenticity 24
the moderating effect of status consumption 26
METHODOLOGY 31
Study design 31
stimuli development 32
pretest 36
main study 39
measures 41
RESULTS 46
Sample overview 46
scale reliability and descriptive analysis 49
randomization check 52
manipulation check 55
effects of homophily types on purchase intention, trustworthiness and authenticity 58
mediating roles of trustworthiness and authenticity 63
status consumption as a second-stage moderator 67
DISCUSSION 73
Effects of homophily types on purchase intention, trustworthiness and authenticity 74
mediating roles of trustworthiness and authenticity 77
moderating role of status consumption 79
theoretical implications 80
managerial implications 84
limitation and future research 85
conclusion 87
REFERENCES 89
APPENDICES 105
Abidin, C. (2015). Communicative intimacies: Influencers and perceived interconnectedness. Ada a Journal of Gender New Media and Technology, 8(8), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.7264/n3mw2ffg
Andonopoulos, V., Lee, J., & Mathies, C. (2023). Authentic isn’t always best: When inauthentic social media influencers induce positive consumer purchase intention through inspiration. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, 103521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103521
Audrezet, A., De Kerviler, G., & Moulard, J. G. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008
Babbie, E. R. (2016). The Practice of Social Research (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall.
Beltramini, R. F., & Evans, K. R. (1985). Perceived believability of research results information in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 14(3), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1985.10672953
Berne-Manero, C., & Marzo-Navarro, M. (2020). Exploring how influencer and relationship marketing serve corporate sustainability. Sustainability, 12(11), 4392. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114392
Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. J. (2010). The quest for authenticity in consumption: Consumers’ purposive choice of authentic cues to shape experienced outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 838–856. https://doi.org/10.1086/615047
Bu, Y., Parkinson, J., & Thaichon, P. (2022). Influencer marketing: Homophily, customer value co-creation behaviour and purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 66, 102904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102904
Bucur, D. (2019). Gender homophily in online book networks. Information Sciences, 481, 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.01.003
Campbell, C., & Farrell, J. R. (2020). More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing. Business Horizons, 63(4), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.003
Carvalho, M. a. M. (2024). Influencing the follower behavior: the role of homophily and perceived usefulness, credibility and enjoyability of travel content. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 7(2), 1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhti-09-2023-0648
Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2020). Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. Journal of Business Research, 117, 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.005
Chapman, M., Filipenko, M., McTavish, M., & Shapiro, J. (2007). First graders’ preferences for narrative and/or information books and perceptions of other boys' and girl's book preferences. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue Canadienne De L Éducation, 30(2), 531. https://doi.org/10.2307/20466649
Cohen, J. M. (1977). Sources of peer group homogeneity. Sociology of Education, 50(4), 227. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112497
Dali, K. (2013). From book appeal to reading appeal: Redefining the concept of appeal in readers’ advisory. The Library Quarterly, 84(1), 22–48. https://doi.org/10.1086/674034
De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035
Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009
Dubois, D., & Ordabayeva, N. (2015). Social hierarchy, social status, and status consumption. In Cambridge University Press (pp. 332–367). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107706552.013
Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Retracted: Super Size Me: Product size as a signal of status. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1047–1062. https://doi.org/10.1086/661890
Eastman, J. K., & Eastman, K. L. (2015). Conceptualizing a model of status consumption theory: An exploration of the antecedents and consequences of the motivation to consume for status. Marketing Management Journal, 25(1), 1–15.
Eastman, J. K., Goldsmith, R. E., & Flynn, L. R. (1999). Status consumption in consumer behavior: Scale development and validation. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.1999.11501839
Erkic, A. (2023). A Guide to Social Media Influencers: Mega, Macro, Micro, and Nano. Flock Social. https://flocksocial.com/blog/types-of-social-media-influencers
Evans, N. J., Phua, J., Lim, J., & Jun, H. (2017). Disclosing Instagram Influencer advertising: The effects of disclosure language on advertising recognition, attitudes, and behavioral intent. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 17(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2017.1366885
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Fink, M., Koller, M., Gartner, J., Floh, A., & Harms, R. (2020). Effective entrepreneurial marketing on Facebook – A longitudinal study. Journal of Business Research, 113, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.005
Fitzmaurice, J., & Comegys, C. (2006). Materialism and social consumption. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 14(4), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.2753/mtp1069-6679140403
Friedman, H. H., Termini, S., & Washington, R. (1976). the effectiveness of advertisements utilizing four types of endorsers. Journal of Advertising, 5(3), 22–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1976.10672647
Goldsmith, R. E., & Clark, R. A. (2011). Materialism, status consumption, and consumer independence. The Journal of Social Psychology, 152(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2011.555434
Gong, S., Zhang, J., Zhao, P., & Jiang, X. (2017). Tweeting as a marketing tool: A field experiment in the tv industry. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(6), 833–850. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0348
Gong, Z. H., & Holiday, S. (2023). Parasocial interaction message elements and disclosure timing in nano- and microinfluencers’ sponsored content as alternative explanations for follower count’s influence on engagement. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 23(4), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2023.2236093
Goodreau, S. M., Kitts, J. A., & Morris, M. (2009). Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. Demography, 46(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0045
Gupta, P., Burton, J. L., & Barros, L. C. (2022). Gender of the online influencer and follower: the differential persuasive impact of homophily, attractiveness and product-match. Internet Research, 33(2), 720–740. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-04-2021-0229
Haenlein, M., Anadol, E., Farnsworth, T., Hugo, H., Hunichen, J., & Welte, D. (2020). Navigating the new era of influencer marketing: How to be successful on Instagram, TikTok?; Co. California Management Review, 63(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620958166
Harvard Business Review. (2024). When it comes to influencers, smaller can be better. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2024/09/when-it-comes-to-influencers-smaller-can-be-better
Hassanzadeh, M., Taheri, M., Shokouhyar, S., & Shokoohyar, S. (2023). Who one is, whom one knows? Evaluating the importance of personal and social characteristics of influential people in social networks. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 75(6), 1008–1032. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-12-2021-0382
He, Y., Pongsakornrungsilp, S., Pongsakornrungsilp, P., Narangajavana, Y., & Kumar, V. (2024). How nano-influencers citizenship behavior affect their stickiness to the social commerce platform? The roles of perceived value. ABAC Journal, 44(3), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.59865/abacj.2024.28
Heaney, J., Goldsmith, R. E., & Jusoh, W. J. W. (2005). Status consumption among malaysian consumers. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 17(4), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1300/j046v17n04_05
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635. https://doi.org/10.1086/266350
Influencer Marketing Hub. (2025). Influencer Marketing Benchmark Report 2025.
https://influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-benchmark-report/
Hudders, L., De Jans, S., & De Veirman, M. (2021). The commercialization of social media stars: a literature review and conceptual framework on the strategic use of social media influencers. International Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 327–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1836925
Ingkasit, R. (2022). หนังสือแพงขึ้น แต่รายได้คนไทยยังไม่ถึงไหน มองปัญหาหนังสือแพงผ่านมุมเศรษฐศาสตร์ (Book prices are rising, but Thai incomes are stagnant: Analyzing the book price problem through an economic lens). The MATTER. https://thematter.co/thinkers/book-price-and-library/188145
Janssen, L., Schouten, A. P., & Croes, E. a. J. (2021). Influencer advertising on Instagram: product-influencer fit and number of followers affect advertising outcomes and influencer evaluations via credibility and identification. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1994205
Jiménez-Castillo, D., & Sánchez-Fernández, R. (2019). The role of digital influencers in brand recommendation: Examining their impact on engagement, expected value and purchase intention. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.009
Ju, I., & Lou, C. (2022). Does influencer–follower relationship matter? Exploring how relationship norms and influencer–product congruence affect advertising effectiveness across product categories. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 22(2), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2022.2087809
Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84(2), 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1086/226792
Kay, S., Mulcahy, R., & Parkinson, J. (2020). When less is more: The impact of macro and micro social media influencers’ disclosure. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3–4), 248–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2020.1718740
Khan, A., Khan, Z., & Nabi, M. K. (2024). “I think exactly the same”—trust in SMIs and online purchase intention: a moderation mediation analysis using PLS-SEM. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 21(2), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/jamr-03-2023-0087
Kim, D., & Jang, S. (2014). Motivational drivers for status consumption: A study of Generation Y consumers. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 38, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.12.003
Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H. (2021). Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. Journal of Business Research, 134, 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.024
Kim, M., Song, D., & Jang, A. (2021). Consumer response toward native advertising on social media: the roles of source type and content type. Internet Research, 31(5), 1656–1676. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-08-2019-0328
Labrecque, L. I. (2014). Fostering consumer–brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.003
Labrecque, L. I., Esche, J. V. D., Mathwick, C., Novak, T. P., & Hofacker, C. F. (2013). Consumer power: Evolution in the digital age. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(4), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.002
Ladhari, R., Massa, E., & Skandrani, H. (2020). YouTube vloggers’ popularity and influence: The roles of homophily, emotional attachment, and expertise. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 102027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102027
Lam, J. M., Ismail, H., & Lee, S. (2020). From desktop to destination: User-generated content platforms, co-created online experiences, destination image and satisfaction. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 18, 100490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100490
Larbpanich, J. (2023). หนังสือราคาแพงขึ้น เราคิดไปเองหรือไม่? (Are book prices rising, or is it just our perception?). Urban Creature. https://urbancreature.co/overpriced-books/
Lee, I., Yi, J., & Kim, S. (2023). Standing the test of time: What makes a book survive on the bestseller list? Journal of Business Research, 164, 114013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114013
Lee, J. A., & Eastin, M. S. (2020). I like what she’s #Endorsing: The impact of female social media influencers’ perceived sincerity, consumer envy, and product type. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(1), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2020.1737849
Lee, J. E., & Watkins, B. (2016). YouTube vloggers’ influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5753–5760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.171
Leung, F. F., Gu, F. F., Li, Y., Zhang, J. Z., & Palmatier, R. W. (2022). Influencer marketing effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 86(6), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429221102889
Lo, L. Y., & Lin, S. (2017). An approach to initiating eWOM intentions. Internet Research, 27(2), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-05-2015-0132
Looi, J., Kemp, D., & Song, Y. W. G. (2023). Instagram influencers in health communication: examining the roles of influencer tier and message construal in COVID-19 prevention public service announcements. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 23(1), 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2022.2140316
Lou, C. (2022). Social media influencers and followers: Theorization of a trans-parasocial relation and explication of its implications for influencer advertising. Journal of Advertising, 51(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1880345
Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501
Makela, K., Kalla, H. K., & Piekkari, R. (2007). Interpersonal similarity as a driver of knowledge sharing within multinational corporations. International Business Review, 16(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2006.11.002
Mandel, N., Petrova, P. K., & Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Images of success and the preference for luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_8
Marques, I. R., Casais, B., & Camilleri, M. A. (2021). The effect of macrocelebrity and microinfluencer endorsements on consumer–brand engagement in Instagram. In Strategic Corporate Communication in the Digital Age (pp. 131–143). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-264-520211008
Marwick, A. E. (2015). Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture, 27(1), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2798379
Masuda, H., Han, S. H., & Lee, J. (2022). Impacts of influencer attributes on purchase intentions in social media influencer marketing: Mediating roles of characterizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121246
Mccroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., & Daly, J. A. (1975). The development of a measure of perceived homophily in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(4), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00281.x
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
Molleda, J., & Roberts, M. (2008b). The Value of “Authenticity” in “Glocal” Strategic Communication: The New Juan Valdez Campaign. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 2(3), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180802178679
Monge, P., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford University Press.
Nabi, N., O’Cass, A., & Siahtiri, V. (2017). Status consumption in newly emerging countries: The influence of personality traits and the mediating role of motivation to consume conspicuously. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 46, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.09.009
O’Cass, A., & McEwen, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.155
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2023). Thailand’s Social Outlook of Q4/2023 and Overview of 2023. https://www.nesdc.go.th/nesdb_en/main.php?filename=social_dev_report
Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
Park, J., Lee, J. M., Xiong, V. Y., Septianto, F., & Seo, Y. (2021). David and Goliath: When and why micro-influencers are more persuasive than mega-influencers. Journal of Advertising, 50(5), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1980470
Perdue, B. C., & Summers, J. O. (1986). Checking the success of manipulations in marketing experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(4), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378602300401
Phan, N. T. T., & Nguyen, T. M. (2024). The influence of key opinion consumers on customers’ purchase intention via TikTok - the case of Generation Z in Vietnam. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 13(1), 51–70.
Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. (2016). Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands: The moderating effect of social comparison, trust, tie strength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brand commitment, and membership intention. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.06.004
Pittman, M., & Abell, A. (2021). More trust in fewer followers: Diverging effects of popularity metrics and green orientation social media influencers. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 56, 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2021.05.002
Pöyry, E., Pelkonen, M., Naumanen, E., & Laaksonen, S. (2019). A call for authenticity: Audience responses to social media influencer endorsements in strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2019.1609965
Puttaprasart, T. (2023). นิยายเป็นเรื่องไร้สาระ? ว่าด้วย ‘นิยาย’ ในฐานะหนังสือชุบชูใจและพาไปสำรวจโลกที่ไม่รู้จัก (Is fiction meaningless? On ‘fiction’ as a comforting book and a gateway to exploring unknown worlds). The MATTER. https://thematter.co/entertainment/every-book- have-their-values/212385
Reinikainen, H., Munnukka, J., Maity, D., & Luoma-Aho, V. (2020). ‘You really are a great big sister’ – parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in influencer marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3–4), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2019.1708781
Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00233
Rogers, E. M., & Bhowmik, D. K. (1970). Homophily-heterophily: Relational concepts for communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(4), 523. https://doi.org/10.1086/267838
Rubin, R. B., & McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158709386664
Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Desire to Acquire: Powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1086/588569
Salgado, M., Núñez, J., & Mackenna, B. (2021). Expectations of trustworthiness in cross-status interactions. Social Science Research, 99, 102596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102596
Settawilai, P. (2021). สุธิดา วิมุตติโกศล : ความในใจจาก “นักวิจารณ์วรรณกรรม” ในประเทศที่ วัฒนธรรมการอ่านอ่อนแอ (Suthida Wimuttikoson: Reflections from a “literary critic” in a country with a weak reading culture). The 101 World. https://www.the101.world/sutida-interview/
Shoenberger, H., & Kim, E. (2023). Explaining purchase intent via expressed reasons to follow an influencer, perceived homophily, and perceived authenticity. International Journal of Advertising, 42(2), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2022.2075636
Shukla, P. (2010). Status consumption in cross‐national context. International Marketing Review, 27(1), 108–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331011020429
Siegel, L. A., Tussyadiah, I., & Scarles, C. (2023). Cyber-physical traveler performances and Instagram travel photography as ideal impression management. Current Issues in Tourism, 26(14), 2332–2356. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2086451
Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011
Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring Attitude toward the Brand and Purchase Intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164
Stephen, A. T., Dover, Y., Muchnik, L., & Goldenberg, J. (2017). Pump it out! The effect of transmitter activity on content propagation in social media. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2897582
Suensilpong, K. (2023). ‘กองดองหนังสือ’ ในแง่มุมจิตวิทยา เป็นเรื่องของความสุขตอนซื้อ หรือเรื่องตัวเราที่เปลี่ยนไปหลังจากนั้น (‘Book hoarding’ in a psychological perspective: Is it about the joy of buying or the self that changes afterward?). Mirror. https://mirrorthailand.com/movinon/thoughts/100932
Sussman, S. W., & Siegal, W. S. (2003). Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Information Systems Research, 14(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.1.47.14767
Thansettakij. (2024). ตลาดหนังสือแตะ 2 หมื่นล. ‘PUBAT’ มั่นใจ ไทยเบอร์ 1 อาเซียน (The book market reaches 20 billion baht: ‘PUBAT’ confident that Thailand is No.1 in ASEAN). Thansettakij. https://www.thansettakij.com/business/tourism/593368
The Publishers and Booksellers Association of Thailand. (2024). รายงานการศึกษาพฤติกรรม การอ่านและการซื้อหนังสือของคนไทย ปี 2567 (Reading Behavior and Book Purchasing Habits of Thai People 2024). https://pubat.or.th/statistics2567/
Thelwall, M. (2019). Reader and author gender and genre in Goodreads. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(2), 403–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617709061
Tian, S., & Li, J. Y. (2022). Effects of celebrity, social media influencer, and peer endorsements on consumer responses toward a celebrity-owned brand: the role of source credibility and congruency. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 17(1/2), 133–161. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijima.2022.125146
TK Park. (2008). ทัศนคติและพฤติกรรมการอ่านของคนไทย (Attitudes and reading behaviors of Thai people). https://www.tkpark.or.th/tha/research_detail/14/%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%A8%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%B4%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B0%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%A4%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%AD%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%82%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%99%E0%B9%84%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%A2
Tobar, H. (2014). Are you a book hoarder? There’s a word for that. - Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/books/jacketcopy/la-et-jc-book-hoarding- tsundoku-20140724-story.html Truong, Y., Simmons, G., McColl, R., & Kitchen, P. J. (2008). Status and conspicuousness – Are they related? strategic marketing implications for luxury brands. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 16(3), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09652540802117124
Tukachinsky, R., Walter, N., & Saucier, C. J. (2020). Antecedents and effects of parasocial relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 70(6), 868–894. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa034
Turner, J. R. (1993). Interpersonal and psychological predictors of parasocial interaction with different television performers. Communication Quarterly, 41(4), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369904
Uzunoğlu, E., & Kip, S. M. (2014). Brand communication through digital influencers: Leveraging blogger engagement. International Journal of Information Management, 34(5), 592–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.04.007
Van Reijmersdal, E. A., Aguiar, T. D., & Van Noort, G. (2024). How is influencer follower size related to brand responses? Journal of Advertising Research, PAP_024. https://doi.org/10.2501/jar-2024-024
Vannini, P., & Franzese, A. (2008). The authenticity of self: Conceptualization, personal experience, and practice. Sociology Compass, 2(5), 1621–1637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00151.x
Verma, D., & Dewani, P. P. (2021). eWOM credibility: A comprehensive framework and literature review. Online Information Review, 45(3), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-06-2020-0263
Wies, S., Bleier, A., & Edeling, A. (2022). Finding goldilocks influencers: How follower count drives social media engagement. Journal of Marketing, 87(3), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429221125131
Witoorut, P. (2024). หมดยุคกองดอง ? คนไทยเจอวิกฤติ ‘หนังสือแพง’ เพราะทุนสูง กระดาษแพง พิมพ์ได้น้อย (The end of book hoarding? Thai readers face a “book price crisis” due to high costs, expensive paper, and limited print runs). Bangkokbiznews. https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/business/business/1146947
Yavaprabhas, K. (2022). Creating “good” Thai citizens: Religions in Thai textbooks. Journal of Mekong Societies, 18(2), 105–124. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/mekongjournal/article/view/263102
Ye, G., Hudders, L., De Jans, S., & De Veirman, M. (2021). The value of influencer marketing for business: A bibliometric analysis and managerial implications. Journal of Advertising, 50(2), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1857888
Yoon, P. (2022). The Myth in Thailand of What It Means to “Read.” The Japan Foundation. https://asiawa.jpf.go.jp/en/culture/features/f-yomu2-thailand-1/
Yuan, S., & Lou, C. (2020). How social media influencers foster relationships with followers: The roles of source credibility and fairness in parasocial relationship and product interest. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2020.1769514
Zhang, K. Z., Barnes, S. J., Zhao, S. J., & Zhang, H. (2018). Can consumers be persuaded on brand microblogs? An empirical study. Information & Management, 55(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.03.005
全文公開日期 2026/06/13