跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 鄧慧文
Teng, Hui-Wen
論文名稱: 主管性別,應徵者性別與晉升潛能對甄選決定的影響
Effects of Manager Sex, Applicant Sex and Promotional Potential on Evaluations for Managerial Position
指導教授: 陳彰儀
Chen, J-I
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 理學院 - 心理學系
Department of Psychology
論文出版年: 1996
畢業學年度: 84
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 130
中文關鍵詞: 女王蜂症候群
外文關鍵詞: Queen-Bee Syndrome
相關次數: 點閱:243下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要目的在於探討國內企業女性主管人員是否存有「女王蜂症候群(Queen Bee Syndrome)」(任職於原屬男性職業(如管理職位)的女性易顯出排斥同排競爭者的情結)的現象,以及這個現象對甄選決定的影響。研究者採用混合設計之實驗法,即以主管性別(男、女)、應徵者性別(男、女)及應徵者晉升潛能(高、低)等三個獨變項,並以主管對應徵者在有關甄選決定的評量項目為依變項(評量項目有:錄取可能性、資格符合程度、未來的工作績效現、晉升為經理的可能性、共事的愉快程度、以及建議應給予的起始薪資),,請參與受試之主管對所呈現之目標之物作甄選決定評量。最後再將研究結果進行統計分析,以瞭解這個變項對甄選決定的影響,以及驗證女性主管的「女王蜂症候群」現象。

    參與本研究之有效受試樣本共152名(男性75名,女性77名)。研究程序以郵寄的方式將兩份研究問卷寄給企業人事單位或用人單位之主管,請主管收到問卷後填寫一份,另一份則請主管轉交給公司內另一名異性主管填寫,隨函附上回郵信封以便填答後寄回;另外,有些問卷則是透過研究者親友所認識的企業工作者,由他們攜問卷至公司後請該公司之男女主管各一名填寫,填寫完異後再郵寄或轉交給研究者。

    研究結果發現,(一).女性應徵者相較於男性應徵者而言,在被建議錄取的可能性、資格符合應徵職位的程度、被預期未來的工作績效表現、以及未來晉升為經理的可能性方面,女性應徵者所得的評價皆與男性應徵者相類似,但是女性應徵者被預期與其共事的愉快程度則是較男性應徵者佳。(二).高晉升潛能應徵者被錄取的可能性較低晉升潛能應徵者大、高晉升潛能應徵者的資料被認為較符合應徵之職位、高晉升潛能應徵者的工作績效被預期將較優秀、而且未來晉升為經理的可能性也屬高晉升潛能應徵者較大。(三).男女主管錄取應徵者的可能性、評量應徵者的資格符合應徵職位之程度、預期應徵者未來的工績效表現、未來晉升為經理的可能性、以及主管預期與應徵者共事的愉快程度並不會因為應徵者性別之不同而在評量分數間有差異。女性主管對女性應徵者的評量分數並未有低估情形。(四).男女主管錄取男女應徵者的可能性、男女主管評量男女應徵者的資格符合應徵職業的程度、未來的工績效表現、晉升為經理的可能性、以及男女主管預期與男女應徵者共事的愉快程度之差異並不會受到應徵者晉升潛能高低之不同而不同。(五).男女應徵者所得之起始薪資可說是相同而沒有顯著之異。

    本研究最後乃針對不符合假設之結果提出討論,並提出本研究之建議,以供未來研究及企業應用之參考。


    第一章緒論..........1
    第一節研究動機與目的..........1
    第二節研究問題..........5
    第三節名詞詮釋..........6
    第二章文獻探討..........
    第一節女性與管理..........7
    第二節女王蜂症候群(Queen Bee Syndrome)..........8
    第三節主管性別與應徵者性別對甄選決定的影響..........14
    第四節應徵者晉升潛能對甄選決定的影響..........21
    第五節甄選決策模式及甄選方法..........26
    第六節研究假設..........33
    第三章研究方法
    第一節研究對象..........35
    第二節研究工具..........35
    第三節研究程序..........38
    第四節研究設計..........39
    第五節統計分析方法..........41
    第四章研究結果
    第一節受試者基本資料分析..........44
    第二節應徵者晉升潛能獨變項之操弄檢驗..........48
    第三節主管性別應徵者性別及應徵者晉升潛能對甄選決定之影響分析..........50
    第四節受試者自評題目的分析..........67
    第五節結論..........72
    第五章討論與建議
    第一節討論..........75
    第二節建議..........87
    參考文獻
    一、中文部份..........91
    二、英文部份..........92
    附錄
    附錄一..........108
    附錄二..........109
    附錄三..........111
    附錄四..........113

    一、中文部份
    中華民國統計年鑑?民國八十一年。行政院主計處出版。
    台悶地區人口統計?民國八十一年。內政部編印,八十二年十二月出版。
    王秀文(民73 ) 台北地區民營企業女性主管工作滿足之研究。東海大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    李美枝(民73 ) 女性心理學。台北:大洋出版社。
    唐文慧( 1988 ) 高職業成就婦女的家庭與事業:以工商企業女性經理人為例。台大社會學研究所碩士論文。
    陳玉玲(民79 ) 台灣地區服務業主管對女性工作人員升遷態度之探討。中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    廖榮利( 1988 ) 台灣女性主管之女性觀與領導觀。人事月刊, 1, 9-17.
    徐宗國(民79 ) 是為少數者? 工作內涵與工作生活素質,女性與工作研究上的一些回顧與局議。婦女與兩性學刊創刊號。台北:台大人口研究中心婦女研究室。
    劉玉的( 1984 ) 台灣地區婦女人力運用情形之分析。台北:行政院經濟建設委員會人力規劃小組編印。
    劉屁雯(民78) 台灣省政府女性主管事業生涯發展之研究。東海大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
    羅淑芳(民76) 台灣地區中、外商工商金融界女性主管工作適應現況及人格特質研討。成功大學工商管理研究所碩士論文。
    二、英文部份
    Arvey, R. D. (1979). Unfair discrimination in the employment
    interview : Legal and psychological aspects. Psychological
    Bulletin, 86, 736-765.
    Arvey, R. D. & Campion, J. E. (1979). The employment
    interview : A summary and review of recent research.
    Personnel Psychology, 35, 281-322.
    Allison, S. T., Messick, D. M. & Goethals, G. R. (1989). On being better but not smarter than others: The Muhammed Ali effect. Social Cognition, 1, 275-295.
    Allison, S. T., Messick, D. M. & Goethals, G. R. (1989). On
    being better but not smarter than others: The Muhammed
    Ali effect. Social Cognition,1, 275-295.
    Barr, S. H. & Hitt, M. A. (1986). A comparison of selection
    decision models in manager versus student samples.
    Personnel Psychology, 39, 599-617.
    Baskett, G. D. (1973). Interview decision as determined by
    competency and attitude similarity. Journal of Applied
    Psychology, 57, 3343-345.
    Bass, B. M., Krusell, J., & Alexander, R. A.(l971). Male
    managersl attitudes toward working women. American
    Behavioral Scientist, 12(2), 221-235.
    Beggan, J. K., Messick, D. M. & Allison, S. T. (1988). Social values and egocentric bias : Two tests of the might over morality nypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social
    Psychology, 55, 606-611.
    Bern, S. L. (1981' ). Bem Sex-Role Inventory, Professional
    Manual. Palo Alto , CA : Consulting Psychologists Press.
    Bernstein, V, Hakel, M. D, Hadan, A.(1975). The college
    student as interviewer : A threat to generalizability ?
    Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 266-268.
    Bigoness, W. J. (1976). Effect of applicant's sex, race, and
    performance on employer's performance ratings : Some
    additional findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, .61, 80-
    84.
    Billing, Y. D. & Alvesson, M. (1993). Gender, managers, and
    organizations. Berlin: Vvalter de Gruyter.
    Bond, J. R. & Vinacke. 'W. E. (1961). Coalitions in mixed sex triads. Sociometry, 24, 61-65.
    Bowman, G. W., Worthy, N. B. & Greyser, S. A. (1965). Are
    women executives people? Harvard Business Review, 43,
    15-28.
    Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others : Self -
    enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, .4., 353-376.
    Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York
    Academic Press. Cann, E., Siegfried, W. D. & Pearce, L. (1981). Forced attention to specific applicant qualifications ratings: Some additional findings. Journal of Applied Psychology,.6l, 80-84.
    Cannings, K. (1988). Managerial Promotion : The Effects of
    Socialization, Spec i alization, and' Gender. Industrial and
    Labor Relations Review, 42(1), 77-88.
    Cascio, W. F. & Phillips, N. F. (1979). Performance testing: A rose among thorns? Personnel Psychology, 32, 751-766.
    Champman, J. B. (1975). Comparison of male and female
    leadership styles. Academy of Management Journal, 18(3),
    645-650.
    Crosby F. J. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women.
    New York: Oxford University Press.
    Day, D. R. & Stogdill, R. M. (1972). Leader behavior of male
    and female supervisors : a comparative study, Personnel
    Psychology, 25, 353-360.
    Denmark, F. L. & Paludi, M. A. (1993). Psychology of women:
    g handbook of issues and theories. Greenwood Publishing
    Group.
    Dipboye, R. L. (1978). Women as managers - stereotype and
    realities. pp.I-9 In Bette Ann Stead( ed.), Women m
    Management, Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice- Hall.
    Dipboye, R. L. (1980). Self-fulfilling prophecies in the selection recruitment interview. Unpublished manuscript.
    Dipboye, R. L. Arvey, R. D. & Terpstra, D. E. (1978). Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as
    determinants of resume evaluations. Journal of Applied
    Psychology, 62, 288-294.
    Dipboye, R. L., Fromkin, H. L. & Wiback, K. (1975). Relative
    importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic
    standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes. Journal of
    Applied Psychology, 60,39-43.
    Dipboye, R. L. & Wiley, 1. W. (1977). Reactions of college
    recruiters to interviewee sex and self-presentation style.
    Journal of Vocational Behavior, 10(1), 1-12.
    Dipboye, R. L. & Wiley, 1. W. (1978). Reactions of male raters to interviewee self- presentation style and sex : Extensions of previous research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 13(2), 192-203.
    Dreher, J & Sackett, p. (1983). Perspectives on Employee
    Staffing and Seclection. Homewood, Ill. : Richard D. Irwin,
    Inc.
    Elliott, A. G. (1981). Sex and decision-making in the selection interview : A real-life study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 54(4), 265-273.
    Ferris, G. R. & Gilmore, D. O. (1977). Effects of mode of
    presentation, sex of applicant, and sex of interviewer on
    simulated intervie'vv decisions. Psychological Reports, 40,
    566.
    Fierman, J. (1990). Why women still donlt hit the top. Fortune, July 30,110-117.
    Frank, F. D. & Drucker, J. (1977). The influence of evaluateels sex on evaluation of a response of a managerial selection instrument. Sex Roles, }, 59-64.
    Frank, L. L. & Hackman, J. R. (1975). Effects of interviewer interviewee similarity on interviewer objectivity in college
    admissions interviews, Journal of Applied Psychology.
    60(3 ), 356-360.
    Fretz, C. F. & Hayman, J. (1973). Progress for women-men are
    still more equal. Harvard Business Review, 2.1, 133-142.
    Friend, R. M. & Gilbert, J. (1973). Threat and fear of negative evaluation as determinants of locus of social comparison. Journal of Personality, 41 328-340.
    Gardner, D. G. & Berger, C. J. (1980 August). The effects of sex stereotypes, amount of relevant information, and awareness of organizational selection practices on sex discrimination for a managerial position. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Detroit.
    Gilmore, D. C., Beehr, T. A. & Love, K. G. (1986). Effects of applicant's sex, applicant's physical attractiveness, type of rater and type of job on interview decisions. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 103- 109.
    Goldberg, P. A. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women?
    Transaction, April, 28-30.
    Golightly, C., Huffman, D. M. & Byrne, D. (1972). Liking and
    loaning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 521-523.
    Gordon, M. E., Slade, L. A. & Schmitt, H. (1986). The "Science of the sophomore" revisited: From convecture to empiricism. Academy of Management Review,11, 191-207.
    Gorman, C. D., Clover, W. H. & Dohe11y, M. E. (1978). Can we
    learn anything about interviewing real people from
    "interviews" of paper people? Two studies of the external;
    validity of a paradigm. Organizational Behavior and Human
    Performance, 22,165-192.
    Gregory, H. D. & Stephanie, J. P. (1986). Sex difference in
    leadership: How real are they? Academy of Management
    Review, 11(1), 118-127.
    Griffeth, R. W. & Bedeian, A. G. (1989). Employee performance evaluations: Effects of ratee age, rater age, and ratee gender. Journal of Organizational Behavior, lQ, 83- 90.
    Griffitt, W. & Jackson, T. (1970). Influence of information about ability and non- ability on personnel selection decisions. Psychological Reports, 27, 959-962.
    Guion, R. M. (1983). Editorial comments from the new editor.
    Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 547-551.
    Guion, R. M. & Gibson, W. M. (1988). Personnel selection and
    placement. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 349-374.
    Gutek, B. A., & Stevens, D. A. (1979). Effects of sex of subject, sex of stimulus cue, and androgyny level on evaluations in work situations which evoke sex role stereotypes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(1 ), 23-32.
    Haefner, J. E. (1977). Race, age, sex, and competence as factors in employer selection of the disadvantaged. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 199-202.
    Hakel, M. D., Ohnesorge, J. P. & Dunnette, M. D. (1970).
    Interviewer evaluations of job applicants' resumes as a
    function of the qualifications of the immediately preceiding
    applicants : An examination of contrast effects. Journal of
    Applied Psychology, 54, 27-30.
    Hakmiller, K. L. (1966). Threat as a determinant of downward
    comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
    2(Suppl. 1),32-39.
    Hall, F. S. & Hall, D. T. (1977). Effects of job incumbents' race and sex on evaluations of managerial performance.
    Academy of rvlanagement Journal, 12, 476-48l.
    Hammer, W. C., Kim, 1. S., Bair, L. & Bigoness, W. J. (1974). Race and sex as determinants of ratings by potential
    employers in a simulated work-sampling task. Journal of
    Applied Psychology, 59, 705-711.
    Hannon, L. W. (1983, March 23). Personal correspondence.
    Heilman, M. E. (1984). Information as a deterrent against sex discrimination . : The effects of applicant sex and
    information type on preliminary employment decisions.
    Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360-
    372.
    Heilman , M. E., Martell, R.F. & Simon, M.C. (1988) The
    vagaries of sex bias Conditions regulating the
    undervaluation, equivaluation, and overvaluation of female
    job applicants. Organizational Behavior and Human
    Decisions Process, .4.1., 98-110.
    Heilman, M. E., Kaplow, S. R., Amato, M. A. G. & Stathatos, P. (1993). When similarity is a liabllity: Effects of sex-based preferential selection on reactions to like-sex and differentsex others. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 917-927.
    Heilman, M. E. & Saruwatari, L. (1979). When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs.
    Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360-
    372.
    Heneman, H. G.,III (1977). Impact of test information and
    applicant sex on applicant evaluations in a selection
    simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 524-526.
    Heller,T. (1982). Women and men as leaders : In Business,
    Education, and Social Service Organization. New York
    Praeger.
    Jacobson, M. B., & Effertz, J. (1974). Sex roles and leadership performance of the leaders and the led. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12,383-397.
    Kalin, R. & Hodgins, D. C. (1984). Sex bias and occupational
    suitability. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, l6.,
    311-325.
    Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New
    York: Basic Books.
    Kauppinen-Toropainen, K. (1987). Ainokaiset Tyoyhteisossa
    [Men and Women in Sex-atypical Work]. Helsinki :
    Tyoterveyslatios.
    Keiffer, M.G. & Cullen, D. M. (1974). Women who discriminate
    against other women : The process of denial. International
    Journal of Group Tensions, 4,21-33.
    Landy, F. J. & Bates, F. (1973). Another look at contrast effects in the employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 141-144.
    Ledbetter, R. R. (1970). Current attitudes held by selected top corporate management regarding the role of as executives. Unou blished doctoral dissertation. United States International University. Ann Arbor, Mich. : University Microfilms, No. 70- 72, 340.
    Levinson, R. M. (1975). Sex discrimination and employment
    practices : An experiment with unconventional job
    inquiries. Social Problems, 22,533-543.
    Lirtzman, S. & Wahba, M. (l972). Determinants of coalitional
    behavior of men and women : Sex roles or situational requirements? Journal of Applies Psychology, 56.
    London, M. & Poplowski, 1. R. (1976). Effects of information on stereotype development in performance appraisal and
    interview contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 11, 239-
    260.
    Maier, N. R. (1970). Male versus female discussion leaders.
    Personnel Psychology, 23, 455-461.
    Magargee, E. J. (1969). Influence of sex-roles on the
    manifestation of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology,
    53,377-382.
    Marks, G. (1984). Thinking one's abilities are unique and one's opinions are common. Personality and Social Psychology
    Bulletin, 10, 203-208.
    Mathison D. L. (1986). Sex differences in the perceptions of
    assertiveness among female managers. Journal of Social
    Psychology, 126(5),599-606.
    Matlin, M. W. (1987). The Psychology of Women. New York :
    CBS College Publishing.
    McGovern, T. V., Jones, B. W. & Morris, S. E. (1979).
    Comparison of professional versus student ratings of job
    interviewee behavior, Journal of Counseling Psychology~ 26,
    176-179.
    McIntyre, S., Moberg, D. J. & Posner, B. Z. (1980). Preferential treatment in preselection decisions according to sex and race. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 738-749.
    Messick, D. M., Bloom, S., Boldizar, J. P. & Samuelson, C. D. (1985). Why we are fairer than others. Journal of
    Experimental Social Psychology, 2..L 480-500.
    Mobley, W. H. (1982). Supervisor and employee race and sex
    effects on performc1l1ce appraisals: A field study of adverse impact and generalizability. Academy of Management
    Journal, 25, 598-606.
    MOlTow, P. C., McElroy, J. C., Stamper, B. G. & Wilson, M.
    A.( 1990). The effects of physical attractiveness and other
    demographic characteristics on promotion decisions. Journal
    of Management, 16(4),723-736.
    Muchinsky, P. M. & Harris, S. L. (1977). The effect of applicant sex and scholastic standing on the evaluation of job applicant resumes in sex-typed occupations. Journal of
    Vocational Behavior, 11 (l ), 95-108.
    Mullins, T. W. (1982). Interviewer decisions as a function of applicant race, applicant quality and interviewer prejudice. Personnel Psychology, 35, 163-174.
    Nieva, V. F. & Gutek, B. A. (1980). Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, }, 267-276.
    Oakens, M. M. & Tschirgi, H. (1978). Impact of the face-to-face interview on prior judgments of a candidate. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 322.
    Oakes, W. (1972). External validity and the use of real people as subjects. American Psychologist, 27, 959-962.
    O'Leary, V. E. (1974). Some attitudinal barriers to occupational aspirations in women. Psychology Bulletin, .8l, 809-826.
    O'Leary, V.E., Unger, R.K. & Wallston, B. S. (1985). Women,
    gender, and social psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum
    Associates, IN.
    Olian, J. D., Schwab, D. P. & Haberfeld, Y. (1988). The Impact of applicant gender compared to qualifications on hiring recommendations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 41, 180-195.
    Oliphant, V.N. & Alexander, E. R. III (1982). Reacts to resumes as a function of resume determinateness, applicant
    characteristics, and sex of raters. Personnel Psychology, 35, 829-843.
    Orpen, C. (1984). Attitude similarity,attraction,and decisionmaking in the employment interview. Journal of Psychology, 117,111-120.
    Peters, L. H., O'Connor, E. J., Weekley, J., Pooyan, A., Frank, B. & Erenkrantz, B. (1984). Sex bias and managerial
    evaluations: A replications and extension. Journal of
    Applied Psychology, 69, 349-352.
    Pheterson, G. J., Kiesler, S. B. & Goldberg, P. A. (1971).
    Evaluation of the performance of women as a function of
    their sex, achievement, and personal history. Journal of
    Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 114-118.
    Powell, G. N. (J 986). Effects of expectancy-confirmation
    processes and applicant's qualifications on recruiter's
    evaluations. Psychological Reports, 58, 1003-1010.
    Powell, G. N. (1987). The effects of sex and gender on
    recruitment. Academy of Management Reviews, 12,731-743.
    Pulakos, E. D. & Wexley, K. N. (1983). The relationship among perceptual similarity, sex, and performance ratings in
    manager-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management
    Journal, 26,129-139.
    Rand, T. M. & Wexley, K. M. (1975). Demonstration of the
    effect, "similar to me," in simulated employment interviews.
    Psychological Repolis) 36(2), 535-544.
    Renwick, P.A. & Tosi, H. (1978). The effects of sex, marital
    status, and educational background on selection decisions.
    Academy of Ivlanagement Journal, 21, 93-103.
    Rijsman, J. (1983). The dynamics of social competition in
    personal and categorical comparison-situations. In W. Doise
    & S. Moscovici Eds), Current Issues in European Social
    Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 279-312. Cambridge : Cambridge
    University Press.
    Rose, G. L. & Andiappan, P. (1978). Sex effects on managerial hiring decisions. Academy of Management Joumal,.2.l, 104-112.
    Rosen, B. & Jerdee, T. H. (1973). Effests of applicant's sex and difficulty of job on evaluations of candidates for managerial positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(1 ), 44-48.
    Rosen, B. & Jerdee, T. H. (1974). Influence of sex role
    stereotypes on personnel decisions. Journal of Applied
    Psychology, 59, 9-14.
    Rosen, B. & Mericle, M. F. (1979). Influence of strong versus weak employment policies and applicant's sex on selection decisions and salary recommendations in a management simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64,435-439.
    Ruble, D. N., & Ruble, T. L. (1982) . Sex stereotypes. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), In the eye of the beholder : Contemporary
    issues instereotyping . New York: Praeger.
    Schein, B., Brenner, V. & Tomkiewicz (1989). The relationship between sex and stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32,288.
    Schmitt, N. & Robelison, J. (1990). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, .4.l, 289-319.
    Schultz, D. P. (1969). The human subject in psychological
    research. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 214-228.
    Schwartz, E. B. (1971). The sex barrier in business. Atlanta, Ga.: Georgia State University.
    Schwartz, S. M. & Fattaleh, D. L. (1972). Representation in
    deductive problem solving : the matrix. Journal of
    Experimental Psychology, 95, 348-349.
    Shaw, E. A. (1972). Commonality of applicant stereotypes
    among recruiters. Personnel Psychology, 25(3 ), 421-432.
    Sharp, C. & Post, R. (1980). Evaluation of male and female
    applicants for sex- congruent and sex-incongruent jobs. Sex
    Roles, .6., 391-401.
    Simas, K. & McCarrey, M. (1979). Impact of recruiter
    authoritarianism and applicant sex on evaluation and
    selection decisions in a recruitment interview analogue study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 483-491.
    ·Staines, G., Tavris, C. & Jayaratne, T. E. (1973). The queen bee syndrome. In C. Tavris(Ed.), The Female Experience, pp.63-66. Del Mar, CA: CRM Books.
    Staines, G., Tavris, C. & Jayaratne, T. E. (1974). The queen bee syndrome. Psychology Today, 1.7(8),55-60.
    Stead, B. A. (1978.). Women in Management, Englwood Cliffs,
    NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Stein, A. H., & Bailey, M. M. (1973). The socialization of
    achievement motivation in females. Psychological Bulletin,
    80, 345-366.
    Sterrett, J. H. (1978). The job interview : Body language and perceptions of potential effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 388-390.
    Stroh, L. K., Brett,J. M. & Reilly, A. H. (1992). All the right stuff: A comparison of female and male managers' career progression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 251-260.
    Sundvik. L & Lindeman. M. (1993). Sex-role identity and
    discrimination against same- sex employees. Journal of
    Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 1-11.
    Taylor, M. S. & Ilgen, D. R. (1981). Sex discrimination against women in initial placement decisions : A laboratory
    investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 859-
    865.
    Taynor, J. & Deaux, K. (1973). When women are more
    deserving than men: Equity, attribution, and perceived sex
    difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 360-367.
    Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in
    experimental social psychology ( Vol. 21, pp. 181- 227).
    New York: Academic Press.
    Terborg, J. R. (1977). Women in management: A research
    review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 647-664.
    Terborg, J. R. & Ilgen, D. R. (1975). A theoretical approach to sex discrimination in traditionally male occupations.
    Organization Behavior and Human Performance, U, 352-
    376.
    Tosi, H. L. & Einbender, S. W. (1985). The effects of the type and amount of information in sex discrimination research: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 88, 712-723.
    Walsh, J. P., Weinberg, R. M. & Fairfield, M. L. (1987). The
    effects of gender on assessment center evaluations. Journal
    of Occupational Psychology, 60, 305-309.
    Wexley, K. N. & Nemeroff, W. F. (1974). The effects of racial prejudice, race of applicant, and biographical similarity on interviewer evaluations of job applicants. Journal of Social and Behavioral Science, 20, 66-78.
    Wexley, K. N. & Pulakos, E. D. (1982). Sex effects on
    performance ratings in manager-subordinate dyads: A field
    study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 433- 439.
    Wills, T. A. (1981). Downdard comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-27l.
    Wills, T. A. (1987). Downward comparison as a coping
    mechanism. In C. R. Snyder & C. Ford (Eds.), Coping with
    negative life events : Clinical and social-psychological
    perspectives. New York: Plenum.
    Wood, J. V., Taylor, S. E. & Lichtman, R. R. (1985). Social
    comparison in adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of
    Personality and Social Psychology, 49,1169-1183.
    Yuen, E. C. & Lim, H. L. (1990). The interaction of biases in the evaluation of managers in Singapore. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 491-508.

    無法下載圖示 (限達賢圖書館四樓資訊教室A單機使用)
    QR CODE
    :::