此論文研究約翰 史都華 彌爾之經濟、社會與政治思想中之效益主義，主張維續社會發展貫穿其思想。透過詳細分析自由與平等如何形塑彌爾提倡之體制理想，聚焦其去中心化社會主義市場經濟、競合性別關係與代議式政府。透過體制設計，個人性與親社會性之協作得以推進動態社會發展。

This thesis examines John Stuart Mill’s utilitarian ethics of social progress in the context of his economic, social and political thought. In contending that Mill was committed to the inculcation of individuality and sociability, the thesis offers a detailed analysis of how liberty and equality frame and qualify Mill’s institutional ideals, specifically his prescribed regimes of the decentralized socialist market economy, a gender relation founded on competitive partnership, and the representative government. It’s shown that a synergy among economic, social, and political development is instrumentalized to permanently serve the overall utility.

References
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 2005. The Ethics of Identity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Allen, Barbara. “The Puzzle of Gender in Liberal Theory: Tocqueville and Mill on Women and the Family.” Digital Library of the Commons. Indiana University, 1995. https://hdl.handle.net/10535/4115.
Annas, Julia. 1977. “Mill and the Subjection of Women.” Philosophy, 52(200), 179-194.
Anthony, Kanu Ikechukwu. 2012. “The Equality of Sexes in J.S. Mill Vis-A-Vis the Participation of Women in the Nigerian Labour and Economy.” Afrrev Laligens, 1(1), 18-29.
Barker, Chris. 2015. “JS Mill on Nineteenth Century Marriage and the Common Law.” Law, Culture, and the Humanities. 15(1), 106-126.
Berlin, Isiah. 1960. John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Life. London: Council of Christians and Jews.
Brilhante, A. Amaral. “The Centrality of Accountability in John Stuart Mill’s Liberal-Utilitarian Conception of Democracy.” PhD diss., University of London, 2007, https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1444009.
Bowles, Samuel and Gintis, Herbert. 1986. Democracy and Capitalism, Property, Community, and the Contradictions of Modern Social Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Dalaqua, Hessmann Gustavo. 2018. “John Stuart Mill’s Republican Feminism.” Kalagatos, 15(2), 14-33
Gairdner, William. 2008. “Poetry and the mystique of the self in John Stuart Mill: sources of libertarian socialism.” Humanitas, 21(1/2), 1-9.
Gaus, Gerald. “Mill's Normative Economics.” In The Companion to Mill, ed. Macleod Christopher and Miller E. Dale (West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017), 488-503.
Gray, John and Smith, G.W. 2013. Mill on Liberty in Focus. London: Routledge.
Groenewegen, D. Peter. 2005. “Was John Stuart Mill A Classical Economist?” History of Economic Ideas, 13(3), 9-31.
Hamburger, Joseph. 2001. John Stuart Mill on Liberty and Control. Chichester: Princeton University Press.
Halliday, R. J. 1976. Political Thinkers. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
Hansson, O. Sven. 2022. “John Stuart Mill and the Conflicts of Equality.” The Journal of Ethics, 26, 433-453.
Hirschmann, J. Nancy. 2008. “Mill, Political Economy and Women’s Work.” American Political Science Review 102(2), 199-213.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan. New York: Dover.
Hughes, Patricia. 1979. “The Reality versus the Ideal: J. S. Mill's Treatment of Women, Workers, and Private Property.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 12(3), 523-542.
Jahn, Beate. 2005. “Barbarian Thoughts: Imperialism in the Philosophy of John Stuart Mill.” Review of International Studies, 31(3), 599-618.
Kinzer, L. Bruce. 1978. “J. S. Mill and the Secret Ballot.” Historical Reflections, 5 (1), 19-39.
Kors, Alan Charles. 2011. “The Paradox of John Stuart Mill.” Social Philosophy and Policy, 28(2), 1-18.
Krall, E. Lorraine. 2012. Freeing Women: Tocqueville, Mill, and Arendt on Women’s Role. Phd dissertation, Georgetown University.
Kundakci, Deniz. 2018. “Right to Universal, Plural and Secret Vote: On the Liberal and Conservative Paradoxes of Mill's 'Elitist' Democracy.” Beytulhikme Philosophy Circle, 8(2), 593-617.
Kwame Anthony Appiah. 2007. The Ethics of Identity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Lamberti, Jean-Claude. 1989. Tocqueville and the Two Democracies. Washington: Harvard University Press.
McCabe, Helen. 2015. “John Stuart Mill, Utility and the Family : attacking the 'citadel of the enemy’." Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 272 (2). 225-235.
Macleod Christopher and Miller E. Dale, eds. 2017. A Companion to Mill. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Mann, Hollie and Spinner-Halev Jeff. 2010. “John Stuart Mill's Feminism: On Progress, the State, and the Path to Justice.” Polity, 42(2), 244-270.
Mousourakis, George. 2013. “Human Fallibilism and Individual Self-Development in John Stuart Mill’s Theory of Liberty.” Ethics & Politics, 15, 386-396.
Morales, H. Maria. Donner,Wendy, Burgess-Jackson, Keith and Annas Julia. 2005. Mill’s the Subjection of Women. United States: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Murdoch, Iris. 1993. Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. London: Penguin Books.
Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. J.M. Robson (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963-1991), 33 vols.
Volume titles as listed:
Volume I - Autobiography and Literary Essays
Volume II - The Principles of Political Economy I
Volume III - Principles of Political Economy Part II
Volume IV - Essays on Economics and Society Part I
Volume V - Essays on Economics and Society Part II
Volume VI - Essays on England, Ireland, and the Empire
Volume VII - A System of Logic Part I
Volume VIII - A System of Logic Part II
Volume IX - William Hamilton’s Philosophy
Volume X - Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society
Volume XI - Essays on Philosophy and the Classics
Volume XII - The Earlier Letters 1812-1848 Part I
Volume XIII - The Earlier Letters 1812-1848 Part II
Volume XIV - The Later Letters 1849-1873 Part I
Volume XV - The Later Letters 1849-1873 Part II
Volume XVI - The Later Letters 1849-1873 Part III
Volume XVII - The Later Letters 1849-1873 Part IV
Volume XVIII - Essays on Politics and Society Part I
Murdoch, Iris. 2003. Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. London: Vintage.
Lipson, Leslie. 1964. The Democratic Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Eunseong, Oh. 2016. “Mill on Paternalism.” Journal of Political Inquiry, 47, 1-9.
Okin, Susan Moller. 1973. ”John Stuart Mill’s Feminism: The Subjection of Women and the Improvement of Mankind." New Zealand Journal of History, 7(2), 105-127.
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.
Pitts, Jennifer. 2005. A Turn to Empire : The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Plamenatz, John.1949. The English Utilitarians. Oxford: Blackwell.
Riley, Jonathan. “Mill’s Neo-Athenian Model of Liberal Democracy.” In J. S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment, ed. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 221-249.
Ryan, Alan. 2012. The Making of Modern Liberalism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Saunders, Ben. 2016. “Reformulating Mill’s Harm Principle.” Mind, 125(500), 1005-1032.
Shanley, Mary Lyndon. 1981. “Marital Slavery and Friendship: John Stuart Mill’s the Subjection of Women.” Political Theory, 9(2), 229-247.
Sigot, Nathalie and Beaurain, Christophe. 2021. “John Stuart Mill and the Employment of Married Women: Reconciling Utility and Justice.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 31(3), 1-43.
Skorupski, John, eds. 1998. The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smart, Paul. 1990. “‘Some Will be More Equal than Others’: J. S. Mill on Democracy, Freedom and Meritocracy.” Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 76(3), 308-323.
Spitz, Elaine. 1982. “On Shanley, ‘Marital Slavery and Friendship.’” Political Theory, 10(3), 461-464.
Taylor, Charles and Gutmann, Amy. 1994. Multiculturalism : Examining the Politics of Recognition. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Ten, C. L. “Democracy, Socialism, and the Working Classes.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill, ed. Skorupski, John (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 372-395.
Thompson, F. Dennis. “Mill in Parliament : When Should a Philosopher Compromise?” In J. S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. ed. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 166-199.
Thompson, F. Dennis. 1976. John Stuart Mill and Representative Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tunick, Mark. 2006. “Tolerant Imperialism: John Stuart Mill’s Defense of British Rule in India.” The Review of Politics, 68(4), 586–611.
Turner, P. Brandon. 2010. “John Stuart Mill and the Antagonistic Foundation of Liberal Politics.” The Review of Politics, 72(1), 25-53.
Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, eds. 2007. J. S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Warner, E. Beth. 2001. “John Stuart Mill’s Theory of Bureaucracy Within Representative Government: Balancing Competence and Participation.” Public Administration Review, 61(4), 403-413.
Zakaras, Alex. “John Stuart Mill, Individuality, and Participatory Democracy.” In J. S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. ed. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 200-220.
Zouboulakis, S. Michel. 2002. “John Stuart Mill’s Institutional Individualism.” History of Economic Ideas, 10(3), 29-45.