跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉明煌
Liu, Ming-huang
論文名稱: 中央與地方政治權力關係之轉變--國民黨威權政體的鞏固與轉型
The Change of Power Relationship beTween National and Local Politics -- The Consolidation and Transition of Kuomintang Authoritarian Regime
指導教授: 黃德福
Huang Teh-fu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學學院 - 政治學系
Department of Political Science
論文出版年: 1996
畢業學年度: 84
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 160
中文關鍵詞: 威權政體民主化威權轉型地方派系依侍主義選舉
外文關鍵詞: Authoritarian Regime, Democratization, Transition From Authoritarian Rule, Local Faction, Clientelism, Election
相關次數: 點閱:238下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文的研究主旨在於 : 從中央與地方政治權力關係變動的主軸來探

    討台灣威權政體的轉型過程。在概念的界定上,早期( 1972 年前)或狹

    義的中央與地方政治權力關係,主要係指涉國民黨與地方派系的結盟關係

    ,後期( 1972 年後)或廣義的意涵,則主要係指涉中央政治勢力和地方

    基層間的關係,其中,國民黨、反對運動及地方派系三者間的關係,乃是

    著重焦點所在。至於分析架構的安排,首先,本文先敘述國民黨威權政體

    形成的歷史背景,繼之分析國民黨威權政體的建構,包括國民黨威權政體的控制與支配,及其內在脆弱性。其次,本文將中央與地方政治權力關係的演變劃分為三個時期:第一個時期是 1949-1972 年, 主要劃分的依據在於 1972 年增額選舉的舉辦(象徵中央大門的開啟),分析焦點則是國民黨與地方派系依侍結盟的建立; 第二個時期是 1972-1986 年,主要劃分的依據在於民進黨的成立(象徵中央政治權力的分化),分析的焦點則是本土地方勢力(包括反對運動和地方派系)的向中央挺進,及其和外來政權之間的互動、激盪;第三個時期是 1986 年後,分析的焦點在於黨國體制的瓦解 -- 國民黨的轉化、國會的全面改選 -- 立法院的轉型及地方派系的變與不變 -- 政經結合體。再者,在分析的流程中,本文援引了兩

    個貫穿上述三個時期的環境仲介變數:一是意識的發展,主要係指「大中國意識」和「台灣主體意識」彼此間的消長;二是選舉機制的發展,包括選舉角色和選舉層次的改變。


    第一章導論..........1
    第一節研究動機..........1
    第二節民主化研究探討..........2
    第三節文獻檢討與分析架構..........18
    第二章國民黨威權政體形成的歷史背景..........25
    第一節日據殖民統治體制的承襲..........25
    第二節二二八事件與土地改革..........27
    第三節軍事戒嚴與動員戡亂體制的延長..........31
    第四節結語..........33
    第三章中央與地方的依侍結盟(1949-1972)..........35
    第一節依侍關係的界定與特質..........35
    第二節國民黨威權政體的建構..........40
    第三節中央與地方的依侍結盟..........57
    第四節結語-中央與地方政治權力關係之建構..........65
    第四章中央與地方政治之間的激盪(1972-1986)..........67
    第一節本土化政策與台灣主體意識的浮現..........67
    第二節國民黨、地方派系與反對運動之間的互動..........79
    第三節中央單向隔離、控制的鬆弛..........89
    第四節結語-中央與地方政治權力關係之調整..........92
    第五章中央與地方政治權力關係的轉變(1986~)..........95
    第一節政治自由化與民主化的衝擊-黨國體制的瓦解..........95
    第二節立法院的轉型與國民黨的轉化..........109
    第三節地方派系的變與不變..........120
    第四節國民黨的台灣化-派閥政治乎?..........127
    第五節結語-中央與地方政治權力關係之轉變..........131
    第六章結論..........135
    參考書目..........143

    一、英文部分
    Bermeo, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking Regime Change," Comparative Politics 22
    (3): 359-77.
    Bosco, Joseph. 1992. “Taiwan Factions: Guanxi, Patronage, adn the State in
    Local Politics. Ethnology 31 (April): 157-83.
    Cheng, Tun-Jen. 1989. “Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist Regime in Taiwan,”
    World Politics 41 (4): 471-99.
    Chou, Yangsun and Andrew Nathan. 1987. ''Democratizing Transition in
    Taiwan," Asian Survey 27 (3): 277-99.
    Chu, Yun-han. 1992. Crafting Democracy in Taiwan (Taipei: Institute for
    National Policy Research).
    Collier, David and Deborah L. Norden 1992. “Strategic Choice Models of
    Political Change in Latin America,” Comparative Politics 24 (2): 229-
    43 .
    Diamond, Lany. 1993. “The Globalization of Democracy,”in Robelt o. Slater;
    Barry M. Schutz and Steven R. Dorr ed. Global Transformation and
    the Third Tflord (Boulder: Lynne Riener Publishers). pp. 31-70.
    Diamond, Larry, Seymour M. Lipset, and Juan Linz. 1987. “Builiding and
    Sustaining Democratic Govelmellt in Developing Cmmtries: Some
    Tentative Findings,” World Affairs 150 (1): 5-19.
    Engstrom, Richard and Chi-huang Chu. 1984. “The Impact of 1980
    Supplementmy Election on Nationalist China's Legislative Yuan,”
    Asian Survey 24 (4): 447-58.
    Esienstadt, S. N. and Louis Rongier. 1980. “Patron-Client Relations as a Model
    of Structuring Social Exchange,”Comparative Studies in Society and
    History 22: 42-75.
    Huang, Teh-fu. 1994. "Elections and the Evolution of the Kuomintang," paper
    Presented at Democratization in Taiwan: Causal Elements and
    Theoretical Implications for Chinese Political Culture, the Multiparty
    System, and Cross Straits Relations," Washington, D.C, Apri18-9.
    Huang, Teh-fu. 1995. "Electoral Competition and the Evolution of the
    Kuomintang," Issues & Studies 31 (5): 91-120.
    Huntington, Samuel P. 1970. "Social and Institution Dynamics of One-Party
    Systems," in Samuel P. Huntington and Clement H. Moore ed.
    Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society (New York: Basic books).
    pp. 3-47.
    Huntington, Samuel P. and Joan M. Nelson. 1977. No Easy Choice--Political
    Participation in Developing Countries (Harvard University Press,
    Second Printing).
    Huntington, Samuel P. 1984. " Will More Countries Become Democratic?"
    Political Science Quarterly 99 (Summer): 193-218.
    Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Waves: Democratization in the Late
    Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma press).
    Karl, Teny Lynn. 1990. "Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America,"
    Comparative Politics 23 (October): 1-2l.
    Lemarchand, Rene and Legg, Keith. 1972. "Political Clientelism and
    Development," Comparath!e Politics 4 (2): 149-78.
    Linz, Juan J. 1970. "An Authoritarian Regime: Spain," in Erik Allardt and Stein
    Rokkan, Mass Politics (New York: The Free Press), pp. 251-83.
    Linz, Juan J. 1990. "Transition to Democracy," The Washington Quarterly 13
    (Summer): 143-64.
    Moore, Clement H. 1970. "The Single Party as Source of Legitimacy," in
    Samuel P. Huntington and Clement H. Moore ed. Authoritarian
    Politics in Modern Society (New York: Basic books). pp. 48-72.
    O'Donnell, Guillermo and Philippe Schmitter eds. 1986. Transitions from
    Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusion About Uncertain
    Democracies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
    Powell, John Duncan. 1970. "Peasant Society and Clientelist Politics,1I The
    American Political Science Review 64 (2): 411-425.
    Przeworski, Adam. 1986. "Some Problems in the Study of the Transition to
    Democracy," in Guillermo O'Donnell, Philippe Schmitter, and
    Whitehead Laurence , eds. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule:
    Comparative Perspective (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press),
    pp. 47-63.
    Przeworski, Adam. 1988. "Democracy as A Contingent Outcome of Conflicts,"
    in John Elster, and Rune Slagstad eds., Constitutionalism and
    Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp.59-81.
    Przeworski, Adam. 1992. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic
    Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America (Camblidge:
    Cambridge University Press).
    Rustow, Dankwa11 A. 1970. "Transition to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic
    Model," Comparative Politics 2 (April): 337-63.
    Sa110ri, Giovanui. 1970. "The Typology of Party Systems--Proposals for
    Improvement," in Edk Allardt aud Stein Rokkan ed. Mass Politics
    (New York: The Fress Press). pp. 322-52.
    Scott, James C. 1972. "Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast
    Asia," The American Political Science Review 66 (1): 91-113.
    Share, Donald, and Mainwaring, Scott. 1986. "Transition Through Transaction:
    Democratization ill Brazil and Spain," in Wayne A. Selcher ed.,
    Political Liberalization in Brazil: Dynamics, Dilemmas, and
    Prospects (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press). pp. 175-215.
    Stepan, Alfred. 1986. "Paths toward Redemocratization: Theoretical and
    Comparative Considerations," in Guillenno O'Donnell, Philippe
    Schmitter and Whitehead Laurence, eds. Transitions from
    AuthoritariaH Rule: Comparative Perspective (Baltimore: Johns
    Hopkins University Press), pp. 64-84.
    Weingrod, Alex. 1968. "Patrons, Patronage, and Political Parties," Comparatil'e
    Studies in Society and History 10 (4): 377-400.
    Winckler, Edwin A. 1984. "Institutionalization and Participation on Taiwan:
    From Hard to Soft Authoritarianism?" The China Quarterly 99
    (September): 481-499.
    Wol( Eric R, 1966. "Kinship, Friendship, and Patron-Client Relations in
    Complex Societies," in Michael Banton ed. The Social Antropology of
    Complex Societies (New York: Praeger), pp. 1-22.
    Wu, Nai-teh, 1987, The Politics of Regime Patronage System: Mobilization
    and Control Within An Authoritarian Regime. Unpublished Ph. D
    Dissertation. University of Chicago.

    無法下載圖示 (限達賢圖書館四樓資訊教室A單機使用)
    QR CODE
    :::