| 研究生: |
劉明煌 Liu, Ming-huang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
中央與地方政治權力關係之轉變--國民黨威權政體的鞏固與轉型 The Change of Power Relationship beTween National and Local Politics -- The Consolidation and Transition of Kuomintang Authoritarian Regime |
| 指導教授: |
黃德福
Huang Teh-fu |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
社會科學學院 - 政治學系 Department of Political Science |
| 論文出版年: | 1996 |
| 畢業學年度: | 84 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 160 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 威權政體 、民主化 、威權轉型 、地方派系 、依侍主義 、選舉 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Authoritarian Regime, Democratization, Transition From Authoritarian Rule, Local Faction, Clientelism, Election |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:238 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文的研究主旨在於 : 從中央與地方政治權力關係變動的主軸來探
討台灣威權政體的轉型過程。在概念的界定上,早期( 1972 年前)或狹
義的中央與地方政治權力關係,主要係指涉國民黨與地方派系的結盟關係
,後期( 1972 年後)或廣義的意涵,則主要係指涉中央政治勢力和地方
基層間的關係,其中,國民黨、反對運動及地方派系三者間的關係,乃是
著重焦點所在。至於分析架構的安排,首先,本文先敘述國民黨威權政體
形成的歷史背景,繼之分析國民黨威權政體的建構,包括國民黨威權政體的控制與支配,及其內在脆弱性。其次,本文將中央與地方政治權力關係的演變劃分為三個時期:第一個時期是 1949-1972 年, 主要劃分的依據在於 1972 年增額選舉的舉辦(象徵中央大門的開啟),分析焦點則是國民黨與地方派系依侍結盟的建立; 第二個時期是 1972-1986 年,主要劃分的依據在於民進黨的成立(象徵中央政治權力的分化),分析的焦點則是本土地方勢力(包括反對運動和地方派系)的向中央挺進,及其和外來政權之間的互動、激盪;第三個時期是 1986 年後,分析的焦點在於黨國體制的瓦解 -- 國民黨的轉化、國會的全面改選 -- 立法院的轉型及地方派系的變與不變 -- 政經結合體。再者,在分析的流程中,本文援引了兩
個貫穿上述三個時期的環境仲介變數:一是意識的發展,主要係指「大中國意識」和「台灣主體意識」彼此間的消長;二是選舉機制的發展,包括選舉角色和選舉層次的改變。
第一章導論..........1
第一節研究動機..........1
第二節民主化研究探討..........2
第三節文獻檢討與分析架構..........18
第二章國民黨威權政體形成的歷史背景..........25
第一節日據殖民統治體制的承襲..........25
第二節二二八事件與土地改革..........27
第三節軍事戒嚴與動員戡亂體制的延長..........31
第四節結語..........33
第三章中央與地方的依侍結盟(1949-1972)..........35
第一節依侍關係的界定與特質..........35
第二節國民黨威權政體的建構..........40
第三節中央與地方的依侍結盟..........57
第四節結語-中央與地方政治權力關係之建構..........65
第四章中央與地方政治之間的激盪(1972-1986)..........67
第一節本土化政策與台灣主體意識的浮現..........67
第二節國民黨、地方派系與反對運動之間的互動..........79
第三節中央單向隔離、控制的鬆弛..........89
第四節結語-中央與地方政治權力關係之調整..........92
第五章中央與地方政治權力關係的轉變(1986~)..........95
第一節政治自由化與民主化的衝擊-黨國體制的瓦解..........95
第二節立法院的轉型與國民黨的轉化..........109
第三節地方派系的變與不變..........120
第四節國民黨的台灣化-派閥政治乎?..........127
第五節結語-中央與地方政治權力關係之轉變..........131
第六章結論..........135
參考書目..........143
一、英文部分
Bermeo, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking Regime Change," Comparative Politics 22
(3): 359-77.
Bosco, Joseph. 1992. “Taiwan Factions: Guanxi, Patronage, adn the State in
Local Politics. Ethnology 31 (April): 157-83.
Cheng, Tun-Jen. 1989. “Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist Regime in Taiwan,”
World Politics 41 (4): 471-99.
Chou, Yangsun and Andrew Nathan. 1987. ''Democratizing Transition in
Taiwan," Asian Survey 27 (3): 277-99.
Chu, Yun-han. 1992. Crafting Democracy in Taiwan (Taipei: Institute for
National Policy Research).
Collier, David and Deborah L. Norden 1992. “Strategic Choice Models of
Political Change in Latin America,” Comparative Politics 24 (2): 229-
43 .
Diamond, Lany. 1993. “The Globalization of Democracy,”in Robelt o. Slater;
Barry M. Schutz and Steven R. Dorr ed. Global Transformation and
the Third Tflord (Boulder: Lynne Riener Publishers). pp. 31-70.
Diamond, Larry, Seymour M. Lipset, and Juan Linz. 1987. “Builiding and
Sustaining Democratic Govelmellt in Developing Cmmtries: Some
Tentative Findings,” World Affairs 150 (1): 5-19.
Engstrom, Richard and Chi-huang Chu. 1984. “The Impact of 1980
Supplementmy Election on Nationalist China's Legislative Yuan,”
Asian Survey 24 (4): 447-58.
Esienstadt, S. N. and Louis Rongier. 1980. “Patron-Client Relations as a Model
of Structuring Social Exchange,”Comparative Studies in Society and
History 22: 42-75.
Huang, Teh-fu. 1994. "Elections and the Evolution of the Kuomintang," paper
Presented at Democratization in Taiwan: Causal Elements and
Theoretical Implications for Chinese Political Culture, the Multiparty
System, and Cross Straits Relations," Washington, D.C, Apri18-9.
Huang, Teh-fu. 1995. "Electoral Competition and the Evolution of the
Kuomintang," Issues & Studies 31 (5): 91-120.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1970. "Social and Institution Dynamics of One-Party
Systems," in Samuel P. Huntington and Clement H. Moore ed.
Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society (New York: Basic books).
pp. 3-47.
Huntington, Samuel P. and Joan M. Nelson. 1977. No Easy Choice--Political
Participation in Developing Countries (Harvard University Press,
Second Printing).
Huntington, Samuel P. 1984. " Will More Countries Become Democratic?"
Political Science Quarterly 99 (Summer): 193-218.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Waves: Democratization in the Late
Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma press).
Karl, Teny Lynn. 1990. "Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America,"
Comparative Politics 23 (October): 1-2l.
Lemarchand, Rene and Legg, Keith. 1972. "Political Clientelism and
Development," Comparath!e Politics 4 (2): 149-78.
Linz, Juan J. 1970. "An Authoritarian Regime: Spain," in Erik Allardt and Stein
Rokkan, Mass Politics (New York: The Free Press), pp. 251-83.
Linz, Juan J. 1990. "Transition to Democracy," The Washington Quarterly 13
(Summer): 143-64.
Moore, Clement H. 1970. "The Single Party as Source of Legitimacy," in
Samuel P. Huntington and Clement H. Moore ed. Authoritarian
Politics in Modern Society (New York: Basic books). pp. 48-72.
O'Donnell, Guillermo and Philippe Schmitter eds. 1986. Transitions from
Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusion About Uncertain
Democracies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
Powell, John Duncan. 1970. "Peasant Society and Clientelist Politics,1I The
American Political Science Review 64 (2): 411-425.
Przeworski, Adam. 1986. "Some Problems in the Study of the Transition to
Democracy," in Guillermo O'Donnell, Philippe Schmitter, and
Whitehead Laurence , eds. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule:
Comparative Perspective (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press),
pp. 47-63.
Przeworski, Adam. 1988. "Democracy as A Contingent Outcome of Conflicts,"
in John Elster, and Rune Slagstad eds., Constitutionalism and
Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp.59-81.
Przeworski, Adam. 1992. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic
Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America (Camblidge:
Cambridge University Press).
Rustow, Dankwa11 A. 1970. "Transition to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic
Model," Comparative Politics 2 (April): 337-63.
Sa110ri, Giovanui. 1970. "The Typology of Party Systems--Proposals for
Improvement," in Edk Allardt aud Stein Rokkan ed. Mass Politics
(New York: The Fress Press). pp. 322-52.
Scott, James C. 1972. "Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast
Asia," The American Political Science Review 66 (1): 91-113.
Share, Donald, and Mainwaring, Scott. 1986. "Transition Through Transaction:
Democratization ill Brazil and Spain," in Wayne A. Selcher ed.,
Political Liberalization in Brazil: Dynamics, Dilemmas, and
Prospects (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press). pp. 175-215.
Stepan, Alfred. 1986. "Paths toward Redemocratization: Theoretical and
Comparative Considerations," in Guillenno O'Donnell, Philippe
Schmitter and Whitehead Laurence, eds. Transitions from
AuthoritariaH Rule: Comparative Perspective (Baltimore: Johns
Hopkins University Press), pp. 64-84.
Weingrod, Alex. 1968. "Patrons, Patronage, and Political Parties," Comparatil'e
Studies in Society and History 10 (4): 377-400.
Winckler, Edwin A. 1984. "Institutionalization and Participation on Taiwan:
From Hard to Soft Authoritarianism?" The China Quarterly 99
(September): 481-499.
Wol( Eric R, 1966. "Kinship, Friendship, and Patron-Client Relations in
Complex Societies," in Michael Banton ed. The Social Antropology of
Complex Societies (New York: Praeger), pp. 1-22.
Wu, Nai-teh, 1987, The Politics of Regime Patronage System: Mobilization
and Control Within An Authoritarian Regime. Unpublished Ph. D
Dissertation. University of Chicago.
(限達賢圖書館四樓資訊教室A單機使用)