本研究以三階段資料包絡分析探討在95到97學年度三年間國內近年升格的私立技職院校的經營績效。研究藉由三階段的調整，期望觀察出各技職院校在摒除環境和產出品質的影響下，真實的學校經營效率表現。結果顯示，當學校屬性為中部學校、南部學校、中型規模學校、科技大學等與各項投入差額之間，具有正向關係，而學校屬性為商科重點或其他科的學校、大型學校等與各項投入差額之間，具有負向關係。而在排除外在因素與統計干擾的影響後，本研究發現各高等技職院校的技術效率、純技術效率與規模效率的差異會減少，多數高等技職院校管理效率仍有改善空間，且亦有部分無效率來自於規模無效率，除部分技職院校處於固定規模報酬階段外，其餘多數技職院校皆處於規模報酬遞增階段。

This paper uses the three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) to measure performance efficiency of the private vocational and technological colleges which are elevated recently in Taiwan during the 2006-2008 periods. With the three-stage adjustment, the researcher presented the relationship between the outside environmental factors among the considered colleges and the input slacks. After excluding the impacts from outside environmental factors and statistical noises, the study finds that the differences among the technical efficiency, the pure technical efficiency, and scale efficiency of the considered colleges would be decreased. In addition, it is also found that most considered colleges have opportunity to improve their efficiency and are in the phase of increasing returns to scale.

1. 丁文玲（2002），「國立大學校務基金之績效評估」，《教育研究資訊》，頁101-124。
2. 王保進（1996），「教育指標基本概念之分析」，《教育研究資訊》，頁1-17。
3. 方正儀（2003），「人心、技術難掌握，績效評估障礙多」，《管理雜誌》，1月號343期，頁113-114。
4. 李怡禛（2007），「智慧資本與組織績效關係之研究--以高等教育機構為例」，《國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文》。
5. 林月雲（2003），「人力資本管理與組織績效的關係」，《國立政治大學企業管理學系國科會研究計畫》。
6. 林容萱（2003），「臺灣地區科技大學效率性之分析：資料包絡分析法的應用」，《國民教育研究集刊》，第9 期，頁179-205。
7. 高樹勛（2007），「台灣綜合型大學教學研究效率評析-三階段資料包絡分析法之應用」，《國立台北大學/經濟學系國科碩士論文》。
8. 黃政傑（1996），《教育改革的理念與實踐》，臺北：師大書苑有限公司。
9. 張潤書（1990），《行政學》，臺北：三民。
10. 羅文基（1989），《技職教育專題研究》，高雄：復文。
11. 鍾任琴（2002），「我國私立技職院校教育經費獎補助合理分配模式之初探」，《朝陽人文社會學刊》，第1卷第1期，頁17-37。
12. Abbott, M. and C. Doucouliagos（2002）, “A Data Envelopment Analysis of the Efficiency of Victorian TAFE Institutes,” The Australian Economic Review, 35(1), 55-69.
13. Ahn, T., A. Charnets and W. W. Cooper（1988）, “Some Statistical and DEA Evaluations of Relative Efficiencies of Public and Private Institutions of Higher Learning,” Socio-Economic Planning Science, 22(6), 259-269.
14. Blind, K. and H. Grupp（1999）, “Interdependencies between the Science and Technology Infrastructure and Innovation Activities in German Regions: Empirical Findings and Policy Consequence,” Research Policy, 28, 451-468.
15. Breu, T. M. and R. L. Raab（1994）, “Efficiency and Perceiver Quality of the Nation’s “Top 25” National Universities and National Liberal Arts Colleges: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Higher Education,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 28(1), 33-45.
16. Brown, Jr. W. O. （2001）, “Faculty Participation in University Governance and the Effect on University Performance,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 44, 129-143.
17. Burrup, P. E., V. Jr. Brimley and R. R. Garfield （1999）, Financing Education in a Climate of Change (7th ed.), Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
18. Carroll , S.J. and C.E. Schneir（1982）, Performance Appraisal and Review Systems, Scoot , Foresman and Company , 2-3.
19. Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes（1978）, “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operations Research, 2(6), 429-444.
20. Cuttance, P. F.（1990）, “Performance Indicators and the Management of Quality in Education,” Keynote address prepared for the 3rd National Conference on Indicators in Education, Canberra.
21. Douglas, A. and J. Douglas (2006), “Campus Spies? Using Mystery Students to Evaluate University Performance,” Educational Research, 48(1), 117–125.
22. Elliott, E. J. (1991), Education Counts: An Indicator System to Monitor the Nations Educational Healthy, Washington D. C.: Acting Commissioner of Education Statistics.
23. Farrell, M. J. （1957）, “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General, 120(3), 253-281.
24. Farrukh, C., P. Fraser and M. Gregory（2003）, “Development of a Structured Approach to Assessing Practice in Product Development Collaborations,” Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs, Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture, 217, 1131-1144.
25. Gross, E.（1967）, “The Definition of Organizational Goal,” British Journal of Sociology, 20, 287-291.
26. Johnstone, J. N.（1981）, Indicators of Education Systems, London: Kogan Page Press.
27. Kaufman, R.（1988）, “Preparing Useful Performance Indicators,” Training and Development, Sep., 80.
28. Keith, B.（2001）, “Organizational Context and Universality Performance Outcomes: The Limited Role of Purposive Action in the Management of Institutional Status,” Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 493-516.
29. Leidecker, J. K. and A. V. Bruno （1984）, “Identifying and Using Critical Success Factors,” Long Range Planning, 17(1), 26-52.
30. Odden, A.（1990）, “Educational Indicators in the United States： The Need for Analysis,” Educational Researcher, 19.
31. Volkwein J. F. and K. V. Sweitzer（2006）, “Institutional Prestige and Reputation among Research Universities and Liberal Arts Colleges,” Research in Higher Education, 47(2), 129-148.