跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張育乾
論文名稱: 可及性與都市化經濟之分析─ 以東協十加三為例
The analysis of accessibility and urbanization economic in ASEAN plus three cooperation.
指導教授: 陳心蘋
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學學院 - 經濟學系
Department of Economics
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 62
中文關鍵詞: 市場潛力等效密度都市化經濟東協十加三
外文關鍵詞: Market Potential, Effective Density, Urbanization Economic, ASEAN Plus Three Cooperation
相關次數: 點閱:292下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 昔日關於聚集經濟的研究,在全球或區域的研究議題多集中於探討城市本身的聚集外部性,而「空間」或「城市間」的相互依賴關係,通常未列入考慮,然而,在新經濟地理(New economic geography)的領域中,則將區域間的相互依賴關係視為研究分析的主要核心。關於空間中相互依賴關係之研究議題,近幾年來已逐漸被不少學者關注之,研究範圍則多是聚焦在全球體系或是歐洲(歐盟)、北美(北美自由貿易區)等地,然而以東南亞國協、東亞為研究範圍的區域內互動實證仍屬相對稀少。此外,運用引力模型基礎下的「市場潛力(market potential)」以及物理概念下的「等效密度(effective density)」分別衡量城市間相互依賴程度與城市內聚集程度者,在大範圍區域內且跨越國界的研究仍然相對稀少。

    本研究與其他許多研究不同的地方在於,利用時間化距離與國家間飛航頻率做為計算兩國間互動、依賴程度的多寡,在不同層級人口結構下探討都市化經濟與市場潛力對一國之國民所得之影響。


    摘 要 ................................................I
    目 次 ................................................II
    表目錄 ................................................III
    圖目錄 ................................................IV
    第一章、 緒論 .......................................- 1 -
    第二章、 文獻回顧 .......................................- 4 -
    第一節 聚集經濟之定義 ...............................- 4 -
    第二節 聚集經濟之實證研究 ...............................- 7 -
    第三節 市場潛力(Market Potential)概念回顧 ......- 12 -
    第三章、 實證模型與資料說明 ..............................- 15 -
    第一節 實證模型 ......................................- 15 -
    第二節 資料來源與說明 ..............................- 20 -
    第四章、 實證結果分析 ..............................- 22 -
    第一節 以國家人口結構探討區域間都市化經濟 ..............- 23 -
    第二節 以都市人口結構探討區域間都市化經濟 ..............- 32 -
    第三節 以勞動人口結構探討區域間都市化經濟 ..............- 42 -
    第五章、 結論 ......................................- 44 -
    附表 ..............................................- 49 -
    參考文獻 ..............................................- 54 -

    中文部分
    杜震華、盧信昌(2001),世界經濟概論─東南亞篇,華泰文化。

    吳玲君(2008),「東協國家與東亞經濟合作:從東協加三到東亞高峰會」,問題與研究,第46卷第2期,頁117-139。

    黃柏偉(2005),「東亞城市網絡及其互動關係之研究」,國立台北大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。

    英文部分
    Brakman S., H. Garretsen, and C. van Marrewijk (2009), The New Introduction to Geographical Economics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Brülhart M. and F. Sbergami(2009), “Agglomeration and Growth: Cross-Country Evidence,” Journal of Urban Economics 65: pp.48–63.

    Castells M.(1989), “The Information City,” Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Ciccone A.(2002), “Agglomeration effects in Europe,” European Economic Review 46: pp.213–227.

    Ciccone A. and R. Hall(1996), “Productivity and the density of economic activity,” American Economic Review 86: pp.54–70.

    Duranton G. and D. Puga(2004), “Microfoundations of urban agglomeration economies,” in J.V. Henderson and J.F. Thisse, eds., Handbook of regional and urban economics, Vol. IV.

    Duranton G. and H. Overman(2005), “Testing for localisation using micro-geographic data,” Review of Economic Studies 72: pp.1077–1106.

    Fujita M., P. Krugman, and A. Venables(1999), The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Graham D. J.(2007a), “Agglomeration, productivity and transport investment,”
    Journal of Transport Economics and Policy,41(3): pp.317–343.

    Graham D. J.(2007b), “Identifying urbanization and localization externalities in manufacturing and service industries,” Papers in Regional Science, (in press).

    Graham D.J.(2007c), “Variable returns to agglomeration and the effect of road traffic congestion,” Journal of Urban Economics 62: pp.103–120.

    Graham D.J. and H.Y. Kim(2007), “An empirical analytical framework for agglomeration economies,” Annals of Regional Science 42: pp.267–289.

    Hanson G.H.(2005), “Market Potential, Increasing Returns, and Geographic Concentration,” Journal of International Economics 67(1): pp.1–24.

    Harris C.(1954), “The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 64: pp.315–348.

    Harvey D.(1989), “The Condition of Postmodernity,” Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Head K. and T. Mayer(2004), “The Empirics of Agglomeration and Trade,” in J.V. Henderson and J.F. Thisse, eds., Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. IV. North Holland, Amsterdam. pp. 2609–2665.

    Head K. and T. Mayer(2004), “Market potential and the location of Japanese investment in the European Union,” Review of Economics and Statistics 86: pp.959–972.

    Henderson J. V.(2003),“Marshall’s scale economies,” Journal of Urban Economics 53: pp.1–28.

    Henderson J. V. and H.-G., Wang(2007), “Urbanization and city growth: The role of institutions,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 37: pp.283–313.

    Krugman P.R.(1991), “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography,” Journal of Political Economy 99: pp.483–499.

    Brulhart M. and F. Sbergami(2009), “Agglomeration and growth: Cross-country evidence,” Journal of Urban Economics 65: pp.48–63.

    Mion G.(2004), “Spatial externalities and empirical analysis: The case of Italy,” Journal of Urban Economics 56: pp.97–118.

    Melo P. C., D. J. Graham, and R. B. Noland(2009), “A Meta-analysis of Estimates of Urban agglomeration economies,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 39: pp.332–342.

    Redding S. and A.J. Venables(2004), “Economic Geography and International Inequality,” Journal of International Economics 62(1): pp.53–82.

    Rice P., A. J. Venables , and E. Patacchini(2005), “Spatial determinants of productivity: Analysis for the regions of Great Britain,” Mimeo, London School of Economics

    Rosenthal S.S. and W.C. Strange(2004), “Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economics,” in J.V. Henderson and J.F. Thisse, eds., Handbook of Regional and Urban economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland.

    無法下載圖示 此全文未授權公開
    QR CODE
    :::