面對氣候變遷，傳統高度仰賴灰色基礎設施之產業園區面臨考驗。生態防減災 (Eco-DRR) 強調以自然基盤作為調適基礎，已成為國際災害風險治理趨勢。為探討產業空間如何落實生態調適，本研究旨在建構適用於臺灣產業園區之Eco-DRR氣候韌性評估架構，並研擬空間差異化調適策略。
本研究透過文獻回顧與模糊德爾菲法 (FDM)，建構涵蓋生態效益、人類生活福祉、經濟可行性、社會參與災害韌性等5大構面及17項指標之評估架構；續以層級分析法 (AHP) 計算相對權重，並以經濟部轄下60處編定產業園區為實證對象，運用二階段集群分析法探討其生態災害韌性分類。
實證結果發現，專家仍將園區之「災害韌性」與「經濟可行性」視為首要考量。代表產業空間在轉型過渡期中，Eco-DRR需建立於確保廠房營運安全之基礎上，確立其作為輔助減災工具的定位。其次，本研究透過集群分析將全臺園區歸納為四大韌性集群，並各自說明各園區集群之調適方向。
綜上，本研究研擬因群制宜之跨層級Eco-DRR調適路徑，提供產業園區從被動工程防災轉向主動生態調適之策略參考，以期達成未來產業永續發展之目標。

In the face of climate change, traditional industrial parks heavily reliant on gray infrastructure are confronting severe challenges. Ecosystem-based Disaster Risk Reduction (Eco-DRR), which emphasizes natural infrastructure as the basis for adaptation, has become a prominent international trend in risk governance. To explore how industrial spaces can implement ecological adaptation, this study aims to construct an Eco-DRR climate resilience assessment framework suitable for Taiwan's industrial parks and formulate spatially differentiated adaptation strategies.
Through a literature review and the Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM), this study constructed an assessment framework comprising 5 dimensions—Ecological Benefits, Human Well-being, Economic Feasibility, Social Participation, and Disaster Resilience—along with 17 indicators. Subsequently, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied to calculate the relative weights of these indicators. Using 60 designated industrial parks under the Ministry of Economic Affairs as empirical subjects, a two-stage cluster analysis was utilized to explore their resilience classifications.
Empirical results reveal that experts still consider "Disaster Resilience" and "Economic Feasibility" as the primary considerations for the parks. This indicates that during the transitional period of industrial spaces, Eco-DRR must be established on the foundation of ensuring the operational safety of facilities, confirming its pragmatic position as an auxiliary disaster reduction tool. Furthermore, through cluster analysis, this study categorized the industrial parks across Taiwan into four major resilience clusters and delineated specific adaptation directions for each.
In conclusion, this study formulates cross-level, cluster-specific Eco-DRR adaptation pathways. These strategies provide a scientific reference for industrial parks to transition from passive engineering-based disaster prevention to proactive ecological adaptation, thereby achieving the ultimate goal of sustainable industrial development.

一、中文參考文獻
吳杰穎、黃昱翔，2011，颱洪災害脆弱度評估指標之建立：以南投縣水里鄉為例。都市與計劃，38(2)，195-218。
周佳宥，2011，台灣災害防救法之過去、現在與未來，法令月刊，62(10)，103-114。
林冠慧、張長義，2015， 脆弱性研究的演變與當前發展，地理學報，7，49-82。
夏禹九、林佩蓉，2011，原住民與自然資源經營—共同經營的理論框架，台灣原住民族研究季刊，4(1)，39-66。
張鎧茹，2018，初探我國地方政府從事災害防救組織協力之動機：理論與實務的比較，公共行政學報，54，79-125。
陳建忠、吳杰穎，2011，氣候變遷下災害風險評估指標系統之建立，建築學報，75，43-60。
陳樹群、王俞婷、吳亭燁，2005，災害高風險縣市之坡地村里耐災程度評估，中華水土保持學報，36(4)，323-337。
楊惠萱、陳怡臻、李欣輯，2014，天然災害社會脆弱度指標之建立及評估：以鄉鎮層級為例，災害防救科技與管理學刊，3(2)，71-93。
廖興中、張鎧如、李天申，2020，新北市里層級之水災暨坡地災害脆弱性分析：全盤型脆弱性管理架構的初步應用，行政暨政策學報，(71)，89-137。
劉怡君、洪鴻智，2022，從災害韌性觀點探討流域之脆弱度、衝擊與調適，都市與計劃，49(1)，71–98。
潘穆嫈、林貝珊、林元祥，2016，韌性研究之回顧與展望，防災科學，1，53–78。
任芝菁，2015，臺灣災害防救體系變遷之政經分析，1949 ~ 2014，臺灣大學碩士論文。
林璇姿，2006，都市公園綠地連接度之探討─以台北市大安區為例，東海大學碩士論文。
柯亭宇，2010，都市綠資源分布與生態綠網結構之研究－以台中市為例，朝陽科技大學碩士論文。
洪敏維，2011，從防災觀點探討都市公園之規劃設計—以屏東縣立運動公園為例屏東科技大學碩士論文。
陳虹潔，2021，產業園區脆弱度評估與調適策略規劃之研究-以編定工業區為例政治大學碩士論文。
楊礎毓，2013，整合災害管理之減災與整備於都市規劃之研究，銘傳大學碩士論文。
鄭滄濱，2001，軟體組織提升人員能力之成熟度模糊評估模式，台灣科技大學碩士論文。
IUCN，2021，『基於自然的解决方案全球標准 NbS的審核、設計和推廣框架』一版。瑞士：世界自然保護聯盟。
鄧振源，2005，『計畫評估─方法與應用』二版，台北：運籌規劃與管理研究中心。
蕭文龍，2023，『統計分析入門與應用：SPSS中文版+SmartPLS 4 (PLS-SEM)』四版，台北：碁峰出版社。
內政部建築研究所，2023，綠建築評估手冊─基本型。
行政院主計總處，2026，國民所得統計摘要。
經濟部，2024，經濟部產業發展署綠色工廠標章制度一般行業清潔生產評估系統評估指引。
經濟部，2025，113年度經濟部產業園區管理局所轄各產業園區員工性別統計分析報告。
經濟部產業園區管理局，2025，114年度產業園區開發與管理年報。
經濟部統計處，2025，工業生產統計年報。
環境部，2024，中華民國空氣品質監測報告 113年年報。
聯合國工業發展組織，2019，工業園區國際指南。

二、英文文獻
Bahadur, A., Tanner, T., & Pichon, F., 2016, “Enhancing Urban Climate Change Resilience: Seven Entry Points for Action (Sustainable Development Working Papers”, ADB Sustainable Development Working Paper Series, 47, 1-53.
Bahadur, A., Wilkinson, E., Gogerty, E., Tanner, T., 2015, “Resilience in the SDGs: Developing an indicator for Target 1.5 that is fit for purpose”.
Brown, K., 2013, “Global environmental change I: A social turn for resilience? A social turn for resilience?”, Progress in Human Geography, 38(1), 107-117.
Bruneau, M., Chang, S., Eguchi, R., Lee, G., O’Rourke, Thomas, Reinhorn, A., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W., & Winterfeldt, D., 2003, “A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities”, Earthquake Spectra, 19, 733-752.
Brunner, R. D., & Lynch, A. H., 2010, Adaptive Governance and Climate Change: Boston: American Meteorological Society.
Carpenter, S. R., & Brock, W. A., 2008, “Adaptive capacity and traps”, Ecology and Society, 13(2), 40.
Chelleri, L., Waters, J. J., Olazabal, M., & Minucci, G., 2015, “Resilience trade-offs: addressing multiple scales and temporal aspects of urban resilience”, Environment and Urbanization, 27(1), 181-198.
Cohen-Shacham, E., Walters, G., Janzen, C. and Maginnis, S. (eds.), 2016, Nature-based Solutions to address global societal challenges, Switzerland: IUCN.
Cote, M., & Nightingale, A. J., 2011, “Resilience thinking meets social theory: Situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research: Situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research”, Progress in Human Geography, 36(4), 475-489.
Cutter, S. L., Burton, C. G., & Emrich, C. T., 2010, “Disaster Resilience Indicators for Benchmarking Baseline Conditions”, Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 7(1).
Djalante, R., Holley, C. & Thomalla, F., 2011, “Adaptive governance and managing resilience to natural hazards”, Int J Disaster Risk Sci 2, 1–14.
Eggermont, H., Balian, E., Azevedo, J., Beumer, V., Brodin, T., Claudet, J., Fady, B., Grube, M., Keune, H., & Lamarque, P., 2015, “Nature-based solutions: new influence for environmental management and research in Europe”. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 24, 243-248.
Estrella, M., & Saalismaa, N., 2013, “Ecosystem-based DRR: An overview” 26-47 in The Role of Ecosystems in Disaster Risk Reduction. edited by Renaud, G., Sudmeier-Rieux, K., & Estrella, M. New York: United Nations University Press.
European Commission, 2021, Evaluating the impact of nature-based solutions – A handbook for practitioners, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
FEMA, 2006, Principles of Emergency Management (IS230). Washington DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Folke, C., 2006, “Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses”, Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267.
Gero, A., Fletcher, S., Rumsey, M., Thiessen, J., Kuruppu, N., Buchan, J., Daly, J., & Willetts, J., 2015, “Disasters and climate change in the Pacific: Adaptive capacity of humanitarian response organizations”, Climate and Development, 7(1), 35–46.
Gupta, A. K., & Nair, S. S. (eds.), 2012, Ecosystem approach to disaster risk reduction. New Delhi: National Institute of Disaster Management.
Holling, C. S., & Meffe, G. K., 1996, “Command and Control and the Pathology of Natural Resource Management”, Conservation Biology, 10(2), 328–337.
Holling, C. S., 1973, “Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.
Holling, C. S., 2001, “Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems”, Ecosystems, 4(5), 390–405.
Holling, C.S. and Gunderson, L.H., 2002, “Resilience and Adaptive Cycles” 25-62 in the Panarchy: Understanding Transformation in Human and Natural Systems, edited by Holling, C.S. and Gunderson, L.H., Washington DC: Island Press.
Hsu, C. & Sandford, B. A., 2007, “The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus”, Practical Assessment”, Research, and Evaluation, 12(1), 10.
IPCC, 2012, Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation, Edinburgh: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC, 2022, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, & B. Rama, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., & Mieno, H., 1993, “The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55(3), 241–253.
Malczewski, J., 2006, “Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifiers: GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for land-use suitability analysis”, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 8(4). 270-277
Dyer, J. S., 1990, “Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Management Science, 36(3):249-258.
Johnson, C., 2011, “Creating an enabling environment for reducing disaster risk: Recent experience of regulatory frameworks for land, planning and building in low and middle-income countries”, in the Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction, edited by Johnson, C., London: University College London.
Manyena, S. B., 2006, “The concept of resilience revisited”, Disasters, 30(4), 434–450.
Munda, G., 2004, “Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences”, European Journal of Operational Research, 158(3), 662-677.
Nalau, J., Becken, S., & Mackey, B., 2018, “Ecosystem-based Adaptation: A review of the constraints”, Environmental Science & Policy, 89, 357–364.
Nehren, U., Sudmeier-Rieux, K., Sandholz, S., Estrella, M., Lomarda, M. and T. Guillén., 2014, The Ecosystem-Based Disaster Risk Reduction Case Study and Exercise Source Book, Geneva and Cologne: Partnership for Environment and Disaster Risk Reduction and Center for Natural Resources and Development.
Dalkey, N. & Helmer, O., 1963. “An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts”, INFORMS, 9(3), 458-467
Pelling, M., 2011, Adaptation to climate change: from resilience to transformation, Routledge, London.
Pimm, S. L., 1991, The balance of nature? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Raymond, C. M., Frantzeskaki, N., Kabisch, N., Berry, P., Breil, M., Nita, M. R., Geneletti, D., & Calfapietra, C., 2017, “A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas”, Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 15–24.
Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G., 2012, Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (2nd ed.), New York, NY: Springer.
Saaty, T. L., 1977, “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281.
Saaty, T. L., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, New York ; London: McGraw-Hill International Book Co.
Saaty, T. L., 2005, The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks, Pittsburgh: RWS Pub.
Schmidt-Thomé, P., 2017, “Towards applying climate change adaptation”, Investigaciones Geográficas (Esp), 67, 49-60.
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2019, Voluntary guidelines for the design and effective implementation of ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction and supplementary information, Technical Series, 93, Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
Smit, B., & Wandel, J., 2006, “Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability”, Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 282–292.
Su, Q., Chen, K., & Liao, L., 2021, “The Impact of Land Use Change on Disaster Risk from the Perspective of Efficiency”, Sustainability, 13(6), 31-51.
Sudmeier-Rieux, K., Ash, N., & Murti, R., 2013, Environmental Guidance Note for Disaster Risk Reduction: Healthy Ecosystems for Human Security and Climate Change Adaptation., Switzerland: IUCN.
Sunkur, R., Kantamaneni, K., Bokhoree, C., & Ravan, S., 2023, “Mangroves' role in supporting ecosystem-based techniques to reduce disaster risk and adapt to climate change: A review”, Journal of Sea Research, 196, 1-13.
Taş, A., & Mutlu Avinç, G., 2024, “Architectural Evaluation of Eco-Industrial Parks within the Scope of Sustainable Human Development Goals”, Kent Akademisi, 17, 30-47.
UNDRR, 2021, Words into action: Nature-based solutions for disaster risk reduction, Switzerland: UNDRR.
UNEP, 2022, Upscaling community resilience through ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction in India - case study, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.
Verschuuren, J. (Ed), 2022, Research handbook on climate change adaptation law, 2nd ed, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. P., 2004, “Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-ecological Systems”, Ecology and Society, 9(2).
Wamsler, C., 2014, Cities, Disaster Risk and Adaptation (1st ed.), London: Routledge.
Wang, X., & Li, M., 2022, “Determinants of Regional Economic Resilience to Economic Crisis: Evidence from Chinese Economies”, Sustainability, 14(2).
Watson, V., 2009, “Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues”, Urban Studies, 46(11), 2259-2275.
Whelchel, A., & Beck, M., 2016, “Decision Tools and Approaches to Advance Ecosystem-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation in the Twenty-First Century” 133-160 in Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security Zones, edited by Brauch, H. G., Oswald Spring, Ú., Mesjasz, C., Grin, J., Kameri-Mbote, P., Chourou, B., & Birkmann, J., Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Zadeh, L. A., 1965, “Fuzzy sets. Information and Control”, 8(3), 338–353.

三、網路資料
經濟部產業園區管理局，2025，工業區年報統計，台灣工業用地供給與服務資訊網。檢索日期：2025年10月15日，https://land.bip.gov.tw/supply/Environ/statistical_mgmb。
行政院國家永續發展委員會，2022，臺灣2050淨零路徑推動歷程，檢索日期：2025年10月16日，https://ncsd.ndc.gov.tw/Fore/nsdn/about0/2050PathPlanning。
環境部氣候變遷署，2024，淨零路徑與關鍵戰略，檢索日期：2025年10月16日，https://www.cca.gov.tw/affairs/response-policies/net-zero/2039.html。