| 研究生: |
林肯 Lin, Ken |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
TIS監理框架下壽險業避險策略最佳化之研究 Optimization of Hedging Strategies for Life Insurers under the TIS Regulatory Framework |
| 指導教授: |
張士傑
Chang, Shih-Chieh 曾毓英 Tzeng, Yu-Ying |
| 口試委員: |
洪明欽
Hung, Ming-Chin 張士傑 Chang, Shih-Chieh 曾毓英 Tzeng, Yu-Ying |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 風險管理與保險學系 Department of Risk Management and Insurance |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 54 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | TIS監理框架 、穩健最佳化 、避險策略最佳化 、四道防火牆 、AC 攤銷新制 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | TIS regulatory framework, robust optimization, hedging strategy optimization, Four-Firewall mechanism, AC amortization |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:12 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在長期低利率環境下,台灣壽險業者為追求收益率而提高海外資產配置,累積顯著的外匯曝險。本研究於TIS(TaiwanInsuranceSolvency)監理框架下,採穩健最佳化(RobustOptimization)方法,以避險比率為唯一決策變數,將避險決策形式化為有限制之最佳化問題:以最小化避險成本為目標,並要求避險比率於多個匯率波動情境下TIS皆滿足監理門檻,據此求解穩健最適避險比率。研究結果顯示,穩健最適避險比率為h∗ =0.4:在正常匯率波動(σe=5%)下TIS達158.7%、中度壓力(σe =7%)下達115.0%,均滿足 TIS ≥ 100% 門檻,且較業界慣行比率節省約三成避險成本。其後再就預定利率與資產負債比等參數進行穩健性檢驗。
模型同時納入2026年1月生效之AC債券匯率新制,與2026年1月30日發布之外匯準備金「四道防火牆」(P、Q、X、Y)架構,反映兩項制度變革對避險決策之共同影響。本研究認為外匯準備金若設計得當,可降低系統流動性風險,並避免市場劇烈波動時被迫拋售海外資產。AC攤銷新制與四道防火牆雖能平滑損益、強化資本緩衝,但亦同步延緩匯損認列速度,使緩衝累積與消耗均呈平滑化。本研究建議監理機關於TIS過渡期間,以TIS 比率下之資本路徑、及壓力情境下各防火牆之消耗速度等量化指標作為監控依據,協助產業逐步調整資產負債管理與避險策略。
Under a prolonged low interest rate environment, Taiwan’s life insurance industry has substantially increased its allocation to foreign assets in pursuit of yield, accumulating significant foreign exchange exposure. Although insurers have adopted instruments such as USD-denominated policies and basket hedging, the scarcity of long-duration domestic bonds, combined with the high cost and limited efficiency of traditional hedging instruments, has made the foreign exchange price fluctuation reserve a critical mechanism for mitigating this exposure.
This study employs a normative simulation analysis under the Taiwan Insurance Solvency (TIS) regulatory framework, applying a robust optimization approach with the hedge ratio as the sole decision variable. The hedging decision is formalized as a constrained optimization problem: minimizing hedging cost subject
to the TIS ratio satisfying the regulatory threshold across multiple exchange rate volatility scenarios, thereby identifying the robust optimal hedge ratio. The results indicate a robust optimal hedge ratio of h∗ = 0.4, under which the TIS ratio reaches 158.7%undernormalvolatility (σe =5%) and 115.0% under moderate stress(σe =7%), satisfying the TIS ≥ 100%threshold in both scenarios while reducing hedging cost by approximately 30% relative to prevailing industry practice. Sensitivity analyses are conducted on parameters including the guaranteed interest rate and the asset-liability ratio. The model also incorporates the Amortized Cost (AC) bond foreign exchange amortization mechanism effective January 2026 and the “Four Firewall” (P, Q, X, Y) foreign exchange reserve architecture announced on January 30, 2026, capturing the joint impact of both reforms on insurers’ hedging decisions.
This study finds that a well-designed foreign exchange reserve can reduce systemic liquidity risk and prevent the forced liquidation of foreign assets under severe market volatility; conversely, a poorly designed reserve may itself become a source of instability, eroding shareholder value and long-term capital efficiency. While the AC amortization mechanism and the Four-Firewall architecture smooth
earnings volatility and strengthen capital buffers, they also slow the recognition of foreign exchange losses, leading to gradual accumulation and depletion of each buffer—warranting long-term observation of their buffering capacity under stress scenarios. In conclusion, policy evaluation should return to the core question of
how regulatory incentives reshape insurers’ behavior. This study recommends that, during the TIS transition period, the supervisory authority monitor key quantitative indicators including the TIS ratio and the depletion rate of each firewall buffer under stress scenarios, thereby assisting insurers in progressively adjusting their asset
liability management and hedging strategies.
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 v
表目錄 vii
圖目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 4
第三節 文獻回顧 7
第二章 研究模型 10
第一節 資本市場情境 10
第二節 負債情境 16
第三節 避險工具 20
第四節 AC攤銷新制之會計處理 25
第五節 經濟資產負債模型 29
第六節 避險決策最佳化 30
第三章 實證結果與分析 34
第一節 實證設計與基礎情境 34
第二節 穩健最適避險比率 35
第三節 條件最適避險比率與波動環境之調整 39
第四節 極端情境下之資本韌性與避險比率之下限 41
第五節 穩健性檢驗 43
第六節 研究限制與未來研究方向 46
第四章 結論與建議 47
第一節 研究結論 47
第二節政策與實務建議 48
參考文獻 50
李承駿(2022)。市場不確定性對人壽保險業避險策略之研究〔未出版碩士論文〕。國立政治大學。
邱子恩(2023)。升息循環下人壽保險公司匯率避險有效性〔未出版碩士論文〕。國立政治大學。
張士傑、黃雅文、洪銳棋、曾暐筑(2018)。人壽保險公司之風險及清償能力評估:檢視利率變動型人壽保險。管理學報,35(3), 333–354。https://doi.org/10.6504/JMBR.201809_35(3).0003
張士傑、陳絳珠、林鴻陞(2026)。外匯價格變動準備金於匯率風險管理機制。管理學報(接受刊登)。
張士傑、葉永濬、李彥寬(2026)。台灣壽險業新一代清償能力制度下資產配置與監理措施分析。中山管理評論,34(4),1–34。 https://doi.org/10.6160/SYSMR.202512/PP.0001
蔡政憲、林建智、陳業寧、石百達、張森林、彭金隆(2017)。強化保險業國外投資之匯率風險管理與監理機制之研究〔委託研究期末報告,案號TIGF-S-104-031〕。財團法人保險安定基金。https://www.tigf.org.tw/files/file_pool/1/0m081587899959956342/.pdf
Andersen, L. (2008). Simple and efficient simulation of the Heston stochastic volatility model. The Journal of Computational Finance, 11(3), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.946405
Björk, T. (2020). Arbitrage theory in continuous time (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cassel, G. (1918). Abnormal deviations in international exchanges. The Economic Journal, 28(112), 413–415.
Chang, S. C., & Lee, Y. K. (2020). Currency uncertainty, interest guarantee, and risk-based premiums in life insurance guaranty schemes. Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, 14(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/apjri-2019-0035
Chang, S. C., Lee, Y. K., Hsuan, W., & Tu, C. Y. (2020). Allocating overseas: Risk assessment of currency hedging in Taiwan life insurance industry. Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, 14(1), Article 20180015. https://doi.org/10.1515/apjri-2018-0015
Gerstner, T., Griebel, M., Holtz, M., Goschnick, R., & Haep, M. (2008). A general asset liability management model for the efficient simulation of portfolios of life insurance policies. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 42(2), 704–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.07.007
Hao, J. C. (2011). The pricing for interest sensitive products of life insurance firms. Modern Economy, 2(3), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2011.23025
Heston, S. L. (1993). A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. The Review of Financial Studies, 6(2), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/6.2.327
Levy Yeyati, E., & Gómez, J. F. (2019). The cost of holding foreign exchange reserves (CID Faculty Working Paper No. 353). Center for International Development at Harvard University. https://growthlab.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/201905-cid-wp-353-holding-exchange-reserves.pdf
Mamon, R.S.(2004). Three ways to solve for bond prices in the Vasicek model. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/S117391260400001X
Vasicek, O. (1977). An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90016-2
網路資料
中央社(2026年3月31日)。壽險避險比率45.1%新低 金管會:逾9000億可抵禦風險。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/202603310400.aspx
行政院主計總處(2026)。消費者物價指數年增率。https://www.stat.gov.tw/Point.aspx?sid=t.2&n=3581&sms=11480
金融監督管理委員會(2024年4月16日)。我國保險業接軌「新一代清償能力制度」(TWICS)第三階段在地化及過渡性措施,及差異化管理措施。https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202404160001&dtable=News
金融監督管理委員會(2024年12月31日)。我國保險業實施「新一代清償能力制度」第四階段在地化及過渡性調適措施。https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202412310002&toolsflag=Y&dtable=News
金融監督管理委員會(2025年6月12日)。壽險業因應近期金融環境變動之暫行措施。https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202506120008&dtable=News
金融監督管理委員會(2025年12月23日)。預告修正「保險業財務報告編製準則」之兌換損益規定,以符合壽險業長期經營特性及財務報表公允表達。https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202512230003&aplistdn=ou=news,ou=multisite,ou=chinese,ou=ap_root,o=fsc,c=tw&dtable=News
金融監督管理委員會(2026年2月12日)。金管會修正外匯價格變動準備金應注意事項,強化壽險業實質避險。https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202602120001&aplistdn=ou=news,ou=multisite,ou=chinese,ou=ap_root,o=fsc,c=tw&dtable=News
財團法人保險事業發展中心(無日期)。保險業資產負債表〔保險財務業務統計〕。擷取於2026年6月5日,https://www.tii.org.tw/tii/information/information1/000001.html
財團法人保險事業發展中心(無日期)。人壽保險業資金運用表〔保險財務業務統計〕。擷取於2026年6月5日,https://www.tii.org.tw/tii/information/information1/000001.html
鉅亨網(2025年12月23日)。避險黑洞有解!壽險業18兆元AC部位匯兌損益改採逐期攤銷 2026年上路。https://news.cnyes.com/news/id/6286642
經濟日報(2026 年1月23日)。國壽採匯率會計新制拍板 有助強化資本穩定度。https://money.udn.com/money/story/5613/9283223
經濟日報(2026年1月27日)。壽險業2025年底外價金飆新高 避險比率降至50%新低。https://money.udn.com/money/story/5613/9292493
經濟日報(2026年3月31日)。壽險避險比率45.1%新低 金管會:逾9000億可抵禦風險。https://money.udn.com/money/story/5613/9414972
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. (2026). Economy at a glance: Inflation (PCE). https://www.federalreserve.gov/economy-at-a-glance-inflationpce.htm
Financial Supervisory Commission. (2020, September 11). FSC announces timetable for adoption of the New Generation Insurance Solvency Regime. Insurance Bureau. https://www.ib.gov.tw/en/home.jsp?id=24&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=multimessage_view.jsp&dataserno=202009110003&aplistdn=ou=news,ou=multisite,ou=english,ou=ap_root,o=fsc,c=tw&dtable=News
Investing.com. (n.d.). Taiwan 10-year bond yield historical data [Data set]. Retrieved June 5, 2026, from https://www.investing.com/rates-bonds/taiwan-10-year-bond-yield-historical-data
Investing.com. (n.d.). U.S. 10-year bond yield historical data [Data set]. Retrieved June 5, 2026, from https://www.investing.com/rates-bonds/u.s.-10-year-bond yield-historical-data Investing.com. (n.d.). USD/TWD historical data [Data set]. Retrieved June 5, 2026, from https://www.investing.com/currencies/usd-twd-historical-data
全文公開日期 2031/07/21