跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李家昇
論文名稱: 偏態預測:台灣加權指數報酬率之研究
Predicting conditional skewness:Evidence from the return distribution of the Taiwan Stock Exchange Value-Weighted Index
指導教授: 郭炳伸
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 國際經營與貿易學系
Department of International Business
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 32
中文關鍵詞: 偏態不對稱性交易量
外文關鍵詞: conditional skewness, skewed Student's t distribution, trading volume
相關次數: 點閱:130下載:82
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 此論文研究有什麼因子會影響台灣股票加權指數報酬率之偏態係數。過去的文獻顯示,交易量和報酬率為可能的因子。實證的結果確實發現,交易量和報酬率顯著地影響偏態係數。


    This study examines the determinants for conditional skewness of the return distribution of the Taiwan Stock Exchange Value-Weighted Index. Important driving factors that affect conditional skewness, based on the theory literature, include trading volumes and returns. To capture the skewness in the data, the family of time series model we consider focuses on the specifications of higher-order moments than mean and volatility that conventional models look at. With the specifications, we are able to test whether the factors, volumes and returns, can influence conditional skewnees of the return distribution. Our results suggest the significance of the factors using data from the Taiwan Stock Exchange Value-Weighted Index.

    Abstract I
    Table of Contents II
    Chapter 1. Introduction 1
    Chapter 2. Model 7
    2.1 Mean and Volatility Equation 8
    2.2 Error Distribution 9
    2.3 Laws of Motion for Shape Parameters 10
    2.4 Complete Model 14
    Chapter 3. Empirical results 17
    3.1 Data Descriptions 17
    3.2 Model Diagnostics 17
    3.3 Estimation Results 19
    3.3.1 Mean and Volatility Equations 19
    3.3.2 Trading Volume on Skewness 19
    3.3.3 Return on Skewness 21
    3.3.4 Relationship between Past Skewness
    and Current Skewness 22
    Chapter 4. Conclusion 23
    References 25
    The List of tables 27
    The List of Figures 29

    1. Bali, T.G., Mo, H., & Tang, Y. 2006, The role of
    autoregressive conditional skewness and kurtosis in the
    estimation of conditional VaR, Available at SSRN.

    2. Black, F. 1976, Studies in stock price volatility
    changes, Proceedings of the 1976 Business Meeting of the
    Business and Economics Statistics Section, American
    Statistical Association, 177-181.

    3. Cao, H., Coval, J., & Hirshleifer, D. 2002, Sidelined
    investors, trading-generated news, and security returns,
    Review of Financial Studies 15, 651–648.

    4. Chen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J.C. 2001, Forecasting
    crashes: trading volume, past returns and conditional
    skewness in stock prices, Journal of Financial Economics
    61, 345–81.

    5. Christoffersen, P., Heston, S., & Jacobs, K. 2006,
    Option valuation with conditional skewness, Journal of
    Econometrics 131, 253–284.

    6. Hansen, B.E. 1994, Autoregressive conditional density
    estimation, International Economic Review 35, 705–730.

    7. Harvey, C.R., & Siddique, A. 1999, Autoregressive
    conditional skewness, Journal of Financial and
    Quantitative Analysis 34, 465–487.

    8. Harvey, C.R., & Siddique, A. 2000, Conditional skewness
    in asset pricing tests, Journal of Finance 55, 1263–
    1295.

    9. Hong, H., & Stein, J.C. 2003, Differences of opinion,
    short-sales constraints and market crashes, Review of
    Financial Studies 16, 487–525.

    10. Hueng C.J., & McDonald J.B. 2005, Forecasting
    asymmetries in aggregate stock market returns: evidence
    from conditional skewness, Journal of empirical finance
    12, 666–685.

    11. Hueng C.J. 2006, Short-sales constraints and stock
    return asymmetry: evidence from the Chinese stock
    markets, Applied Financial Economics, 16:10, 707–716.

    12. Lamourex, C.G., & Lastrapes, W.D. 1990,
    Heteroskedasticity in stock returns data: Volume versus
    GARCH effects, Journal of Finance 45, 221–229.

    13. Nelson , D.B. 1991, Conditional heteroskedasticity in
    asset returns: A new approach,Econometrica 59, 347–370.

    14. Patton, A.J. 2004, On the out-of-sample importance of
    skewness and asymmetric dependence for asset
    allocation, Journal of Financial Econometrics 2, 130–
    168.

    QR CODE
    :::