| 研究生: |
劉興岳 |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
企業經理人員人格特徵對其領導方式與員工士氣影響之研究 無 |
| 指導教授: | 黃國隆 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration |
| 論文出版年: | 1980 |
| 畢業學年度: | 69 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 132 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 無 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:71 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
無
序言 壹
目錄 叁
圖表目錄 伍
第一章 緒論1-1
第一節 研究目的1-1
第二節 研究範圍與研究構架1-2
第三節 研究假設1-5
第四節 本研究報告結構綱要1-7
第二章 經理人員人格特徵2-1
第一節 年齡2-1
第二節 教育程度2-2
第三節 經驗
第四節 風險偏好2-5
第五節 成就動機2-6
第六節 內外制握2-12
第三章 領導3-1
第一節 領導的意義3-1
第二節 領導理論3-8
第三節 領導行為3-14
第四章 士氣4-1
第一節 士氣意義,重要性及因素4-1
第二節 士氣的衡量4-7
第三節 領導、士氣與工作績效的關係4-9
第五章 研究方法5-1
第一節 研究對象與調查方式5-1
第二節 測量工具5-2
第六章 研究結果6-1
第一節 樣本資料分佈情形6-1
第二節 經理人員之人格特徵與其領導方式之關係6-4
第三節 經理人員之領導方式與員工士氣之關係6-9
第七章 結論與建議7-1
第一節 結論7-1
第二節 研究限制與建議7-1
參考書目8-1
附表一 甲卷 甲-1
附表二 乙卷 乙-1
圖表目錄
圖 頁次
1-1不同管理階層所需要的管理技能1-3
1-2本研究觀念架構圖1-5
3-1費德勒對領導型態與績效的研究結論3-13
3-2獨裁——民主連續模式3-15
3-3李可氏管理系統3-16
3-4俄亥俄州大領導行為象限圖3-19
3-5管理方格3-20
表
2-1各國管理人員需求滿足的順序2-8
2-2各國管理人員需求重要性的順序2-9
6-1樣本經理人員人格特徵分佈表6-1
6-2樣本經理人員領導方式之體恤與結構因素分佈表6-3
6-3樣本員工士氣分數分佈表6-4
6-4樣本經理人員之年齡與其領導方式之卡方檢定表
6-5樣本經理人員行業經歷與領導方之卡方檢定表6-6
6-6樣本經理人員學歷與領導方式之卡方檢定表6-7
6-7樣本經理人員之風險偏好與領導方式之卡方檢定表6-7
6-8樣本經理人員成就動機與領導方式之卡方檢定表6-8
6-9樣本經理人員之內外控與其領導方式之卡方檢定表6-9
6-10樣本各組之員工士氣平均數6-10
6-11樣本各組員工士氣變異數分析表6-11
一、中文書目
王瓊玲譯:行為管理學。台北,大中國圖書公司,民66。
李序僧:工業心理學。台北,大中國圖書公司,民66。
李裕昆等譯:管理學通論。台北,中華企管發展中心,民64。
林正誼:基層幹部領導作風對士氣之影響。國立政治大學,碩士論文,民67.。
政治作戰學校政治系:領導技術。台北,政治作戰學校教務處,民66.。
吳思華等譯:組織理論與管理。台北,長橋出版社,民67.。
洪有義:內外在制握與洛氏量表簡介。
胡海國譯:發展心理學。台北,華新出版社,民66.。
許是祥譯:企業管理:理論、程序、實務。台北,中華企管中心,民65。
張春興、楊國樞:心理學。台北,三民書局,民64
莊書彰:企業家成就動機與產品創新之關係研究。國立政治大學,碩士論文,民67.。
湯淑貞:管理心理學。台北,三民書局,民69.年。
鄭伯壎、樊景立編譯:組織行為:管理心理學。台北,大洋出版社,民64。
聯經出版社編譯:管理學。台北,聯經出版社,民65。
二、英文書目
1. Aekinson, J. W and Feathers, N.T. A Theory of Achievement Motivation, N.Y: John Wiley & Sons, 1966
2. Bales, Robert F. and Strodtbeck, Fred L. "Phases in Group Problem Solving,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology Vol. 46, No. 4, Oct. 1951, 485-495.
3. Barnard, C.I. The Function of the Executive, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1968.
4. Blake, R.P. Mouton, J.S, et, al.”Break though in Organization Development, “Harvard Business Review, 42, Nov-Dec, 1964, 133-55.
5. Blake, R.R. Mouton, J.S. The managerial Grid, Huston: Gulf Publishing Co. 1964.
6. Borgatta, E.F. et al."Some Findings Relevant to a Great Man Theory of Leadership,"
American Sociological Review, Vol. 29, 1954, 755-59.
7. Bryne, D. The Attraction Paradigm, N.Y: Academic Press, 1971.
8. Burrough, Rollins, and Hopkins, “Effect of Age, Depare Mental Experience on Performance, “ A. M. J. Vol. 16, No. 2, 1973
9. Carlisle, H.M. Management: Concepts and Situations, Chicago: Science Research Associats
Inc. 1976.
10. Cattell, Raymond B. and Stice, Glen F. The Psychodynamic of Small Group, Urbana:
University of Illinois, 1953.
11. Dubin, Rober. Human Relations In Administration, “The Socialogy of Organization, with Readings and Cases,” N.Y: Prentic-Hall, 1951.
12. Evens, G.E. and Leaseu, L.N, ”My Job Contest,” Personal Psychology Monograph No.1 Washington, D.C. 1950
13. Fiedler, F.E.A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. N.Y: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
14. Fleishman, E.A.”A. Leader Behavior Description for Industrial,” in R.M Stogdill and A.E. Coons eds, Leaders Behavior: Its Description and Measurement, Columbus, Ohio Bureau of Business Research; Ohio State U, 1957.
15. French, J.R.P and Raven, B.”The Bases of Social Power,” from Dorwin Cartwright (ed.), Studies in Social Power, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1959.
16. French, J.R.P and Snyder, Richard, “Leadership and Interpersonal Power, “from Dorwim Cartwright (ed.), Studies in Social Power, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press,1959.
17. Friedlander, F. ”Motivation to Work and Organizational Performance ,“Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.50 ,No.2 ,1966 ,143-52.
18. Gluck, William F. “Business Policy: Strategy Formation and Management McGraw-Hill, 1976.
19. Guion, R. M.”Some Definition of Morale, ”Personal Psychology, 11,1958,56-61.
20. Haire, Mason. Ghiselli, Edwin E. and Porter, Lyman W. Managerial Thinking, N.Y: John Willey & Sons, 1966.
21. Hempill, John K. “Leadership Acts,” Columbus, Ohio State University, Research Foundation
1954, 148
22. Herman, J.B. ”Are Situational Contingencies Limiting Job Attitude - Job Performance Relationships ? " Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol.10,1973 208-224.
23. House, R. J. Wigdor, L.A. and Shulz, K.”Leader Behavior, Psychological Participation, Employee Satisfaction and Performance: An Extension of Prior Investigations and a Motivation Theory Interpretation, “In W.M. Fry (ed.) Proceedings Seventh Annual Conference of Eastern Academy of Management, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1970, 179-195.
24. Hudson, T.L.(ed.) Perspectives on interpersonal attraction, N.Y: Academic Press, 1973
25. Johnson, R.A. et al, Management, System and Society: A Introduction, Pacific Palisades, Calif. Goodger, 1976 177-178.
26. Kahn, R.L."Productivity a Job Satisfaction," Personal Psychology, Vol.13. No. 3, 1960. 275-287.
27. Kerr, S. et, al. “Toward a Contingency Theory of. Leadership, Based upon Consideration and Intiating Structure Literature, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 1974, 68-82
28. Kluckhohu, Clyde and Murray, Henry A. Personality Formation: The Determinates of
Personality in Nature, Society, and Culture, N.Y: Alfred A. Knopf, 1956.
29. Koontz, H and O’Donnell, Management: A Systems and Contingency Analysis of Managerial Functions, 6th ed, N.Y: McGraw-Hill,1976.
30. Kuhn D.K. Slocum, J.W. and Chase, R.B. ”Does Job Performance Affect Job Satisfaction?” Personal Journal, Vol.50,No.6,June .1971, 455.
31. Lawler, E.E. and Porter, L.W. ”The Effect of Performance and Employee Need Satisfaction:
Which Comes First ?” California Management Reviews, Vol.13,No.4, 1971, 43-47.
32 Likert, R. The Human Organization, N.Y: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
33. Mandelbaum, B.L. and Kiphis, D.”Leader Behavior Dimension Related to Students, Evaluation of Teching Effectiveness,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.58,No.2, 1973, 250-253.
34. McClleland, D.C. "Business Drives and National Achievement ," Harvard Business Review, July-August, 1962, 103-105.
35. McClleland, D.C.et.al, The Achievement Motive, N.Y: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953.
36. McCormick, E. and Tiffin, J. Industrial Psychology,6th ed. England, Elitts, N.Y: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
37. Patchen, Martin.”Supervisory Methods and Group Performance Norms,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1962,275-293.
38. Rosen, Benson, and Jerdee, Thomas H.”Too Old or Not Too Old” Harrard Business Review,
Nov.-Dec, 1977, 97-106.
39. Scott, W.G. and Mitchell, T.R. Organizational Theory: A Situational and Behavioral Analysis
, Home Wood, Illi.: Richard D. Irwin,1972.
40. Smith, P.C.et. al. Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement, Chicago: Rand
McNully, 1968.
41. Stogdill, Ralph. M.”Leadership, Membership and Org.” Psychological Bulletin, Vol.47 No.1 January, 1950, 1-4
42. Stogdill, Ralph. U.”Personal Factors Associated with Leadership: A Survey of the Situation Literature, “Journal of Psychology, 25, 1948, 35-71.
43. Tannenbaun, R. and Schmidt, W.H.”How to choose a Leadership Pattern, “Harvard Business Review, Vol.51, No.3, May-June, 1973, 4-10
44. Thomas, L.T. In “Human Relation at Work,” (Paris. K.) 2nd. Ed., 1962
45. Victor, and Burham, ”Organizational Innovation,” A.S.Q. June, 1975, 168.
46. Viteles, M.S. Motivation and Morale In Industry, N.Y : W. W. Norton & Company, 1973
47. Vrooms, Victor, Work and Motivation, N.Y: John Wiley & Sons, 1964.
48. Webber, Max. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. N.Y: Free Press. 1964.
49. Yuzuk, R.P. The Assessment of Employee Morale, Columbs, Ohio: The Ohio State University, 1961.
此全文未授權公開