跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳曉芸
論文名稱: 從代理理論之觀點探討股權結構對保險經營之影響
指導教授: 陳彩稚
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 風險管理與保險學系
Department of Risk Management and Insurance
論文出版年: 2000
畢業學年度: 88
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 103
中文關鍵詞: 代理問題
相關次數: 點閱:198下載:67
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 現今企業經營由於所有權與經營權分離,常形成代理問題。本研究之目的,即在探討目前保險公司的組織型態,是否有代理問題存在,總經理與董事等之持股狀況,是否會影響到其經營績效。

    本研究使用民國85年至87年三年度中,上市與公開發行之本國壽險與產險公司的資料,採用主成份分析、多元迴歸模型與集群分析進行檢定及分析。本研究之結果如下所示:

    一、壽險公司之代理問題較為明顯,研究發現顯示:

    (一)股權集中度越高,壽險公司業務面之經營效能越好。

    (二)董監事持股比率越高,壽險公司業務面與整體面之經營效能越好。

    (三)主要經理人持股比率越高,壽險公司財務面之經營越佳。

    (四)總經理持股比率越高,壽險公司財務面之經營越好。

    (五)外部董事持股比率越高,壽險公司業務面與整體面之經營效能越好。

    二、產險公司方面之代理問題並不顯著,研究發現除了股權集中度,對於產險公司財務面之經營效能有影響外;董監事的持股比率及主要經理人持股比率…等,與產險公司之經營績效,並無顯著相關性。


    Nowadays the enterprise administration arises ( produces as a result of ) agency problem owing to the separation of ownership and administration. The main purpose on this study is to explore whether the agent problem exists in the organized pattern of insurance company. And is it possible that the administrative efficiency is affected by the president's ownership or the directors' ownership?

    The study is based on the information of domestic life-insurance companies and non-life insurance companies from 1996-1998, which is public offering company, adopts the principal components analysis, regression analysis, and cluster analysis to test it, the consequence of the study is as follows:

    1. Life insurance companies show the agency problem more obviously.

    The study discovers and displays as follows:

    (1) The more concentrated the ownership is, the more efficient the sales administration of the share of the insurance company is

    (2) The higher percentage of share that board of directors and supervisors have, the more efficient the insurance company is in sales and whole administration.

    (3) The higher percentage of share that the major managers have, the more efficient the insurance company is in financial administration.

    (4) The higher percentage of share that the president has, the more efficient the insurance company is in financial administration.

    (5) The higher percentage of share that the extra directors have, the more efficient the insurance company is in sales and whole administration.

    2. Non-life insurance doesn't show obviously in the agency problem. The study discovers that except the ownership concentration affects the insurance company in financial administration, the supervisors' ownership and major managers' ownership ...etc. are not significant relationship with the administrative efficiency of non-life insurance.

    封面頁
    證明書
    致謝詞
    論文摘要
    目錄
    表目錄
    圖目錄
    第一章、緒論
    第一節:研究背景與動機
    第二節:研究目的
    第三節:研究方法與資料來源
    第四節:研究限制
    第五節:研究流程與研究架構
    第二章、文獻探討
    第一節:理論介紹
    第二節:實證文獻
    第三章、實證模型與研究方法
    第一節:研究假設的提出
    第二節:模型建立與重要變數說明
    第三節:統計方法
    第四節:樣本公司基本資料說明
    第四章、實證結果(一):股權結構與保險公司經營效能總指標之實證分析
    第一節:主成份分析實證結果
    第二節:多元迴歸分析實證結果
    第三節:不同股權結構集群對保險經營特性分析
    第五章、實證結果(二):股權結構與保險公司單項經營效能之實證分析
    第一節:壽險公司股權結構與經營效能之實證分析
    第二節:產險公司股權結構與經營效能之分析
    第六章、結論與建議
    第一節:結論
    第二節:建議
    參考文獻

    一、 中文部分
    1.王泰升,「從企業所有權與經營權分離論公開發行制度」,國立中興法律研究所碩士論文,民國77年6月。
    2.沈樹雄,「財務報表分析」,台北,五南書局,民國77年2版。
    3.呂永正,「所有權變動與融資決策之關係」,私立東海大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,民國77年6月。
    4.邱毅、張訓華,「股權結構、董事會組成與企業財務績效」,立東吳大學管理學研究所碩士論文,民國80年1月。
    5.吳學經,「企業統治類型、董事會類型死企業績效關係之研究」,輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文,民國81年7月。
    6.吳俊,「以代理理論探討分權化組織獎酬制度之研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文,民國82年6月。
    7.林炯垚,「財務管理─理論與實務」,華泰書局,民國79年2月初版。
    8.林榮照,「股權結構、董事會組成對企業財務績效之影響」,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文,民國81年6月。
    9.周文賢,「多變數統計分析SAS/STAT使用方法」,待出版書稿。
    10.陳顧遠,「商事法」,復興書局,民國57年初版。
    11.陳杰忠,「台灣上市公司股權結構與股票報酬率之研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文,民國81年6月。
    12.陳遠哲、鄭純農,「保險會計選集」,台北,致遠管理顧問股份有限公司,民國84年3月初版。
    13.陳森松、康裕民、吳瑞雲、莊文昌譯述,「保險經營(上策)」,台北,中華民國產物保險核保學會,民國84年3月初版。
    14.陳淑惠,「產險公司組織結構與績效關係之研究」,私立逢甲大學保險學研究所碩士論文,民國87年6月。
    15.陸年青、許冀湯合譯,Berle, A.A. and C.G. Means著,「現代股份有限公司與私有財產」,台灣銀行經濟研究室編印,民國70年出版。
    16.張明峰,「股權結構對公司績效影響之研究」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,民國80年6月。
    17.曾勇義,「企業組織與管理」,藍白出版社,民國63年5月初版。
    18.鄒政下,「保險會計理論與實務」,台北,鄒政下,民國85年3月。
    19.葉彩蓮,「企業經營績效之比較研究-X效率理論之探討」,私立東吳大學經濟研究所碩士論文,民國72年7月。
    20.黃英陶,「代理問題對資本結構影響之研究」,國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文,民國77年6月。
    21.黃榮龍,「股權結構與經營績效之關係」,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文,民國82年6月。
    22.黃俊英,「多變量分析」,台北,華泰,87年8月6版。
    23.蔡文旭,「代理問題之實證研究-以國內上市公司為研究對象」,國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文,民國80年6月。
    24.賴源河,「實用商事法精義」,台北,五南圖書出版公司,民國74年11月再版。
    25.盧坤泉,「產業市場結構與經營績效關係之研究」,私立逢甲大學保險學研究所碩士論文,民國87年6月。
    26.戴淵明,「公司控制型態與其經營績效關係之研究-台灣地區上市公司之實證分析」,民國75年6月。
    27.謝淑娟,「以權益代理問題的觀點探討股權結構與公司經營績效之關係以台灣上市公司實證」,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,民國83年6月。
    28.顏月珠,「商用統計學」,台北,三民書局,民國77年3月。
    二、英文部分
    1.Aggarwal, R., and R.P. Rao,〝Institutional Ownership and Distribution of Equity Returns.〞The Financial Review, Vol.25.No.2,pp.211-229, 1990.
    2.Agrawal, A., and C.R. Knoeber, 〝Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders.〞Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.31,No.3,pp.377-397, September 1996.
    3.Barnea, A., R.A. Haugen and L.W. Senbet,〝Market Imperfections, Agency Problem, and Capital Structure: A Review.〞Financial Management, pp.7-22, Summer 1981.
    4. Black, K, JR. and Skipper. H, JR., Life & Health Insurance, 13th edition, Phiuticehall, 2000.
    5.Boudreaux, K.J.,〝Managerialism and Risk-Return Performance.〞Southern Economic Journal, Vol.40,pp.366-373, 1973.
    6.Brickley,J.A., R.C. Lease and C.W. Smith,Jr., 〝Ownership Structure and Voting on Anti-takeover Amendments.〞Journal of Finance Economics, Vol.20,pp.267-291, 1988.
    7.Chaganti, R., and F. Damanpour,〝Institutional Ownership, Capital Structure, and Firm Performance.〞Strategic Management Journal,Vol.12,pp.479-491, 1991.
    8.Colquitt, L.L., W.S. David, and H.G. Norman,〝Determinants of Cash Holdings by Property-Liability Insurers.〞Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol.66,No.3,pp.401-415, 1999.
    9.Demsetz, H, 〝The Structure of Corporate Ownership and the Theory of the firm.〞Journal of Political Economic, Vol.26,pp.375-390, 1983.
    10.Demsetz, H. and K. Lehn,〝The Structure of Corporate Ownership:causes and Consequences.〞Journal of Political Economy, Vo1.93,pp.1155-1177, 1985.
    11.Donaldson, L., and J.H. Davis,〝Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory:CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns.〞Australian Journal of Management, Vol.16. No.1,pp.49-64, 1991.
    12.Drucker, Peter F.,〝The New Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility.〞 California Management Review, Vol.26,pp(.53-63, 1984.
    13.Easterbrook, F.H.,〝Two Agency-Cost Explanation of Dividends.〞American Economic Review, Vol.74,pp.650-659,1984.
    14.Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 〝Agency Theory:Assessment and Review.〞Academy of Management Review, Vol.14,No.1, pp.57-74, 1989.
    15.Fama,E.F. and M.C. Jensen, 〝Separation of Ownership and Control.〞Journal of Law and Economics, Vo1.26,pp.301-325, 1983.
    16.Guesneric, R., P. Piard and P. Rey,〝Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard with Risk Neutral Agents.〞European Economic Review, Vol.33,pp.807-823, 1988.
    17.Hansen, G.S., and C.W.L. Hill,〝Are Institutional Investor Myopic? A Time-series Study of Four Technology-Driven Industry.〞Strategic Management Journal, Vol.12,pp.1-16, 1991.
    18.Herman,E.S. Corporate Control, Corporate Power. Cambridge University Press, 1981.
    19.Hessen, R.,〝The modern Corporation and Private Property:A Reappraisal.〞 Journal of Law and Economic, Vol.26,No.282,(1983), in symposium:Corporation and Private Property.
    20.Hill, W.L. and A.S. Scott,〝Effects of Ownership Structure and Control on Corporate Productivity.〞Academy of Management Journal, Vol.32,No.1,pp.25-46, 1989.
    21.Jensen M.C., and W.H. Meckling,〝Theory of the Firm:Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure.〞Journal of Financial Economics, Vo1.3,pp.305-360, 1976.
    22.Jensen,M. and R.S. Ruback,〝The Market for Corporate Control: Empirical evidence.〞Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.11,pp.5-50, 1983.
    23.Kesner I.F.,〝Directors Stock Ownership and Organization Performance:An Investigation of Fortune 500 Companies.〞Journal of Management, Vo1.13,pp.499-507, 1987.
    24.Kim, W.S., J.W. Lee, and J.C. Francis,〝Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Insider Ownership.〞Financial Review, Vol.23,No.1,pp.53-64, 1988.
    25.Lloyd, W.P., J.S. Jahera and S.J. Goldstein,〝The Relation Between Returns, Ownership Structure and Market Value.〞Journal of Financial Research, Vol9,No.2,pp.171-177,1986.
    26.Madden, G.P.,〝The Separation of Ownership From Control and Investment Performance.〞Journal of Economics and Business, Vol.34,pp.149-152, 1982.
    27.McConnell , J.J., and S. Henri,〝Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value.〞Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.27,pp.595-612, 1990.
    28.McEachern, W.A. 〝Corporate Control and Risk.〞Economic Inquiry, pp.270-278, 1976.
    29.Mckean, J.R. and J.J. Kania,〝An Industry Approach to Owner-Manager Control and Profit Performance.〞Journal of Business, Vol.51,pp.327-341, 1978.
    30.Mohd, M.A., L. G. Perry, and J.N. Rimbey,〝The Impact of ownership structure on Corporate debt Policy: A time-series cross-session analysis.〞 Financial Review, Vol.33,No.3, pp,85-98, August 1998.
    31.Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny,〝Management Ownership and Market Valuation:AN Empirical Analysis.〞Journal of Financial Economics, Vo1.20,pp.293-315, 1988.
    32.Moyer, R.C., E.C. Rober, and M.S. Phillip,〝Security Analyst Monitoring Activity: Agency Costs and Information Demands.〞Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.24,pp.503-512, 1989.
    33.Murali, R., and B.W. Johnathan〝Agents, Owners, Control and Performance.〞 Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol.16,pp.385-398, 1989.
    34.Norburn, D., and S. Birley,〝The Top Management Team and Corporate Performance.〞Strategic Management Journal, Vol.9, pp.235-237, 1988.
    35.Oswald, S. L., and Jr. Jahera,〝The Influence of Ownership on Performance : An Empirical Study.〞Strategic Management Journal,Vol.12,pp.321-326, 1991.
    36.Oviatt, B.m.,〝Agency and Transaction Cost Perspectives on the Manager-Shareholder Relationship:Incentives for Congruent Interests.〞Academy of Management Review, Vol.13. No.2,pp.214-225, 1988.
    37.Palmer, J.,〝The Profit Performance Effects of the Separation of Ownership from Control in Large U.S. Industrial Corporations.〞Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, pp.293-303, spring 1973.
    38.Pfeffer, J.,〝Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors:the Organization and its Environment.〞Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.17,pp.218-228, 1972.
    39.Pound,J.,〝Proxy Contests and The Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight.〞 Journal of Financial Economics, VOl.20,pp.237-265. 1988.
    40.Rechner, P.L., and D.R. Dalton,〝CEO Duality and Organizational Performance:A Longitudinal Analysis.〞Strategic Management Journal, Vol.12, pp.155-160, 1991.
    41.Schellenger,M.H., D.D, Wood, and A. Tashakori,〝Boards of Directors Composition. Shareholder Wealth, and Dividend Policy.〞Journal of Management, Vol.15,pp.457-467, 1989.
    42.Sorensen R.,〝The Separation of Ownership and Control and Firm performance: An Empirical Analysis.〞Southern Economic Jouranl, Vol.41,pp.145-148, 1974.
    43.Szewczyk, S.H., G.P. Tsetsekos, and R. Varma,〝Institutional Ownership and the Liquidity of Common Stock Offerings.〞The Financial Review, Vol.27,No.2,pp.211-225, 1992.
    44.Terrie E.T. and E.G, Bouchie, Property-Liability Insurance Accounting and Finance, 3rd edition, American Institute of Insurance, 1990.
    45.Thomas, A.B.,〝Does Leadership Make a Difference to Organizational Performance?〞Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.33,pp.388-400, 1988.
    46.Ware, R.F.,〝Performance of Manager-control versus Owner-controlled Firm in the Food and Beverage Industry.〞Quarterly review of Economics and Business, Vol.15,pp.81-82, 1975.
    47.Weisbach, M.S.,〝Outside Directors and Ceo Turnover.〞Journal of Financial Economics, Vol,20,pp.431-460,1988.
    48.Wong, K.A.,〝Board Ownership, Market Risk and Corporate Value.〞Journal of Financial Studies, Vol.1,pp.93-101, 1993.

    QR CODE
    :::