跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃驛凱
Huang, Yi-Kai
論文名稱: 以兩階段估計之 Dynamic Nelson–Siegel 模型建構極端利率風險情境:ICS 2.0 下壽險業最適資產配置
Constructing Extreme Interest Risk Scenarios Using the Two–Step Dynamic Nelson–Siegel Model: Optimal Asset Allocation for Life Insurers under ICS 2.0
指導教授: 楊曉文
口試委員: 黃泓智
宮可倫
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 金融學系
Department of Money and Banking
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 66
中文關鍵詞: 最適資產配置ICS 2.0Dynamic Nelson–Siegel 模型資產負債管理市場風險資本
外文關鍵詞: Optimal Asset Allocation, ICS 2.0, Dynamic Nelson–Siegel Model, Asset Liability Management, Market Risk Capital
相關次數: 點閱:11下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著我國導入 IFRS 17 與新一代清償能力制度,保險公司之資產負債評價逐漸轉向經濟價值基礎,資產配置亦須同時考量投資績效、風險資本及資本適足性,因此,本研究依據 ICS 2.0 規範建構結合利率期限結構模型、資產負債評價與市場風險資本之分析架構,探討壽險公司於資本限制下的最適資產配置問題。
    本文首先採用兩階段法估計之 Dynamic Nelson–Siegel 模型估計及預測美國公債殖利率曲線,接著建構均值回歸、水平上升及水平下降等利率加壓情境,作為資產負債評價之基礎。在資產配置方面,本文建立僅配置公債之模型一及納入 S&P 500 股票部位之模型二,並計算市場風險資本,以比較不同資產配置架構下之投資績效與資本適足性。最後,以一年期經濟利潤 (Economic Profit) 作為最適化目標,在風險資本限制下搜尋最適投資組合。
    研究結果顯示,利率下降情境對壽險公司自有資金之影響最為顯著,反映資產負債存續期間配置對資本適足性的重要性。模型一主要透過不同到期期間公債之搭配平衡投資收益與利率風險;模型二納入股票後雖能提升投資績效與經濟利潤,同時亦增加權益風險資本,使資本適足性受到壓縮,而公債期限結構亦隨之調整,但中長天期公債仍維持重要地位,顯示股票並非單純取代固定收益資產。整體而言,ICS 2.0 架構下之壽險資產配置已由傳統報酬與風險之權衡,進一步轉變為投資報酬、風險資本與資本適足性之整合性決策問題。


    With the adoption of IFRS 17 and TW–ICS in Taiwan, insurers’ asset-liability valuation has shifted to economic value basis. Asset allocation therefore needs to consider investment performance and risk capital simultaneously. Based on ICS 2.0 framework, this study develops a framework integrating term structure modeling, asset-liability valuation, and market risk capital to investigate optimal asset allocation for life insurers under capital constraints.
    This study applies the Dynamic Nelson–Siegel model, estimated using a two–step method, to estimate and forecast the U.S. Treasury yield curve and construct stress scenarios. Two asset allocation models are examined: Model 1 invests only in government bonds; Model 2 additionally includes an S&P 500 equity position. One-year economic profit is adopted as the optimization objective under risk capital constraints.
    The results indicate that level down scenario has the greatest impact on insurers’ own funds. Model 1 balances investment returns and interest rate risk through government bonds of different maturities; Model 2 improves investment performance but also increases equity risk capital and reduces capital adequacy. Long–term government bonds remain important in the optimal portfolio, indicating that equities do not replace fixed-income assets.

    第一章 緒論 1
    第二章 文獻回顧 6
    第三章 保險資本標準 ICS 11
    第四章 研究方法 18
    第五章 研究結果與分析 33
    第六章 結論與建議 61
    參考文獻 64

    張士傑、葉永濬、李彥寬 (2025). 台灣壽險業新一代清償能力制度下資產配置與監理措施分析. 中山管理評論. 預刊登文章.
    財團法人保險事業發展中心 (2025a). 2024 年臺灣壽險業市場概況.
    財團法人保險事業發展中心 (2025b). 2025 上半年臺灣壽險業市場概況.
    財團法人保險事業發展中心 (2025c). 人身保險業財務統計. https://www.tii.org.tw/export/sites/tii/information/files/5-1.114.pdf.
    Björk, T. and Christensen, B. J. (1999). Interest Rate Dynamics and Consistent Forward Rate Curves. Mathematical Finance, 9(4):323–348.
    Braun, A., Schmeiser, H., and Schreiber, F. (2017). Portfolio Optimization under Solvency II: Implicit Constraints Imposed by the Market Risk Standard Formula. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 84(1):177–207.
    Braun, A., Schmeiser, H., and Schreiber, F. (2018). Return on Risk-Adjusted Capital under Solvency II: Implications for the Asset Management of Insurance Companies. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice, 43:456–472.
    Cox, J. C., Ingersoll, J. E., and Ross, S. A. (1985). A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates. Econometrica, 53(2):385–407.
    De Pooter, M. (2007). Examining the Nelson–Siegel Class of Term Structure Models: In-Sample Fit versus Out-of-Sample Forecasting Performance. SSRN Working Paper 992748, Social Science Research Network.
    Diebold, F. X. and Li, C. (2006). Forecasting the Term Structure of Government Bond Yields. Journal of Econometrics, 130(2):337–364.
    Diebold, F. X., Rudebusch, G. D., and Aruoba, S. B. (2006). The Macroeconomy and the Yield Curve: A Dynamic Latent Factor Approach. Journal of Econometrics, 131(1–2):309–338.
    Eling, M. and Schmeiser, H. (2010). Insurance and the Credit Crisis: Impact and Ten Consequences for Risk Management and Supervision. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 35(1):9–34.
    Fong, H. G. and Vasicek, O. A. (1984). A Risk Minimizing Strategy for Portfolio Immunization. The Journal of Finance, 39(5):1541–1546.
    Gatzert, N. and Martin, M. (2012). Quantifying Credit and Market Risk under Solvency II: Standard Approach versus Internal Model. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 51(3):649–666.
    Gilli, M., Große, S., and Schumann, E. (2010). Calibrating the Nelson–Siegel–Svensson Model. Working Paper 31, COMISEF. Available at SSRN 1676747.
    Höring, D. (2013). Will Solvency II Market Risk Requirements bite? the Impact of Solvency II on Insurers’ Asset Allocation. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 38(2):250–273.
    IAIS (2006). Issues Paper on Asset-Liability Management. International Association of Insurance Supervisors.
    IAIS (2024a). Instructions for the April 2024 Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) Data Collection Exercise of the Monitoring Period Project. Technical specifications, International Association of Insurance Supervisors, Basel, Switzerland.
    IAIS (2024b). Insurance Capital Standard Level 1 and Level 2 Texts. Technical report, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland. Adopted on 5 December 2024.
    Ibáñez, F. (2015). Calibrating the Dynamic Nelson–Siegel Model: A Practitioner Approach. MPRA Paper 68377, University Library of Munich.
    Kimball, R. C. (1998). Economic Profit and Performance Measurement in Banking. New England Economic Review, pages 35–53.
    Koopman, S. J., Mallee, M. I. P., and Van der Wel, M. (2010). Analyzing the Term Structure of Interest Rates using the Dynamic Nelson–Siegel Model with Time-Varying Parameters. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 28(3):329–343.
    Kouwenberg, R. (2018). Strategic Asset Allocation for Insurers under Solvency II. Journal of Asset Management, 19:447–459.
    Macaulay, F. R. (1938). Some Theoretical Problems Suggested by the Movements of Interest Rates, Bond Yields and Stock Prices in the United States since 1856. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), New York.
    Nelson, C. R. and Siegel, A. F. (1987). Parsimonious Modeling of Yield Curves. Journal of Business, 60(4):473–489.
    Redington, F. M. (1952). Review of the Principles of Life-Office Valuations. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 78(3):286–340.
    Shiu, E. S. W. (1987). On the Fisher–Weil Immunization Theorem. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 6(4):259–266.
    Smith, A. and Wilson, T. (2001). Fitting Yield Curves with Long Term Constraints. Technical report, Bacon & Woodrow.
    Svensson, L. E. O. (1994). Estimating and interpreting Forward Interest Rates: Sweden 1992–1994. IMF Working Paper WP/94/114, International Monetary Fund (IMF).
    Van Bragt, D., Steehouwer, H., and Waalwijk, B. (2010). Market Consistent ALM for Life Insurers–steps Toward Solvency II. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 35(1):92–109.
    Vasicek, O. (1977). An Equilibrium Characterization of the Term Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2):177–188.

    QR CODE
    :::