跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉昀臻
Liu, Yun-Zhen
論文名稱: 企業累積碳排放強度變化、永續經濟活動與營業風險之關聯性研究
The Relationship among Cumulative Carbon Emission Intensity, Sustainable Economic Activities, and Operational Risk
指導教授: 翁嘉祥
口試委員: 翁嘉祥
黃祥宇
黃政二
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 會計學系
Department of Accounting
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 69
中文關鍵詞: 累積碳排放強度永續經濟活動營業風險
外文關鍵詞: Cumulative Carbon Emission Intensity, Sustainable Economic Activity, Operational Risk
相關次數: 點閱:33下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著永續氣候議題與轉型風險日益受到重視,各國政府相繼推出更嚴格的氣候相關法規,企業所面臨的碳排放管理壓力也與日俱增。在此背景下,如何有效降低碳排放、同時維持穩定的財務表現,已成為企業經營的重要課題。然而,現有研究多聚焦於單一年度的靜態碳排放水準,較少探討企業長期累積的減碳努力是否真正降低了其面臨的營運風險。此外,在永續金融制度快速發展的背景下,永續經濟活動等制度性分類標準能否強化市場對企業減碳成效的認可,亦尚缺乏系統性的實證研究。
    本研究以自然資源基礎觀點(Natural-Resource-Based View, NRBV)為理論核心,探討企業累積三年碳排放強度變化、永續經濟活動認定與企業營業風險之間的關係,並進一步檢視永續經濟活動認定能否強化累積減碳成效對降低營業風險的效果。研究以2018至2022年台灣上市櫃公司為樣本,進行全產業分析,並進一步針對鋼鐵業與水泥業兩大高碳排產業建構子樣本進行檢驗。營業風險以資產報酬率標準差與個股報酬特有波動度三年平均值兩種代理變數加以衡量。
    實證結果顯示,在全產業樣本中,企業累積碳排放強度的改善能顯著降低未來的盈餘波動,顯示長期減碳能力已在內部財務穩定性上產生可量測的效益。在高碳排產業的永續經濟活動認定的直接效果上,僅達最低認定門檻的企業,其市場特有波動度反而較高,顯示處於轉型初期的企業短期內面臨較高的市場不確定性。在調節效果上,永續經濟活動認定確實能強化累積碳排改善對降低盈餘波動的邊際效果,但在市場特有風險的定價層面,受限於制度推行初期的訊號可信度不足與代理衝突的干擾,調節效果尚未能穩健顯現。


    As climate regulations tighten globally, firms face mounting pressure to manage carbon emissions while maintaining stable financial performance. Yet existing research has largely focused on static, single-period carbon emission levels, leaving open the question of whether long-term, cumulative carbon abatement efforts genuinely reduce operational risk. Moreover, whether institutional sustainability classifications, such as sustainable economic activity (SEA) recognition, can strengthen market confidence in firms' carbon reduction achievements remains empirically underexplored.
    Drawing on the Natural-Resource-Based View, this study examines the relationships among cumulative three-year carbon emission intensity change, SEA recognition, and corporate operational risk, and tests whether SEA recognition moderates the risk-reducing effect of cumulative carbon abatement. Using Taiwan-listed firms from 2018 to 2022, the study conducts both a full-industry analysis and a sub-sample analysis focused on the steel and cement sectors. Operational risk is proxied by the standard deviation of return on assets and the three-year average idiosyncratic volatility.
    Results show that cumulative carbon intensity improvements significantly reduce future earnings volatility in the full sample. In high-carbon industries, firms at the minimum SEA threshold exhibit higher idiosyncratic volatility, reflecting elevated market uncertainty during early-stage transition. SEA recognition amplifies the marginal risk-reducing effect of carbon abatement on earnings volatility; however, its moderating effect on market-level risk pricing remains inconclusive, constrained by nascent institutional credibility and persistent agency conflicts.

    第一章 緒論 1
    一、研究動機與目的 1
    第二章 文獻探討 6
    一、累積碳排放強度與營業風險之關係 6
    二、永續經濟活動與營業風險之關係 10
    三、永續經濟活動認定對營業風險與累積減碳成效的調節效果 14
    第三章 研究方法 17
    一、資料來源與樣本選取 17
    二、實證模型與變數衡量 22
    第四章 實證結果分析 30
    一、敘述性統計與相關性分析 30
    二、實證迴歸結果 39
    三、穩健性測試 45
    第五章 研究結論及建議 52
    一、研究結論 52
    二、研究限制及未來建議 54
    參考文獻 56
    附錄 61

    行政院環境保護署 (2022)。環保署公告修正「第一批應盤查登錄溫室氣體排放量之排放源」,環境部新聞專區。
    https://enews.moenv.gov.tw/page/3b3c62c78849f32f/1cae0b25-67a4-4fd1-900d-4ff527f88645
    金融監督管理委員會 (2024)。永續經濟活動認定參考指引(第二版)。https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202412310005&dtable=News
    環境部氣候變遷署 (2026)。國家溫室氣體排放統計。氣候公民對話平台。取自 https://www.cca.gov.tw/climatetalks/emission-and-reduction/national/1867.html
    郭怡萱(2020)。ESG 績效對公司風險之影響〔碩士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/r5fh7u
    Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451–4469. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043
    Al Rabab’a, E. A., Rashid, A., Shams, S., & Bose, S. (2024). Corporate carbon performance and firm risk: Evidence from Asia-Pacific countries. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, Article 100427.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2024.100427
    Aswani, J., Raghunandan, A., & Rajgopal, S. (2024). Are carbon emissions associated with stock returns? Review of Finance, 28(1), 75–106.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfad013
    Atilgan, Y., Demirtas, K. O., Edmans, A., & Gunaydin, A. D. (2023). Does the carbon premium reflect risk or mispricing? (Working Paper). SSRN.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4573622
    Azzone, G., & Manzini, R. (1994). Measuring strategic environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 3(1), 1–14.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3280030101
    Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
    Benlemlih, M., Shaukat, A., & Qiu, Y. (2018). Environmental and social disclosures and firm risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 613–626.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3285-5
    Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517–549.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008
    Busch, T., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2011). How hot is your bottom line? Linking carbon and financial performance. Business & Society, 50(2), 233–265.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650311398780
    Cespa, G., & Cestone, G. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(3), 741–771.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00156.x
    Chang, Y., Du, X., Zeng, Q. (2021). Does environmental information disclosure mitigate corporate risk? Evidence from China. J. Contemp. Account. Econ. 17, 100239.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2020.100239
    Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64
    Downar, B., Ernstberger, J., Reichelstein, S., Schwenen, S., & Zaklan, G. (2021). The impact of carbon disclosure mandates on emissions and financial operating performance. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(4), 1137–1175.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09611-x
    Freeman, R. E., & McVea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management (Darden Business School Working Paper No. 01-02). SSRN.
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.263511
    Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777-798. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.18378878
    Guo, L., Liu, Y., Jiang, Z., Yuan, X., & Jing, Q. (2025). Impact of land prices on corporate carbon emission intensity. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 3632.
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86102-y
    Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.
    https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033
    Heal, G. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: An economic and financial framework. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 30(3), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.gpp.2510037
    He, F., Qin, S., Liu, Y., & Wu, J. G. (2022). CSR and idiosyncratic risk: Evidence from ESG information disclosure. Finance Research Letters, 49, Article 102936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102936
    Heinkel, R., Kraus, A., & Zechner, J. (2001). The effect of green investment on corporate behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676219
    Hoffmann, V. H., & Busch, T. (2008). Corporate carbon performance indicators. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(4), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00066.x
    Jung, H., Lee, J., & Song, C. K. (2023). Carbon productivity and volatility. Finance Research Letters, 56, Article 104052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104052
    Kabir, M. N., Rahman, S., Rahman, M. A., & Anwar, M. (2021). Carbon emissions and default risk: International evidence from firm-level data. Economic Modelling, 103, 105617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105617
    Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020). The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1067–1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz137
    Lee, D. D., & Faff, R. (2009). Corporate sustainability performance and idiosyncratic risk: A global perspective. Financial Review, 44(2), 213–237.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2009.00216.x
    Lee, S. Y., & Min, H. 2015. Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114.
    Lioui, A., & Sharma, Z. (2012). Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Disentangling direct and indirect effects. Ecological Economics, 78, 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.004
    Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2014). Does voluntary carbon disclosure reflect underlying carbon performance? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 10(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2014.08.003
    Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. (2014). Firm-Value Effects of Carbon Emissions and Carbon Disclosures. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 695–724. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24468367
    McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.https://doi.org/10.5465/256342
    Nipper, M., Ostermaier, A., & Theis, J. (2025). Mandatory disclosure of standardized sustainability metrics: The case of the EU Taxonomy Regulation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(2), 2171-2190. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.15576
    Olson, E. G. (2008). Creating an enterprise-level "green" strategy. Journal of Business Strategy, 29(2), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660810858125
    Perera, K., Kuruppuarachchi, D., Kumarasinghe, S., & Suleman, M. T. (2023). The impact of carbon disclosure and carbon emissions intensity on firms' idiosyncratic volatility. Energy Economics, 128, Article 107053.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107053
    Pérez, L., Hunt, V., Samandari, H., Nuttall, R., & Biniek, K. (2022). Does ESG really matter—and why? McKinsey Quarterly, 2022(3), 1–9.
    Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
    Preston, L. E., & O’Bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business & Society, 36(4), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600406
    Sindhi, S., & Kumar, N. (2012). Corporate environmental responsibility – transitional and evolving. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 23(6), 640–657. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777831211262927
    Spence, M. (1978). Job market signaling. In P. Diamond & M. Rothschild (Eds.), Uncertainty in economics (pp. 281–306). Academic Press.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-214850-7.50025-5
    Trinks, A., & Hille, E. (2026). Carbon costs and industrial firm performance: Evidence from international microdata. Energy Economics, 153, Article 109077.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.109077
    Trinks, A., Ibikunle, G., Mulder, M., & Scholtens, B. (2022). Carbon intensity and the cost of equity capital. The Energy Journal, 43(2), 181–214.
    https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.43.2.atri
    Trinks, A., Mulder, M., & Scholtens, B. (2020). An efficiency perspective on carbon emissions and financial performance. Ecological Economics, 175, Article 106632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106632.
    Tzouvanas, P., Kizys, R., Chatziantoniou, I., & Sagitova, R. (2020). Environmental disclosure and idiosyncratic risk in the European manufacturing sector. Energy Economics, 87, Article 104715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104715
    Yang, Z., Huong, N. T. T., Nam, N. H., Nga, N. T. T., & Thanh, C. T. (2020). Greenwashing behaviours: Causes, taxonomy and consequences based on a systematic literature review. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(5), 1486–1507. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.13225
    Zhang, Q., Hu, Z., Zhang, Z., & Zhao, R. (2025). Carbon emission and idiosyncratic risk: Role of environmental regulation and disclosure. International Review of Financial Analysis, 105, Article 104419.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104419

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2028/06/30
    QR CODE
    :::