| 研究生: |
賴怡君 |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
定錨效果內在機制之探討--無意識層次與意識層次的定錨效果 |
| 指導教授: |
顏乃欣
Yen,Nai-Shing |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
理學院 - 心理學系 Department of Psychology |
| 論文出版年: | 2004 |
| 畢業學年度: | 92 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 78 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 定錨效果 、無意識層次 、意識層次 、定錨效果的量測 、錨點極端性 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:261 下載:158 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究主要探討定錨效果內在機制中,無意識歷程與意識歷程定錨效果的區分。在實驗一中,利用快速呈現的研究典範,發現即使是在受試者沒有意識到錨點的情況下仍然會有定錨效果的發生。實驗二中則同時操弄時間壓力與意識層次,結果發現透過無意識歷程產生的定錨效果,時間壓力的有無並不會造成定錨效果大小的差異;而透過意識歷程產生的定錨效果,則在有時間壓力的情況下,會有比較大的定錨效果。實驗三則釐清以往研究所探討「錨點極端性對定錨效果的影響」中許多不一致的結果,認為以往研究結果的歧異有可能是由於所使用的量測方式不適當的原因所導致,當採用修正後的量測方式「調整指數」去重新計算定錨效果,並利用讓受試者寫下訊息的方式以了解產生訊息的性質與數量,結果發現當錨點越極端時,受試者所搜尋到目標與錨點一致的訊息就越少,定錨效果也就會越小。實驗四中同時操弄時間壓力與錨點極端性,結果發現沒有時間壓力時,錨點越極端其定錨效果越小;而當有時間壓力時,錨點極端性就不會產生效果。以上結果由無意識層次及意識層次的角度來討論所有的定錨現象。
摘要………………………………………………………………………Ⅰ
目錄………………………………………………………………………Ⅱ
圖目錄……………………………………………………………………Ⅳ
表目錄……………………………………………………………………Ⅴ
緒論…………………………………………………………………………1
文獻探討……………………………………………………………………4
定錨現象的相關研究…………………………………………………4
各理論模式對定錨效果的解釋……………………………………………5
無意識訊息對決策判斷的影響………………………………………12
修正的整合模式………………………………………………………15
定錨效果的量測………………………………………………………27
研究假設………………………………………………………………30
前測…………………………………………………………………………33
實驗一………………………………………………………………………36
實驗二………………………………………………………………………39
實驗三………………………………………………………………………45
實驗四………………………………………………………………………51
綜合討論……………………………………………………………………55
參考文獻……………………………………………………………………62
附錄…………………………………………………………………………67
附錄一、研究所使用的問題…………………………………………67
附錄二、前測實驗指導語……………………………………………68
附錄三、實驗一指導語………………………………………………69
附錄四、實驗二指導語-未覺知無意識無時間壓力組………………70
附錄五、實驗二指導語-未覺知無意識有時間壓力組………………71
附錄六、實驗二指導語-注意無意識無時間壓力組…………………72
附錄七、實驗二指導語-注意無意識有時間壓力組…………………73
附錄八、實驗二指導語-注意意識無時間壓力組……………………74
附錄九、實驗二指導語-注意意識有時間壓力組……………………75
附錄十、實驗三指導語………………………………………………76
附錄十一、實驗四指導語無時間壓力組……………………………77
附錄十二、實驗四指導語有時間壓力組……………………………78
林志皇(2001)。「影響定錨效果的因素」。國立中正大學心理學研究所
未發表之碩士論文。
蕭湘如,李玉惠(2000)。錨點個數與錨點一致性對定錨效果的影響。
「中華心理學刊」,42, 155-170。
Balota, D. A. (1983). Automatic semantic activation and
episodic memory encoding. Journal of Verbal Learning and
Verbal Behavioral, 22, 88-104.
Brewer, N. T., & Chapman, G. B. (2002). The fragile of basic
anchoring effect. Journal of Decision Making, 15, 65-77.
Chapman, G. B., & Bornstein, B. H.(1996). The more you ask for,
the more you get: Anchoring in personal injury verdicts.
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 519-540.
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1994). The limits of
anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 223-
242.
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Anchoring, activation,
and the construction of values. Organizational Behavior and
Human Decision Processes, 79, 115-153.
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). Incorporating the
irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. In T.
Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and
Biases, (pp120-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dupoux, E., Kouider, S., & Mehler, J. (2003). Lexical access
without attention? Explorations using dichotic priming.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 29, 172-184.
Hinsz, V. B., Kalnbach, L. R., & Lorentz, N. R. (1997). Using
judgemental anchors to establish challenging self-set goals
without jeopardizing commitment. Organizational Behavior
and Human Decision Processes,71, 287-308.
Jacowitz, K.E., & Kahnman, D. (1995). Measures of anchoring in
estimation tasks. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 21, 1161-1166.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: a
judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3,
434-454.
Kristensen, H., & Garling, T. (1997). The effects of anchor
points and reference points on negotiation process and
outcome. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 71, 84-94.
Kruger, J. (1999). Lake Wobegon be gone! The “Below-average
effect” and the egocentric nature of comparative ability
judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
77, 221-232.
Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective
discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized.
Science, 207, 557-558.
Marcel, A. J. (1974). Perception with and without awareness.
Paper presented at the meeting of the Experimental
Psychology Society, Stirling, Scotland.
Maule, A. J., & Edland, A. C. (1997). The effect of time
pressure on human judgment and decision making. In R.
Ranyard, W. R. Crozier, & O. Svenson (Eds.), Decision
Making, (pp189-204). New York: Routledge.
Merikle, P. M. (2000). Subliminal perception. In A. E. Kazdin
(Eds.), Encylopedia of Psychology, (Vol.7, pp.497-499). New
York: Oxford University Press.
Merikle, P. M., & Daneman, M. (1998). Psychological
investigations of unconscious perception. Journal of
Consciousness Studies, 5, 5-18.
Merikle, P. M., & Joordens, S. (1997). Measuring unconscious
influences. In J. D. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.),
Scientific Approaches to Consciousness. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Merikle, P. M., Joordens, S., & Stolz, J. Z. (1995). Measuring
the relative magnitude of unconscious influences.
Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 422-439.
Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and
awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal
stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 64, 723-739.
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (1999). Hypothesis-consistent
testing and semantics priming in the anchoring paradigm: A
selective accessibility model. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 35, 136-164.
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2000a). Numeric judgments under
uncertainty: The role of knowledge in anchoring. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 495-518.
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2000b). The use of category and
exemplar knowledge in the solution of anchoring task.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1038-1052.
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2001). The semantics of
anchoring. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 86, 2, 234-255.
Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., & Pfeiffer, T. (2000). Overcoming
the inevitable anchoring effect: Considering the opposite
compensates for selective accessibility. Personality and
Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1142-1150.
Posner, P. G. & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and
cognitive of control. In R. Solso (Ed.), Information
Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium. Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Schwarz, N. (1990). Assessing frequency reports of mundane
behaviors: Contribution of cognitive psychology to
questionnaire construction. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark
(Eds.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Vol.
11. Research Methods in Personality and Social Psychology
(pp.98-119). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Shafir, E. & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2002). Rationality. Annual Review
of Psychology, 53, 491-517.
Strack, F. (1992). The different routes to social judgment:
Experimental versus informational strategies. In L. L.
Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.). The Construction of Social
Judgment (pp.249-275). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Strack, F., & Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic
anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 437-446.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choices.
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99-118.
Tversky, A., & Kahnman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty:
Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
Quattrone, G. A., Lawrence, C. P., Finkel, S. E., & Andrus, D.
C. (1984). Explorations in Anchoring: The Effect of Prior
Range, Anchor Extremity, and Suggestive Hints. Manuscript,
Stanford University.
Wansink, B., Kent, R. J., & Hoch, S. J. (1998). An anchoring
and adjustment model of purchase quantity decisions.
Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 71-81.
Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and
mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and
evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117-142.
Wilson, T. D., Houston, C. E., Etling, K. M. & Brekke, N.
(1996). A new look at anchoring effect: Basic anchoring and
its antecedent. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General, 125, 387-402.
Wong, K. F., & Kwong, Y. Y. (2000). Is 7300m equal to 7.3km?
Same semantics but different anchoring effects.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82,
2, 314-333.