跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 石峻維
Shih, Chun-Wei
論文名稱: 經營判斷法則對企業經營決策之影響
The Impact of the Business Judgment Rule on Corporate Decision-Making
指導教授: 廖柏蒼
Liao, Bo-Tsang
口試委員: 劉連煜
Liu, Len-Yu
潘健民
Pan, Chien-Min
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 會計學系
Department of Accounting
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 142
中文關鍵詞: 經營判斷法則實質盈餘管理研發投入董事責任
外文關鍵詞: Business Judgment Rule, Real Earnings Management, R&D intensity, Directors’ Liability
相關次數: 點閱:48下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 經營判斷法則旨在避免法院以事後觀點過度介入董事之商業決策,並於董事基於充分資訊、善意、無利益衝突且未濫用裁量權之情形下,賦予其經營裁量一定程度之尊重,相較於美國法,我國公司法雖未明文規範經營判斷法則,惟近年最高法院已逐步於判決中援引相關概念,並將其作為審查董事忠實義務與善良管理人注意義務之重要判斷框架。
    本文以最高法院105年度台上字第2206號刑事判決、109年度台上字第4806號刑事判決及112年度台上字第1306號民事判決作為三個事件時點,並以高科技電子產業作為較可能受司法見解影響之公司群體,本文採用事件前後各一年之二組二期 OLS-DID 設計,檢驗高科技電子產業公司在相關判決後,相較於其他產業公司之實質盈餘管理與研發投入是否呈現差異變化。
    實證結果顯示,高科技電子產業公司於部分事件後實質盈餘管理相較於其他產業呈現顯著下降,尤其 2016 年及 2020 年事件後之交乘項呈負向顯著,表示最高法院援引並具體化經營判斷法則後,高科技電子產業公司可能降低透過實際營運活動進行短期盈餘操弄之誘因;相較之下,研發投入之結果並未呈現穩定正向顯著效果,此可能反映研發投入受產業技術週期、公司資源條件與市場需求等因素影響較大,未必能於短期內立即反映司法見解變化。
    本文之研究貢獻在於將公司法上經營判斷法則之討論延伸至企業營運決策與投資決策之實證分析,補充我國經營判斷法則研究中較少涉及之量化證據,並提供司法見解如何影響企業決策行為之初步觀察。


    The business judgment rule limits ex post judicial review of directors’ business decisions and grants deference when directors act on an informed basis, in good faith, and without conflicts of interest or abuse of discretion. Although Taiwan’s Company Act does not expressly codify the rule, the Supreme Court has gradually incorporated related concepts into its review of directors’ fiduciary duties.
    Using three Supreme Court decisions as event points, this study applies a two-group, two-period OLS-DID design to examine changes in real earnings management and R&D intensity. Firms in high-tech electronics industries serve as the treatment group.
    The results show that, following the 2016 and 2020 decisions, high-tech electronics firms exhibit significantly larger relative declines in real earnings management than firms in other industries. However, the results for R&D intensity are not consistently significant. These findings provide preliminary evidence that judicial developments in the business judgment rule are associated with firms’ short-term operating decisions, but not necessarily with long-term investment.

    謝辭 ii
    摘要 iv
    Abstract v
    目錄 vi
    壹、緒論 1
    一、研究背景及目的 1
    二、研究問題 2
    三、研究貢獻 4
    四、研究架構及流程 5
    貳、文獻回顧 7
    一、經營判斷法則 7
    1.經營判斷法則之發展及內涵 7
    2.經營判斷法則之法理基礎 8
    (1)所有權與經營權分離 8
    (2)鼓勵董事承擔風險 9
    (3)避免事後究責 10
    3.經營判斷法則之要件 11
    (1)須為一項經營決策 (A Business Decision)11
    (2)無利害關係且具獨立性(Disinterestedness and Independence) 12
    (3)已盡合理注意(Due Care) 13
    (4)善意(Good Faith) 14
    (5)無濫用裁量權(No Abuse of Discretion) 16
    4.經營判斷法則之經濟意義 16
    5.經營判斷法則於我國實務之運用 17
    (1)幸福人壽案 18
    (2)兆豐案 19
    (3)朝陽人壽案 20
    (4)小結 21
    (5)元立案 22
    (6)力霸案 23
    (7)小結 24
    二、盈餘管理 28
    1.盈餘管理的意義 28
    2.盈餘管理之動機 28
    (1)迎合預期盈餘(Meet or beat expectations, MBE) 28
    (2)薪酬契約 29
    (3)借貸契約 29
    3.盈餘管理之型態 30
    (1)應計盈餘管理 30
    (2)實質盈餘管理 32
    (3)分類移轉 33
    三、研發投入 34
    1.研發投入之經濟意義與衡量方式 34
    2.研發投入、無形資產與資訊不確定性 34
    3.訴訟風險與研發投入 35
    參、研究設計 37
    一、假說發展 37
    二、研究方法 42
    三、研究事件 44
    四、樣本選取 48
    五、研究模型 53
    1.盈餘管理之模型 53
    (1)實質盈餘管理 53
    (2)綜合性實質盈餘管理指標 55
    (3)主要模型 56
    (4)變數解釋 59
    2.研發投入之模型 61
    (1)主要模型 61
    (2)變數解釋 62
    六、主要變數 63
    七、控制變數 65
    肆、實證結果與分析 68
    一、敘述性統計 68
    二、相關矩陣 71
    三、實證結果分析 76
    1.盈餘管理分析 76
    (1)實質盈餘管理指標 76
    (2)過度生產與裁量性支出削減型實質盈餘管理 79
    (3)銷售操弄與裁量性支出削減型實質盈餘管理 83
    2.研發投入分析 87
    伍、額外測試 90
    一、應計盈餘管理 90
    1.裁量性應計數模型 91
    (1)裁量性應計數之計算方式 91
    (2)主要模型 92
    (3)變數解釋 94
    2.樣本選取 96
    3.實證結果 97
    (1)敘述性統計 97
    (2)相關矩陣 99
    (3)實證結果分析 102
    二、研發投入 114
    1.研發投入之模型 114
    (1)主要模型 115
    (2)變數解釋 116
    2.樣本選取 118
    3.實證結果 119
    (1)敘述性統計 119
    (2)相關矩陣 121
    (3)主要實證結果 123
    陸、結論與建議 126
    一、研究結論 126
    二、研究建議 130
    1.對司法實務之建議 130
    2.對公司治理實務之建議 130
    3.對主管機關與制度設計之建議 131
    三、研究限制 132
    四、未來研究方向 134
    參考文獻 135
    外文文獻 135
    中文文獻 140

    外文文獻
    Court Case
    Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 812 (Del. 1984).
    Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 U.S. 288, 56 S. Ct. 466, 80 L. Ed. 688 (1936).
    Beam v. Stewart, 845 A.2d 1040 (Del. 2004)
    Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc., 634 A.2d 361 (Del. 1993).
    Charitable Corporation v. Sutton, Atk. 400, 404–406 (1742).
    In re Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litigation, 906 A.2d 27 (Del. 2006).
    Kamin v. American Express Co., 86 Misc. 2d 809, 383 N.Y.S.2d 807 (1976)
    Percy v. Millaudon, 8 Mart. (n.s.) 68, 78 (La. 1829).
    Rales v. Blasband, 634 A.2d 927 (Del. 1993).
    Resolution Trust Corp. v. Blasdell, 930 F. Supp. 417, 423 (D. Ariz. 1994).
    Smith v. Van Gorkom, 488 A.2d 858 (Del. 1985)
    Sinclair Oil Corp. v. Levien, 280 A.2d 717 (Del. 1971).
    Zapata Corp. v. Maldonado, 430 A.2d 779, 782 (Del. 1981).
    Journal Paper
    Adhikari, B. K., A. Agrawal, and J. Malm. 2019. Do women managers keep firms out of trouble? Evidence from corporate litigation and policies. Journal of Accounting and Economics 67: 202–225.
    Bainbridge, S. M. 2004. The business judgment rule as abstention doctrine. Vanderbilt Law Review 57(1): 83–130.
    Bargeron, L. L., K. M. Lehn, and C. J. Zutter. 2010. Sarbanes-Oxley and corporate risk-taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics 49(1–2): 34–52.
    Bartov, E., D. Givoly, and C. Hayn. 2002. The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33(2): 173–204.
    Barua, A., S. Lin, and A. M. Sbaraglia. 2010. Earnings management using discontinued operations. The Accounting Review 85(5): 1485–1509.
    Bayless, M. 1984. The business judgment rule and the director’s duty of attention: Time for reality. The Business Lawyer 39(4): 1477–1501.
    Bertrand, M., E. Duflo, and S. Mullainathan. 2004. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(1): 249–275.
    Burgstahler, D., and I. Dichev. 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24(1): 99–126.
    Bushee, B. J. 1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review 73(3): 305–333.
    Card, D., and A. B. Krueger. 1994. Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. The American Economic Review 84(4): 772–793.
    Chan, S. H., J. D. Martin, and J. W. Kensinger. 1990. Corporate research and development expenditures and share value. Journal of Financial Economics 26(2): 255–276.
    Cohen, D. A., A. Dey, and T. Z. Lys. 2008. Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre- and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods. The Accounting Review 83(3): 757–787.
    Cohen, D. A., and P. Zarowin. 2010. Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50(1): 2–19.
    Cohen, W. M., and S. Klepper. 1996. Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. The Review of Economics and Statistics 78(2): 232–243.
    Darrough, M., and J. Ye. 2007. Valuation of loss firms in a knowledge-based economy. Review of Accounting Studies 12: 61–93.
    Davis, Y., S. Govindaraj, and K. Suslava. 2024. Does the stock market anticipate events and Supreme Court decisions in corporate cases? Global Finance Journal 60: Article 100946.
    DeAngelo, L. E. 1986. Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes: A study of management buyouts of public stockholders. The Accounting Review 61(3): 400–420.
    Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70(2): 193–225.
    Donelson, D., Elizabeth T., and Christopher G. Y. 2021. The effects of independent director litigation risk. Contemporary Accounting Research 39(2): 982–1022.
    Endiana, I. D. M., and P. D. Kumalasari. 2022. Impact of earning volatility, real earnings management and accruals on investment policy: Evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan 26(4): 791–804.
    Field, L., M. Lowry, and S. Shu. 2005. Does disclosure deter or trigger litigation? Journal of Accounting and Economics 39(3): 487–507.
    Gevurtz, F. A 2004. Earnings management and the business judgment rule: An essay on recent corporate scandals. William Mitchell Law Review 30(4): 1261–1277.
    García Lara, J. M., B. García Osma, and F. Penalva. 2016. Accounting conservatism and firm investment efficiency. Journal of Accounting and Economics 61(1): 221–238.
    Goodman-Bacon, A. 2021. Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Journal of Econometrics 225(2): 254–277.
    Gunny, K. A. 2010. The relation between earnings management using real activities manipulation and future performance: Evidence from meeting earnings benchmarks. Contemporary Accounting Research 27(3): 855–888.
    Gupta, J., N. N. Kushwaha, X. Li, and T. Ebrahimi. 2024. Does firm-Level political risk influence earnings management? Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting: 1165–1198.
    Healy, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7(1–3): 85–107.
    Huang, X., Y. Rui, J. Shen, and G. Y. Tian. 2017. U.S. class action lawsuits targeting foreign firms: The country spillover effect. Journal of Corporate Finance 45: 378-400.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305–360.
    Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29(2): 193–228.
    Kim, I., and D. J. Skinner. 2012. Measuring securities litigation risk. Journal of Accounting and Economics 53(1–2): 290–310.
    Kothari, S. P., A. J. Leone, and C. E. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39(1): 163–197.
    Leahy, J. K. 2015. A decade after Disney: A primer on good and bad faith. University of Cincinnati Law Review 83(3): 859–914.
    Lev, B., and T. Sougiannis. 1996. The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21(1): 107–138.
    Liao, Q., and B. Ouyang. 2019. Shareholder litigation risk and real earnings management: A causal inference. Review of Accounting and Finance 18(4): 557–588.
    MacKinlay, A. C. 1997. Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature 35(1): 13–39.
    Malikov, K., S. Manson, and J. Coakley. 2018. Earnings management using classification shifting of revenues. The British Accounting Review 50(3): 291–305.
    McVay, S. E. 2006. Earnings management using classification shifting: An examination of core earnings and special items. The Accounting Review 81(3): 501–531.
    Rajgopal, S., and M. Venkatachalam. 2011. Financial reporting quality and idiosyncratic return volatility. Journal of Accounting and Economics 51(1–2): 1–20.
    Rogers, J. L., and A. Van Buskirk. 2009. Shareholder litigation and changes in disclosure behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics 47(1–3): 136–156.
    Roychowdhury, S. 2006. Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42(3): 335–370.
    Schipper, K. 1989. Commentary on earnings management. Accounting Horizons 3: 91–102.
    Shahzad, F., S. A. Rauf, I. U. Rehman, A. Saeed, and S. Al Barghouthi. 2017. Earning management strategies of Leveraged family and non-family controlled firms: An empirical evidence. International Journal of Business and Society 18(S3): 503–518.
    Smith, C. W., and R. L. Watts. 1992. The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of Financial Economics 32(3): 263–292.
    Sweeney, A. P. 1994. Debt-covenant violations and managers’ accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17(3): 281–308.
    Veasey, N. 1990. Duty of loyalty: The criticality of the counselor’s role. The Business Lawyer 45: 2065–2072.
    Book Chapter
    Kershaw, D. 2018. The structural dissonance of Delaware’s business judgment rule. In The foundations of Anglo-American corporate fiduciary law, edited by P. B. Miller and A. S. Gold. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 93–133.
    中文文獻
    判決
    臺灣高等法院102年度金上重更(一)字第16號刑事判決。
    臺灣高等法院 105 年度重上字第 973 號民事判決
    最高法院105年度台上字第2206號刑事判決
    最高法院 107 年度台上字第 326 號民事判決
    臺灣高等法院108年度金上訴字第23號刑事判決。
    最高法院 109 年度台上字第4806號刑事判決
    臺灣高等法院 110 年度重上字第 83 號民事判決
    臺灣高等法院臺中分院110年度重上更一字第64號民事判決。
    最高法院 112 年度台上字第173號民事判決
    最高法院 112 年度台上字第1306號民事判決
    最高法院 113 年度台上字第967號刑事判決
    期刊
    方嘉麟,2012,論經營判斷法則於我國法下適用之可能——以明基併購西門子手機部門一案為例,政大法學評論,第128期:261-349。
    李維心,2009,從實務觀點談商業判斷法則之引進,中原財經法學,第22期:129-211。
    邵慶平,2011,商業判斷原則的角色與適用-聯電案的延伸思考,科技法學評論,8卷1期:103-139。
    周振鋒,2017,論商業判斷法則於我國刑事案件之運用,法令月刊,68卷12期:84-105。
    官月緞、簡松源、徐永檳,2008,會計弊案與財務報導保守性-安隆/博達觀察,當代會計,9卷1期:69-106。
    邱忠義,2014,刑法背信罪之信託義務與商業判斷法則──以理性主義為基礎,月旦法學雜誌,第229期:216-227。
    張文瀞,2001,審計品質對上市公司盈餘管理之影響,當代會計,2卷2期:195-214。
    陳明進、李桓伊,2017,產業創新條例限縮投資抵減對企業研究發展支出行為之影響,管理學報,34卷2期:277-305。
    曾淑瑜,2014,銀行法特別背信罪適用爭議,台灣法學雜誌,第261期:55-66。
    黃朝琮,2020,論經營判斷法則之實務見解,中原財經法學,第45期:223-257。
    黃新宗、劉美芳、李國賓,2010,中小企業法律風險之探討,全球管理與經濟,6卷1期:70-83。
    蔡昌憲、溫祖德,2011,論商業判斷法則於背信罪之適用妥當性:評高雄高分院九十六年度金上重訴字第一號判決,月旦法學雜誌,第195期:176-203。
    劉連煜,2007,董事責任與經營判斷法則,月旦民商法雜誌,第17期:178-196。
    劉連煜,2020,董事責任與經營判斷法則的運用-從我國司法判決看經營判斷法則的發展,財金法學研究,3卷1期:1-34。
    戴志傑,2004,公司法上「經營判斷法則」之研究,月旦法學雜誌,第106期:157-176。
    歐進士,1998,我國企業研究發展與經營績效關聯之實證研究,中山管理評論,6卷2期:357-386。
    馬秀如、朱德芳,2023,獨董之變,會計研究月刊,第452期:94-99。
    函釋
    經濟部商業發展署商策字第11401401940號函(2025年3月12日)。有關忠實義務之內涵。
    專書
    劉連煜,2025,現代公司法,台北:新學林。
    金成隆、陳美惠,2020,高等財務會計研究-理論與實證,台北:滄海圖書。
    賴英照,2009,股市遊戲規則,最新證券交易法解析,自版。

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2031/07/23
    QR CODE
    :::