| 研究生: |
楊佩容 |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
台灣高科技廠商市場導向、技術機會主義與創新行為關係之研究 |
| 指導教授: | 陳建維 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 國際經營與貿易學系 Department of International Business |
| 論文出版年: | 2006 |
| 畢業學年度: | 94 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 72 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 技術機會主義 、市場導向 、創新行為 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:195 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
台灣的高科技產業在全球供應鏈中擁有舉足輕重的地位,亦面臨全球化之下所帶來前所未有的激烈競爭。在此瞬息萬變的環境下,創新已成為支持企業生存,進一步帶來差異化優勢的原動力。而企業內部的策略導向主宰著企業的策略擬定,包括創新策略。其中市場導向被學者認為是現代行銷管理和策略的核心之一,它不僅對組織績效有正向影響,更被認為能透過創新來影響組織績效。技術機會主義是一個新興的概念,對企業採用新技術的能力有正向影響,與技術層面的創新息息相關。本研究創新行為分為製程創新、產品創新與管理創新,旨在探討技術機會主義與市場導向對於企業創新行為的影響,並加入技術變動性與市場變動性作為權變因素,檢視其對企業策略導向與創新行為之間關係的影響。
本研究以新竹、南港以及內湖等三個科學園區的積體電路、電腦與周邊設備、通訊、光電、精密機械、生物技術等廠商作為實証研究的對象,有效分析樣本廠商共80家。資料蒐集後分別以信度、效度檢定、迴歸分析等方法來進行實證並驗證本研究所提出之各項假設。研究結果發現:(1)技術機會主義對於企業製程創新行為有正向影響,且環境中技術變動性提高會強化該影響效果;市場變動性提高則會減弱影響效果。(2)技術機會主義對於企業產品創新行為有正向影響,環境中技術變動性不會影響該效果,市場變動性提高則會減弱該效果。(3)市場導向對於企業的產品創新行為沒有正向影響,且環境中技術與市場變動性皆不會影響該效果。(4)市場導向對企業的管理創新行為有正向影響,而環境中的技術與市場變動性皆不會影響該效果。
目錄
目錄…………………………………………………….. ……………... ... I
表目錄…………………………………………………….. ……………... III
圖目錄…………………………………………………….. ……………... IV
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………........... 01
1.1 研究背景與動機……………………………………………………... 01
1.2 研究目的…………………………………………………………….. 03
1.3 研究程序…………………………………………………………….. 03
第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………... 05
2.1 企業創新行為……………………………………………………….. 05
2.2 影響創新行為之公司因素………………………………………….... 12
2.3 高科技產業之定義與特性………………………………………….... 18
2.4 研究架構與假設……………………………………………………... 25
第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………... 33
3.1 研究方法…………………………………………………………….. 33
3.2 問卷設計……………………………………….. …………………... 33
3.3 變數定義與衡量……………………………………………………... 34
3.4 問卷發放…………………………………………………………….. 38
3.5 資料分析………………………………………….…………………. 39
第四章 研究結果………………………………………………………..... 43
4.1 基本資料分析…………………………………….………………..... 43
4.2 信度與效度分析……………………………………………………... 44
4.3 迴歸分析………………………………………….………………..... 50
4.4 發現與討論……………………………………….………………..... 56
第五章 結論與建議……………………………………………………… 59
5-1 研究結論………………………………………….…………………. 59
5-2 研究貢獻……………………………………………………………. 59
5-3 管理義涵……………………………………………………………. 60
5-4 研究限制……………………………………………………………. 60
5-5 後續研究建議……………………………………………………….. 61
附錄
參考文獻……………………………………………………...………….. 63
研究問卷……………………………………………………...………….. 68
中文部份
吳明穎,「我國高科技產業經營績效之研究--以上市電子業為例」,1999。
吳思華,「知識流通對產業創新的影響」,第七屆產業管理研討會,1998。
吳貴民,「市場導向與學習導向對組織創新與組織績效影響之研究--以台灣生化 相關科技產業為例」,靜宜大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,2003。
吳毓蘭,「台灣出口績優產業競爭優勢變動之研究」,國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文,1994。
林文寶,「技術知識整合、知識能量與組織學習對核心競爭力及創新績效關聯性之研究」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文,2001。
林秋霞,「技術機會主義與公司績效之關係」,國立政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文,2003。
林義屏,「市場導向、組織學習、組織創新與組織績效間關係之研究--以科學園區資訊電子產業為例」,國立中山大學企業管理學系博士論文,2001。
洪基超,「創新類型與創新網絡配適對於創新績效影響之研究--以光電產業為例」,輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文,2003。
胡嘉杰,「台灣高科技產業新產品上市之整合性行銷溝通--產品、品牌及產業影響因素之探討」,國立政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文,2003。
莊博文,「技術能力、行銷能力與組織績效關係之研究」,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,2004。
陳建銘,「台灣高科技產業內部策略導向對新產品上市策略與績效影響之研究」,國立台灣政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文,2003。
陳國源,「市場導向、製造策略、顧客滿意度對經營績效影響之研究--以台灣汽車零配件產業為例」,國立成功大學管理學院高階管理碩士在職專班 (EMBA)碩士論文,2004。
黃亮樺,「市場導向、新產品開發策略與新產品創新程度之關係研究」,國立台北
科技大學生產系統工程與管理研究所碩士學位論文,2003。
蔡忠興,「技術創新活動對經營內涵影響之研究─以大陸台商為例」,大葉大學國際企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文,2004。
賴鍾慶,「創新能力的來源及其本身技術商品化績效之影響」,國立中興大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文,2003。
戴泰元,「公司策略、市場導向、推廣活動與績效之關係研究--以台灣電子業為例」,國立台灣政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文,1999。
蘇立暐,「產品創新與市場競爭地位之關係--以台灣行動電話業為例」,逢甲大學企業管理學系碩士班論文,2003。
蘇奕中,「創新策略之效益分析與評估--以資訊電子業為例」,國立中正大學會計學研究所碩士論文,2003。
英文部分
Abernathy W. J., Utterback J. M., 1975, "A Dynamic Model of Process and Product
Innovation", Omega, 3(6): 639-56.
Afuah Allen (1998), Innovation Management--Strategies, Implementation, and Profits:
Oxford University Press
Andrews, Jonlee. and Daniel C. Smith (1996), "In Search of Marketing Imagination: Factors
Affecting the Creativity of Marketing Programs for Mature Products", Journal of
Marketing Research, Vol. 33(2), 17-33.
Avlonitis, Geroge J, Athanassios Kouremenos and Nicos Tzokas (1994), "Assessing the
Innovativeness of Organizations and its antecedents: Products Innovstrat", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 11, 5-28.
Betz, Frederick (1987), Managing Technology-competing Through New Ventures, Innovation,
and Corporate Research. New York:Prentice Hall.
Betz, Frederick (1993), Strategic Technology Management. NewYork:McGraw-Hill.
Chandy, Rajesh K. and Gerard J. Tellis (1998), "Organizing fir Radical Innovation: The
Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize," Journal of Research, 35 (November), 474-87.
Chesbrough, Henry William (2003a), Open Innovation. Harvard University Press:
Cambridge, M.A.
Chesbrough, Henry William (2003b), “The era of open innovation,” Sloan Management Review, Summer: 35-41.
Christensen, Clayton M. (1997), The Innovator's Dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School
Press.
Chuang, Li-Min (2005), "An Empirical Study of the Construction of Measuring Model for
Organizational Innovation in Taiwanese High-tech Enterprises", Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, Mar, Vol. 6 No. 1 pp.299-304.
Cooper, Robert G. and Ulricke de Brentani (1991), "New Industrial Financial Services:
What Distinguishes the Winners", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 8 No. 2, 75-90.
Daft, Richard L. and Karl E. Weick (1984), "Toward a Model of Organizations as
Interpretation Systems," Academy of Management Review," 9(2), 284-95.
Daft, Richard L.(1978), “A Dual-core Model of Organizational Innovation,” Academy of
Management Journal, Vol.21, No. 2, 193-210.
Damanpour, Fariborz, Kathryn A. Szabat, and William M. Evan (1989), “The Relationship
Between Types of Innovation and Organizational Performance’,” Journal of Management Studies, November, 587-601.
Day, George S. (1994), “The capabilities of market-driven organizations,” Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 58 No. 4 , 37-52.
Drucker, Peter Ferdinand (1985), Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles.
Heinemann, London.
Edosomwan, Johnson A. (1989), Integrating Innovation and Technology Management, John
Willy & Sons, Inc., New York, pp.105-121.
Ettlie, John E. and William. P. Bridges (1982), "Environmental Uncertainty and
Organizational Technology Policy,” IEEE Trans. Organizational Management, 29(1), 2-10.
Frankle, E. G. (1990), Management of Technology Change. Kluwer Academic.
Freeman, C. (1991). The nature of innovation and the evolution of the productive system. In
OECD (eds.). Technology and Productivity-the Challenge for Economic Policy. Paris: OECD.
Garcia, Rosanna and Roger Calantone(2002), "A critical look at technological innovation
typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management" Vol. 19 No. 2, 110-132.
Gatignon, Hubert and Jean-Marc Xuereb (1997), "Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New
Product Performance," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 34 No.1, 77-90.
Grupp, Hariolf (1998), Foundations of Economics of Innovatoin: Theory, Measurement, and
Practice, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar PublishingLtd.
Han, Jin ., Namwoon Kim, and Rajendra K. Srivastava (1998), "Market Orientation and
Organizational Performance: Is Innovatoin a Missing Link?" Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62 No.4, 30-45.
Heide, Jan B. and Allen M. Weiss (1995), "Vender Consideration and Swiching Behavior for
Buyers in High-Technology Markets." Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59 No. 3, 30-43
Henard, David H. and David M. Szymanski (2001), "Why Some New Products are More
Successful than Others", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38 No. 3, 362-75.
Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli, (1993) , "Market Orientation: Antecedents and
Consequences," Journal of Marketing, Vol.57, Iss.3, pp. 53-70.
Kawaku Atuahene-Gima (1995), "An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Market
Orientation on New Products Performance: A contingency Approach", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 12 (4), 275-93.
Kohli, A. K. & Jaworski, B. J. (1990),“Market Orientation: The Construct, Research
Propositions, and Managerial Implications”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, pp.1-18.
Kohli, Ajay K., Bernard J. Jaworski, and Ajith Kumar (1993), "MARKOR: A Measure of
Market Orientation," Journal of Marketing Research, 30(November), 467-77.
Kotler, Philip (2000), Marketing Management, 10th ed., Prentice Hall Inc., p.13.
Kuniyoshi Child and Tadao Kagono (1988), Innovation and the Japanese Management
System, Berlin:Walter de Gruyter and Co.
Mansfield, E. (1974), Technology and technological change, Economic Analysis and The
Multinational Enterprise, George Allen & Unwin, 147-183.
Mohr , Jakki J. (2001), Marketing of High-Technology Products and Innovations, Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Moriarty, Rowland and Thomas Kosnik (1989), "High-tech Marketing: Concepts, Continuity,
and Change," Sloan Management Review, 7-17
Naver, John C. and Stanley F. Slater (1990), “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business
Profitability”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 No. 4, 20-36.
Nunnally, Jum. C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2nd Edition, NY: McGraw Hill Inc.
Pierce, Jon L. and Andre L. Delbecq (1997), "Organization Structure, Individual Attitudes
and Innovation," Academy of Management Review, 2(Jan), 27-37
Pisano, Gary P (1990), "The R & D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis,"
Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35 No.1, 153-76.
Porter, Michael E. (1985), Competitive Advantage, New York:Free Press.
Rice, Mark P., Gina Colarelli O'Connor, Lois S Peters, Joseph G Morone (1998), "Managing
Discontinous Innovation", Research Technology Management Vol. 41 No.3, pp. 52-8
Rohit Deshpande, John.U. Farely, and Frederick. E. Webster (1993), "Corporate Culture, Customer Orientatoin, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57 No. 1, 23-37.
Ruekert, Robert W. (1992), “Deveoloping a Market Orienation:An Organizational Strategy
Perspectives,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 9, pp.225-245.
Schilling, Melissa A. (2002), "Technology Success and Failure in Winner-take-all Market:
The Impact of Learning Orientation, Timing and Network Externalities," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45 No.2, 389-98.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development. Boston:Harvard
Business School Press.
Sethi, Rajesh, Daniel C. Smith, and C. Whan Park.( 2001), "Cross-fuctional product
development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of new consumer products", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38 No. 1, 73-85.
Shapiro, Benson P. (1998), "What the Hell Is 'Market Orientation'?" Harvard Business
Review, Vol. 66 No.4, 119-25.
Smith, B. L. R. and Claude E. Barfield (1996), Technology, R&D, and the Economy.
Washington, DC:The Brookings Institution.
Song, X. Michael and Montoya-Weiss, Mitzi M.(1998), " Critical Development Activities for
Really New Versus Incremental Products", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 15 No. 2, 124-35.
Srinivasan, Raji, Gary L Lilien, and Arvind Rangaswamy (2002), "Technological
Opportunism and RadicalTechnology Adoption: An Application to E-Business," Journal of Marketing, Vol.66 No. 3, 47-60.
Trist, E. L.(1981), “The Evolution of Socio-Techniocal Systems as a Conceptual Framwork
and as an Action Research Program in Perspectives,” Organization Design and Behavior, A.H. Van de Ven and W. F. Joyce, eds New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Tushman, Michael L. and David A. Nadler (1986), “Organizing For Innovation,”California
Management Review, vol. 28, 74-92.
Vrakking, Willem J (1990), "The Innovative Organization," Long Range Planning Vol. 23
No. 2, 94-102.
Wang, Catherine L. and Ahmed, Pervaiz K. (2004), "The development and Volidation of the
Organizational Innovativeness Construct using Confirmatory Factor Analysis", European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 7 No.4, 303-13
Zhou, Kevin Zheng, Chi Kin (Bennett) Yim, and David K. Tse (2005), "The Effects of
Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovation", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69 No. 2, 42-60.
Zirger, B.J. (1997), "The Influence of Development Experience and Product Innovativeness
on Product Outcome", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 9 No. 3, 287-97.
此全文未授權公開