| 研究生: |
黃雪玲 |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
認識發展、學習環境與國中學生數理科學業成就之關係 無 |
| 指導教授: | 林邦傑 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
教育學院 - 教育學系 Department of Education |
| 論文出版年: | 1979 |
| 畢業學年度: | 68 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 93 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 無 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:88 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究目的在探討認知發展、學習環境與國中學生數理科學業成就之關係。以國中二年級248名學生為對象,每人均接受皮亞傑認知發展測驗、學習環境量表(LEI)以及數理科成就測驗等三項測驗。結果發現認知發展與數理科成績之相關(.67〜.73)達.01顯著水準,愈是形式操作期的學生,其數理科學業成就愈高。學習環境與數理科成績之相關只在十五個分量表中的滿意度、環境、與民主性等三個量表上達.05顯著水準。這些相關雖顯著,但都偏低(-.14〜-.21)。本研究並建立數理科學業成就之迴歸模式,以認知發展,學習環境、性別等三個預測變項,預測數理科學業成就。結果發現不論對數學、化學,物理或三科總成積的預測,認知發展均為最主要的預測變項。
第一章 緒論1
第一節 前言1
第二節 各名詞的操作定義6
第三節 本研究的假設9
第二章 文獻探討11
第一節 認知發展與數理科學業成就之關係11
第二節 學習環境與數理科學業成就之關係15
第三節 性別與數理科學業成就之關係19
第三章 方去21
1.受試者21
2.工具
(1)皮亞傑認知發展紙筆測驗21
(2)學習環境量表24
(3)國中學業成就測驗33
3.過程33
第四章 結果35
第五章 討論與建議55
參考文獻59
附錄一69
附錄二77
圖表目錄
表一:皮亞傑認知發展測驗項目分析表22
表二:學習環境量表α信度表30
表三:學習環境各分量表之內部相關表31
表四:認知發展測驗、學習環境量表,反成就測驗之平均數和標準差表35
表五:性別、認知發展與數理科成就測驗成績之相關表36
表六:認知發展與各科之相關彼此差異之t值表37
表七:學習環境量表與成就測驗之相關表38
表八:X_2預測數學科之多元相關及迴歸係數表40
表九:X_2+X_1預測數學科之多元相關及迴歸係數表41
表十:預測變項與數學科成就之多元相關係數及變異百分比(R^2%)表43
表十一:X_2+X_1+X_17預測化學科之多元相關次迴歸係數表46
表十二:預測變項與化學科成就之多元相關係數及變異百分比(R^2%)表47
表十三:X_2+X_8+X_17+X_14預測物理科之多元相關及迴歸係數表49
表十四:預測變項與物理科成就之多元相關係數及變異百分比(R^2%)表51
表十五:X_2+X_1預測三科總分之多元相關及迴歸係數表52
表十六:預測變項與三科總分之多元相關係數及變異百分比(R^2%)表54
表十七:「形式性」分量表各項題目與分量表總分之平均數,標準差與相關係數表69
表十八:「凝聚性」分量表各項題目與分量表總分之平均數,標準差與相關係數表69
表十九:「速度性」分量表各項題目與分量表總分之平均數,標準差與相關係數表70
表二十:「目標導向性」分量表各項題目與分量表總分之平均數、標準差與相關係數表70
表二一:「派系性」分量表各項題目與分量表總分之平均數、標準差與相關係數表71
表二二:「滿意度」分量表各項題目與分量表總分之平均數、標準差與相關係數表71
表二三:「多樣性」分量表各項題目與分量表總分之平均數、標準差與相關係數表72
表二四:「衝突性」分量表各項題目與分量表總分之平均數、標準差與相關係數表72
第二五:「環境」分量表各項題目與分量表總分之平均數,標準差與相關係數表73
表二六:「困難度」分量表各項題目與分量表總分之平均數、標準差與相關係數表73
表二七:「民主性」分量表各項題目與分量表總分之平均數,標準差與相關係數表74
表二八:「冷漠度」分量表各項題目與分量表總分之平均數、標準差與相關係數表74
表二九:「組織瓦解度」分量表各項題目與分量表總分之平均數、標準差與相關係數表75
表三十:「競爭性」分量表各項題目與分量表總分之平均數,標準差與相關係數表75
表三一:「偏袒度」分量表各項題目與分量表總分之平均數,標準差與相關係數表76
張春興等 教育心理學(修正版),台北;文景書局,民63年。
Albanese, Mark & Others, “Piagetian Criteria as Predictors of Success in First Year Courses, ” Journal of Chemical Education, 1974, 53(9), 571-572.
Anderson, G. J. & Walberg, H. J. “Classroom Climate and Group Learning,” International Journal of the Educational Sciences, 1968, 2, 175-180.
Anderson, G. J. & Walberg, H. J. and Welch, W. W. “Curriculum Effects on the Social Climate of Learning: A New Representation of Discriminatnt Functions,” American Educational Research Journal, 1969, 6,3, 315-329.
Anderson, G. J. “Effects of Classroom Social Climate on Individual Learning,” American Eductional Research Journal, 1970c, 7, 2, 135-152.
Anderson, G. J. “Effects of Course Content and Teacher Sex on the Social Climate of Learning, “ American Educational Research Journal, 1971, 8, 649-663.
Anderson, G. J. & Walberg, H. J. “ Class Size and the Social Environment of Learning: A Mixed Replication and Extension,” Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1972, 18, 4, 277-286.
Astin, A. W. “Classroom Environment in Different Field of Study,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1965, 56, 275-282.
Backman, M. E. “Patterns of Mental Abilities: Ethnic, Socioeconomic, and Sex Differences,” American Educational Research Journal, 1972, 9, 1-12.
Bany, M. A. & Johnson, L. V. Classroom Group Behavior, New York: MacMillan, 1964.
Bloom, B. S. Stability and Change in Hunan Characteristics, New York: Wiley, 1964.
Brainerd, C. J. “The Development of the Proportionality Scheme in Children and Adolescents, ” Developmental Psychology, 1971, 5, 469-476.
Calonico, J. M. & Calonico, B. A. “Classroom Interaction : A Sociological Approach, Bales Interaction Process Inventory,” Journal of Educational Research, 1972, 66, 165-168.
Chiappetta, E. L. “A Review of Piagettan Studies Relevant to Science Instruction at the Secondary and College Level,” Science Education, 1976, 60(2), 253-261.
Coeniff, D. F. “Student Perceptions of Self-Esteem and Educational Environment,” Dissertation Abstracts, 1972, 32, 4831a.
Dale, L. G. “The Growth of Systematic Thinking: Replication and Analysis of Piaget’s First Chemical Experiment,” Australian Journal of Psychology, 1970, 20, 277-285.
Draper, N. R. & Smith, H. Applied Regression Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, 1966. Elkind, D., Medvine, L., and Rockway, A. S. “Representational Level and Concept Production in Children and Adolescents,” Developmental Psychology, 1970, 2, 85-89.
Enwiemem Xavier Asquo Edet. “The Incidence of Formal Operations of Students in Eight Subject Areas of the Nustep Program at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln Campus,” Dissertation Abstracts, 1976, 37(5): 2761-A.
Flanagan, J. C., Dailey, J. T., Shaycoft, M. F., Gorham, W. A., Orr, D. B., Goldberg, I., and Neyman, C. A., Jr. Counselor’s Technical Manual for Interpreting Test Scores( Projet Talent), Palo Alto, California, 1961.
Flavell, J., The Developmental Psychology of Jean Piaget, New York : Van Nostrand, 1963.
Friot, F. E. “ The Relationship Between an Inquiry Teaching Approach and Intellectual Development,” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oklahoma, 1970.
Getzels, J. W., & Thelon, H. A. “The Classroom as a Unigne Social Social System”, National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, 1960, 59, 53-81.
Harvey, O. J. “Neliefs and Behavior: Some Implications for Education,” Science Teacher, 1970, 37, 10-14.
Hearn, J. C., & Moos, R. H. “Subject Matter and Classroom Climate: A Test of Holland’s Environmental Propositions,” American Educational Research Journal, Winter 1978, 15(1),
111-124.
Higgens-Trenk, A., & Gaite, A. J. H. “Elusiveness of Formal Operational Thought,” Proceedings, 79th Annual Convention, American Psychological Association, 1971, pp. 201-202.
Hilton, T. L., & Berglund, G. W. “Sex Differences in Matematics Achievement-A Longitudinal Study”, Educational Testing Service Research Bulletin, unpublished, 1971.
Holland, J. L. Making Vocational Choice: A Theory of Careers, Englewood Cliffs, New-Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. The Growth of Logical Thinking from Children to Adolescence, New York : Basic Books, 1958.
Karplus, R., Karplus, E. “Intellectual Development Beyond Elementary School I: Deductive Logic, “ School Science and Mathematics, 1970, 5, 398-406.
Karplus, R., & Peterson, R. W. “Intellectual Development Beyond Elementary School II: Ratio A Survey, “ School Science and Mathematics, 1970, 5, 812-820.
Keasey, C. T. “The Nature of Formal Operations in Preadolescence, and Middle age,” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, U. of California, Berkley, 1970.
Keating, D. P., and Stantey, J. C. “Extreme Measmes for the Exceptionally Gifted in Mathematics and Science,” Study of the Mathematically and Scientifically Precocious
Yonth, 1972.
Lawrenz, F. P. “Student Perception of the Classroom Learning Environment in Biology, Chemistry, and Physics Courses, “ Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1976, 13, 315-323.
Lawson, A. E., “ Relationship of Concrete and Formal Operational Science Subject Matter and the Developmental Level of the Learner,” paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching Convention, Chicago, April, 1974.
Lawson, A. E., and Wollman W. T. “Encouraging the Transition from Concrete to Formal Cognitive Functioning-An Experiment ,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1976, 13(5), 461-466.
Longeot, F. “Un essai d' application do la Psychologie genetique a la Psychologie differentielle, 1962, BINOP#3, (Bulletin de L’ Institut National D’ Etude Du Travail et Orientation Professionelle) (An Essay of the Application of Genetic Psychology to Differential Psychology, translated by K. Kelley).
Longeot, F. “Analyse Statistique de Trois Tests Genetiques Collectifs, 1965, BINOP#4, 219-237 (Statistical Analysis of Three Collective Genetic Tests, translated by K. kelley).
Lovell, K. “A Follow-Up Study of Inhelder and Piaget’s The Growth of Logical Thinking,” British Journal of Psychology, 1961, 52, 143-153.
Pace, E. R., & Stern G. G. “An Approach to the Measurement of Psychological Characteristics of College Environments,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1958, 49, 269-277.
Piaget, J., The Psychology of Intelligence, New Jersey: Little- field, Adams and Company, 1966.
Renner, J. W., & Stafford, D. G. Teaching Science in the Secondary School. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1973, pp. 291-296; ibid, pp. 89-90.
Saarni, C. I. “Piagetian Operations and Field Independence as Factors in Children’s Problem-SoIving Performance, ” Child Development, 1973, 44, 338-345.
Sallade, J. W. “An Experimental Study of the Effects of a Planned Environment on the Self-Esteem of Pupils,” Dissertation Abstracts, 1972, 32, 907a.
Sayre, S., and Ball, D. W. “Piagetian Cognitive Development and Achievement in Science, “ Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1975, 12(2), 165-174.
Sheehan, D., “The Effectiveness of Concrete end Formal Instructional Procedures with Concrete and Formal Operational Students,” Ann Arbor, Michigan University Microfilms, 1970.
Steele, J. M., Walberg, H. J., & House, E. R. “Subject Areas and Cognitive Press,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974, 66, 363-366.
Sullivan, E. V. Piaget and the School Curriculum A Critical Appraisal, Toronto: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1967.
Sullivan, E. V., McCullough, G., and Stager, M. “ A Developmental study of the Relationship Between Conceptual, Ego, and Moral Development, “ Child Development, 1970, 41, 399-411.
Svensson, A. Relative achievement School Performance in Relation to Intelligence, Sex and Home Environment, Stockholm: Almguist & Wiksell, 1971.
Terman, L. M., and Oden, M. H., The Gifted Child Grows Up, Stanford University, California: Stanford Univer. Press, 1947.
Tisher, R. P. “A Piagetian Questionnaire Applied to Pupils in a Secondary School, “ Child Development, 1971, 42,1633-1636.
Trickett, E. J., & Moos, R. H. “Generality and Specificity of Student Relations in High School Classroom, “Adolescence, 1970, 5, 373-390.
Tuddenham, R. D. Psychometrizing Piaget’s Method Clinique, Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Convention, Chicago, 1968.
Walberg, H. J. “Structual and Affective Aspects of Classroom Climate,” Psychology in the Schools, 1968, 5, 247-253.
Walberg, H. J., & Anderson, G. J. “The Achievement Creativity Dimension and Classroom Climate,” Journal of Creative Behavior, 1968, 59, 414-419.
Walberg, H. J., & Anderson, G. J. “ Classroom Climate and Individual Learning,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1968b, 59(6), 414-419.
Walberg, H. J. “ Physics, Femininity, and Creativity,” Developmental Psychology, 1969b, 1, 47-54.
Walberg, H. J. “Class Size and the Social Environment of Learning, “ Human Relations, 1969a, 77, 64-70.
Walberg, H. J. & Ahlgren, A. “Predictors of the Social Environment of Learning,” American Educational Research Journal, 1970, 7, 153-167.
Walberg, H. J., & Anderson, G. J. “Properties of the Achieving Urban Classes,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972, 381-385.
Walberg, H. J., Sorenson, J., and Fischbach, T. “Ecological Correlates of Ambience in the Learning Environment,” American Educational Research Journal, 1972, 139-148.
Yager, R. E. “Priorities for Research in Science Educations A Study Committee Report,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1978, 15, 99-107.
Yamamoto, K., Thomas, E. C., & Karns, E. A “School-Related Attitudes in Middle-School Age Students, “ American Educational Research Journal, 1969, 6, 191-206.
此全文未授權公開