跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳雅新
Wu, Ya-Hsin
論文名稱: 預售屋實價登錄對成屋價格之影響-以台中市與台南市為例
The Impact of Pre-Sale House Actual Price Registration on the Existing House Prices: Evidence from Taichung and Tainan
指導教授: 林左裕
Lin, Tso-Yu
口試委員: 彭建文
Peng, Chien-Wen
游舜德
Yuo, Shun-Te
徐士勛
Hsu, Shih-Hsun
林左裕
Lin, Tso-Yu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學學院 - 地政學系
Department of Land Economics
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 77
中文關鍵詞: 實價登錄2.0房價ARDL模型資訊透明度定錨效果
外文關鍵詞: Actual Price Registration 2.0, Housing Price, ARDL Model, Price Transparency, Anchoring Effect
相關次數: 點閱:22下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 台灣房價持續多年居高不下,使民眾購屋的負擔日益增加,因此政府近年實施多項打房政策。其中,自2021年7月1日實施之實價登錄2.0,針對預售屋的資訊揭露與交易管理進行重大修正,無疑對房地產市場產生深遠的影響。因此,本研究藉由探討預售屋實價登錄制度對成屋價格之影響,並以不同房市結構之台中市與台南市為例,檢視實價登錄新制度推動前後,成屋與預售屋市場價格的互相影響情形。了解實價登錄實施後預售屋對成屋影響變化是否有不同,以及資訊透明化對房價的影響。研究採用內政部不動產實價登錄資料,建立2012年第四季至2024年第四季之預售價格季指數,並以內政部住宅價格指數為成屋資料,另外加入相關總體經濟變數。方法上使用自我迴歸分配落後模型ARDL與誤差修正模型ECM,分析預售屋價格對成屋價格之長短期影響,並進行共整合檢定與模型穩健性測試,增加模型的解釋度與可靠性。

    研究結果顯示,台中地區預售屋價格對成屋價格具有顯著正向影響,政策實施後的交乘項亦為顯著正向,顯示預售市場具備穩定的定錨效果,且政策上路後預售屋價格影響力加強。而台中房價同時受消費者物價指數、經濟成長率、股價指數與利率等總體變數顯著影響,反映出市場對景氣與資本市場變動反應敏感,屬資金導向與投資性明顯之市場,其價格修正速度亦高於台南。相較之下,台南地區對預售屋價格長期反應較弱,僅短期顯著,顯示政策應持續加強監管,其總體經濟變數中則以物價指數與建築成本為長期顯著因子,價格更依賴生活成本與供給條件。政策虛擬變數在台中及台南均為長期顯著負向,顯示政策實施後具壓抑價格之效果。此結果呈現兩市的不動產市場差異及政府對房市管制之效果,與兩市分別為投資及自住導向市場相符。

    整體而言,預售屋實價登錄政策對兩市呈現不同結果,顯示預售屋市場資訊透明化,將對不同地區價格形成產生異質性影響。本研究亦補足中南部實證文獻缺口,並指出不同地區應採取差異化政策措施,未來政策推動應考量地方市場結構差異,並強化制度監督與價格透明度,以穩定房市發展。


    In Taiwan, housing prices have continued the rising trend, increasing the financial burden on buyers. In response, the government implemented several housing market regulations, including the Actual Price Registration 2.0 policy in July 2021, which enhanced transaction transparency for pre-sale houses. Therefore, this study examines the impact of the policy on existing house prices, using Taichung and Tainan as a case study due to their distin-ct market structures.

    Using quarterly data from Q4 2012 to Q4 2024, this study constructs price indices for pre-sale and existing houses based on data from the Department of Land Administration, supplemented with macroeconomic indicators such as mortgage rates, stock indices, GDP growth, and construction cost indices. The Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model and the Error Correction Model (ECM) are employed to analyze both short- and long-term relationships between pre-sale and existing house prices. Cointegration tests and model diagnostics are applied to ensure robustness.

    The results indicate that in Taichung, pre-sale housing prices have a significant positive effect on existing house prices, and this effect is further strengthened after the Actual Price Registration 2.0 policy. Taichung's housing prices are also significantly influenced by CPI, GDP growth, stock index, and interest rates, reflecting an investment-driven market with fast price adjustment. In contrast, Tainan shows weaker and delayed responses to pre-sale prices. The policy dummy is significantly negative in the long term, suggesting a suppressive effect on prices. CPI and construction costs are the main long-term drivers in Tainan, indicating a market more sensitive to living costs and policy signals. These results confirm structural differences between the two cities, aligned with their investment- and self-use-oriented market characteristics.

    These findings suggest that the effects of price transparency policies are heterogeneous across regions. Policymakers should consider local market differences and strengthen institutional transparency to promote housing market stability.

    中文摘要 I
    英文摘要 II
    目錄 IV
    圖目錄 VI
    表目錄 VII
    第一章 緒論 1
    第一節 研究動機與目的 1
    第二節 研究範圍 6
    第三節 研究方法 7
    第四節 研究架構與流程 9
    第二章 文獻回顧 12
    第一節 實價登錄制度與其對房市影響 12
    第二節 預售屋對成屋價格影響 17
    第三節 總體經濟變數對房價影響 22
    第四節 小結 31
    第三章 研究設計 33
    第一節 研究設計與流程 34
    第二節 資料說明與變數選取 43
    第四章 實證結果與分析 48
    第一節 基本敘述統計 48
    第二節 時間序列實證結果分析 51
    第三節 模型診斷與穩健性檢定 62
    第四節 小結 67
    第五章 結論與建議 69
    第一節 結論 69
    第二節 建議 71
    參考文獻 72

    一、中文文獻

    余興祐,2023,「價格透明度對房價的影響: 以預售屋市場為例」,臺灣大學社會經濟研究所碩士論文:台北
    昌菖,2016,《貨幣供應量、地價對房價的影響研究——基於35個大中城市統計數據的實證分析》。江蘇社會科學, 2016(6),58
    林秋瑾,1998「預售屋與成屋住宅價格關係之分析—市場效率之驗證」,『管理學報』,15(4):643-664
    林祖嘉、游士儀,2018,「總體經濟對房地產景氣循環不對稱影響之研究—中國大陸之實證分析」,『住宅學報』,27(1):23-46
    林清汶,2020,「不動產交易實價登錄資訊全都露適法性之探討」,『軍法專刊』66(3):33-47
    林新雄,2023,「預售屋實價登錄對房市之影響」,中正大學高階主管管理研究所碩士論文:嘉義
    花敬群、張金鶚,1999,「住宅空間次市場之間成屋與預售屋的價量關係─「振興營建業措施」效應檢討」,『1999年中華民國住宅學會第八屆年會論文集』
    柯秀環,2024,「新成屋與中古屋價格關聯之研究」,臺灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文:台北
    張金鶚、楊宗憲、洪御仁,2008,「中古屋及預售屋房價指數之建立、評估與整合 ─台北市之實證分析」,『住宅學報』,17(2):13-34
    陳柏如,2015,〈臺灣房價與貸款成數、房屋使用者成本相關性的檢驗〉,經濟論文叢刊, 51(2), 225–256
    陳慶陽,2014,「我國不動產交易實價登錄政策之執行與評估」:以臺南市為例,中正大學政治研究所碩士論文:嘉義
    陳隆麒、李文雄(1998)。「臺灣地區房價、股價、利率互動關係之研究-聯立方程模型與向量自我迴歸模型之應用」。『中國財務學刊』,5(4),51-71。
    彭建文、張金鶚,2000,「總體經濟對房地產景氣影響之研究」,『國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學』,10:330-343
    曾昭舜,2016,「預售屋價格發現功能之研究」,屏東大學不動產經營學研究所碩士論文:屏東
    楊宗憲、張金鶚,1999,「成屋與預售屋市場價格泡沫關係之探討」,『1999年中華民國住宅學會第八屆年會論文集』,471-484
    洪淑娟、雷立芬,2010,「中古屋、預售屋∕新成屋房價與總體經濟變數互動關係之研究」,『臺灣銀行季刊』,61(1):155-167
    廖芳敏,2016,「分區探討中古屋與預售屋受總體經濟影響-平滑移轉模型應用」,淡江大學財務金融研究所碩士論文:台北
    廖豐進,2014,「實價登錄後臺中市住宅價格之研究」,臺中科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文:臺中
    蔡怡純,2020,。〈總體經濟與房地產關聯分析〉,《2020臺灣地區房地產年鑑》,2-19
    鄭茹菁,2022,「實價登錄 2.0 對預售屋的影響-以新竹地區為例」,清華大學經營管理研究所碩士論文:新竹

    二、英文文獻

    Abraham, J. M., & Hendershott, P. H. (1992). Patterns and determinants of metropolitan house prices, 1977 to 1991. Conference Series: [Proceedings], (36), 18–56. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    Adams, Z., & Füss, R. (2010). Macroeconomic determinants of international housing markets. Journal of Housing Economics, 19(1), 38–50
    Hou,C.Y (2013), The Price Lead-Lag Relationship between the Presale and Spot Real Estate Market, National Chengchi University, Taipei
    Case, K. E., & Shiller, R. J. (2003). Is There a Bubble in the Housing Market? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2003(2), 299–362
    Cevik, S., & Naik, S. (2022). Don't Look Up: House Prices in Emerging Europe. IMF Working Paper No. 2022/236. International Monetary Fund
    Yu, C.-M., & Chen, P.-F. (2018). House Prices, Mortgage Rate, and Policy: Megadata Analysis in Taipei. Sustainability, 10(4), 926
    David E. Rapach & Jack K. Strauss (2007),Forecasting Real Housing Price Growth in the Eighth District States, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Regional Economic Development, 3(2),33-42.
    Deng, Y., Han, C., Li, T., & Wang, Y. (2024). The effectiveness and consequences of the government's interventions for Hong Kong's residential housing markets. Real Estate Economics, 52, 324–365
    Geng, N. (2018). Fundamental Drivers of House Prices in Advanced Economies. IMF Working Paper,18(164):1
    Glaeser, E. L., Gyourko, J., & Saks, R. E. (2005). Why Have Housing Prices Gone Up? American Economic Review, 95(2), 329–333.
    Goodhart, C., & Hofmann, B. (2008). House prices, money, credit, and the macroeconomy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(1), 180–205.
    Holly, S., Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2010). A spatio-temporal model of house prices in the USA. Journal of Econometrics, 158(1), 160–173
    Hua, C.-C., Chang, C.-O., & Hsieh, C. (2001). The Price-Volume Relationships between the Existing and the Pre-Sales Housing Markets in Taiwan. INTERNATIONAL REAL ESTATE REVIEW, 4(1), 80–94
    Ibrahim, M. H. (2010). House price-stock price relations in Thailand: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 3(1), 69-82.
    Li,J. (2020). The Effects of Macroeconomic Factors on Housing Prices in China: Empirical Research and Linear Regression Analysis. 2020 2nd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2020)
    Lo, D., Liu, N., McCord, M. J. & Haran, M. (2021). Information transparency and pricing strategy in the Scottish housing market. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 15(2), 429–450
    Jud, G.D., & Winkler,D.T. (2002). The dynamics of metropolitan housing prices, Journal of Real Estate Research,23(1-2):29-46
    Kuttner, K. N., & Shim, I. (2016). Can non-interest rate policies stabilize housing markets? Evidence from a panel of 57 economies. Journal of Financial Stability, 26, 31-44.
    Frondel, M., Gerster, A., & Vance, C. (2020). The Power of Mandatory Quality Disclosure: Evidence from the German Housing Market. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 7(1), 181-208.
    Mayer, C. J., & Somerville, C. T. (2000). Residential Construction: Using the Urban Growth Model to Estimate Housing Supply. Journal of Urban Economics, 48(1), 85–109
    Malpezzi, S., & Maclennan, D. (2001). The Long-Run Price Elasticity of Supply of New Residential Construction in the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of Housing Economics, 10(3), 278-306.
    Mayer, C., & Somerville, C. T. (2000). Land use regulation and new construction. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30(6), 639–662
    Tumsok, M., Kapak, G., & Tong, T (2024) , Determinants of housing prices in Papua New Guinea—an ARDL approach, (Griffith University–South Pacific Central Banks Joint Policy Research Working Paper No. 25). Griffith University.
    Mian, A., & Sufi, A. (2009). The Consequences of Mortgage Credit Expansion: Evidence from the U.S. Mortgage Default Crisis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1449–1496
    Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2005).The residential demand for electricity in Australia: An application of the bounds testing approach to cointegration. Energy Policy, 33(4), 467–474.
    Neukirchen, M., & Lange, H. (2005). Characteristics and macroeconomic drivers of house price changes in Australia (U21Global Working Paper No. 016/2005). U21Global Graduate School.
    Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55(3), 703–708.
    Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1999). An Autoregressive Distributed-Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis. In S. Strøm (Ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, 371-413. Cambridge University Press.
    Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
    Peter, C. B. P., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
    Poterba, James M. (1984). Tax Subsidies to Owner-Occupied Housing: An Asset-Market Approach.The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99(4), 729–752
    Singh, B. (2023). Housing prices and macroprudential policies: Evidence from microdata. Economic Systems, 47(1), 101008.
    So, S. M. S., & Wan, F. S. L. (2023). Macroeconomic Determinants of Housing Prices in Hong Kong. The Journal of Prediction Markets, 17(1), 117–139
    Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Yoshino, N., & Chiu, A. (2019). Internal and external determinants of housing price booms in Hong Kong, China (ADBI Working Paper No. 948) Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.
    Tang, Y. (2014). Information disclosure and price discovery. Journal of Financial Markets, 19, 39-61.
    Tripathi, S. (2020). Macroeconomic determinants of housing prices: A cross country level analysis (MPRA Paper No. 98089). Munich Personal RePEc Archive
    Yiu, C.Y., Wong, S. K. and Chau, K. W. (2009) Transaction volume and price dispersion in the presale and spot real estate markets, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 38 (3), 241-253
    Zhang, L., Ci, L., Wu, Y., & Wiwatanapataphee, B. (2024). The real estate time-stamping and registration system based on Ethereum blockchain. Blockchain: Research and Applications, 5(1), 100175

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2028/01/07
    QR CODE
    :::