跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林彥汝
Lin, Yan-Ru
論文名稱: 移轉訂價下跨國企業的租稅逃漏行為
A study on Tax Evasion and Transfer Pricing of the Multinational Enterprises
指導教授: 翁堃嵐
口試委員: 翁堃嵐
顏志達
胡均立
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學學院 - 財政學系
Department of Public Finance
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 27
中文關鍵詞: 移轉訂價租稅逃漏
外文關鍵詞: Transfer Pricing, Tax Evasion
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202100698
相關次數: 點閱:35下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 傳統探討移轉訂價的文獻忽略了廠商可以進行租稅逃漏的事實。有鑒於此,本文設立擁有一個外國子公司的跨國企業母公司,母公司在追求預期稅後利潤極大之目標下,不僅會進行移轉訂價,同時也會從事租稅逃漏的活動。在此設定之下,本文重新探討並比較公式計價與分離會計兩種移轉訂價的課稅制度。依據本文的研究顯示:在引入跨國企業母公司可從事租稅逃漏行為之情況下,公式計價制度雖具有避免企業利用移轉訂價轉移跨國間利潤之優點,卻會誘發企業進行租稅逃漏行為。且當兩國稅率具有差異時,FA制度下存在誘發MNE逃漏高於SA制度下更多租稅之可能性。因此從稅基流失的觀點來看,公式計價制度不必然會優於分離會計制度。換言之,此一結果可對傳統移轉訂價文獻認為公式計價課稅基礎相對分離會計課稅基礎能完全抑制跨國企業從事移轉訂價活動避免稅基流失的觀點提出不同的看法。


    The traditional literature discussing transfer pricing ignores the fact that multinational enterprises (MNEs) can evade taxation. In view of this, this paper establishes a multinational parent company with a foreign subsidiary. The parent company will not only transfer prices but also engage in tax evasion activities in pursuit of maximizing the goal after-tax profits. Under this setting, this paper reexamines and compares two transfer pricing systems of formula apportionment (FA) and separate accounting (SA). According to the research in this paper, when the introduction of multinational parent companies can engage in tax evasion activities, although formula apportionment still has the advantage of preventing companies from using transfer pricing to transfer profits between countries, it will induce MNEs to evade taxation. And when there are differences in tax rates between the two countries, there is a possibility that FA will induce more tax evasion from MNE than under SA. Therefore, from the perspective of tax base loss, formula apportionment is not necessarily better than the separate accounting. In other words, this result can put forward different views on whether FA is a superior method of taxing multinationals.

    第一章 緒論 1
    第一節 研究動機與目的 1
    第二節 研究架構 3
    第二章 文獻回顧 4
    第一節 租稅逃漏文獻 4
    第二節 移轉訂價 6
    第三章 傳統租稅逃漏模型 (不考慮移轉訂價活動) 9
    第四章 基本模型 10
    第一節 集權管理 12
    一、 Formula Apportionment (FA) 12
    二、 Separate Accounting (SA) 15
    第二節 分權管理 18
    一、 Formula Apportionment (FA) 19
    二、 Separate Accounting (SA) 21
    第五章 結論 24
    參考文獻 26

    Allingham, M. G., and A. Sandmo (1972), “Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis,” Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323-338.
    Chen, K. P. and C. Y. C. Chu (2005), “Internal Control versus External Manipulation: A Model of Corporate Income Tax Evasion,” Rand Journal of Economics, 36, 151-164.
    Crocker, K. J. and J. Slemrod (2005), “Corporate Tax Evasion with Agency Costs,” Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1593-1610.
    Desai, M. A. and D. Dharmapala (2009), “Corporate Tax Avoidance and Firm Value,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91, 537-546
    Gordon, R. and JD Wilson (1986), “An Examination of Multijurisdictional Corporate Income Taxation Under Formula Apportionment," Econometrica,54(6), 1357–1373.
    Horst, T. (1971) “The Theory of the Multinational Firm: Optimal Behavior under Different Tariff and Tax Rates,” Journal of Political Economy, 79(5),1059–1072
    Horst, T. (1993), “The Comparable Profits Method,” Tax Notes International, 14, 1443-1458.
    Kreutzer, D. and D.R. Lee (1986), “On Taxation and Understated Monopoly Profits,” National Tax Journal, 39, 241-243.
    Kreutzer, D. and D.R. Lee (1988), “Tax Evasion and Monopoly Output Decisions: A Reply,” National Tax Journal, 41, 583-584.
    Lee, K. (1998), “Tax Evasion, Monopoly, and Nonneutral Profit Taxes,” National Tax Journal, 51, 333-338.
    Liu, L., Schmidt-Eisenlohr, T., and D. Guo (2019), “International transfer pricing and tax avoidance: Evidence from linked trade-tax statistics in the UK,” Review of Economics and Statistics (forthcoming).
    Musgrace, P. (1973) International tax base division and the multinational corporation, Public Finance 27, 394–411.
    Nielsen, SB, Raimondos-Moller, P., and Schjelderup (2001), Tax spillovers under separate accounting and formula apportionment, EPRU Working Paper no. 01-07, University of Copenhagen
    Nielsen, SB, Raimondos-Moller, P., and Schjelderup. (2003), “Formula Apportionment and Transfer Pricing under Oligopolistic Competition," Journal of Public Economic Theory, 5, 419–437
    Rossing, C. P., Cools, M., and C. Rohde (2017), “International transfer pricing in multinational enterprises,” Journal of Accounting Education, 39, 55-67.
    Samuelson, L. (1982), “The Multinational Firm with Arm's Length Transfer Pricing Limits," Journal of International Economics, 13, 365–374.
    Schjelderup, G. and Sorgard, L. (1997), "Transfer Pricing as a Strategic Device for Decentralized Multinationals," International Tax and Public Finance, 4,277–290.
    Wang, L.F.S. and J.L. Conant (1988), “Corporate Tax and Output Decisions of Uncertain Monopolist,” National Tax Journal, 41, 579-581.
    Yaniv, G.. (1995), “A note on the Tax-Evading Firm,” National Tax Journal, 48, 113-120.
    Yaniv, G.. (1996), “Tax Evasion and Output Decisions,” Public Finance Quarterly, 24,501-505.
    Yitzhaki, S. (1974), “A note on income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis,” Journal of Public Economics, 3, 201-2.
    Yitzhaki, S. (1987), “On the excess burden of tax evasion,” Public Finance Quarterly, 15,123-37.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2026/07/04
    QR CODE
    :::