| 研究生: |
郭士浤 Kuo, Shih-Hung |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
中國崛起背景下威脅認知對美日同盟強度演變之研究 A Study on the Evolution of the U.S.-Japan Alliance Strength in the Context of China's Rise and Threat Perception |
| 指導教授: |
楊雯婷
李明 |
| 口試委員: | 陳秉逵 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
國際事務學院 - 外交學系 Department of Diplomacy |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 115 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 114 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 中國崛起 、美日同盟 、威脅認知 、同盟義務承擔 、延伸性嚇阻 、同盟強度 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | China Rise, U.S.-Japan Alliance, Threat Perception, Assumption of Alliance Obligations, Extended Deterrence, Alliance Strength |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:37 下載:4 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究將中國物質能力的持續增長視為結構性背景,探討在美日同盟此一非對稱同盟中,國家主觀的威脅認知如何作為核心政策驅動因素,影響美日同盟強度的變遷。本研究擺脫過往偏重物質能力對比的線性分析,探究成員國如何詮釋對手的戰略意圖與具體行為,進而催化同盟內部的調整機制。
本研究採質性個案研究,採用過程追蹤與文獻分析法,檢視2005年至2024年間美日同盟強度的演進。在分析架構上,本文建立以美日兩國對中威脅認知為自變數的理論模型,並將日本同盟義務承擔與美國延伸性嚇阻姿態視為操作化要素,進而以範疇、深度與凝聚力三者作為綜合測量依變數同盟強度變化的指標。在實證分析上,本文將二十年的歷史演進依序劃分為2005-2008年、2009-2012年、2013-2020年以及2021-2024年四個階段,檢視美日兩國如何以逐步推動防衛指針修訂、法律體制解禁與嚇阻機制升格等方式因應地緣政治的觸發事件以及區域安全環境的變化,最終促成同盟強度的實質變化。
研究結果驗證了理論假設,確認對中威脅認知的趨同、日本積極義務的承擔以及美國延伸嚇阻姿態的強化,與美日同盟強度的增強存在顯著的正向連動關係。本研究補充了Stephen Walt提出的威脅平衡論,突顯具體觸發事件與進攻意圖歸因對同盟調整的作用;揭示了不對稱同盟中弱勢盟友管理被拋棄恐懼,與強勢盟友強化嚇阻以確保扈從的的雙向保證機制;證明在不修改基礎條約文本的前提下,同盟仍可透過次級的戰略指引與雙邊常設機制的革新,實現同盟強度的重構。
Viewing the continuous growth of China's material capabilities as the structural background, this study explores how a state's subjective threat perception serves as a core policy driver influencing the transformation of the U.S.-Japan alliance strength within an asymmetric alliance. Moving beyond past linear analyses that focused exclusively on comparisons of material capabilities, this paper delves into how alliance members interpret the strategic intentions and concrete behaviors of their adversary, thereby catalyzing internal alliance adjustment mechanisms.
Positioned as a qualitative case study, this research employs process tracing and documentary analysis to examine the evolution of the U.S.-Japan alliance strength from 2005 to 2024. In terms of the analytical framework, this paper establishes a theoretical model with the two nations' threat perception of China as the independent variable. It treats Japan's assumption of alliance obligations and the U.S. extended deterrence posture as operationalized elements. Consequently, scope, depth, and cohesion are utilized as comprehensive indicators to measure the dependent variable, changes in alliance strength. Regarding the empirical analysis, this study chronologically divides the twenty-year historical development into four distinct phases: 2005-2008, 2009-2012, 2013-2020, and 2021-2024. Within this framework, the paper examines how the U.S. and Japan responded to geopolitical trigger events and shifts in the regional security environment by progressively driving the revision of defense guidelines, the lifting of legal restrictions, and the elevation of deterrence mechanisms, which ultimately facilitated a substantive shift in the alliance strength.
The research findings validate the theoretical hypotheses, confirming that the convergence of threat perceptions toward China, Japan's active assumption of obligations, and the strengthening of the U.S. extended deterrence posture share a significant positive correlation with the enhancement of the U.S.-Japan alliance strength. The academic contributions of this study are threefold. First, it supplements the balance of threat theory proposed by Stephen Walt, highlighting the decisive role of concrete trigger events and offensive intention attribution in alliance adjustments. Second, it reveals a two-way assurance mechanism in asymmetric alliances, wherein the weaker ally proactively manages the fear of abandonment while the stronger ally strengthens deterrence to ensure the ally's bandwagoning. Finally, it proves that even without modifying foundational treaty texts, an alliance can achieve a restructuring of its strength through secondary strategic guidelines and innovations in bilateral standing mechanisms.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題 2
第三節 研究方法 3
第四節 研究範圍與研究限制 4
第五節 章節安排 6
第二章 文獻回顧與分析架構 9
第一節 對於美日同盟研究的回顧 9
第二節 分析架構 13
第三節 研究假設 26
第三章 2005年至2008年:謹慎接觸與觀望階段 29
第一節 美日雙方的對中威脅認知 29
第二節 日本的同盟義務承擔 35
第三節 美國的延伸性嚇阻姿態 38
第四節 綜合美日同盟強度狀態 40
第四章 2009年至2012年:再平衡萌芽與雙方認知激化階段 43
第一節 美日雙方對中的威脅認知 43
第二節 日本的同盟義務承擔 47
第三節 美國的延伸性嚇阻姿態 51
第四節 綜合美日同盟強度狀態 54
第五章 2013年至2020年:大國競爭框架成形與戰略防範定調階段 57
第一節 美日雙方對中的威脅認知 58
第二節 日本的同盟義務承擔 62
第三節 美國的延伸性嚇阻姿態 67
第四節 綜合美日同盟強度狀態 70
第六章 2021年至2024年:高強度同步競爭與同盟一體化深化階段 73
第一節 美日雙方對中的威脅認知 73
第二節 日本的同盟義務承擔 77
第三節 美國的延伸性嚇阻姿態 80
第四節 綜合美日同盟強度狀態 82
第七章 結論 85
第一節 理論假設的驗證 85
第二節 研究發現與主要論點總結 87
第三節 理論對話與學術貢獻 90
第四節 未來展望與研究限制 92
參考書目 97
【中文文獻】
※期刊文獻與專書
石原忠浩,2019,〈推動戰略互惠關係中的日「中」關係:進展與限制〉,《展望與探索月刊》,17(9):34-55。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20200116001-201909-202001200022-202001200022-94-114
呂建良,2005,〈從「市民社會」評析2005年4月中國反日示威運動〉,《展望與探索月刊》,3(11):51-66。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20200116001-200511-202003250020-202003250020-51-66
張隆義,1984,〈論日本防衛經費的自我限制〉,《問題與研究》,23(5):75-86。https://wenti.nccu.edu.tw/upload/%E8%AB%96%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E9%98%B2%E8%A1%9B%E7%B6%93%E8%B2%BB%E7%9A%84%E8%87%AA%E6%88%91%E9%99%90%E5%88%B6.pdf
郭育仁,2014,〈第二次安倍內閣之外交政策走向〉,《全球政治評論》,46:43-64。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=17263786-201404-201405070005-201405070005-43-64
黃奕婷、張登及,2017,〈冷戰後韓美同盟變遷之研究(1992-2013)〉,《遠景基金會季刊》,18(4):61-112。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/15601696-201710-201712120013-201712120013-61-112
楊仕樂,2012,〈評判反介入/區域拒止下的「海空戰」概念〉,《問題與研究》,51(4):71-94 。 https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.201212_51(4).0003
蔡東杰、盧信吉,2020,〈日本對美國同盟戰略之調整:威脅平衡視角之探討〉,《戰略與評估》,10(2):62-87。https://indsr.org.tw/uploads/indsr/files/202203/a0de6a08-af68-4bf5-84b1-11114412ac11.pdf
※智庫與政策報告
李大中,2013,〈從防衛白皮書解讀日本對於中國大陸軍事發展之疑慮〉,《2012 年度公益財団法人交流協会フェローシップ事業成果報告書》。https://www.koryu.or.jp/Portals/0/resources/tokyo/ez3_contents_nsf/15aef977a6d6761f49256de4002084ae/9985292037255ce449257b7c002bc433/$FILE/2012lidajung.pdf
【日文文獻】
※官方資料與政府文件
内閣官房,2013,《国家安全保障戦略》,東京:内閣官房。https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/siryou/131217anzenhoshou/nss-j.pdf
内閣官房,2022,《国家安全保障戦略》,東京:内閣官房。https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/siryou/221216anzenhoshounss-j.pdf
外務省,1991年,〈第2節 湾岸危機への日本の対応〉 。 https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/bluebook/1991/h03-2-2.htm
外務省、防衛省,2007年5月1日,〈日米安全保障協議委員会共同発表:地域的・グローバルな安全保障・防衛協力の新展開〉。https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/usa/hosho/pdfs/2plus2_07_kh.pdf
外務省,2010a年12月14日,〈在日米軍駐留経費負担の包括的な見直しの結果について〉。https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/usa/hosho/futanminaosi_101214.html
外務省,2010b年4月7日,〈米国の『核態勢の見直し(NPR)』の公表について(外務大臣談話)〉。https://worldjpn.net/documents/texts/exdfam/20100407.S1J.html
外務省,2013年11月25日,〈中国による防空識別区の設定について(外務次官による駐日中国大使への申入れ)〉。https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/page4_000293.html
外務省,2014a年3月31日,〈南シナ海をめぐる問題(フィリピンによる国連海洋法条約に基づく仲裁手続)(外務報道官談話)〉。https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/danwa/page4_000425.html
外務省,2014b年4月25日,〈日米共同声明:アジア太平洋及びこれを越えた地域の未来を形作る日本と米国〉。https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/na/na1/us/page3_000756.html
外務省,2015,《日米防衛協力のための指針》,東京:外務省。
外務省,2018年2月3日,〈米国の「核態勢の見直し(NPR)」の公表について(外務大臣談話)〉。https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/danwa/page4_003718.html
外務省,2021年12月21日,〈在日米軍の駐留経費に係る負担についての実質合意〉。 https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/release/press4_009222.html
安倍晋三,2013年10月15日,〈第百八十五回国会における安倍内閣総理大臣所信表明演説〉。 https://www.rw.emb-japan.go.jp/speech%20of%20Prime%20Minister%20Abe%202013.10.15.pdf
防衛庁,1997年,〈日米防衛協力のための指針Q&A〉 。 https://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/anpo/alliguideline/q_a.html
防衛庁,2004年12月10日,〈平成17年度以降に係る防衛計画の大綱について〉。https://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/agenda/guideline/2005/taikou.html
防衛庁,2005,《平成17年版防衛白書》,東京:国立印刷局。http://www.clearing.mod.go.jp/hakusho_data/2005/2005/index.html
防衛庁,2006,《平成18年版防衛白書》,東京:国立印刷局。http://www.clearing.mod.go.jp/hakusho_data/2006/2006/index.html
防衛省,2007,《平成19年版防衛白書》,東京:防衛省。http://www.clearing.mod.go.jp/hakusho_data/2007/2007/index.html
防衛省,2008,《平成20年版防衛白書》,東京:防衛省。http://www.clearing.mod.go.jp/hakusho_data/2008/2008/index.html
防衛省,2010年12月17日,〈平成23年度以降に係る防衛計画の大綱について〉。https://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/agenda/guideline/2011/taikou.html
防衛省,2012,《平成24年版防衛白書》,東京:防衛省。http://www.clearing.mod.go.jp/hakusho_data/2012/2012/index.html
防衛省,2015,〈我が国の防衛と予算(案):平成27年度予算の概要〉 。 https://www.ssri-j.com/MediaReport/DocumentJPN/FY15Budget.pdf
防衛省,2016,《平成28年版防衛白書》,東京:防衛省。http://www.clearing.mod.go.jp/hakusho_data/2016/pdf/index.html
防衛省,2020,《令和2年版防衛白書》,東京:防衛省。http://www.clearing.mod.go.jp/hakusho_data/2020/html/nk000000.html
防衛省,2022a年8月4日,〈中国による弾道ミサイル発射について〉。https://www.mod.go.jp/j/press/news/2022/08/04d.html
防衛省,2022b年12月16日,《防衛力整備計画》。https://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/agenda/guideline/plan/pdf/plan.pdf
防衛省,2023a年3月,〈防衛力抜本的強化「元年」予算:令和5年度予算の概要〉。https://www.mod.go.jp/j/budget/yosan_gaiyo/2023/yosan_20230329.pdf
防衛省,2023b,《令和5年版防衛白書》,東京:防衛省。https://www.mod.go.jp/j/press/wp/wp2023/pdf/R05zenpen.pdf
防衛省,2024,《令和6年版防衛白書》,東京:防衛省。https://www.mod.go.jp/j/press/wp/wp2024/pdf/R06zenpen.pdf
麻生太郎,2006年11月30日,〈「自由と繁栄の弧」をつくる〉。https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/enzetsu/18/easo_1130.html
鳩山由紀夫,2009年11月15日,〈アジア太平洋地域における新しい共同体構想(シンガポール・リー・クアンユー大学での講演)〉。 https://warp.ndl.go.jp/en/web/20100604153211/http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/hatoyama/statement/200911/15singapore.html
衆議院予算委員会,2006a年10月5日,〈第165回国会衆議院予算委員会会議録第2号〉。https://www.shugiin.go.jp/internet/itdb_kaigirokua.nsf/html/kaigirokua/001816520061005002.htm
衆議院予算委員会,2006b年10月2日,〈第165回国会衆議院予算委員会会議録第4号〉。https://www.shugiin.go.jp/internet/itdb_kaigirokua.nsf/html/kaigirokua/000116520061002004.htm
衆議院本会議,2015,〈第189回国会衆議院本会議録第28号〉,5月26日。https://www.shugiin.go.jp/internet/itdb_kaigirokua.nsf/html/kaigirokua/029818920150626014.htm
※智庫與政策報告
石川卓,2010,〈「アメリカ外交にとっての同盟」と同盟理論〉,《平成22年度外務省国際問題調査研究・提言事業報告書:日米関係の今後の展開と日本の外交》,29-41,東京:日本国際問題研究所。https://www2.jiia.or.jp/pdf/resarch/h22_nichibei_kankei/05_Chapter1-3.pdf
高木誠一郎,2011,〈日米同盟に対する中国の認識と対応―冷戦後の展開〉,《日米中関係の中長期的展望――パワー・トランジッション》,第2部・第4章,81-90。東京:日本国際問題研究所。https://www2.jiia.or.jp/pdf/resarch/H23_Japan_US_China/04_Takagi.pdf
防衛研究所,2007,《東アジア戦略概観2007》,東京:防衛研究所。https://www.nids.mod.go.jp/publication/east-asian/j2007.html
防衛研究所,2011,《東アジア戦略概観2011》,東京:防衛研究所。https://www.nids.mod.go.jp/publication/east-asian/j2011.html
Solis, Mireya,2022,《経済安全保障:日米同盟の追い風となるか向かい風となるか》,笹川平和財団米国(SPFUSA)。https://spfusa.org/publications/%E7%B5%8C%E6%B8%88%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E4%BF%9D%E9%9A%9C%EF%BC%9A%E6%97%A5%E7%B1%B3%E5%90%8C%E7%9B%9F%E3%81%AE-%E8%BF%BD%E3%81%84%E9%A2%A8%E3%81%A8%E3%81%AA%E3%82%8B%E3%81%8B%E5%90%91%E3%81%8B%E3%81%84/
※期刊文獻與專書
土山實男,1997,〈日米同盟の国際政治理論-リアリズム・リベラル制度論・コンストラクティヴィズム〉,《国際政治》,115: 161-179。https://doi.org/10.11375/kokusaiseiji1957.115_161
久古聡美,2013,〈北朝鮮の核問題をめぐる経緯と展望:金正恩体制下の動向を中心に〉,《調査と情報―Issue Brief―》,775: 1-13,東京:国立国会図書館。https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/8091645
千々和泰明,2017,〈「51大綱」における防衛構想と自衛隊〉,《戦史研究年報》,20: 44-64。https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/11442223
中逵啓示,2025年,〈専守防衛とは何だったのか?—冷戦期後半—〉,《立命館国際研究》,38(2): 89-103。https://ritsumei.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2004598/files/ir_38-2_5_NAKATSUJI.pdf
五百旗頭真,2014,《戦後日本外交史》,第3版補訂版,東京都:有斐閣。
水沢紀元,2005,〈ジョセフ・ナイの国際政治理論―そのリアリズム性に関する一考察〉,《政治学研究論集》21:231-252。https://meiji.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/10032
水野均,2010,〈周辺事態法の成立・米軍再編問題と「世界」:日米同盟をめぐる論説の検証(5)〉,《千葉商大紀要》,47(2): 81-96。 https://cuc.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2311
玉置敦彦,2016,〈同盟概念再考-揺れ動く国際情勢と日米同盟〉,《神奈川大学アジア・レビュー》,3: 82-97。https://kanagawa-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/9949
沓脱和人,2017,〈戦後における防衛関係費の推移〉,《立法と調査》,395: 83-98。https://www.sangiin.go.jp/japanese/annai/chousa/rippou_chousa/backnumber/2017pdf/20171201081.pdf
張胡苗,2024,〈日本の防衛政策と日米同盟に対する中国の認識変化、1995-2022年〉,《慶應義塾大学大学院法学研究科論文集》,64: 267-317。https://koara.lib.keio.ac.jp/xoonips/modules/xoonips/detail.php?koara_id=AN00069591-00000064-0267
菊池一隆,2011,〈教科書問題の歴史と共通歴史教科書〉,《愛知学院大学文学部紀要》,41: 9-29。https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1520009408229033984
塚越康記,2015,〈日本のレアアース政策と WTO 提訴:中国の輸出規制問題に対する意思決定の変遷〉,《海幹校戦略研究》,5(2): 91-123。https://www.mod.go.jp/msdf/navcol/assets/pdf/ssg2015_12_05.pdf
※網路資料
言論 NPO,2011年8月11日,〈日本国民の中国へのイメージ形成が「生活感覚中心」から「尖閣」に移り始めてきた~「第7回日中共同世論調査」結果~〉。https://www.genron-npo.net/discussions/archives/4165-2
孫崎享,2007年2月6日,〈防衛省への昇格〉,一般社団法人日本英語交流連盟 (ESUJ)。https://www.esuj.gr.jp/jitow/217_index_detail.php#japanese
産経新聞,2013年9月13日,〈「積極的平和主義」柱に 安保戦略有識者懇〉 。https://www.sankei.com/article/20130913-SCE2IC354NKUFJYT27Z5UMAENA/
Indo-Pacific Forum, 2022年8月27日, 〈中国共産党によるミサイル発射で日本の防衛力増強への支持の機運が高まる〉。https://ipdefenseforum.com/ja/2022/08/中国共産党によるミサイル発射で日本の防衛力増/
【英文文獻】
※官方資料與政府文件
Clinton, Hillary. 2010. "Remarks with Japanese Foreign Minister Seiji Maehara." U.S. Department of State, October 27. https://2009-2017.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2010/10/150110.htm
Commission to Assess United States National Security Space Management and Organization. 2001. Report of the Commission to Assess United States National Security Space Management and Organization. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA404328.pdf
Ministry of Defense (Japan). 2016. Defense Programs and Budget of Japan: Overview of FY2016 Budget. Tokyo: Ministry of Defense. https://www.mod.go.jp/en/d_act/d_budget/pdf/280330.pdf
Obama, Barack. 2009. "Remarks of President Barack Obama." Arms Control Association, April 5. https://www.armscontrol.org/documents-reports/2009-04/remarks-president-barack-obama.
Obama, Barack. 2011. "Remarks by President Obama to the Australian Parliament." The White House, November 17. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/11/17/remarks-president-obama-australian-parliament
Parliamentary Library. 2022. South China Sea Perspectives: Japan. Research Paper Series 2022-23. Canberra: Parliamentary Library, August 16. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_departments/Parliamentary_Library/Research/Research_Papers/2022-23/SouthChinaSeaPerspectivesJapan
The White House. 2015. National Security Strategy. Washington, DC: The White House, February. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2015_national_security_strategy_2.pdf
The White House. 2017a. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, DC: The White House, December. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf
The White House. 2017b. "Joint Statement from President Donald J. Trump and Prime Minister Shinzo Abe." February 10. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/joint-statement-president-donald-j-trump-prime-minister-shinzo-abe/
The White House. 2022. National Security Strategy. Washington, DC: White House, October. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf
The White House. 2024. "United States-Japan Joint Leaders’ Statement: Global Partners for the Future." U.S. Embassy & Consulates in China, April 10. https://china.usembassy-china.org.cn/united-states-japan-joint-leaders-statement/
U.S. Department of Defense. 2004. 2004 Statistical Compendium on Allied Contributions to the Common Defense. Washington, DC: Department of Defense. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA475431.pdf
U.S. Department of Defense. 2005. The Military Power of the People’s Republic of China 2005: Annual Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA436132.pdf
U.S. Department of Defense. 2006a. Annual Report to Congress: Military Power of the People’s Republic of China 2006. Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA449718.pdf
U.S. Department of Defense. 2006b. Quadrennial Defense Review Report. Washington, DC: Department of Defense. https://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/quadrennial/QDR2006.pdf?ver=2014-06-25-111017-150
U.S. Department of Defense. 2010a. Quadrennial Defense Review Report: 2010 Overview and Implications for National Security Planning. Washington, DC: Department of Defense. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA522091.pdf
U.S. Department of Defense. 2010b. Nuclear Posture Review Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense. https://csps.aerospace.org/sites/default/files/2021-08/Nuke%20Posture%20Review%20Apr10.pdf
U.S. Department of Defense. 2018. Nuclear Posture Review. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense. https://aiaa.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/2018-NUCLEAR-POSTURE-REVIEW-FINAL-REPORT.pdf
U.S. Department of Defense. 2022a. 2022 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense, October. https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/2003103845/-1/-1/1/2022-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY-NPR-MDR.PDF
U.S. Department of Defense. 2022b. 2022 Nuclear Posture Review. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense. https://fas.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/2022-Nuclear-Posture-Review.pdf
U.S. Department of Defense. 2024. Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2024. Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense, December. https://media.defense.gov/2024/Dec/18/2003615520/-1/-1/0/MILITARY-AND-SECURITY-DEVELOPMENTS-INVOLVING-THE-PEOPLES-REPUBLIC-OF-CHINA-2024.PDF
U.S. Department of State. 2011. "Joint Statement of the U.S.-Japan Security Consultative Committee: Toward a Deeper and Broader U.S.-Japan Alliance: Building on 50 Years of Partnership." June 21. https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2011/06/166597.htm
U.S. Department of State. 2012. "Joint Statement of the Security Consultative Committee." April 27. https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2012/04/188586.htm
U.S. Department of State. 2015. "Joint Statement of the Security Consultative Committee: A Stronger Alliance for a Bright Future." April 27. https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2015/04/241125.htm
U.S. Department of State. 2017. "Joint Statement of the Security Consultative Committee." August 17. https://2017-2021.state.gov/joint-statement-of-the-security-consultative-committee/
U.S. Department of State. 2021. "U.S.-Japan Joint Press Statement." April 16. https://2021-2025.state.gov/u-s-japan-joint-press-statement/
U.S. Department of State. 2022. "Joint Statement of the U.S.-Japan Security Consultative Committee (2+2)." January 6. https://2021-2025.state.gov/joint-statement-of-the-u-s-japan-security-consultative-committee-22/
U.S. Department of State. 2023a. "U.S.-Japan Extended Deterrence Dialogue." June 27. https://2021-2025.state.gov/u-s-japan-extended-deterrence-dialogue/
U.S. Department of State. 2023b. "Joint Statement of the 2023 U.S.-Japan Security Consultative Committee (2+2)." January 11. https://2021-2025.state.gov/joint-statement-of-the-security-consultative-committee-22/
U.S. Department of State. 2024. "Joint Statement of the U.S.-Japan Security Consultative Committee (2+2)." July 28. https://2021-2025.state.gov/joint-statement-of-the-security-consultative-committee-22-2/
U.S. Department of State and Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2005. "U.S.-Japan Alliance: Transformation and Realignment for the Future." Joint Statement of the Security Consultative Committee, October 29. https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/n-america/us/security/scc/doc0510.html
U.S. Department of State and Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2006. "United States-Japan Roadmap for Realignment Implementation." Joint Statement of the Security Consultative Committee, May 1. https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/n-america/us/security/scc/doc0605.html
U.S. Department of State and Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2007. "Alliance Strategic Capabilities." Joint Statement of the Security Consultative Committee, May 1. https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/n-america/us/security/scc/joint0705.html
U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. 2024. 2024 Annual Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Government Publishing Office, November. https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2024-11/2024_Annual_Report_to_Congress.pdf
Steinberg, James B. 2009. "Administration’s Vision of the U.S.-China Relationship." Address at the National Press Club, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State, September 24. https://2009-2017.state.gov/s/d/former/steinberg/remarks/2009/169332.htm
Zoellick, Robert B. 2005. "Whither China: From Membership to Responsibility?" Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State. https://2001-2009.state.gov/s/d/former/zoellick/rem/53682.htm
※智庫與政策報告
Congressional Research Service. 2019a. The U.S.-Japan Alliance. CRS Report RL33740. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, June 13. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/RL33740.pdf
Congressional Research Service. 2019b. U.S. Military Presence on Okinawa and Realignment to Guam. In Focus IF10672. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, April 9. https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/2019-04-09_IF10672_fa1b16c0a8ed397a7b3ab9d8b1a51737f7690652.pdf
Congressional Research Service. 2021. The Senkakus (Diaoyu/Diaoyutai) Dispute: U.S. Treaty Obligations. CRS Report R42761. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R42761
Congressional Research Service. 2023. Japan-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress. CRS Report RL33436. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RL33436
Congressional Research Service. 2025. U.S. Extended Deterrence and Regional Nuclear Capabilities. In Focus IF12735. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12735
Costlow, Matthew R., and Keith B. Payne. 2023. TLAM-N and SLCM-N: Lessons for Extended Deterrence and Assuring Allies. Information Series No. 567. Fairfax, VA: National Institute for Public Policy, November 15. https://nipp.org/information_series/matthew-r-costlow-and-keith-b-payne-tlam-n-and-slcm-n-lessons-for-extended-deterrence-and-assuring-allies-no-567-november-15-2023/
Kulacki, Gregory. 2010. Japan and America’s Nuclear Posture. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists. https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/2019-09/japan-american-nuclear-posture.pdf
Kulacki, Gregory. 2014. An Authoritative Source on China's Military Space Strategy. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists. https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/China-s-Military-Space-Strategy.pdf
Lemnios, Zachary J. 2022. US National Security in a New Era of Intense Global Competition. Arlington, VA: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, February 10. https://www.potomacinstitute.org/papers/us-national-security-in-a-new-era-of-intense-global-competition
Liff, Adam P. 2010. Japan’s 2010 National Defense Program Guidelines: Reading the Tea Leaves. Asia Pacific Bulletin No. 89. Washington, DC: East-West Center, December 22. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/125946/apb089_1.pdf
Roberts, Brad. 2013. Extended Deterrence and Strategic Stability in Northeast Asia. NIDS Visiting Scholar Paper Series, No. 1. Tokyo: National Institute for Defense Studies. https://www.nids.mod.go.jp/english/publication/visiting/pdf/01.pdf
Rozman, Gilbert. 2011. China’s Narratives Regarding National Security Policy. Philadelphia, PA: Foreign Policy Research Institute, March 13. https://www.fpri.org/article/2011/03/chinas-narratives-regarding-national-security-policy/
Sakaguchi, Daisaku. 2009. The Realignment of US Forces in Japan and its Impact on the Interdependent Relationship between Japan and the US. NIDS Joint Studies Security Report, No. 3. Tokyo: National Institute for Defense Studies. https://www.nids.mod.go.jp/english/publication/joint_research/series3/pdf/01.pdf
Scheber, Thomas, and Kurt Guthe. 2010. U.S. Extended Deterrence and Assurance for Allies in Northeast Asia. Fairfax, VA: National Institute Press. https://nipp.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/US-Extend-Deter-for-print.pdf
Swaine, Michael D. 2014. "Chinese Views and Commentary on the East China Sea Air Defense Identification Zone (ECS ADIZ)." China Leadership Monitor, no. 43. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/CLM43MS_Final_022514.pdf
Tellis, Ashley J. 2007. "Punching the U.S. Military's 'Soft Ribs': China's Antisatellite Weapon Test in Strategic Perspective." Policy Brief, no. 51. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2007/06/punching-the-us-militarys-soft-ribs-chinas-antisatellite-weapon-test-in-strategic-perspective
Ueno, Kazushi. 2013. "Japan’s Defense Program Guidelines." USAWC Strategy Research Project. Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College. Defense Technical Information Center. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA590265.pdf
※期刊文獻與專書
Anderton, Charles H., and John R. Carter. 2019. Principles of Conflict Economics: The Political Economy of War, Terrorism, Genocide, and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ayson, Robert. 2023. “New Zealand’s Alliance Obligations in a China-Australia War.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 77 (3): 233-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2023.2177253
Blankenship, Brian. 2021. “The Price of Protection: Explaining Success and Failure of US Alliance Burden-Sharing Pressure.” Security Studies 30 (5): 691-724. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2021.2018624
Cha, Victor. 2017. "Informal Hierarchy in Asia: The Origins of the U.S.-Japan Alliance." International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 17 (1): 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcw017
Chai, Sun-Ki. 1997. "Entrenching the Yoshida Defense Doctrine: Three Techniques for Institutionalization." International Organization 51 (3): 389-412. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2703609
Chan, Che-po, and Brian Bridges. 2006. "China, Japan, and the Clash of Nationalisms." Asian Perspective 30 (1): 127-56. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42704536
Chan, Steve. 2003. "Extended Deterrence in the Taiwan Strait: Learning from Rationalist Explanations in International Relations." World Affairs 166 (2): 109-25. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20672683
Christensen, Kyle D. 2012. "Strategic Developments in the Western Pacific: Anti-Access/Area Denial and the AirSea Battle Concept." Journal of Military and Strategic Studies 14(3-4). https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/journals/jomass/v14i3/f_0027474_22448.pdf
Christensen, Thomas J. 1999. "China, the U.S.-Japan Alliance, and the Security Dilemma in East Asia." International Security 23 (4): 49-80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539294
Clinton, Hillary. 2011. "America’s Pacific Century: The Future of Geopolitics Will Be Decided in Asia, Not in Afghanistan or Iraq, and the United States Should Be Right at the Center of the Action." Foreign Policy (189): 56-63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41353253
Clinton, Joshua D., and Brett V. Benson. 2016. "Assessing the Variation of Formal Military Alliances." Journal of Conflict Resolution 60 (5): 866-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002714560348
Cohen, Raymond. 1978. "Threat Perception in International Crisis." Political Science Quarterly 93 (1): 93-107. https://doi.org/10.2307/2149052
Desmaele, Linde. 2024. "Burden Sharing for What? NATO Implications of Three US Visions." The Washington Quarterly 47 (4): 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2024.2432808
Hu, Zhenshuo. 2022. "The Indo-Pacific Strategy from the Perspective of Offensive Realism." Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities 1 (1): 36-41. https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/jrssh/article/view/39
Hughes, Christopher W. 2009. "‘Super-Sizing’ the DPRK Threat: Japan’s Evolving Military Posture and North Korea." Asian Survey, 49(2): 291-311. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2009.49.2.291
Huth, Paul K. 1988. Extended Deterrence and the Prevention of War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Izumi, Hajime, and Katsuhisa Furukawa. 2007. "Not Going Nuclear: Japan's Response to North Korea's Nuclear Test." Arms Control Today 37 (5). https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2007-06/features/not-going-nuclear-japans-response-north-koreas-nuclear-test
Kubo, Fumiaki. 2019. "Japan-US Alliance in the Face of Populism: The Vulnerability of an Alliance Based on Asymmetric Rights and Obligations." The Japanese Journal of American Studies 30: 1-19. https://www.jaas.gr.jp/jaas/2019pdf/Fumiaki%20Kubo.pdf
Medeiros, Evan S. 2005. "Strategic Hedging and the Future of Asia-Pacific Stability." The Washington Quarterly 29 (1): 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1162/016366005774859724
Midford, Paul. 2003. "Japan’s Response to Terror: Dispatching the SDF to the Arabian Sea." Asian Survey 43 (2): 329-51. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2003.43.2.329.
Mochizuki, Mike M. 2007. "Japan Tests the Nuclear Taboo." The Nonproliferation Review 14 (2): 303-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700701379393
Nagy, Stephen R., and Hanh Nguyen. 2022. "Deterrence, Resilience, and Engagement: Tokyo's Response to the Ukraine War and Russia-China Alignment." Stosunki Międzynarodow-International Relations 58: 180-198. https://doi.org/10.12688/stomiedintrelat.17632.1
Nye, Joseph S. 1995. "The Case for Deep Engagement." Foreign Affairs 74 (4): 90-102. https://doi.org/10.2307/20047210
Pomeroy, Caleb. 2025. "The Damocles Delusion: The Sense of Power Inflates Threat Perception in World Politics." International Organization 79 (1): 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818324000407
Procházka, Josef, Aleš Olejníček, and Jakub Odehnal. 2024. "NATO Cohesion in Global Power Competition: A Quantitative Cluster Analysis." Obrana a strategie 24 (2): 157-178. https://doi.org/10.3849/1802-7199.24.2024.02.157-178
Samuels, Richard J. 2007. Securing Japan: Tokyo’s Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Singer, J. David. 1958. "Threat-Perception and the Armament-Tension Dilemma." The Journal of Conflict Resolution 2 (1): 90-105. http://www.jstor.org/stable/172848
Singh, Bhubhindar. 2008. "Japan’s Security Policy: From a Peace State to an International State." The Pacific Review 21 (3): 303-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740802134141
Soeya, Yoshihide. 2002. "The China Factor in the U.S.-Japan Alliance: The Myth of a China Threat." Journal of East Asian Studies 2 (2): 37-66. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23417815
Tsuruoka, Michito. 2021. "US Nuclear Weapons and US Alliances in North-East Asia." In Alliances, Nuclear Weapons and Escalation in Asia, edited by Stephan Frühling and Andrew O'Neil, 133-140. Canberra: ANU Press. https://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/n9294/pdf/ch12.pdf
Vekasi, Kristin. 2019. "Politics, Markets, and Rare Commodities: Responses to Chinese Rare Earth Policy." Japanese Journal of Political Science 20 (1): 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109918000385
Walt, Stephen M. 1990. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Weitsman, Patricia A. 2013. Waging War: Alliances, Coalitions, and Institutions of Interstate Violence. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka. 2012. "Japan’s China Policy in Domestic Power Transition and Alliance Politics." Asian Affairs: An American Review 39 (2): 106-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2012.678130
Wright, John. 2022. "Japan's Self-Imposed One Percent: Does It Really Matter?" Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs, July 11. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/JIPA/Display/Article/3089775/japans-self-imposed-one-percent-does-it-really-matter/
Zhao, Suisheng. 2005. "China's Pragmatic Nationalism: Is It Manageable?" The Washington Quarterly 29 (1): 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1162/016366005774859670
※網路資料
Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. 2016. "Judgment Day: The South China Sea Tribunal Issues Its Ruling." Center for Strategic and International Studies, July 12. https://amti.csis.org/arbitration-ruling-analysis/
SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute). 2025. "SIPRI Military Expenditure Database.". https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex