跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 蔡美真
Janina Clare Castro Tan
論文名稱： 跨境原住民族知識交流的協作網絡:CTPILS評估研究
Collaborative Networks for Indigenous Knowledge Exchange: An Evaluation of CTPILS
指導教授： 官大衛
Kuan, Da-Wei
口試委員: 林浩立
Lin, Hao-Li
江順楠
Chiang, Shun-Nan
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 社會科學學院 - 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
International Master's Program in Asia-Pacific Studies(IMAS)
論文出版年： 2026
畢業學年度： 114
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 125
中文關鍵詞： 行動者網絡理論 、CTPILS 、原住民族知識 、協作網絡 、轉譯 、台灣 、菲律賓
外文關鍵詞： Actor–Network Theory, CTPILS, Indigenous knowledge, collaborative networks, translation, Taiwan, Philippines
相關次數： 點閱：12  下載：0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 跨境原住民族知識合作日益促使大學、研究人員、教育工作者、原住民族組織與社群共同推動知識交流、研究及能力建構。然而，協作網絡的建立並不必然保證參與、關係與共同工作能夠跨越制度變動及不同資助週期而持續發展。本研究運用行動者網絡理論及卡隆的轉譯框架，分析台灣－菲律賓原住民族知識、在地知識與永續研究中心（Center for Taiwan–Philippines Indigenous Knowledge, Local Knowledge, and Sustainable Studies, CTPILS）在三個資助階段中的發展。作為一項質性個案研究，本研究以計畫文件、個別訪談、團體訪談資料，以及在台灣與菲律賓相關活動中取得的觀察資料為基礎。透過檢視大學、研究人員、原住民族組織、教師、社群、資助安排、行政程序與計畫活動如何被連結起來，本研究評估該網絡如何推進其目標，以及合作關係如何隨時間被維持、調整或削弱。
    本研究追蹤行動者如何被納入網絡、角色與責任如何經由協商而形成，以及CTPILS在經歷兩個國家科學及技術委員會資助週期與資助結束後的轉型階段時，其關係如何發生變化。研究結果顯示，該中心為跨境知識交流、研究、教師培訓、社群參與及教育材料的發展創造了機會。同時，不同行動者與不同階段之間，參與的強度與持續性並不一致。既有關係與關鍵中介者支持了網絡的擴展與協調，而資助、行政、溝通及機構參與方面的變化，則影響了協作活動與成果如何得以延續。

    Cross-border Indigenous knowledge collaborations have increasingly brought universities, researchers, educators, Indigenous organizations, and communities together to support knowledge exchange, research, and capacity building. However, the creation of a collaborative network does not necessarily ensure that participation, relationships, and shared work will continue across institutional changes and funding cycles. This research analyzes the development of the Center for Taiwan–Philippines Indigenous Knowledge, Local Knowledge, and Sustainable Studies (CTPILS) across three funding periods using Actor–Network Theory and Callon’s framework of translation. As a qualitative case study, it draws on project documents, interviews, group interview materials, and observations from activities conducted in Taiwan and the Philippines. By looking at how universities, researchers, Indigenous organizations, teachers, communities, funding arrangements, administrative procedures, and project activities were brought into relation, the study evaluates how the network pursued its goals and how collaboration was maintained, adjusted, or weakened over time.
    The analysis traces how actors were enrolled, how roles and responsibilities were negotiated, and how relationships changed as CTPILS moved through two National Science and Technology Council funding cycles and a post-funding transition. The findings indicate that the center created opportunities for cross-border knowledge exchange, research, teacher training, community engagement, and the development of educational materials. At the same time, the strength and continuity of participation varied across actors and periods. Existing relationships and key brokers supported the expansion and coordination of the network, while changes in funding, administration, communication, and institutional participation shaped how collaborative activities and outputs were carried forward.

    Acknowledgements i
    摘要 ii
    List of Figures iv
    List of Abbreviations iv
    Chapter 1 – Introduction 1
    1.1 Background of the Study: Why study collaborative networks? 1
    1.2 Research Question and Objectives 3
    1.3 Literature Review 5
    1.4 Conceptual Framework 18
    1.5 Significance of the Study 24
    1.6 Methodology 26
    1.7 Scope and Limitations 30
    Chapter 2 - CTPILS Early Formation (2019–2021) 33
    2.1 Establishment of the Center and Initial Institutional Partnerships 34
    2.2 Implementing the First Funding Cycle in Taiwan and Ifugao 38
    2.3 Expanding and Maintaining the Collaborative Network 43
    2.4 Analytical Synthesis of the Early Development of CTPILS (2019–2021) 45
    Chapter 3 - Development of CTPILS and Operational Consolidation (2022–2024) 49
    3.1 Reconfiguring the Network in the Second Funding Cycle 49
    3.2 Differentiated Participation and Knowledge Production 51
    3.3 Administrative Translation and Coordination Labor 56
    3.4 Analytical Synthesis: Network Consolidation and Its Limits 59
    Chapter 4 - Post-NSTC Reorientation and the Wider CTPILS Network 64
    4.1 Reorienting CTPILS Under FANCA 64
    4.2 Organizational Continuity and Cultural Mediation in Taiwan 66
    4.3 Institutional Continuity Without Dedicated Funding in Ifugao 71
    4.4 The Wider Network Beyond the Original Center 74
    4.5 Analytical Synthesis: Reorientation, Network Survival,
    and Selective Continuity 76
    Chapter 5 - Analysis: Relations, Repeated Translation, and the Effectiveness of CTPILS 81
    5.1 Relations as Pathways of Network Formation 82 
    5.2 Uneven Knowledge Translation and the Problem of Aftercare 87
    5.3 Non-Human Actors and the Infrastructure of Collaboration 90
    5.4 Projectification, Attribution, and Selective Continuity 96
    5.5 Repeated Translation and the Limits of Network Survival 100
    Chapter 6 – Conclusions, Contributions, Limitations, and Recommendations 104
    6.1 Conclusion: Relational Formation, Uneven Power, and Selective Continuity 104
    6.2 Contributions of the Study 107
    6.3 Recommendations for Sustaining CTPILS 109
    6.4 Recommendations for Further Study and Theoretical Development 111
    Bibliography 115
    Appendices 118
    Appendix A: Participants & Interview Schedule 118
    Appendix B: Chronological List CTPILS Activities 119
    Appendix C: Book Chapters and Authors 124

    Ady, J. C. (1995). Toward a differential demand model of sojourner adjustment. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 92–114). Sage.
    Austronesian Forum. (n.d.). Austronesian Forum. Retrieved July 23, 2026, from https://austronesianforum.org/en/index.html
    Baldwin, J. R., & Hecht, M. L. (1995). The layered perspective of cultural (in)tolerance(s): The roots of a multidisciplinary approach. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 59–91). Sage.
    Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168–1181. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0641
    Burgoon, J. K. (1995). Cross-cultural and intercultural applications of expectancy violations theory. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 194–214). Sage.
    Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–233). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Chen, C., Hubbard, M., & Liao, C.-S. (2013). When public-private partnerships fail: Analysing citizen engagement in public-private partnerships: Cases from Taiwan and China. Public Management Review, 15(6), 839–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.698856
    Davies, D. (2022). Educating hypocrisy: Private-public partnerships and management of multicultural projects in Taiwan. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 16(3), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15595692.2021.1968374
    Fowler, N., Lindahl, M., & Sköld, D. (2015). The projectification of university research: A study of resistance and accommodation of project management tools & techniques. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 8(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2013-0059
    Galla, C. K., Kawaiʻaeʻa, K., & Nicholas, S. E. (2014). Carrying the torch forward: Indigenous academics building capacity through an international collaborative model. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 37(1), 193–217.
    Gallois, C., Giles, H., Jones, E., Cargile, A. C., & Ota, H. (1995). Accommodating intercultural encounters: Elaborations and extensions. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 115–147). Sage.
    Gudykunst, W. B. (1995). Anxiety/uncertainty management theory: Current status. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 8–58). Sage.
    Katriel, T. (1995). From “context” to “contexts” in intercultural communication research. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 271–284). Sage.
    Kim, M.-S. (1995). Toward a theory of conversational constraints: Focusing on individual-level dimensions of culture. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 148–169). Sage.
    Kim, Y. Y. (1995). Cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 170–193). Sage.
    Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
    McGloin, C., Marshall, A., & Adams, M. (2009). Leading the way: Indigenous knowledge and collaboration at the Woolyungah Indigenous Centre. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 6(2), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.6.2.4
    Oetzel, J. G. (1995). Intercultural small groups: An effective decision-making theory. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 247–270). Sage.
    Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
    Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2015). Governing by numbers: Audit culture, rankings and the new world order. Social Anthropology, 23(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12098
    Sillitoe, P. (2018). Some challenges of collaborative research with local knowledge. Antropologia Pubblica, 4(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1473/anpub.v4i1.126
    Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (3rd ed.). Zed Books.
    Wiseman, R. L., & Van Horn, T. (1995). Theorizing in intercultural communication. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 2–7). Sage.
    Ylijoki, O.-H. (2016). Projectification and conflicting temporalities in academic knowledge production. Teorie vědy/Theory of Science, 38(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2016.331
    Yuanyi, S. (2023). Indigenous ecological knowledge: Preserving traditional wisdom for conservation. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 13(7), 19–21. https://doi.org/10.15421/2023_474

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2027/08/13
    QR CODE
    :::